Echocardiography in Valvular Heart Disease
Louis Evan Teichholz
CHOCARDIOGRAPHY is an important noninvasive technique that allows the study of
the dimensions and movements of various cardiac
structures, including the valves and chambers. The
technical aspects and physical principles as well as
the clinical usefulness in various disease settings
have been previously reviewed. ~-6 The purpose of
this review is to discuss this technique in relation
to valvular heart disease.
E
MITRAL VALVE
Normal Mitral Valve
In order to fully understand the changes in the
mitral valve echocardiogram in patients with valvular heart disease, a brief review of the normal
motion pattern of the mitral valve is in order. The
mitral valve has two leaflets, a larger anterior leaflet that is easily visualized by echocardiography
and a smaller posterior leaflet that is much more
difficult to visualize. The normal posterior leaflet
shows mirror-image motion as compared to the anterior leaflet. The details of the motion of the
mitral valve were originally described by Edler 7,a
and further characterized by others. 9-~3 Figure 1
shows the normal pattern of motion of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve. During systole
(C-D), there is smooth anterior motion of both
the anterior and posterior leaflets of the valve as
the heart and mitral annulus rock anteriorly. In
early diastole, the mitral valve opens rapidly (D-E),
and then during and after rapid filling the mitral
valve floats to midposition (E-F). With long cycle
lengths, there may be some low-amplitude oscillatory motion during mid-diastole. With atrial systole, the valve reopens (A) and then closes during
the onset of ventricular systole (A-C). The normal
amplitude is 20-35 mm/sec, and the normal E-F
slope, i.e., diastolic velocity, is 80-150 mm/sec. ~4
From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, and the Department of
Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Supported by USPHS Grant 5 P01 HL 11306 and the
Women's A id for Heart Research.
Reprint requests should be addressed to Louis Evan
Teichholz, M.D., Mt. Sinai Hospital, Fifth Avenue and
lOOth Street, New York, N. Y. 10029.
9 1975 by Grune & Stratton, Inc.
Figure 2 shows an echocardiogram of a normal
mitral valve.
Mitral Stenosis
The study of the mitral valve in mitral stenosis
was one of the earliest uses of diagnostic ultrasound, 7'15'16 since it afforded easy visualization of
the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and the
many striking findings present in rheumatic heart
disease. The pathophysiologic processes involved
in rheumatic mitral stenosis include fusion of the
commissures of the anterior and posterior leaflets
of the mitral valve, fusion of the Chordae
tendineae, leaflet thickening and deposition of
calcium, left atrial dilatation, and decreased contractile function of the left atrium. An important
finding in mitral stenosis is the decrease in the E-F
slope as a manifestation of decreased left ventricular filling in early diastole 9'12'1s-21 (Fig. 3). This
finding has its counterpart in the decreased rapid
filling wave noted on the apexcardiogram. In the
presence of a mobile valve, the E-F slope has been
shown to be related to the severity of the mitral
s t e n o s i s . 9'15'16'22-24 Severe mitral stenosis with a
valve area of <1.0 sq cm has been associated with a
velocity of <10 mm/sec. Moderate mitral stenosis
with a mitral valve area between 1.0 and 2.5 sq cm
has been found to be associated with a diastolic
velocity in the range of 10-25 mm/sec, while mild
mitral stenosis, i.e., valve area >2.5 sq cm, has
usually been associated with diastolic velocities
from 25 to 35 mm/sec. If the valve is not mobile
and is bound down and thickened because of calcification, fibrosis, or shortening of the chordae
tendineae, the excursion of the mitral valve as seen
on the echocardiogram will be diminished 4'23'2s
(Fig. 4). Normally, the total amplitude of excursion of the mitral valve is greater than 20 mm. In
patients with immobile mitral valves, this value is
less than 20 mm and usually less than 15 ram. It is
important to note that the estimation of the
severity of mitral stenosis by the use of the E-F
slope is less reliable in the presence of an immobile
valve. The determination of the amplitude of the
mitral valve has been shown to be useful in predicting whether or not mitral commissurotomy will
be successful. In general, those patients with too-
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol. XVII, No. 4 (January/February), 197,5
283
284
TEICHHOLZ
\\ MV DIASTOLtCVEI.OCtTY
\~,NL: 80-150 MM/SEC
\\
\~E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N\
/
J
I
.
~
1
^
~
/ ~
~.B
My AMmTUO~
NL: 20"35 MM
L_! ....
Fig. 1. Motion pattern of anterior leaflet of mitral
valve. C-D, systole, D-E, diastolic opening. E-F, diastolic
closing, A-C, systolic closing. Normal valves for amplitude and diastolic velocity are given.
Fig. 2. Mitral valve. (A) Normal anterior
leaflet of mitral valve. {B) Mitral valve illustrating normal motion of the anterior
leaflet (A) and the mirror image motion of
posterior leaflet (P) of mitral valve.
bile mitral valves have proved to be much more
amenable to mitral valvuoplasty, while those with
heavily calcified immobile valves have needed
mitral valve replacement. Calcification and thickening of the mitral valve are detected as multiple
multilayered echoes on the anterior leaflet of the
mitral valve or a thickening in the echo pattern 14'2s (Fig. 4). These echoes may remain promi~
nent as echoes are attenuated, so that echoes from
the walls of the heart may disappear while the
strong mitral valve echoes remain. However, the
hallmark of mitral stenosis is the fusion of commissures of the mitral valve, which has, as its echocardiographic counterpart, the loss of the normal
motion of the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve
ECH OCAR DI OGRAPHY
Fig. 3. Mitral valve echocardiogram from a patient with
mitral stenosis. The echo shows (1) decreased E-F slope,
(2) normal exclusion, and (3) diminutive A wave. (From
Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
285
o
Fig. 4. Mitral stenosis with heavily
calcified, immobile valve, The echo
shows (11 markedly increased thickness of mitral valve echoes and (2)
decreased excursion indicating decreased mobility. (From Teichholz
LE:
Echocardiography slide set,
Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
in the direction opposite to the anterior leaflet. In
mitral stenosis, the posterior leaflet of the mitral
valve appears to move with the anterior leaflet 26
(Fig. 5). Whether this represents the posterior leaflet being pulled by the larger anterior leaflet, or
whether it might represent a posterior leaflet that
does not move at all, but that shows the motion of
the mitral valve apparatus, is not clear. 3 The finding of a posterior leaflet that definitely moves independently in an opposite direction to the anterior leaflet during diastole appears to exclude the
diagnosis of mitral stenosis. Another finding in
286
TEICHHOLZ
-A
.p
Fig. 5. Echocardiogram in mitra| stenosis illustrating the motion of the posterior leaflet of the
mitral valve (P), which moves with
the anterior leaflet of the mitral
valve (A). (From Teichholz LE"
Echocardiography slide set, Tampa
Tracings; by permission.)
mitral stenosis is a diminished A wave when the
patient is in normal sinus rhythm that is probably
due to dilatation and poor contractile function of
the left atrium (Fig. 3). The echocardiographic
findings and their physiologic counterparts are
summarized in Table 1.
A study of the size of the left atrium is also helpful in patients with suspected mitral stenosis. The
left atrial dimension is measured from the posterior
aortic wall to the anterior portion of the left atrial
wall at end-systole. The normal value is less than
2.2 cm/sq m. 27 This dimension has been shown to
be correlated with angiographic findings and echocardiography appears to be the most accurate,
noninvasive technique for the determination of
left atrial size. Using this internal dimension, it has
been found that patients with mitral stenosis
usually have enlarged left atria (Fig. 6). The left
atrium can also be examined by using the suprasternal approach in which the transducer is placed
Table 1. Mitral Stenosis
Echocardiogram
A L M V and PLMV
move together
Decreased E-F slope
Increased thickness
of MV
Decreased A wave
Decreased amplitude
of MV
Anatomy or Physiology
Fusion of commissures
Decreased rate of LV
filling
Fibrosis and calcification
Decreased atrial contraction
Decreased mobility
in a suprasternal notch and angled interiorly and to
the left so that the beam passes through the arch
of the aorta, the right pulmonary artery, and the
left atrium. 28 This gives a left atrial dimension in
a different plane and could supplement the information obtained from the standard position.
Echocardiography of the mitral valve has been
shown to be useful not only in the diagnosis and
estimation of the severity of mitral stenosis but
also as an adjunctive measure for determining the
effects of mitral commissurotomy. The mitral valve
velocity will increase significantly after valvuloptasty, and the motion of the mitral valve can be
followed by echocardiography in postoperative
patients, lo,23,29,34
The decreased E-F slope characteristic of mitral
stenosis is presumably secondary to the decreased
rate of left ventricular filling, which in turn is due
to the fixed stenosis at, the mitral valve orifice. This
finding, unfortunately, is not specific for mitral
stenosis and is found in other conditions in which
there is either (1) a decreased rate of left ventricular filling or (2) decreased flow across the mitral
valve. This pattern has been called false or pseudomitral stenosis. 26 The decreased E-F slope has
been found in varied groups of patients including
those with aortic stenosis, coronary artery disease,
idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis (IHSS),
hypertensive cardiomyopathy with left ventricular
hypertrophy, and pulmonary hypertension. All
these conditions can be characterized by either a
decreased volume of blood flow across the mitral
ECH OCAR DI OG R APHY
287
i11
i~
Enlarged left atrium in a
patient with severe mitral stenosis.
(From Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa Tracings; by
permission.)
9 il I
i
~:
.......
-
Fig. 6.
valve, as in pulmonary hypertension, or as a decreased rate of flow across the mitral valve usually
secondary to decreased left ventricular compliance. 3s The differentiation of these conditions
from mitral stenosis requires a careful examination
of the mitral valve echocardiographic pattern. The
finding of a posterior leaflet that moves normally,
i.e., independently of the anterior leaflet, supports
the etiology as being other than mitral stenosis.
Unfortunately, it is not possible in all cases to
definitely record the posterior leaflet of the mitral
valve. Other criteria that tend to support the diagnosis of a condition other than mitral stenosis
is the finding of a normal A wave when the patient
is in normal sinus rhythm and the finding of the
mitral valve diastolic velocity greater than 50
mm/sec.
Mixed Mitral Stenosis and Mitral Insufficiency
In mixed lesions of mitral stenosis and mitral
insufficiency, one may or may not see evidence of
mitral insufficiency. 36 In some cases, even with
the clinical findings of mitral insufficiency, one
sees the echocardiographic pattern of pure mitral
stenosis. 37 In many cases, the stenotic component
will dominate; however, occasionally one can see
the diastolic slope more rapid initially, then becoming slow 14'38 (Fig. 7). When this pattern is
found, mixed mitral stenosis and insufficiency is
suggested.
-;:
,,J-!
iJ i
Isolated Mitral Insufficiency
The pattern of mitral valve motion in mitral msufficiency can be varied depending on the etiology. 39 It was originally thought that in patients
with mitral insufficiency, the anterior leaflet
echoes showed increased excursion and increased
diastolic velocity. 9'3~176 However, in our experience and the experience of others, this pattern
has not been specific for mitral insufficiency but
can be seen in any condition in which there is a hyperkinetic circulation with increased flow across
the mitral valve, i.e., ventricular septal defect or a
normal young person with a catecholamine drive.
On occasion, we have seen such a finding in mitral
insufficiency, but it is distinctly uncommon, and in
the vast majority of patients with mitral insufficiency neither the excursion nor the velocity is
increased. Recently, Millward et al. 42 discussed
the finding of multiple systolic echoes in patients
with cardiomyopathy.and mitral insufficiency and
concluded that the finding of these multiple
echoes during systole is indicative of mitral insufficiency. This has not been our experience. Frequently, these multiple echoes are seen in a patient with a dilated heart but without mitral
insufficiency as determined by left ventricutar
angiography. There are multiple echoes, but by
moving the transducer, one can see, at a given
position, systolic apposition of both the anterior
and the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve. Such
288
TEICHHOLZ
.=
.
.
.
.
~ , - ' ~
.
.
"'
.
,:
'-
,
~
.
.
.-.. ,~,
;,
~
,,
;
~
~
a finding probably represents a dilated left ventricle with a greater opportunity for seeing larger
portions of the leaflets of the mitral valve. The
multiple echoes may be due to the fact that larger
portions of the mitral valve can be seen by the
relatively wide echo beam. Adjunctive measurements in the detection of mitral insufficiency consist of the finding of increased left atrial size or
exaggerated left atrial motion. In many cases of
acute mitral insufficiency where there has not been
dilatation of the left atrium, a marked exaggera-
.y
-
-,.
..:-~.
--
" -,-.
.
-
=.. . . . . .
'~-..-
Fig. 7. Combined mitral stenosis-mitral insufficiency with
slow diastolic velocity and initially more rapid diastolic velocity
due to the mitral insufficiency.
(From Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
tion of the motion of the posterior wall of the
left atrium is seen 3 (Fig. 8). This tends to disappear as the left atrium dilates. In addition, as in
aortic insufficiency, there tends to be a hyperdynamic left ventricular motion pattern seen especially in the interventficular septum with an increased ejection fraction. 43 There are, however,
certain abnormalities of the mitral valve that may
be associated with mitral insufficiency in which
the echocardiogram is much more helpful. These
will be discussed in subsequent sections.
-7--
Fig. 8. Two examples of hyperdynamic motion of the left atrial wall (moving posteriorly in systole) behind the mitral
valve secondary to acute severe mitral insufficiency. (From Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa Tracings; by
permission.)
ECH OCAR DI OG RAPH Y
289
/A
Fig. 9. Two
echocardiograms
showing Barlow's syndrome with
systolic separation of anterior and
posterior leaflets of mitra| valve.
(A) Late systolic prolapse. (B)
Holosystolic
prolapse.
(From
Teichholz LE: Echocardiography
slide set, Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
Barlow's Syndrome
It is becoming evident that Barlow's syndrome is
a very common disorder. 44 This is a syndrome
consisting of a mid-systolic click with or without
late systolic murmur. The pathophysiology is that
of a redundant mitral valve with ballooning of the
leaflets, usually during mid-systole. Pathologically,
these valves show myxomatous degeneration. Echocardiography has proved to be a sensitive and specific technique for the detection of this abnormality. 4s'46 There is abnormal motion of the mitral
valve in early or mid-diastole with separation of
leaflets at some point during systole accounting for
the mitral insufficiency. Usually, this abnormality
affects both leaflets. The echocardiographic finding of posterior leaflet prolapse is much more dramatic than that of the anterior leaflet but unfortunately harder to find. The echocardiographic
abnormality is characterized by an abnormal systolic posterior motion of the anterior and posterior
leaflets. The anterior leaflet usually shows discrete
posterior motion, flat motion, or a hammockshaped deformity. The posterior leaflet shows
either a late systolic prolapse, or, on occasion,
holosystolic prolapse. 47 Since there is redundancy
in the mitral valve itself, there are usually multi-
290
- Z ~ Z _ ~ - - - - - ~ - Z - _ Z - - - - -
TEICHHOLZ
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
i .
.
.
.
•--z-
i ;lli!ltliil!iill iiiillf!! i
Fig. 10. Echocardiogram from
a patient with ruptured chordae
to anterior leaflet of mitral valve.
Multiple systolic echoes and increased
excursion
a r e demonstrated. (From ~ Teichholz LE:
Echocardiography slide set, Tampa
Tracings; by permission.)
ple diastolic and systolic echoes recorded. Examples of Bartow's syndrome are seen in Figs. 9A
and B. This abnormality of the mitral valve has
been found to be frequent in patients with Marfan's syndrome, pectus excavatum without Marfan's syndrome, and recently patients with secundum atrial septal defects. With lesser degrees of
abnormality, the detection may be more difficult.
In our own experience, the abnormality may not
be detected on all portions of the valve. The abnormal motion tends to be most prominent when
the beam is po!nting in the area of the AV groove.
Therefore, if one suspects this abnormality, one
must explore the valve very carefully to pick up
the abnormal motion pattern. Sometimes, it is
necessary to change the position of the patient, i.e.,
record in the left lateral decubitus position or with
the patient sitting up. On occasion, amyl nitrite
will bring out a latent abnormality in the valve.
Ruptured Chordae-Flail Valve
The pattern seen in ruptured chordae of the
mitral valve is dependent on which leaflet is involved. In rupture of the anterior leaflet, 48'49 two
findings can usually be noted: (1) coarse erratic
motion of the mitral valve during diastole, and (2)
multiple echoes in systole occurring over a wide
portion of the leaflet (Fig. 10). In a few cases, a
notch has been reported on the echo immediately
after the E point. 3 Posterior ruptured chordae 48-s~
has been associated with marked exaggerated motion of the posterior leaflet in systole and during
diastole. The posterior leaflet moves anteriorly,
may display fluttering, and stays in midposition
until the onset of systole. Occasionally, if there is
only a small portion of flail valve, certain areas of
the valve may look relatively normal, while others
will show an abnormal pattern of motion. In some
cases, the flail leaflet has been shown to be in the
left atrial cavity in the position where one records
the aortic root and the left atrium. In many cases,
the rupture of chordae is of recent origin, and,
therefore, the left atrium has not dilated but,
rather, shows a hyperdynamic motion pattern. In
our experience, there is an increased incidence of
ruptured chordae in patients in whom the underlying echocardiographic motion pattern of the
mitral valve is consistent with that of Barlow's syndrome.
Papillary Muscle Dysfunction
Talburg et al. 41 have discussed the echocardiographic findings of papillary muscle dysfunction
and have commented on an increased excursion
and an increased diastolic velocity in this disorder 9
We have been unable to confirm these findings in
our laboratory, s2 Although one may occasionally
see an increased excursion and velocity in papillary muscle dysfunction, other findings include a
low-amplitude systolic bulge seen on the anterior
leaflet of the mitral valve in association with a
normally sized left ventricular outflow tract. However, in our opinion, none of these findings is specific, and, in the majority of cases, no abnormality
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
291
AAO
AV
Fig. 11.
Normal aortic root and valve cusps.
(AAO) Anterior aortic wall. (AV) Aortic valve
cusps. (PAO) Posterior aortic wall. (From
Teichholz LE: Echocardiography
Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
slide set,
9
,
.'
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
J
.
-
.
seen. 14 The anterior cusp is the right coronary
cusp, the posterior, the noncoronary cusp. The left
coronary cusp is not in the plane of the transducer
and thus is not visualized. 14
of mitral valve motion may be detected; in fact,
some patients may show a decreased E-F slope
secondary to decreased left ventricular compliance.
AORTIC VALVE
Normal Aortic Valve and Root
Aortic Stenosis
The anatomy of the normal aortic root and valve
has been described, s3-s7 The normal aortic root
shows two parallel-moving echos with a dimension
measured in systole of less than 2.2 cm/sq m. With
proper angulation of the transducer, one can visualize inside the root the fine, boxlike structures of
the aortic valve cusps-opening at the beginning of
systole and closing at the end of systole (Fig. 11).
Occasionally, a fine fluttering motion can be
The detection of aortic valve disease by diagnostic ultrasound is much more difficult technically and the data somewhat less reliable than in
the study of mitral valve disease. Dilatation of the
aortic root is detected by an increased width of
aortic root echoes (aortic root >2.2 cm/sq m).
Calcification shows up as thick multiple echoes
within the root s3,s4,58 (Fig. 12). In a heavily
calcified valve, it may be impossible to obtain a
9
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
i
.
Fig. 12. Calcification in aortic valve
and root. Echo shows multiple echoes
within the root that persist on the echoes
are progressively attenuated. The normal
aortic cusp motion is not seen.
2.92
,v
,
TEICHHOLZ
9
Fig. 13. Mild aortic stenosis.
The aortic valve cusps are visualized and show decreased excursion. (From Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa
Tracings; by permission.)
good picture of the valve leaflets, and the normal
boxlike motion may be obscured. If two fine,
mobile cusps are visualized in adults with acquired
aortic stenosis, aortic stenosis with a significant
gradient can be excluded. 3 The average separation
o f the cusps during systole in normals was 1.9 cm
with a range of 1.6-2.6 cm. Recently, it has been
shown that if this orifice diameter is less than 0.6
cm, this would be associated with a gradient greater
Fig. 14. Aortic root and valve from a patient with
bicuspid aortic valve. The upper and lower arrows
point to the walls of the aortic root. The middle arrow
points to the diastolic echo of the aortic valve, which
is eccentrically placed.
than 55 mm Hg. If the measurement, however,
were between 1.3 and 2.0 cm, this would be associated with a gradient less than 35 mm Hg. s9
Figure 13 shows a patient with mild aortic stenosis
with decreased aortic valve excursion. However, it
,should b e noted that decreased excursion of the
aortic valve may also be seen in conditions other
than aortic stenosis, most notably those with low
cardiac output states, s9 In congenital aortic ste-
ECHOCAR DIOG R APHY
nosis, there can be a significant gradient with (1)
a lack of calcium in the aortic valve or root and (2)
relatively normal aortic valve motion. Echocardiography, therefore, has not been found to be
useful in this condition. However, bicuspid aortic
valve has recently been diagnosed by the use of
ultrasound using the criteria of a large asymmetrically placed cusp with marked eccentricity of
the aortic valve cusp echoes in diastole with multilayered diastolic echoes 6~ (Fig. 14). Echocardiography has also been helpful in evaluating the
effects of systolic overload on the left ventricle as
related to the development of increased thickness
of the walls of the left ventricle. The determination
of left ventricular wall thickness is accurate and
can be correlated with direct measurements of
wall thickness of postmortem specimens. 61'6s
Aortic Insufficiency
The diagnosis of aortic insufficiency rests not
with the examination of the aortic valve but rather
with examination of the mitral valve, since generally there are no characteristic findings of aortic
valve motion that suggest a diagnosis of aortic insufficiency. The useful finding in aortic insufficiency is a rapid, high-frequency fluttering of the
mitral valve 66-68 (Fig. 15). The mechanism for
this fluttering is presumably the same as that offered to explain the Austin-Flint murmur in this
condition. 69'7~ The leak through the aortic valve
causes blood to strike the anterior leaflet of the
mitral valve and set it in motion. In some cases,
fluttering of the posterior leaflet of the mitral
Fig. 15. Mitra|
valve echocardiogram
from a patient with aortic insufficiency.
There is marked high frequency "fluttering"
of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve
during diastole.
293
valve, in addition to the anterior leaflet, may be
noted. This finding can occasionally be found in
patients in whom the murmur of aortic insufficiency is not appreciated. If the mitral valve is
thickened and not sufficiently pliable to vibrate, as
in mitral stenosis, the finding may be absent; however, we have seen this fluttering pattern in patients with mild stenosis. This rapid fluttering
should be distinguished from the slower frequency
of fluttering in atrial fibrillation 71 (Fig. 16) and
the chaotic fluttering of a flail anterior leaflet of
the mitral valve. Fluttering similar to that seen in
aortic insufficiency has been seen in patients with
ventricular septal defects and right-to-left shunts.
In some cases of aortic insufficiency, the E-F slope
is decreased. The explanation for the decreased
slope is probably related to a decrease in left ventricular compliance. In many patients, there is a
question of combined valvular disease; i.e., aortic
insufficiency in association with mitral stenosis.
The murmur of aortic insufficiency may be heard,
as well as a diastolic rumble that could represent
mitral stenosis or the Austin-Flint murmur. The
echocardiogram may be very helpful in the differentiation of these two conditions by the use of
the following criteria: (1) In aortic insufficiency
without mitral stenosis, the A wave of the anterior
leaflet of the mitral valve tends to be preserved in
contrast to the findings observed in mitral stenosis.
(2) The mitral valve diastolic velocity (E-F slope)
is usually greater than 50 mm/sec in aortic insufficiency, while in mitral slenosis values of less than
50 mm/sec, usually less than 35 mm/sec, are seen.
294
TEICHHOLZ
Fig. 16. L o w frequency oscillation o f mitral valve secondary to
fibrillatory waves from a patient
with atrial fibrillation w i t h o u t intrinsic mitral valve disease. (From
Teichholz LE: Echocardiography
slide set, Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
If there is an increase in the left ventricular enddiastolic pressure, one may also see a notch on the
A-C slope 72 (Fig. 17). This has been reported in
various conditions, and we have frequently seen
this finding in patients with aortic insufficiency.
A helpful adjunct to the diagnosis of aortic insufficiency is the finding of a dilated hyperdynamic
left ventricle secondary to the left ventricular
volume overload. ~3
In acute, severe aortic insufficiency, occasionally
there is premature closure of the mitral valve that
can be detected on the echocardiogram. In this
case, the mitral valve becomes fully closed before
the onset of the QRS complex. 68
Fig. 17. Mitral valve echo
from a patient with increased
left ventricular end diastolic
pressure. The "notch" on the
A - C slope is indicated in the
last complex by the' arrow 9
(From Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa
Tracings; by permission.)
TRICUSPID VALVE
The normal tricuspid valve has a motion pattern
similar to that of the mitral valve 29 (Fig. 18). The
posterior septal cusp is difficult to visualize. It is
very difficult to record the entire motion of the
tricuspid valve in normal subjects, and if one
easily records a tricuspid valve, this usually indicates right ventricular enlargement. Tricuspid stenosis can sometimes be diagnosed by the finding
of a decrease in the E-F slope of the tricuspid
valve. 9'29"74 However, just as in the case ofmitral
valve disease, this is not specific for tricuspid stenosis and can also be seen in other processes that
cause a decreased filling rate of the right yen-
ECHOCAR DI OGRAPH Y
295
liiiiilil,,tliiidli,,ii
lidlilii !!, , Cl
llllllll!ll!tll.llll,,lll!ll!llllill
-
Fig. 18. Normal tricuspid valve. (From
Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide
set, Tampa Tracings; by permission.}
"
-
-
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
"
~---ZCZ-=--
ii
tricle) 4 Fluttering of the tricuspid valve has been
reported in pulmonic insufficiency, 14'75 and rapid
diastolic slopes have been recorded in tricuspid insufficiency. ~4
In addition, with right ventricular diastolic overload, one will see an increased right ventricular internal dimension measured from the anterior wall
of the right ventricle to the right ventricular side
of the interventricular septum and a paradoxical
septal motion in which the septum during systole
moves anteriorly toward the right ventricle rather
than posteriorly towards the posterior wall of the
left ventricle. This finding is seen in tricuspid ino
sufficiency. ~6 In patients with valvular or other
cardiac disease and an increased RVEDP, an echocardiogram showing a notch on the A-C slope of
the tricuspid valve may be recorded. In addition,
patterns with an A wave greater than the E point
and with decreased C-D slope may be recorded in
patients with an elevated initial diastolic pressure.
No discussion of the tricuspid valve would be
complete without some comments on Ebstein's
anomaly] 7-8~ In the presence of Ebste~,n's anomaly, the tricuspid valve is usually found further to
the left of the sternum, and the beam must, therefore, be oriented in that direction. Significant echocardiographic findings in Ebstein's anomaly of the
tricuspid valve are: (I) large excursion of the tricuspid valve; (2) decreased E-F slope; (3) delayed
closure of the tricuspid valve; and (4) abnormal
paradoxical septal motion. It should be noted that
the delayed closure of the tricuspid valve has been
seen in patients with Ebstein's anomaly with or
without type B Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
and thus appears to be associated with the delayed component of the first heart sound rather
than the conduction abnormality.
PULMONIC VALVE
Gramiak et al. 81 have discussed the normal
anatomy and physiology of the pulmonic valve and
the normal echocardiographic patterns. This valve
is particularly difficult to study in adults. Although
there have been some preliminary findings of valvular abnormalities in pulmonic stenosis and in
pulmonary hypertension, 3 the number of instances
in which this valve can be appreciated in adults is
small enough to make it less useful diagnostically.
PROSTHETIC VALVES
Characteristic echocardiographic patterns have
been reported from various types of cardiac
prostheses. 82-9s In general, parallel echoes from
the cage and sewing ring are seen with superimposed motion of the poppet when the transducer
is positioned along the axis of motion. When there
is a silastic ball as the poppet, it may appear to be
larger than the actual valve itself because the speed
of sound is slower by a factor of 0.64 in silastic. 96
The prosthetic aortic valve has been found to be
much more difficult to record than the prosthetic
mitral valve, due in part to the orientation of the
valve in the chest wall. Malfunction of prosthetic
valves have been reported as characterized by a
296
TEICHHOLZ
."
..,~,
7"
.
t
.
.
.
.
.
\
9
.,,~
.
"
'~,
9 ,~
'
,"
"
~
Fig. 19. Porcine (heterograft) valve prosthesis in the mitral position. The transducer was swept from the aortic root (on
the left} to the prosthesis (on the right}. The motion of one of the valve cusps can be seen within the sewing ring of the
prosthesis. (From Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
limitation of excursion, reduction in the velocity
of the poppet motion, or inconsistent motion pattern of the poppet. 97'9a Fungal vegetations have
been identified 99 as well as decreased motion
secondary to clot a~176
and excessive rocking motion
due to loss of support of the suture line. ~~ Recently, stented fascia lala grafts have been studied, x~ and we have looked at porcine mitral valves;
the patterns seen in these patients represent a
structure similar to a double aortic root and motion o f the porcine valve cusps can sometimes be
visualized (Fig. 19). Of interest is the finding of
abnormal septal motion in a large proportion of
patients with either an aortic or a mitral valve
prosthesis. ~~ The nature o f this abnormal motion
is not clear at this time. This does not appear to be
related to tricuspid insufficiency and may disappear with time after surgery.
Combined use o f echocardiography and phonocardiography should allow one to follow serially
individual patients with prosthetic valves and hopefully allow one to diagnose at an early stage manifestations of prosthetic valvular dysfunction.
MISCELLANEOUS
CONDITIONS
Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic
Stenosis (IHSS}
Echocardiography has proved to be a sensitive
method for the diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis (IHSS). 1~176 The
earliest description of the echocardiographic ab-
normalities in IHSS was that of abnormal motion
of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve
(ALMV). l~176 The ALMV forms one side of the
outflow tract of the left ventricle with the interventricular septum (IVS) forming the other boundary. In IHSS, there is a decrease in the outflow
tract size, i.e., the distance between the ALMV and
IVS. In addition, in IHSS with obstruction there is
an abrupt systolic anterior motion of this leaflet
(SAM) (Figs. 20A and B). The duration and extent
of abnormality appears to be related to the severity
of obstruction, m'112 This abnormality is lacking
in patients without obstruction, but can be induced
by maneuvers that increase the gradient such as
the Valsalva maneuver, isoproterenol infusion, or
inhalation of amyl nitrite.~~ ms,l~o The effect of
propanolol therapy on SAM has been inconstantvarious groups reporting correction of this abnormality, 6'1~ while others have found no effect
despite abolition or reduction of the gradient. ~~
Ventriculotomy has been shown to abolish both
the gradient and the SAM in the majority of patients, mS'1~~
although this has not been seen
by other observers. 112 Although the SAM is an important diagnostic finding in IHSS, care must be
exercised to examine the tip of the ALMV because
a form of systolic anterior movement can be seen
in normals if one examines the ALMV in a position
close to the mitral annulus. 6'11~ This is especially
common in patients with hyperdynamic left ventricular motion with increased excursion of posterior wall and mitral annulus. This "systolic
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
297
A
Fig. 20. Two examples of
abnormal mitral valve motion
in IHSS. Both show the systolic anterior motion (SAM) of
the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and decreased E-F
slope. B also shows a notch on
the A-C slope secondary to increased left ventricular enddiastolic
pressure.
(From
Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa Tracings; by permission.)
J,
*
B
hump" can be distinguished from the SAM of IHSS
by taking care to examine the tip of the ALMV,
which is usually at a position where the posterior
leaflet is also visualized. Secondly, in IHSS there is
abrupt posterior motion of the ALMV prior to
diastole, while the annular motion blends into the
diastolic opening motion of the ALMV.
Other abnormalities of the mitral valve seen in
IHSS are a decrease in the E-F slope secondary to
decreased left ventricular compliance 1~176176
(Figs. 20A and B) and, occasionally, a notch on the
A-C slope in the presence of an increased left
ventricular end-diastolic pressure. In most cases,
?
~
N
';
"
~*
"'
~
'*
""
the ALMV appears to touch the IVS in early
diastole, but this finding is not specific for IHSS
and is seen in some patients with small or hyperdynamic left ventricles. Examination of the aortic
root and valve cusps in patients with significant
left ventricular outflow obstruction shows an abnormal pattern of motion of the aortic valve
cusps, s'11~
There is normal initial opening followed by mid-systolic reopening. This finding has
as its counterparts the mid-systolic dip in the
carotid pulse tracing and the double apical systolic
impulse.
However, the echocardiographic finding that is
298
TEICHHOLZ
...
:. t .'..
,,
i" .
"., i ,
i;.
,.;'
9
9
Fig. 21. Asymmetric septal hypertrophy (ASH) in a patient with I HSS. The ratio of the thickness of the interventricular
septum (IVS) to the posterior wall (PWLV) is approximately 13:1. (From Teichholz LE: Echocardiography slide set, Tampa
Tracings; by permission.)
the most sensitive indicator of this disease is asymmetric septal hypertrophy 114-117 (Fig. 21), i.e.,
hypertrophy of the IVS so that the ratio of IVS
thickness/posterior wall thickness is greater than
1.2/1. This finding may be found in patients without left ventricular outflow obstruction and in
asymptomatic relatives of patients with IHSS] Is
To avoid artifacts care must be taken to record
and make measurements of the thickness of the
IVS and posterior wall in the position just below
the mitral valve. Recently, it has been suggested
that ASH is not absolutely specific for IHSS but
may be found in patients with right ventricular
systolic overload as wellJ 19
The study of IHSS by echocardiography has not
only been of aid in the diagnosis but has also aided
in the study of the pathophysiology of this disorder. Recently, study of the IVS and ALMV in
IHSS by B-scan ultrasonography lz~ has clearly
demonstrated the displacement of the mitral valve
anteriorly toward the IVS, probably as a result of
abnormal orientation of the papillary muscles
secondary to the left ventricular distortion caused
by the marked septal hypertrophy.
Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis
Echocardiography has recently been used to detect involvement of specific valves with vegetations
secondary to subacute bacterial endocarditis.12~' 122
In these studies, vegetations were felt to be detected on valves if these vegetations were greater
than 2 mm in diameter. Further work is necessary
to confirm and extend these observations.
A trial M y x o ma
Left atrial myxomas are usually pedunculated
tumors arising from the interatrial septum, which
may prolapse and obstruct the mitral valve orifice.
Echocardiography has proved to be a very useful
tool in the diagnosis of this disorderJ 23-~a7 Since
each tumor is different in size, shape, location, and
mobility, it is not surprising that the echocardiographic manifestations may be markedly varied.
Usually, one sees multilayered, usually parallel
echoes behind the mitral valve in diastole as the
tumor prolapses into the mitral orifice. In some
cases, the multiple echoes may also be seen in
systole. Because of the obstruction to left atrial
emptying and left ventricular filling caused by the
tumor, there is also a decrease in the E-F slope.
Although the use of echocardiography in the detection of left atrial myxoma has proved to be extremely useful, care must be taken to adjust the
sensitivity or gain setting carefully in order to obtain adequate echocardiograms. The sensitivity
should not be so high as to introduce artifacts. In
addition to examining the echoes of the mitral
valve, the left atrial cavity behind the aortic root
ECH OCAR DI OG RAPHY
299
should be examined carefully so as to visualize the
echoes behind the mitral valve, and the absence of
abnormal echoes in the left atrium behind the
aortic root make the diagnosis of left atrial
myxoma doubtful. Right atrial myxomas have also
been studied using ultrasound. 138-14~
SUMMARY
Echocardiography is a useful new technique that
allows for the diagnosis and assessment of the
severity of various forms of valvular heart disease.
It is a safe and noninvasive procedure that can
readily be used on the critically ill as well as the
ambulatory patient. Since the examination can be
easily repeated, echocardiography can be used to
study a patient over an extended period of time to
follow the severity of the disease.
With proper care and experience in the performance and interpretation, the cardiologist can
derive much useful information to aid in the initial
evaluation and long-term follow-up of patients with
various forms of valvular disease. With improvements in instrumentation and the use of newer
techniques, the usefulness of ultrasound will be
further enhanced.
REFERENCES
1. Wells PNT: Physical Principles of Ultrasonic Diagnosis. New York, Academic Press, 1969
2. Wells PNT: Ultrasonics in clinical diagnosis. London,
Churchill Livingstone, 1972
3. Feigenbaum H: Echocardiography. Philadelphia, Lea
& Febiger, 1972
4. Popp RL, Harrison DC: Echocardiography, in Weissler
AM (ed): Noninvasive Cardiology. New York, Grune &
Stratton, 1974
5. Feigenbaum H: Clinical applications of echocardiography. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 14:531, 1972
6. Feigenbaum H: Ultrasound as a clinical tool in
valvular heart disease, in Likoff W (ed): Valvular Heart
Disease. Philadelphia, Davis, 1973
7. Edler I: Ultrasound cardiogram in mitral valve disease. Acta Chir Scand 3:230, 1956
8. Edler I: Ultrasoundcardiography. Acta Med Scand
170 (Suppl 370):1, 1961
9. Effert S, Erkens H, Grossebrockhoff F: Ultrasonic
echo method in cardiological diagnosis. Ger Med Mon
2:325, 1957
10. Wharton CF, Bescos LL: Mitral valve movement: A
study using an ultrasound technique. Br Heart J 32:344,
1970
11. Zaky A, Grabhorn L, Feigenbaum H: Movement of
the mitral ring: A study of ultrasoundcardiography. Cardiovasc Res 1:121, 1967
12. Zaky A, Nasser WK, Feigenbaum H: Study of mitral
valve action recorded by reflected ultrasound and its application in the diagnosis of mitral stenosis. Circulation
37:789, 1968
13. Zaky A, Steinmetz EF, Feigenbaum H: Role of
atrium in closure of mitral valve in man. Am J Physiol
217:1952, 1969
14. Gramiak R, Shah PM: Cardiac ultrasonography.
Radiol Clin North Am 9:469, 1971
15. Edler I, Hertz CH: Ultrasound cardiogram in mitral
valve disease. Acta Chir Scand 111:230, 1956
16. Edler I, Gustofson A: Ultrasonic cardiogram in
mitral stenosis. Acta Med Scand 159:85, 1957
17. Joyner CR, Reid JM, Bond JP: Reflected ultrasound
in the assessment of mitral valve disease. Circulation
27:503, 1963
18. Segal BL, Likoff W, Kingsley B: Echocardiography:
Clinical application in mitral stenosis. JAMA 193:161,
1966
19. Wharton CF: Reflected ultrasound patterns in
mitral valve disease. Guys Hosp Rep 118:187, 1969
20. Schmitt W, Schneider KW, Braum H, et al: Comparison of intracardiac catheter findings, ultrasound cardiogram findings and intraoperatively obtained measurement results in patients with mitral stenosis. Munch Med
Wochenschr 112:577, 1970
21. Eisenreich R, Fischer E: Diagnostic value of the
ultrasonic cardiogram in evaluation of mitral valve stenosis. Z Gesamte Inn Med 26:527, 1971
22. Joyner CR, Reid JM: Ultrasound cardiogram in the
selection of patients for mitral valve surgery. Ann NY
Acad Sci 118:512, 1965
23. Gustafson A: Ultrasound cardiography in mitral
stenosis. Acta Med Scand Suppl 461 : 1-123, 1966
24. Gustafson A: Correlation between ultrasoundcardiography, hemodynamics and surgical findings in mitral
stenosis. Am J Cardiol 19:32, 1967
25. Joyner CR, Dyrda I, Barrett JS, et al: Preoperative
determination of the functional anatomy of the mitral
valve. Circulation 32 (II): 120, 1966
26. Duchak JM Jr, Chang S, Feigenbaum H: The
posterior mitral valve echo and the echocardiographic
diagnosis of mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 29:628, 1972
27. Hirata T, Wolfe SB, Popp RL, et al: Estimation of
left atrial size using ultrasound. Am Heart J 78:43, 1969
28. Goldberg BB: Suprasternal ultrasonography. JAMA
215:245, 1971
29. Edict I, Gustafson A, Karlefors T, et al: Ultrasound
cardiography. Acta Med Scand 170 (Suppl 370):67, 1961
30. Effert S: Pre- and postoperative evaluation of mitral
stenosis by ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 19:59, 1967
31. Silver W, Rodriquez-Torres R, Newfelt E: The echocardiogram in a case of mitral stenosis before and after
surgery. Am Heart J 78:811, 1969
32. Mary DA, Pakrashi BC, Wooler GH, et ah Study with
reflected ultrasound of patients with mitral valve repair.
Br Heart J 35:480, 1973
33. Follath F: Echocardiographic studies before and
300
after mitral commisurotomy. Schweiz Med Wochenschr
103:279, 1973
34. Ilmurzynska K, Kompiel JL: Ultrasonography in
the diagnosis of mitral restenosis and orifice calcification.
Kardiol Pol 16:119, 1973
35. Quinones MA, Gaasch WH, Waisser E, et al: Reduction in the rate of diastolic descent of the mitral valve
echogram in patients with altered left ventricular diastolic
pressure-volume relations. Circulation 49:246, 1974
36. Winsberg F, Mercer EN: Echocardiography in combined valve disease. Radiology 105:405, 1972
37. Winters WL, Hafer J Jr, Soloff LA: Abnormal
mitral valve motion as demonstrated by the ultrasound
technique in apparent pure mitral insufficiency. Am Heart
J 77:196, 1969
38. Segal BL, Likoff W, Kingsley F: Echocardiography:
Clinical application in combined mitral stenosis and mitral
regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 19:42, 1967
39. Burgess J, Clark R, Kamigaki M, et al: Echocardiographic findings in different types of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 48:97, 1973
40. Segal BL, Likoff W, Kingsley B: Echocardiography:
Clinical application in mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol
19:50, 1967
41. Talburg VK, de Pasquale NP, Burch GE: The echocardiogram in papillary muscle dysfunction. Am Heart J
83:12, 1972
42. Millward DK, McLaurin LP, Craige E: Echocardiographic studies of the mitral valve in patients with congestive eardiomyopathy and mitral regurgitation. Am
Heart J 85:413, 1973
43. Stone JM, Haine CL, Chang S, et ah The use of
ultrasound to detect volume overload of the left ventricle. Circulation (III) 40:196, 1969
44. Jeresaty RM: Mitral valve prolapse-click syndrome.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis 15:623, 1973
45. Dillon JC, Haine CL, Chang S, et al: Use of echocardiography in patients with prolapsed mitral valve. Circulation 43:503, 1971
46. Kerber RE, Isaeff DM, Hancock EW: Echocardiographic patterns in patients with the syndrome of systolic
click and late systolic murmur. N Engl J Med 284:691,
1971
47. Popp RL, Brown OR, Silverman JF, et al: Echocardiographic abnormalities in the mitral valve prolapse
syndrome. Circulation 49:428, 1974
48. Duchak JM Jr, Chang S, Feigenbaum H: Echocardiographic features of torn chordae tendineae. Am J
Cardiol 29:260, 1972
49. Giles TD, Burch GE, Martinez EC: Value of exploratory "scanning" in the echocardiographic diagnosis
of ruptured chordae tendineae. Circulation 49:678, 1974
50. Sweatman TW, Selzer A, Cohn K: Echocardiographic
diagnosis of ruptured chordae tendineae. Am J Cardiol
26:661, 1970
51. Sweatman T, Selzer A, Kamagaki M, et al: Echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral regurgitation due to
ruptured chordae tendineae. Circulation 46:580, 1972
52. Bergeron GA, Cohen MV, Teichholz LE, et al:
Echocardiographic analysis of mitral valve motion after
acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1975 (in press)
53. Elder I, Gustafson A, Karlefors T, et ah Mitral and
TEICHHOLZ
aortic valve movement recorded by an ultrasonic echo
method: An experimental study. Acta Med Scand 170
(Suppl 370):67, 1961
54. Gramiak R, Shah PM: Echocardiography of the
aortic root. Invest Radiol 3: 356, 1968
55. Gramiak R, Shah PM, Kramer DH: Ultrasound
cardiography: Contrast studies in anatomy and function.
Radiology 92:939, 1969
56. Gramiak R, Shah PM: Echocardiography of the
normal and diseased aortic valve. Radiology 96:1, 1970
57. Hernberg J, Weiss B, Keegan A: The ultrasonic recording of aortic valve motion. Radiology 94:361, 1970
58. Klepacki Z: Ultrasonography in aortic valve disease.
Kardiol Pol 16:125, 1973
59. Yeh HC, Winsberg F, Mercer EN: Echographic
aortic valve oriface dimension; its use in evaluation of
aortic stenosis and cardiac output. J Clin Ultrasound
1:182, 1973
60. Nanda NC, Gramiak R, Manning J, et ah Echocardiographic recognition of the congenital bicuspid aortic
valve. Circulation 49:870, 1974
61. Ilmurzynaska K, Segal B: Measurement of thickness of left ventricular posterior wall by means of ultrasounds. Pol Med J 8:806, 1969
62. Sjogren AL, Hytonen I, Frick MH: Ultrasonic measurement of left ventricular wall thickness. Chest 57:37,
1970
63. Troy BL, Pombo J, Rackley CE: Measurement of
left ventricular wall thickness and mass by echocardiography. Circulation 45:602, 1972
64. Sjogren AL: Left ventricular wall thickness in patients with circulatory overload of the left ventricle. Ultrasonic, physical, electrocardiographic and radiologic correlations. Ann Clin Res 4:310, 1972
65. Abbasi AS, Macalpin RN, Eber LM, et al: Left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by echocardiography. N
EnglJ Med 289:118, 1973
66. Joyner CR, Dyrda I, Reid JM: Behavior of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve in patients with the
Austin-Flint murmur. Clin Res 14:251, 1966
67. Winsberg F, Gabor GE, Hernberg JG: Fluttering of
the mitral valve in aortic insufficiency. Circulation 41:
225, 1970
68. Pridie RB, Beham R, Oakley CM: Echocardiography
of the mitral valve in aortic valve disease. Br Heart J
33:296, 1971
69. Graige E, Fortnin NJ: Studies on mitral valve motion in the presence of the Austin-Flint murmur. Trans
Am Clin Climatol Assoc 83:209, 1972
70. Fortuin NG, Craige E: On the mechanism of the
Austin-Flint murmur. Circulation 45:550, 1972
71. Gabor GE, Winsberg F: Motion of mitral valves in
cardiac arrhythmias: Ultrasonic cardiographic study. Invest Radio1 5:355, 1970
72. Konecke LL, Feigenbaum H, Chang S, et al: Abnormal mitral valve motion in patients with elevated left
ventricular diastolic pressures. Circulation 47: 989, 1973
73. Danford HG, Danford DA, Mielke JE, et al: Electrocardiographic evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of
chronic aortic insufficiency with observations on left ventricular performance. Circulation 48:253, 1973
74. Joyner CR, Hey BE Jr, Johnson J, et al: Reflected
ECHOCAR DIOGRAPHY
ultrasound in the diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis. Am J
Cardiol 19:66, 1967
75. Green EW, Agruss NS, Adolph RJ: Right-sided
Austin-Flint murmur. Documentation by intracardiac
phonocardiography, echocardiography, and postmortem
findings. Am J Cardiol 32:370, 1973
76. Diamond MA, Dillon JC, Haine CL, et al: Electrocardiographic features of atrial septal defect. Circulation
43:129, 1971
77. Lundstrom NR, Edler I: Ultrasoundcardiography in
infants and children. Acta Paediatr Scand 60:117, 1971
78. Crews TL, Pridie RB, Benham R, et al: Auscultatory
and phonocardiographic findings on Ebstein's anomaly.
Correlation of first heart sound with ultrasonic records
of tricuspid valve movement. Br Heart J 34:681, 1972
79. Lundstrom NR: Ech0cardiography in the diagnosis
of Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve. Circulation
47:597, 1973
80. Tajik AJ, Gau GT, Giuliani EF, et al: Echocardiogram in Ebstein's anomaly with Wolff-Parkinson-White
preexcitation syndrome, Type B. Circulation 47:813,
1973
81. Gramiak R, Handa NC, Shah PM: Echocardiographic
detection of pulmonary valve. Radiology 102:153, 1972
82. Popp RL, Carmichael BM: Cardiac echography in
the diagnosis of prosthetic mitral value malfunction. Circulation 44 (Suppl II):33, 1971
83. Mahringer W, Hausen WJ: Ultrasound cardiogram in
patients with mitral valve disc prosthesis. Angiology 21:
336, 1970
84. Winters WL, Gimenez JL, Soloff L: Clinical application of ultrasound in the analysis of prosthetic ball
valve function. Am J Cardiol 19:97, 1967
85. Gimenez JL, Winters WL Jr, Davila JC, et al: Dynamics of the Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis: A
cinefluorographic and ultrasonic study in humans. Am J
Med Sci 250:652, 1965
86. Reid JM, Bor I: Ultrasound cardiogram of artificial
mitral valves (Starr-Edwards prosthesis). Z Kreislaufforsch
58:979, 1969
87. Mahringer W, Hausen WJ: The origin of the ultrasound echocardiogram in mitral stenosis. Studies on
prosthetic valves with the aid of roentgen cinematography. Z Kreistaufforsch 58:1193, 1969
88. Siggers DC, Sivaporn A, Srivongse A: Analysis of
dynamics of mitral Starr-Edwards valve prosthesis using
reflected ultrasound. Br Heart J 32:552, 1970
89. Pernod J, Servelle M, Haguenauer G, et al: Ultrasonic echocardiography in the assessment of indications
and results of valve prostheses. Presse Med 78:2189, 1970
90. Pernod J, Servelle M, Kermarec J, et al: Mechanographic and ultrasonic study of mitral prostheses. Ann
Med Interne (Paris), 169, 1971
91. Siggers DE, Srivongse SA, Deuchar D: Analysis of
dynamics of mitral Start-Edwards valve prosthesis using
reflected ultrasound. Br Heart J 401,1971
92. Aigner A, Baumbarti P, Knapp E, et al: Functional
evaluation of the aortic valve prosthesis. Schweiz Med
Wochenschr 102:298, 1972
93. Douglas JE, Williams GD: Echocardiographic evaluation of the Bjork-Shiley prosthetic value. Circulation
50:52, 1974
301
94. Johnson ML, Holmes JH, Paton BC: Echocardiographic determination of mitral disc valve excursion.
Circulation 47:1274, 1973
95. Gibson TC, Starek PJK, Moos S, et al: Echocardiographic and phonocardiographic characteristics of the
Lillihei-Kaster mitral valve prosthesis. Circulation 49:
434, 1974
96. Johnson ML, Paton BC, Holmes JH: Ultrasonic
evaluation of prosthetic valve motion. Circulation 41
(Suppl 1I): 3, 1970
97. Belenkie I, Carr M, Schlant RC, et al: Malfunction
of a Cutter-Smeloff mitral ball valve prosthesis-diagnosis
by phonocardiography and echocardiography. Am Heart
J 86:399, 1973
98. Oliva PB, Johnson ML, Pomerantz M, et al: Dysfunction of the Beall mitral prosthesis and its detection
by cinefluoroscopy and echocardiography. Am J Cardiol
31:393, 1973
99. Schelbert HR, Muller OF: Detection of fungal
vegetations involving a Starr-Edwards mitral prosthesis by
means of ultrasound. Vasc Surg 6:20, 1972
I00. Preifer J, Godlschlager N, Sweatman T, et al: Malfunction of mitral ball valve prosthesis due to thrombus.
Report of two cases with notes on early clinical diagnosis.
Am J Cardiot 29:95, 1972
101. Winters WL, Gimenez JL, Soloff L: Clinical application of ultrasound in the analysis of prosthetic ball
valve function. Am J Cardiol 19:97, 1967
102. Das M, Pakrashi BC, Catchpole RW, et al: Echocardiographic studies of stented fascia lata grafts in the
mitral position. Circulation 49: 237, 1974
103. Miller HC, Gibson DG, Stephens JD: Role of echocardiography and phonocardiography in diagnosis of mitral paraprosthetic regurgitation with Starr-Edwards prosthesis. Br Heart J 35:1217, 1973
104. King JF, Demaria AN, Reis RL, et al: Echocardiographic assessment of idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis, Chest 64:723, 1973
105. Takik AJ, Giuliani ER: Echocardiographic observations in idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis.
Mayo Clin Proc 49:89, 1974
106. Moreyra E, Klein J J, Schimada H, et al: Idiopathic
hypertrophic subaortic stenosis diagnosed by reflected ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 23: 32, 1969
107. Shah PM, Gramiak R, Kramer DH: Ultrasound localization of left ventricular outflow obstruction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 40: 3,
1969
108. Popp RL, Harrison DC: Ultrasound in the diagnosis
and evaluation of therapy of idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. Circulation 40:905, 1969
109. Pridie RB, Oakley CM: Mechanism of mitral regurgitation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Br Heart J 32:203, 1970
110. Shah PM, Gramiak R, Adelman AG, et al: Role of
echocardiography in diagnostic and hemodynamic assessment of hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. Circulation
44:891, I971
111. Henry WL, Clark CE, Glancy DL, et al: Echocardiographic measurement of the left ventricular outflow gradient on idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 288:989, 1973
302
112. Boulton MR, King JF, Reis RL, et al: Alterations
of echocardiographic features of idiopathic hypertrophic
subaortid stenosi~ b.g operation: Simultaneous comparison
withlpre: early iind late'~postopg~tiVg catheterization in
the same patients undergoing verltrieular septal myectomy. Circulation (in press)
113. Shah PM, Gramiak R, Adelman AG, et al: Echocardiographic assessment of the effects of surgery and
propranolol on the dynamics of outflow obstruction in
hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. Circulation 45:516, 1972
114. Abbasie AS, Macalpin RN, Eber LN, et al: Echocardiographic diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without outflow obstruction. Circulation
46:897, 1972
115. Henry WL, Clark CE, Epstein SE: Asymmetric
septal hypertrophy: The unifying link in the IHSS disease
spectrum. Circulation 47:827, 1973
116. Clark CE, Henry WL, Epstein SE: The sensitivity
and specificity of echocardiography in diagnosing IHSS
by detection of asymmetrical septal hypertrophy. Circulation 46:11-139, 1972
117. Henry WL, Clark EC, Epstein SE: Asymmetric
septal hypertrophy. Echocardiographic identification of
the pathognomonic abnormality of IHSS. Circulation
47:225-233, 1973
118. Clark CE, Henry WL, Epstein SE: Familial prevalence and genetic transmission of idiopathic hypertr0phic
subaortiC stenosis. N Engi J Med 289: 709,1973
119. Goodman DJ, Harrison DC, Popp RL: Echocardiographic features of primary pulmonary hypertension.
Am J Cardiol 33:438, 1974
120. Cohen MV, Teichholz LE, Gorlin R: Study of left
ventricular outflow tract and pathophysiologic mechanism
of obstruction in idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis by B-scan ultrasonography. (Submitted for publication)
121. Dillon JC, Feigenbaum HI Konecke LL, et al:
Echocardiographic manifestations of valvular vegetation s.
Am Heart J 86:698, 1973
122. Spangler RD, Johnson ML, Holmes JH, et al:
Echocardiographic demonstration of bacterial vegetations
in active infective endocarditis. J Clin Ultrasound 1:126,
1973
123. Effert S, Domanig E: The diagnosis of intraatrial
tumors and thrombi by the ultrasonic echo method. Ger
Med Mon 4:1, 1959
TEICHHOLZ
124. Schattenberg TT: Echocardiographic diagnosis of
left atrial myxoma. Mayo Clin Proc 43:620, 1968
125. Finegan RE, Harrison DC: Diagnosis of left atrial
myxoma by echocardiography. N Engl J Med 282:1022,
1970
126. Popp RL, Harrison DC: Ultrasound for the diagnosis of atrial tumors. Ann Intern Med 7:785, 1969
127. Wolfe SB, Popp RL, Feigenbaum H: Diagnosis of
atrial tumors by ultrasound. Circulation 39:615, 1969
128. Kostis JB, Moghadam AN: Echocardiographic diagnosis of left atrial myxoma. Chest 58:550, 1970
129. Spencer WH, Petes RH, Orgain ES: Detection of
left atrial myxoma by echocardiography. Arch Intern
Med 28:787, 1971
130. Nicholls AJ, Goodman MA, Pridie RB: Left atrial
myxoma in a child diagnosed by ultrasound. Postgrad
Med J 47:804, 1971
131. Nasser WK, Davis RH, Dillon JC, et al: Atrial
myxoma. I. Clinical and pathologic features in nine cases.
Am Heart J 83:694, 1972
132. Nasser WK, Davis RH, Dillon JC, et al: Atrial
, myxoma. II. Phonocardiographic, echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and angiographic features in nine cases. Am
Heart J 83:810, 1972
133. Pridie RB: Left atrial myxomas in childhoodpresentation with emboli-diagnosis by ultrasonics. Thorax
27:759, !973
134. Srivastava TN, Fletcher E: The echocardiograrn in
left atrial myxoma. Am J Med 54:136, 1973
135. Schattenberg TT, Tajik AJ, Gua GT: Echocardiogram o n left atrial myxoma. Chest 63:423, 1973
136. Sinha SN, Hoeschen RJ, Miller A: Diagnosis of
left atrial myxoma by echocardiography. Can Med Assoc
J 108:332, 1973
137. Martinez EC, Giles TD, Butch GE: Echocardiographic diagnosis of left atrial myxoma. Am J Cardiol
33:281, 1974
138. Waxier EB, Kawa N, Kasparian H: Right atrial
myxoma: Echocardiographic, phonocardiographic, and
hemodynamic signs. Am Heart J 83:251, 1972
139. Goldschlager A' Popper R, Goidschiager N, et ai:
Right atrial myxoma with right to left shunt and
polycythemia presenting a congenital heart disease. Am J
Cardiol 30:82, 1972
140. Harbold NB Jr, Gau GT: Echocardiographic diagnosis of right atrial myxoma. Mayo Clin Proc 48:284,
1973