Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Two professional development models for teachers were compared for teacher and student outcomes when it came to reading instruction for upper elementary students with learning disabilities. Literacy Learning Cohorts (LLC) were responsible for providing the reading instruction. A two-day study went on that had professional development days, with follow-up meetings, coaching, and a video self-analysis. The results of the study showed that the LLC teachers learned a lot about fluency measures. They also learned about, and began to change, instructional time given to students, quality and fluency of instruction. LLC teachers also gained knowledge of word attack skills and decoding efficiency. If the LLC teachers begin to give students with learning disabilities more time for reading instruction then they will be able to decode and read more fluently. Word attack tests were given to students to see their decoding skills. Professional development models are important for making an impact in teaching teachers more effective ways of instructing their students with learning disabilities.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 2008
In this paper, we ask what constitutes effective professional development for teachers faced with struggling readers in high school. Metacognitive teacher training, instructional coaching, mentorship, and collaborative learning are considered. We describe a professional development model preparing high school teachers to teach PHAST PACES, a remedial reading program. A metacognitive teaching style and specific skills for teaching comprehension and decoding strategies were emphasized. Teachers provided high positive ratings regarding the usefulness of the training, and attributed to the training an increased sense of efficacy in improving student outcomes and understanding reading problems. A comparison of student outcomes for teachers’ first and subsequent classes suggested that the professional development model promotes better outcomes on more complex skills.
Learning and Individual Differences, 2008
Psychology, 2011
This study seeks to address the current literacy skills, practices, and dispositions of teachers who educate students with significant disabilities. It sought to address two questions including how do teachers who educate students with significant disabilities design and implement literacy instruction, and how do teachers who educate students with significant disabilities assess instruction to track students' progress and make instructional decisions. Participants in the study included one special education teacher, five students, two paraeducators, and one speech-therapy. The study included personal observation in one special education classroom and an interview for the teacher. Result of the study indicated that designing and implementing literacy instruction for students with significant disabilities engage individualizing instructions according to students' unique abilities, practicing literacy throughout the day, and arranging literacy instruction to the state common core.
US-China Education Review B, 2016
Professional Development in Education
2024
Ottemperare alle norme (anche grammaticali) in Italiano digitale - XXX, 2024/3 (luglio-settembre)
Icon of the art and science of the Renaissance, 2024
Small Towns, una realidad urbana en la Hispania romana Congreso Internacional MARQ Museo Arqueológico de Alicante 26-28 de Octubre de 2021, 2022
Revista Brasileira de Educação em Geografia, 2016
ATTI DEL XXVI COLLOQUIO DELL’ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA PER LO STUDIO E LA CONSERVAZIONE DEL MOSAICO, Roma, 18-21 marzo 2020 a cura di Claudia Angelelli e Chiara Cecalupo, 2021
Monograph, 2024
Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology 9, 2022
Social Science & Medicine, 1993
International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2024
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1995
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
The FASEB Journal, 2005
Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2017
Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 2019