Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 198–204
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Hazardous Materials
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhazmat
Reduction of acute toxicity and genotoxicity of dye effluent using
Fenton-coagulation process
Jing Zhang, Shuo Chen, Ying Zhang, Xie Quan ∗ , Huimin Zhao, Yaobin Zhang
Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (Ministry of Education), School of Environmental Science and Technology,
Dalian University of Technology, Linggong Road 2, Dalian 116024, PR China
h i g h l i g h t s
• The COD met the discharge standards after the Fenton-coagulation treatment.
• The acute toxicity of dye effluent was removed after Fenton-coagulation process.
• The dye effluent exhibited no significant genotoxicity after treatment.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 21 November 2013
Received in revised form 11 March 2014
Accepted 14 April 2014
Available online 21 April 2014
Keywords:
Acute toxicity
COD
Dye effluent
Fenton-coagulation
Genotoxicity
a b s t r a c t
Dye wastewater exhibits significant ecotoxicity even though its physico-chemical parameters meet the
discharge standards. In this work, the acute toxicity and genotoxicity of dye effluent were tested, and the
Fenton-coagulation process was carried out to detoxify this dye effluent. The acute toxicity was evaluated
according to the mortality rate of zebrafish, and genotoxicity was evaluated by micronucleus (MN) and
comet assays. Removal of color and chemical oxygen demand (COD) was also investigated. The results
indicated that the dye effluent showed strong acute toxicity and genotoxicity to zebrafish. After 4 h of
treatment by Fenton-coagulation process, the dye effluent exhibited no significant acute toxicity and
genotoxicity to zebrafish. In addition, its COD was less than 50 mg/L, which met the discharge standard.
It demonstrates that Fenton-coagulation process can comprehensively reduce the acute toxicity and
genotoxicity as well as the COD of the dye effluent.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Dye wastewater, containing high concentrations of unfixed
dyes, salts and other organic compounds, is one of the major industrial water pollution sources in developing countries [1]. More
than 1.6 × 109 m3 dye wastewater is generated annually in China
[2]. Azo dyes are one of the most common pollutants in the dye
wastewater. Moreover, they are recalcitrant to be degraded by
conventional biological wastewater treatment methods. Azo dyes
have attracted more attention on its intermediates, especially aromatic amines, produced under anaerobic conditions and cannot be
entirely removed by aerobic biological process. Aromatic amines
were considered to be more toxic than azo dyes for their carcinogenic effect to aquatic life [3–5]. Consequently, effective treatment
processes need to be applied in the treatment of dye wastewater. Different kinds of treatment processes have been applied to
treat this wastewater [6–9]. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs)
are efficient methods to degrade refractory organic pollutants,
since they can generate the powerful oxidant, •OH (E◦ = 2.8 V),
without selectivity for most organic compounds [10]. Among the
AOPs, Fenton process has gained increasing attention with its simple equipment, mild operating conditions (room temperature and
atmospheric pressure) and effective •OH generation [10,11]. The
Fenton reaction mechanism is that H2 O2 decomposes catalytically
by Fe2+ to form the •OH at acidic pH (Eq. (1)), which can oxidize most organic matter into harmless compounds such as CO2 ,
H2 O, and some organic acids such as formic acid, acetic, and oxalic
acids [11]. Additionally, Fe3+ can catalyze the H2 O2 in the so-called
Fenton-like reaction, regenerating Fe2+ , thus the process is sustaining via Eqs. (2)–(8) [12].
Fe2+ + H2 O2 → •OH + OH− + Fe3+
3+
Fe
3+
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 411 84706140; fax: +86 411 84706263.
E-mail address: quanxie@dlut.edu.cn (X. Quan).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.022
0304-3894/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Fe
2+
Fe
+ H2 O2 → Fe
2+
+ HOO• → Fe
+ • OH → Fe
+
+ H + HOO•
2+
3+
+
(1)
(2)
+ H + O2
(3)
−
(4)
+ OH
J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 198–204
•OH + H2 O2 → H2 O + HOO•
(5)
Fe2+ + HOO• → HOO− + Fe3+
(6)
•OH + •OH → H2 O2
(7)
•OH + organics → products + CO2 + H2 O
(8)
Both Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions are coagulants, simultaneous occurrence
of oxidation and coagulation, can be obtained by adjusting pH in
Fenton-coagulation process. It can achieve better removal of target
compounds, color, and COD, than the Fenton process [10,13,14].
Little attention has been paid to assess the ecotoxicity of biologically treated dye effluent, when the chemical parameters of it meet
the standard. Previous study has shown that despite of the reduction of color, COD and TOC, the wastewater ecotoxicity cannot be
significantly reduced, even can be potentially increased [15–17].
Therefore, it is essential to evaluate dye effluent ecotoxicity for
their potential risks to ecosystems. Acute toxicity is frequently
used to reflect the ecotoxicity of wastewater to organisms exposed
in them [18,19]. Besides, the genotoxicity is of special concern,
because it may cause adverse reproductive damage to organisms
directly or even lead to their extinction [7,20]. These two kinds
of biological monitoring combined together can provide a relative
comprehensive evaluation of the toxic hazard of wastewater on
natural environments.
In this work, we assessed the chemical parameters and acute
toxicity and genotoxicity of effluent from an industrial dye wastewater treatment plant (WwTP), and investigated the detoxification
efficiency of Fenton-coagulation process in this real dye effluent
treatment. Combination of chemical and biological analysis can
provide comprehensive evaluation of dye effluent in order to avoid
potential ecological risks. Furthermore, Fenton-coagulation process has been proven to be effective on detoxification of real dye
effluent.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Synthetic dye effluent
The active red azo dye 3BS and sucrose were dissolved in tapwater to prepared the synthetic effluent. The chemical formula of
dye 3BS is shown in Fig. 1 [21]. The final concentrations of dye and
COD in synthetic dye effluent were 10 mg/L (9.21 × 10−3 mM) and
100 mg/L, respectively, which are close to those of real industrial
dye effluent.
2.2. Real dye effluent
According to 24-h composite sampling method [22], the real
dye effluent samples were collected from an industrial wastewater
treatment plant of the textile factory (Liaoning, China) used dye 3BS
as original materials. Samples were transported to the laboratory
immediately and kept at 4 ◦ C without any chemicals addition before
analysis. Water quality of real dye effluent is given in Table 1.
Fig. 1. Chemical formula of dye 3BS.
199
Table 1
Water quality of the real dye effluent.
Parameter
Unit
Effluent
Maximum
allowable value
pH
Color
COD
BOD
BOD/COD ratio
SS
TP
TN
TOC
NH4 + −N
–
Dilution times
mg/L
mg/L
–
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
7.5
30
96.1
20
0.21
53.4
1.1
67.7
20.6
61.3
6–9
70
50
25
–
60
1.0
20
–
12
– means does not exist
2.3. Fenton process
The Fenton process was carried out in 5-L glass bottles at room
temperature and atmospheric pressure. The initial pH of the sample
was manually adjusted to 3 with 1 M H2 SO4 . Then the Fenton regent
was added in the reactor. The Fe2+ dose was varied between 0.18 to
0.9 mM. H2 O2 was varied between 1.08 mM and 8.64 mM (0.18–1.5
times stoichiometric amount with respect to COD).
2.4. Coagulation process
Samples from each time interval of Fenton process were
adjusted pH to 7 with 1 M NaOH for coagulation process.
2.5. Chemical analysis
COD, biological oxygen demand (BOD), NH4 + −N, suspended
solid (SS), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were determined according to the APHA standard methods [23]. The pH was
measured by a pH analyzer. TOC was determined by a TOC analyzer
(Shimadzu, TOC-VCPH , Japan). The color level was measured by the
dilution times method [24]. The concentration of 3BS was measured by UV–vis spectrophotometer (Techcomp, UV-2301, China)
at 541 nm [25]. H2 O2 concentration was determined by a spectrophotometric method as previously described [26].
2.6. Toxicity tests
2.6.1. Acute toxicity test
The 96 h acute-static toxicity test was done as previously
described [27]. Zebrafish (Tuebingen strain, 3–6 months old) were
exposed to different dilution volume ratios of effluent samples (5%,
10%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) in triplicate. Potassium dichromate
(>30 mg/L) and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) (>60 mg/L) were
set as positive controls.
2.6.2. Genotoxicity assays
The genotoxicity was assessed by MN and comet assays upon the
zebrafish exposed to effluent samples for 96 h. Potassium dichromate (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg/L) and 4-NQO (20, 30, 40 and 50 mg/L)
were set as positive controls (Figs. S1 and S2), meanwhile, uncontaminated dechlorinated tap water was set as negative control (NC).
The dechlorinated tap water treated by Fenton-coagulation process
was set as Fenton-coagulation process control (FC).
MN assay: Zebrafish blood was smeared on clean slides containing fetal bovine serum by making a caudal cut. Slides were air-dried,
fixed in methanol and then stained in 10% Giemsa’s stain. MN frequency was observed in the light microscope under oil immersion
(10 × 100 magnification) [15].
Comet assay: Liver cells of zebrafish were used for the comet
assay. Rough microscope slides were first coated with 1% normal
J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 198–204
2.7. Statistical analysis
Tail moment was quantified using the image analysis program
Casp 1.2.2 (Zbigniew Koza, Poland). The results were expressed as
the mean ± SD. Statistically significant differences among means
were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test with significance at p < 0.05 for all tests.
(a)
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=3:1, Fenton
1.0
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=3:1, Fenton-coagulation
0.8
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton-coagulation
0.6
c/c0
melting point agarose (NMP) and solidified on ice. The supportive (second) agarose layer covered with 0.7% low melting point
(LMP) agarose at a ratio of 1 part cells to 3 parts agarose to
prevent the nuclear DNA from escaping during cell lysis and electrophoresis. The lysis of cells was carried out by incubating the
microgels for 1.5 h at 4 ◦ C in fresh lysis solution. The microgels
were then submerged into a 4 ◦ C alkaline electrophoresis buffer
(300 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH 13) for 20 min to unwind the
nuclear DNA. Afterwards the microgels were placed side by side
into an electrophoresis chamber containing an electrophoresis
buffer. Electrophoresis was performed at 25 V, 300 mA for 20 min.
Following electrophoresis, the microgels were neutralized in a
freshly prepared 400 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) for 15 min for
three times. The DNA was stained with Gelred (0.2 L/mL) before
microscope analysis. Tail moment was used as the measure of DNA
damage [15].
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton
2+
0.4
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton -coagulation
0.2
0.0
0
3.1.1. Color and COD removal of synthetic effluent by
Fenton-coagulation process
Before treating the real dye effluent, the operation conditions
and effectiveness of Fenton-coagulation process were investigated
through treating the synthetic dye effluent. The effect of Fe2+ dose
on 3BS and COD removal was investigated at the initial conditions: 4.32 mM H2 O2 and pH = 3 (data not shown). The 3BS and COD
removal efficiencies were increased when the Fe2+ dose increased
from 0.18 mM, and reached maximum efficiencies (97% and 73%,
respectively) at Fe2+ dose of 0.36 mM, and then declined when the
dose of Fe2+ got higher than 0.36 mM. In subsequent studies, the
initial Fe2+ dose was selected at 0.36 mM.
H2 O2 plays an important role as an oxidant in the Fenton reaction for generating the •OH. To optimize the dose of H2 O2 in Fenton
process, Fenton reagent ratio (M[H2 O2 ]:M[Fe2+ ]) from 3:1 to 24:1
(1.08 mM to 8.64 mM H2 O2 ) under 0.36 mM Fe2+ at pH 3 was investigated. It showed that 97% of 3BS and 73% of COD could be removed
at the initial Fenton reagent ratio up to 12:1 (Fig. 2) since the presence of enough H2 O2 catalyzed by Fe2+ for producing more •OH (Eq.
(1)). However, decrements of 3BS and COD removal were observed
when the Fenton reagent ratio was higher than 12:1 (data not
shown), since the redundant H2 O2 might scavenge •OH (Eq. (5)).
Then the coagulation process after Fenton process was investigated on the synthetic effluent. The 3BS and COD removal
efficiencies were increased up to 99% and 80% by this process,
respectively. The reason was that the formation of iron hydroxides, which could adsorb organic matters in the solution, led to the
decrease of 3BS and COD [28].
3.1.2. H2 O2 decomposition in Fenton and Fenton-coagulation
processes
In Fenton and Fenton-coagulation processes, H2 O2 may appear
as a residue at the end of treatment and contribute to relatively
higher toxicity than that of Fe2+ [29,30]. Hence, the dose of H2 O2
during the treatment was investigated as shown in Fig. 3. At the
first stage of the reaction, the consumption rate of H2 O2 was fast
30
40
50
60
1.0
0.8
2+
[HO]:
[Fe ]=3:1, Fenton
2 2
2+
[Fe ]=3:1, Fenton-coagulation
[HO]:
2 2
0.4
2+
[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton
[HO]:
2 2
2+
[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton-coagulation
[HO]:
2 2
0.2
2+
[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton
[HO]:
2 2
2+
[HO]:
[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton-coagulation
2 2
0.0
0
1
2
t (h)
3
4
Fig. 2. Effects of Fenton reagent ratio on synthetic effluent treatment by Fenton and
Fenton-coagulation processes: (a) degradation of 3BS, (b) removal of COD. pH0 = 3,
[Fe2+ ]0 = 0.36 mM, C0 ,3BS = 10 mg/L, COD0 = 100 mg/L.
with the main reaction catalyzed by Fe2+ . Then the consumption
rate of H2 O2 got slow with the main reaction catalyzed by Fe3+
[11]. The H2 O2 consumption was related to COD and 3BS removal
in the synthetic effluent since •OH from H2 O2 catalyzed by Fe2+
could oxidize the organic compounds. The coagulation process also
reduced the H2 O2 concentration, probably due to the increment of
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton
4
H2O2 Concentration (mM)
3.1. Application of Fenton-coagulation process on synthetic
effluent
20
(b)
0.6
3. Results and discussion
10
t (min)
COD/COD0
200
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton-coagulation
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton
3
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton-coagulation
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=3:1, Fenton
2
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=3:1, Fenton-coagulation
1
0
0
1
2
3
4
t (h)
Fig. 3. Decomposition of H2 O2 in the synthetic effluent during the Fenton
and Fenton-coagulation processes at different Fenton reagent ratios. pH0 = 3,
[Fe2+ ]0 = 0.36 mM, C0 ,3BS = 10 mg/L, COD0 = 100 mg/L.
J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 198–204
Treatment time (h)
0
0.5
1
2
3
4
Dilution (%)
100
100
75
50
25
100
75
100
75
100
75
100
75
Mortality rate (%)
(Fenton reagent ratio)
3:1
8±5
23 ± 5
0
0
0
23 ± 5
0
23 ± 5
0
25 ± 6
0
26 ± 5
0
6:1
8±5
65 ± 6
30 ± 8
8±5
0
20 ± 8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12:1
8±5
25 ± 6
8±5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(a)
10
NC
12:1
FC
Raw wastewater
MN Friquency (‰)
Table 2
Acute toxicity of synthetic effluent during the Fenton-coagulation process
at different Fenton reagent ratio (pH0 = 3, [Fe2+ ]0 = 0.36 mM, C0 , 3BS = 10 mg/L,
COD0 = 100 mg/L, pHt = 7). Both NC and Fenton reagent control with 100% survival.
201
3:1
8
6
6:1
*
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
4
*
*
*
*
2
0
0.5
0
1
2
3
t (h)
4
(b) 20
NC
12:1
*
*
FC
Raw wastewater
3.1.3. Acute toxicity of the synthetic effluent
To clarify the potential risk of synthetic effluent during
Fenton-coagulation process, the evolution of acute toxicity was
investigated (Table 2). The NC and FC did not pose any acute toxicity
to zebrafish. The acute toxicity of synthetic effluent showed specific
dose-dependence. The Fenton-coagulation process resulted in the
augmentation of acute toxic effects on zebrafish at initial periods
of the process. At Fenton reagent ratio of 3:1, the mortality rate
increased from 8% to about 23% after 0.5 h treatment, and was not
reduced by extending treatment time. However, at Fenton reagent
ratio of 6:1 and 12:1, the acute toxicity, increasing to 65% and
25% after 0.5 h treatment, was removed by extending treatment
time. It implied that the formation of intermediate products was
more toxic than their parent compounds, and could be degraded by
Fenton-coagulation process in enough reaction time at the appropriate Fenton reagent ratio. Moreover, a faster degradation rate was
achieved at Fenton reagent ratio of 12:1 than that of 6:1 because
of higher amount of •OH produced. Therefore, the acute toxicity
removal of synthetic effluent depended on the Fenton reagent ratio.
Furthermore, the coagulation process also promoted the acute toxicity removal through the sedimentation of toxic pollutants.
3.1.4. Genotoxicity of the synthetic effluent
Dye effluent may bring potential damage to the chromosome
and DNA of organisms. MN and comet assays were used to
characterize the genotoxicity of synthetic dye effluent after Fentoncoagulation process, and the results were shown in Fig. 4. The
genotoxicity of FC at each interval was not significantly different from that of NC, thus residues of Fenton-coagulation process
do not contribute to the genotoxicity. All the synthetic effluent
samples before and during Fenton-coagulation process did not
exhibit any acute toxicity at 25% dilution while some of them
displayed significant acute toxicity without dilution. So in the genotoxicity removal experiments, the genotoxicity of the synthetic
effluent samples were performed at 25% dilution to avoid the interference by the acute toxicity. The results showed that the raw
synthetic effluent induced a strong genotoxicity response toward
zebrafish assessed by both MN and comet assays. The effluent
treated by Fenton-coagulation process at all three Fenton reagent
ratios caused significant increase in genotoxicity at the initial stage
of process. However, the genotoxicity decreased during the treatment at Fenton reagent ratio of 6:1 and 12:1, achieving 46% and
79% reduction of MN frequency, and 30% and 77% reduction of
tail moment, except for the samples treated at Fenton reagent
3:1
Tail Moment
pH enhancing the decomposition of H2 O2 into O2 and H2 O as well
as the adsorption of H2 O2 on ferric hydroxide gel.
15
*
6:1
*
** *
*
*
10
*
*
*
*
*
*
5
0
0
0.5
1
t (h)
2
3
4
Fig. 4. Genotoxicity bioassays of 25% diluted synthetic effluent during the Fentoncoagulation process at different Fenton reagent ratios (3:1, 6:1 and 12:1) (a) MN
assay, (b) comet assay. pH0 = 3, [Fe2+ ]0 = 0.36 mM, C0 , 3BS = 10 mg/L, COD0 = 100 mg/L,
pHt = 7. * Statistically significant differences according to NC (p < 0.05).
ratio of 3:1, which presented no decrease in the genotoxicity for
even 4 h treatment. The genotoxicity evolution was probably due
to the rapid transformation of compounds in synthetic effluent
into more toxic intermediates and the subsequent degradation
of the intermediates into inorganic compounds and organic acids
with low genotoxicity [31]. Increasing initial Fenton reagent ratio
enhanced the genotoxicity reduction with the formation of more
•OH that could oxidize the synthetic effluent and its intermediates. In addition, the Fenton-coagulation process could achieve a
better detoxification by oxidation and sedimentation of the toxic
contaminants than Fenton process.
3.2. Application of Fenton-coagulation process on real effluent
3.2.1. COD evolution of real effluent
According to Chinese Sewage Discharge Standard (GB42872012), only color, BOD, SS and pH parameters are regulated. The
levels of COD, TP, TN and NH4 + −N in real effluent are beyond the
discharge standards as shown in Table 1. The BOD/COD ratio of
real dye effluent (<0.3) was rather low implying its low biodegradability. Therefore, Fenton-coagulation as an alternative advanced
treatment process was attempted to treat this type of effluent aiming to meet the discharge standard.
From the part of 3.1, it showed that the acute toxicity and
genotoxicity of synthetic effluent could not be removed and even
increased at low Fenton reagent ratio of 3:1 (Table 2 and Fig. 4).
Here, the initial conditions of Fenton-coagulation process were
0.36 mM Fe2+ , pH = 3, and Fenton reagent ratios varying at 6:1
202
J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 198–204
Table 3
Acute toxicity of real effluent during the Fenton-coagulation process at different
Fenton reagent ratios (pH0 = 3, [Fe2+ ]0 = 0.36 mM, COD0 = 96.1 mg/L, pHt = 7). Both
NC and Fenton reagent control with 100% survival.
1.0
COD/COD0
0.8
Time (h)
Dilution (%)
Mortality rate (%)
Raw real wastewater
0
[H2 O2 ]:[Fe2+ ] = 6:1
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
100
75
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
17 ± 6
0
30 ± 8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.6
2+
0.4
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton-coagulation
0.2
[H2 O2 ]:[Fe2+ ] = 12:1
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton-coagulation
0.0
0
1
2
3
4
t (h)
Fig. 5. Evolution of COD for different Fenton reagent ratios on real effluent treatment during Fenton and Fenton-coagulation processes. pH0 = 3, [Fe2+ ]0 = 0.36 mM,
COD0 = 96.1 mg/L.
and 12:1 (Fig. 5). The results indicated that increasing the Fenton
reagent ratio from 6:1 to 12:1 could improve COD removal. At Fenton reagent ratio of 6:1, 38% and 56% COD removal were achieved
in Fenton and Fenton-coagulation process, respectively, while at
Fenton reagent ratio of 12:1, 51% and 65% COD could be removed
in Fenton and Fenton-coagulation process, respectively. The final
COD of real effluent all met the Chinese Sewage Discharge Standard
(<50 mg/L), except that of the effluent treated by Fenton process at
Fenton reagent ratio of 6:1. In Fenton process, the dose of Fenton
reagent was in direct proportion to the COD removal. In coagulation
process, COD removal could be further increased by the emergence
of iron flocs deposits. The COD removal of real effluent treated by
Fenton-coagulation process was much lower than that of synthetic
effluent. It probably resulted from undesirable side reactions that
occurred between the •OH and anions present in the real effluent,
such as chlorides, carbonates, sulfates and so on [32].
3.2.2. H2 O2 decomposition during the Fenton and
Fenton-coagulation processes
The H2 O2 concentration in the real effluent treated at Fenton
reagent ratios of 6:1 and 12:1 by Fenton and Fenton-coagulation
process was measured (Fig. 6). It decreased continually until
completely exhausted. The consumption of H2 O2 was related to
the reaction of H2 O2 and Fe2+ , producing •OH and consequently
5
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton
H2O2 Concentration (mM)
Treatment procedure
2+
4
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=12:1, Fenton-coagulation
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton
3
2+
[H2O2]:[Fe ]=6:1, Fenton-coagulation
2
1
0
0
1
2
3
4
t (h)
Fig. 6. Decomposition of H2 O2 in the real effluent during the Fenton and Fentoncoagulation processes at different Fenton reagent ratios. pH0 = 3, [Fe2+ ]0 = 0.36 mM,
COD0 = 96.1 mg/L.
achieving a high efficiency of COD removal as shown in Fig. 5.
Subsequently, the coagulation process also promoted the H2 O2
consumption for the adsorption of H2 O2 on the oxyhydroxides
formed by Fe3+ precipitation.
3.2.3. Acute toxicity of real effluent
In some cases, the COD removal does not show significant toxicity reduction after advanced treatments, or the intermediates cause
more toxicity than their parent compounds [33–37], so it is necessary to carry out further toxicity tests. The real effluent from the
dye WwTP showed acute toxicity to zebrafish with mortality rate
of about 17% (Table 3). At Fenton reagent ratio of 6:1, the mortality rate of zebrafish was increased to 30% when the real effluent
was treated by Fenton-coagulation process for 1 h. With extending treatment time, a fast decrease of acute toxicity was observed.
The increased acute toxicity at initial stage was probably due to
the production of intermediates with more toxicity to zebrafish
as literature reported [38]. The acute toxicity decreased rapidly at
Fenton reagent ratio of 12:1, achieving no inhibition of zebrafish
survival after 1 h treatment. It was implied that more •OH generated attacked the organic matters through the reaction of Fe2+ and
H2 O2 (Eq. (1)).
3.2.4. Genotoxicity of real effluent
Table 3 demonstrated that effluent exhibited significant acute
toxicity without dilution while it had no acute toxicity with
75% dilution. Accordingly, the genotoxicity of the real effluent
were tested at 75% dilution for avoiding the interference of acute
toxicity. The genotoxicity of real effluent before and after Fentoncoagulation process was tested as shown in Fig. 7. The raw real
effluent sample without treatment induced high genotoxicity for
the zebrafish. Based on the MN assay (Fig. 7 (a)), at Fenton reagent
ratio of 6:1, the genotoxicity of real effluent increased in the initial
1 h and only 41% of genotoxicity was reduced after 4 h treatment
by Fenton-coagulation process. At Fenton reagent ratio of 12:1, the
rising tendency of genotoxicity in the initial 1 h was also observed,
however, the genotoxicity decreased fast and was not significantly
different from NC after 4 h since more •OH was produced.
Based on the comet assay (Fig. 7 (b)), at Fenton reagent ratio
of 6:1, the genotoxicity of the real effluent remained nearly
unchanged during the initial 1 h treatment and was significantly
removed from 1 to 4 h. At Fenton ratio of 12:1, the genotoxicity
was reduced to almost the same level as NC after 4 h treatment.
The genotoxicity removal efficiency was higher at the ratio of 12:1
than that of 6:1. Therefore, Fenton reagent ratio of 12:1 was the
appropriate condition for genotoxicity removal.
The MN assay demonstrated that the genotoxicity of real effluent treated by Fenton-coagulation for 1 h was higher than that of
raw real effluent; but the comet assay showed the contrary results
on genotoxicity. In some cases, MN and comet assays achieved the
different results on genotoxicity for the different mechanisms of
(a)
8
MN Friquency (%0)
J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 198–204
6
Raw wastewater
6:1
12:1
*
*
*
NC
FC
*
*
4
*
*
203
with removal efficiency up to 65% was 33.6 mg/L, which met the
Chinese Sewage Discharge Standard. The acute toxicity was completely removed, and the genotoxicity was reduced to the same
level as NC and FC after 4 h of treatment. Taking together, this work
demonstrated that Fenton-coagulation process can provide comprehensive treatment for mineralization and detoxification of dye
effluent. Moreover, this study also illustrates the essential need for
a battery of bioassays in ecological risk assessment of effluent.
Acknowledgement
2
The research was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (NSFC-JST 21261140334) and National Science and Technology Major Project Water Pollution Control and
Treatment (No. 2012ZX07202006-004).
0
0
1
2
3
4
t (h)
Appendix A. Supplementary data
(b)
Raw wastewater
6:1
10
*
Tail Moment
NC
FC
*
*
12:1
**
*
*
5
*
0
0
1
2
3
4
t (h)
Fig. 7. Genotoxicity bioassays of 75% diluted real effluent during the Fentoncoagulation process for different Fenton reagent ratios (6:1 and 12:1), (a) MN assay,
(b) comet assay. pH0 = 3, [Fe2+ ] = 0.36 mM, COD0 = 96.1 mg/L, pHt = 7. * Statistically
significant differences according to NC (p < 0.05).
these two bioassays. The MN assay is related to chromosome aberrations in a meiotic or mitotic division, such as losses [39]. The
comet assay examines DNA strand breaks and alkali labile sites (single and double-strand breaks) by measuring the migration of DNA
from immobilized nuclear DNA [40]. Besides, the MN and comet
assays employed the different body tissues of zebrafish, peripheral
blood and liver, respectively. Therefore, both bioassays taken into
account can give an overall evaluation of the potential genotoxicity.
The ecotoxicity data suggest it is not appropriate simply relying
on chemical estimates in wastewater risk [41]. Chemical analyses
combined with ecotoxicity bioassays can draw a comprehensive
assessment of wastewater risk. It can provide a scientific basis
for wastewater discharge standards and a scientific technology for
detoxification.
4. Conclusions
The chemical parameters, acute toxicity and genotoxicity of synthetic and real dye effluent were investigated and detoxification
of both kinds of effluent was achieved using Fenton-coagulation
process. For synthetic effluent, 99% of color and 80% of COD were
removed under the conditions of Fe2+ dose of 0.36 mM and Fenton
reagent ratio of 12:1 at pH 3 after 4 h treatment, meanwhile, the
acute toxicity was completely removed and the genotoxicity was
reduced to almost the same level as NC. For real dye effluent, COD
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.jhazmat.2014.04.022.
References
[1] S.H. Chang, S.H. Chuang, H.C. Li, H.H. Liang, L.C. Huang, Comparative study on
the degradation of I.C. Remazol Brilliant Blue R and I.C. Acid Black 1 by Fenton
oxidation and Fe0 /air process and toxicity evaluation, J. Hazard. Mater. 166
(2009) 1279–1288.
[2] X. Zhu, J. Ni, J. Wei, X. Xing, H. Li, Destination of organic pollutants during electrochemical oxidation of biologically-pretreated dye wastewater using
boron-doped diamond anode, J. Hazard. Mater. 189 (2011) 127–133.
[3] J. Garcia-Montano, X. Domenech, J.A. Garcia-Hortal, F. Torrades, J. Peral, The
testing of several biological and chemical coupled treatments for Cibacron Red
FN-R azo dye removal, J. Hazard. Mater. 154 (2008) 484–490.
[4] M. Jonstrup, M. Punzi, B. Mattiasson, Comparison of anaerobic pre-treatment
and aerobic post-treatment coupled to photo-Fenton oxidation for degradation
of azo dyes, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 224 (2011) 55–61.
[5] H.M. Pinheiro, E. Touraud, O. Thomas, Aromatic amines from azo dye reduction:
status review with emphasis on direct UV spectrophotometric detection in
textile industry wastewaters, Dyes Pigment 61 (2004) 121–139.
[6] S. Meriç, H. Selçuk, V. Belgiorno, Acute toxicity removal in textile finishing
wastewater by Fenton’s oxidation, ozone and coagulation–flocculation processes, Water Res. 39 (2005) 1147–1153.
[7] S. Vanhulle, M. Trovaslet, E. Enaud, M. Lucas, S. Taghavi, D. van der Lelie, B. van
Aken, M. Foret, R.C.A. Onderwater, D. Wesenberg, S.N. Agathos, Y.-J. Schneider,
A.-M. Corbisier, Decolorization, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity reduction during a combined ozonation/fungal treatment of dye-contaminated wastewater,
Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2007) 584–589.
[8] F. Zhang, A. Yediler, X. Liang, Decomposition pathways and reaction intermediate formation of the purified, hydrolyzed azo reactive dye C.I. Reactive Red
120 during ozonation, Chemosphere 67 (2007) 712–717.
[9] S.M.d.A.G.U. de Souza, K.A.S. Bonilla, A.A.U. de Souza, Removal of COD and
color from hydrolyzed textile azo dye by combined ozonation and biological
treatment, J. Hazard. Mater. 179 (2010) 35–42.
[10] J.A. Zazo, J.A. Casas, C.B. Molina, A. Quintanilla, J.J. Rodriguez, Evolution of ecotoxicity upon Fenton’s oxidation of phenol in water, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41
(2007) 7164–7170.
[11] N. Masomboon, C. Ratanatamskul, M.C. Lu, Chemical oxidation of 2,6dimethylaniline in the Fenton process, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (2009)
8629–8634.
[12] J.J. Pignatello, Dark and photoassisted Fe3+ -catalyzed degradation of chlorophenoxy herbicides by hydrogen-peroxide, Environ. Sci. Technol. 26 (1992)
944–951.
[13] M.I. Badawy, M.E.M. Ali, Fenton’s peroxidation and coagulation processes for
the treatment of combined industrial and domestic wastewater, J. Hazard.
Mater. 136 (2006) 961–966.
[14] S.-F. Kang, C.-H. Liao, M.-C. Chen, Pre-oxidation and coagulation of textile
wastewater by the Fenton process, Chemosphere 46 (2002) 923–928.
[15] J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Quan, S. Chen, H. Zhao, Y. Jin, W. Zhang, Evaluation of removal efficiency for acute toxicity and genotoxicity on zebrafish
in anoxic–oxic process from selected municipal wastewater treatment plants,
Chemosphere 90 (2013) 2662–2666.
[16] W. Zhang, W. Liu, J. Zhang, H. Zhao, Y. Zhang, X. Quan, Y. Jin, Characterisation
of acute toxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative stress posed by textile effluent on
zebrafish, J. Environ. Sci.-China 24 (2012) 2019–2027.
[17] T.W. Ma, X.Q. Wan, Q.H. Huang, Z.J. Wang, J.K. Liu, Biomarker responses and
reproductive toxicity of the effluent from a Chinese large sewage treatment
plant in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), Chemosphere 59 (2005) 281–288.
204
J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 198–204
[18] S. Meric, H. Selcuk, V. Belgiorno, Acute toxicity removal in textile finishing
wastewater by Fenton’s oxidation, ozone and coagulation–flocculation processes, Water Res. 39 (2005) 1147–1153.
[19] H. Yu, E. Nie, J. Xu, S. Yan, W.J. Cooper, W. Song, Degradation of diclofenac
by advanced oxidation and reduction processes: kinetic studies, degradation
pathways and toxicity assessments, Water Res. 47 (2013) 1909–1918.
[20] D.I. Kern, R.d.O. Schwaickhardt, G. Mohr, L.T. Lobo, L.T. Kist, E.L. Machado,
Toxicity and genotoxicity of hospital laundry wastewaters treated with photocatalytic ozonation, Sci. Total Environ. 443 (2013) 566–572.
[21] D.D. Asouhidou, K.S. Triantafyllidis, N.K. Lazaridis, K.A. Matis, S.-S. Kim, T.J. Pinnavaia, Sorption of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions by ordered hexagonal
and disordered mesoporous carbons, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 117 (2009)
257–267.
[22] USEPA, Short-time methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluent and
receiving water to freshwater organisms, Office of Water, US, EPA, NW Washington DC, 2002.
[23] APHA, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,
American Public Health Association/American water work Association/Water
environment Federation, Washington D.C., USA, 1998.
[24] H. Kong, H. Wu, Pretreatment of textile dyeing wastewater using an anoxic
baffled reactor, Bioresource Technol. 99 (2008) 7886–7891.
[25] D.D. Asouhidou, K.S. Triantafyllidis, N.K. Lazaridis, K.A. Matis, Adsorption of
Remazol Red 3BS from aqueous solutions using APTES- and cyclodextrinmodified HMS-type mesoporous silicas, Colloid. Surf. A 346 (2009) 83–90.
[26] R.F. Nogueira, M.C. Oliveira, W.C. Paterlini, Simple and fast spectrophotometric
determination of H2 O2 in photo-Fenton reactions using metavanadate, Talanta
66 (2005) 86–91.
[27] OECD, OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals. Guideline no. 203: fish, acute
toxicity test, 1992.
[28] J.-S. Guo, A.A. Abbas, Y.-P. Chen, Z.-P. Liu, F. Fang, P. Chen, Treatment of landfill
leachate using a combined stripping, Fenton, SBR, and coagulation process, J.
Hazard. Mater. 178 (2010) 699–705.
[29] J. Garcia-Montano, N. Ruiz, I. Munoz, X. Domenech, J.A. Garcia-Hortal, F. Torrades, J. Peral, Environmental assessment of different photo-Fenton approaches
for commercial reactive dye removal, J. Hazard. Mater. 138 (2006) 218–225.
[30] H. Lee, M. Shoda, Removal of COD and color from livestock wastewater by the
Fenton method, J. Hazard. Mater. 153 (2008) 1314–1319.
[31] C.A. Martinez-Huitle, E. Brillas, Decontamination of wastewaters containing
synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods: a general review, Appl.
Catal. B-Environ. 87 (2009) 105–145.
[32] C.S.D. Rodrigues, L.M. Madeira, R.A.R. Boaventura, Optimization and economic analysis of textile wastewater treatment by photo-Fenton process
under artificial and simulated solar radiation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013)
13313–13324.
[33] D. Vogna, R. Marotta, R. Andreozzi, A. Napolitano, M. d’Ischia, Kinetic and chemical assessment of the UV/H2 O2 treatment of antiepileptic drug carbamazepine,
Chemosphere 54 (2004) 497–505.
[34] P. Calza, V.A. Sakkas, C. Medana, C. Baiocchi, A. Dimou, E. Pelizzetti, T. Albanis,
Photocatalytic degradation study of diclofenac over aqueous TiO2 suspensions,
Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 67 (2006) 197–205.
[35] R.F. Dantas, M. Canterino, R. Marotta, C. Sansa, S. Esplugas, R. Andreozzi, Bezafibrate removal by means of ozonation: primary intermediates, kinetics, and
toxicity assessment, Water Res. 41 (2007) 2525–2532.
[36] L. Prieto-Rodriguez, I. Oller, N. Klamerth, A. Agueera, E.M. Rodriguez, S. Malato,
Application of solar AOPs and ozonation for elimination of micropollutants
in municipal wastewater treatment plant effluents, Water Res. 47 (2013)
1521–1528.
[37] N. De la Cruz, L. Esquius, D. Grandjean, A. Magnet, A. Tungler, L.F. de Alencastro,
C. Pulgarin, Degradation of emergent contaminants by UV, UV/H2 O2 and neutral
photo-Fenton at pilot scale in a domestic wastewater treatment plant, Water
Res. 47 (2013) 5836–5845.
[38] Y. Gao, Y. Ji, G. Li, T. An, Mechanism, kinetics and toxicity assessment of OHinitiated transformation of triclosan in aquatic environments, Water Res. 49
(2014) 360–370.
[39] B.J. Majer, B. Laky, S. Knasmuller, F. Kassie, Use of the micronucleus assay with
exfoliated epithelial cells as a biomarker for monitoring individuals at elevated
risk of genetic damage and in chemoprevention trials, Mutat. Res. 489 (2001)
147–172.
[40] N.P. Singh, M.T. McCoy, R.R. Tice, E.L. Schneider, A simple technique for quantitation of low-levels of DNA damage in individual cells, Exp. Cell Res. 175 (1988)
184–191.
[41] G. Li, T. An, X. Nie, G. Sheng, X. Zeng, J. Fu, Z. Lin, E.Y. Zeng, Mutagenicity assessment of produced water during photoelectrocatalytic degradation, Environ.
Toxicol. Chem. 26 (2007) 416–423.