‘War and Peace’ and the APRC Proposals1
Dr. Colin Irwin
University of Liverpool
www.peacepolls.org
May 2010
Key findings:
1
•
The preliminary APRC proposals have gained more Sinhala support after the war so that
they are now equally acceptable to the Sinhala, Tamils, Up-Country Tamils and Muslims.
•
Although the majority of Tamils and Muslims across Sri Lanka want a unitary state a
significant minority of Tamils from the Northern Province still want to keep the ‘right to
secession’. However most of them will give this up for the complete ‘package’ of APRC
reforms.
•
The President, political and religious leaders can all influence support for these
preliminary APRC proposals but although Eastern Tamils will follow their politicians on
this issue Northern Tamils ‘Don’t Know’ how to respond to theirs.
•
Although all communities strongly support language and fundamental rights Tamil
concerns about the special status of Buddhism has increased after the war as a political
issue.
This research is based on a preliminary set of proposals formulated in February 2009.
Contents
Page
About the poll
2
Introduction
2
Sinhala response
5
Tamil response
7
Up-Country Tamil response
11
Muslim response
13
Support for reform
15
Some further notes on Northern, Eastern and
Tamils in the rest of Sri Lanka
18
Political party response
20
A further note on the politics of ‘Religious Rights’
28
Summary of results for the APRC proposals
29
Problems
30
If there is no reform
33
Those for or against the APRC proposals in Sri Lanka
35
Opposition to progressive reform outside Sri Lanka
37
Appendix: Questionnaire and additional results
39
1
About the poll
The research for this poll was carried out by the staff of Social Indicator of Colombo, on behalf of Dr.
Colin Irwin from the University of Liverpool who developed the peace polls method as part of the
successful Northern Ireland peace process. The survey work for the first poll in this series was
completed between March and May 2008 and included a random sample of 1,700 people from all parts
of Sri Lanka with the exception of the Northern Province. Using the same methods the survey work for
the second poll was completed a year later in March 2009 to test the then preliminary APRC proposals
against public opinion before the end of the war. A year later in March 2010 these same proposals were
tested again but with a larger sample that included the Northern Province. Additionally four versions of
the questionnaire were run to measure the impact that the support of the President, religious and political
leaders would have on the acceptability of the proposals (Table 1). All interviews were face-to-face and
the margin of error varied between +/- 2% and +/- 4.3% depending on the question and version of the
questionnaire being analysed. A copy of the questionnaire is given in the Appendix with additional
results.
Table 1. Sample plan
Sinhala
Tamil
Up-Country Tamil
Muslim
Total
Neutral
300
200
200
200
900
President
250
100
75
75
500
Religious
250
100
75
75
500
Political
250
100
75
75
500
Total
1050
500
425
425
2400
Introduction
The President of Sri Lanka established the All Party Representative Committee (APRC) to draft a set of
constitutional reforms that, following the war, would provide the country and all it’s citizens with a real
opportunity for enduring political stability, increased economic growth and improvements in the quality
of life. Critically, when tested against public opinion a year ago these proposals, with some minor
reservations were acceptable to a significant majority of both Sinhalese and Tamils (Table 2). But due to
the ongoing conflict the Tamils in the North could not be sampled then. With the end of the war and the
defeat of their leadership would they accept the APRC proposals? Additionally 21% of Sinhalese did not
know or were unwilling to give an opinion on such important issues at that time. With the end of the war
would their views change and if so would this be for or against the APRC proposals?
Table 2. Question: ‘Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined
here?’ (March 2009).
Per cent
Sinhala
Tamil
Up Country Tamil
Muslim
Yes
67
86
92
90
No
12
4
0
1
DK
21
10
8
9
The poll run in March 2009 also indicated that the President then enjoyed unprecedented popularity
(93% ‘trust very much or trust quite a bit’ amongst the Sinhala) so it also seemed important to test the
effects his support and the support of religious and political leaders could have on the acceptability of
the APRC proposals. This was done by framing the questions in these terms and also by asking if such
support would change the views of the person being interviewed in a neutral version of the
questionnaire.
2
A summary of the APRC proposals as they existed in February 2009 is listed in Table 3 as a series of 14
‘show cards’. Those being interviewed were asked what they thought of each item on a given card. Was
it ‘essential’, ‘desirable’, ‘acceptable’, ‘tolerable’ or ‘unacceptable’? Then they were asked what they
thought of the ‘package’ as a whole, if they would support such a ‘package’ and under what
circumstances.
Table 3. The APRC proposals in summary form, as they existed in February 2009.
SHOW CARDS 1 to 14
1. The Structure of the State – Powers will be divided between the centre and the provinces under
a unitary state.
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces – These powers will be clearly defined in two
separate lists. One for the Centre and one for the Provinces.2
3. The Parliament - Will consist of two houses. The House of Representatives directly elected by
the people and the Senate elected by the Provincial Legislators with each Province having the
same number of Senators.
4. Amending the Constitution – Amendments affecting the powers of the Provinces can only be
made if a majority of Senators from each of the Provinces votes in favour together with not less
than two thirds of a joint session of both houses. Amending certain specific articles will also
require approval by the people at a referendum.3
5. The Powers of the President – The Executive Presidency will cease to exist at the end of the
incumbent’s term and be replaced by the Westminster system with a Prime Minister enjoying
majority support in the House of Representatives.
2
An additional constitutional item overlooked at the time of drafting the APRC proposals for this
questionnaire could be inserted here as follows:
Land and Water – The Central Government will retain State lands required for the functions in its list of
powers. All other State lands will go to the Provinces subject to the rights of persons owning or
occupying such land. The Provincial Government will be responsible for the management of these lands
with priority in land settlement being given to the needy of local Districts. An independent Commission
of experts with equal representation from the Central Government and Provinces will be established to
develop and oversee land and water use policies.
Although this item has not been tested against public opinion it seems unlikely that it should diminish
support for the APRC proposals.
3
Since drafting this questionnaire the APRC have refined the amendment procedure as follows:
Amending the Constitution – Amendments to the Constitution will require the approval of two thirds of
the members of each House of Parliament sitting and voting separately. Amending certain specific
articles will also require approval by the people at a referendum.
It is not expected that this change would significantly alter the results of the public opinion poll as it has
almost the same effect in law
3
6. The Powers of Local Authorities – The Local Authorities will have powers to make by-laws in
respect of subjects listed separately in the Constitution.
7. Language Rights – The Tamil and Singhala languages will have parity of status as national and
official languages and as languages of the courts. English can also be used for official purposes
where it is expedient to do so. Singhala and Tamil shall be the medium of instruction at the
school level as well as English if facilities are available. Singhala, Tamil and English shall be
used at institutes of higher education.
8. Religious Rights – Buddhism shall have ‘pride of place’ with religious freedom for all citizens
being guaranteed.
9. Fundamental Rights – Individual and Group Rights will be recognized including the equality of
all citizens and the protection of all persons before the law.
10. Electoral System – The House of Representatives and Provincial Legislators will be elected on a
mixed system of first past the post and proportional representation.
11. The Judiciary – Will be independent of the Executive. The Court of Appeal will function with
Divisions in the Provinces along with the Provincial High Courts.
12. Public Service – There will be separate services for the Centre and the Provinces with certain
categories of officers classified as all island services. The Village, Divisional and District levels
of administration will all come under the Provinces. As far as is practical the Public Service will
reflect the composition of the population and it will be independent.
13. Safeguards against secession – The Constitution will provide for adequate safeguards against
attempts by any Province to succeed from the State.
14. Law and Order - There will be a Sri Lanka police officers service consisting of senior officers
from all ethnic groups. Policing will be devolved to the Provinces with certain powers retained
by the centre. National security will be the responsibility of the centre.
4
Sinhala response
The results for the Sinhala community are listed in Table 4 for 2010 and Table 5 for 2009 with a rank
ordering of those items they consider ‘essential or desirable’ in Tables 6 and 7.
The key percentages to look at in Tables 4 and 5 are the levels of ‘unacceptable’. First of all it should be
pointed out that these results are very good when compared to places like Northern Ireland and the
Middle East where levels of ‘unacceptable’ of 50 per cent plus had to or have yet to be negotiated.
Having said that of course Sri Lanka is not Northern Ireland or Israel and Palestine. The political context
in Sri Lanka is very different.
Table 4. Sinhala response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
Sinhala per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
25
19
19
22
23
13
47
64
60
21
37
24
43
39
42
40
33
40
37
36
35
25
31
34
39
36
33
32
14
16
18
14
13
18
8
5
7
15
14
21
10
10
3
3
4
5
5
9
3
2
1
7
2
4
3
2
8
11
12
6
15
15
5
2
8
3
5
4
9
8
11
15
13
8
10
2
1
2
15
6
11
7
7
20
38
22
7
4
10
Table 5. Sinhala response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
Sinhala per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
20
13
9
14
12
11
33
46
35
18
18
13
18
21
35
28
21
23
26
22
35
30
36
25
28
28
25
25
16
23
19
19
14
27
12
10
16
18
16
21
19
16
5
5
6
5
5
7
3
3
2
4
4
6
4
7
9
11
15
8
23
11
9
5
3
13
10
6
8
14
16
21
29
31
19
23
8
6
7
24
24
25
26
17
13
21
25
11
9
22
The most important finding to note here is that the level of ‘unacceptable’ has fallen significantly across
most of the APRC proposals from a high of 23% ‘unacceptable’ for the ‘The Powers of the President’ in
2009 to only 15% in 2010. Most significantly the levels of acceptability have risen, while, at the same
5
time the ‘Don’t Knows’ in 2010 are half of what they were in 2009. Perhaps the Sinhala who were
reluctant to express their views before the end of the war had, for the most part, positive views of the
APRC proposals but were only willing to express those views now that the war is over or, perhaps, post
war they have decided to be magnanimous towards their Tamil countrymen and women when they have
been faced with military defeat especially in the context of growing confidence that their country will
not be divided. Whatever the reason the trend is clear and can be seen across all the results for the
Sinhala community.
Table 6. Sinhala priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2010)
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Sinhala per cent ‘essential or desirable’
Fundamental Rights
Religious Rights
Language Rights
The Judiciary
Safeguards against secession
Law and Order
The Structure of the State
Amending the Constitution
The Powers of the President
Public Service
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
Electoral System
The Parliament
The Powers of Local Authorities
91
89
82
76
76
71
67
62
60
60
59
58
55
52
49
Table 7. Sinhala priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2009)
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Sinhala per cent ‘essential or desirable’
Religious Rights
Fundamental Rights
Language Rights
The Structure of the State
The Judiciary
Law and Order
Electoral System
Safeguards against secession
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
Public Service
The Powers of the President
Amending the Constitution
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
The Powers of Local Authorities
The Parliament
76
71
68
55
46
46
43
43
41
41
38
37
34
33
30
As to the benefits these are prioritised for the Sinhala in Tables 6 and 7. Interestingly the top three items
in 2009 were Religious, Fundamental and Language Rights at 76%, 71% and 68% ‘essential or
desirable’. In 2010 the order has changed a little with Fundamental Rights first at 91% (20% up on last
year) followed by Religious and Language Rights at 89% and 82% (up 13% and 14% respectively). As
one of the top priorities for the Tamil community remains ‘Language Rights’ this result continues to be
most encouraging for the prospects of long term peace.
6
Tamil response
The results for the Tamil community are listed in Tables 11 and 12 with a rank ordering of those items
they consider ‘essential or desirable’ in Tables 13 and 14.
Again the key percentages to look at in Table 11 and 12 are the levels of ‘unacceptable’ and again the
results are very good. However, unlike the results for the Sinhala there is little change between 2009 and
2010 with one notable exception. The one serious potential difficulty here is ‘Religious Rights’ at 28%
‘unacceptable’ in 2009 rising to 50% ‘unacceptable’ in 2010. But on the same issue 44% of Tamils
consider this feature of the APRC proposals to be ‘essential’ in 2009 falling to 22% in 2010. They are
clearly ‘split’ on this item. Why? And why is opposition to this constitutional provision so unusually
strong?
Perhaps the answer is to be found in the way the question was asked? In the summary proposals
‘Religious Rights’ was drafted as, ‘Buddhism shall have ‘pride of place’ with religious freedom for all
citizens being guaranteed.’ It seems very likely that those Tamils who considered this proposal to be
‘unacceptable’ were focusing on the suggestion that ‘Buddhism shall have ‘pride of place’ while those
who considered this proposal to be ‘essential’ were focused on ‘with religious freedom for all citizens
being guaranteed.’ The problem here seems to be a matter of education, understanding and or some sort
of good or bad previous experience in this regard. Clearly this item requires some explanation or
clarification to make sure there are no misunderstandings in the Tamil community and that their
religious freedom will be effectively guaranteed by a new Sri Lanka constitution. Unfortunately, with
the end of the war and the defeat of the Tamil insurgency in the North of the country more Tamils are
now concerned about the implications of this provision than they were before the end of the war.
Perhaps a certain amount of ‘triumphalism’ on the part of the Sinhala community or some sense of not
knowing their own position in a newly united Sri Lanka has aggravated this problem. The Government
may wish to consider what steps it can take to address this issue before it becomes a cause for
disaffection. Fortunately the end of a season of electoral politics and the formation of a new Parliament
will provide the people of Sri Lanka with a new opportunity for reconciliation.
With regards to the benefits of the APRC proposals the top items for the Tamils are ‘Language Rights’
at 85% ‘essential or desirable’, ‘Fundamental Rights’ at 76% and ‘The Judiciary’ at 73% in 2009 and
‘Fundamental Rights’ at 87%, ‘Language Rights’ at 86% and ‘The Judiciary’ at 84% in 2010 (Tables 13
and 14). Fortunately the Sinhala also welcome these reforms so there should be no political difficulty
with each community’s top priorities. In other conflicts around the world such a result is most unusual.
Top priorities generally require a degree of ‘horse trading’. It is perhaps a mark of the understanding of
each community’s needs by the other community that has produced this unusual but most welcome
result and/or the careful drafting of the All Party Representative Committee.
In 2009 it was not possible to undertake this research in the Northern Province. However in 2010 this
was now possible. Table 15 gives the results for the APRC proposals broken down for the Tamil
response in the Eastern Province and Northern Province separately and also for the rest of Sri Lanka
without these Provinces included - ‘Other Sri Lanka’.
There is little difference between these three samples with one exception. Again all three groups of
Tamils reject the ‘Religious Rights’ proposal at 52%, 49% and 49% ‘unacceptable’ in the Eastern,
Northern and ‘Other’ Provinces respectively. But Northern Tamils also reject the proposal for
‘Safeguards against secession’ at 28% ‘unacceptable’ although 38% believe it is ‘essential or desirable’,
15% ‘acceptable’, 5% ‘tolerable’ and 14% ‘don’t know’. So like the other Tamils in Sri Lanka this
group remain a minority which is reduced further to only 7% ‘unacceptable’ for Northern Tamils and
3% for all Sri Lanka Tamils providing the other provisions of the APRC proposals are implemented
together as a ‘package’.
7
Table 11. The Tamil response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
Tamil per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
37
44
46
41
51
37
75
22
66
34
57
38
28
41
29
29
27
25
19
34
11
11
21
22
27
39
24
32
17
13
14
19
14
17
11
7
10
26
7
17
18
14
5
4
2
2
3
4
2
8
1
5
2
1
7
5
7
4
4
5
5
2
1
50
1
3
1
15
5
5
5
8
8
8
6
1
2
2
10
7
6
9
4
42
24
17
5
3
8
Table 12. The Tamil response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
Tamil per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
33
31
37
39
37
34
72
44
69
31
49
38
33
55
19
22
24
26
29
21
13
10
7
21
24
28
17
17
16
21
17
15
12
15
8
6
11
15
12
17
17
11
11
15
13
7
6
15
2
6
4
12
7
8
16
7
15
4
1
2
6
6
1
28
2
7
1
3
7
2
7
7
8
11
9
9
4
6
7
13
6
7
11
8
41
27
14
6
2
11
8
Table 13. Tamil priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2010)
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Tamil per cent ‘essential or desirable’
Fundamental Rights
Language Rights
The Judiciary
Public Service
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
The Parliament
Law and Order
The Powers of Local Authorities
The Powers of the President
The Structure of the State
Amending the Constitution
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
Electoral System
Safeguards against secession
Religious Rights
87
86
84
77
73
73
73
71
70
66
66
66
56
52
33
Table 14. Tamil priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2009)
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Tamil per cent ‘essential or desirable’
Language Rights
Fundamental Rights
The Judiciary
Law and Order
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
The Powers of the President
Public Service
Amending the Constitution
The Parliament
The Powers of Local Authorities
Religious Rights
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
The Structure of the State
Electoral System
Safeguards against secession
9
85
76
73
72
68
66
66
65
61
55
54
53
52
52
50
Table 15. Northern, Eastern and ‘Other’ Sri Lanka Tamils in the rest of the country (March 2010)
Eastern Tamil
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
39
46
45
49
59
39
69
8
54
34
72
37
39
31
34
32
29
26
23
31
12
11
29
17
22
46
19
49
19
15
20
20
9
28
19
9
15
35
3
14
23
17
2
3
3
2
3
2
6
5
2
3
2
3
2
45
29
19
6
Northern Tamil
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
31
39
41
25
41
37
72
27
65
21
46
27
14
31
26
26
26
28
19
37
13
13
19
25
29
41
24
22
21
17
14
21
20
12
11
6
14
29
17
25
15
21
9
8
2
4
7
8
4
4
1
7
2
1
5
8
11
6
6
11
5
2
1
49
2
5
11
12
8
5
1
28
11
1
1
13
6
5
14
7
32
21
20
8
7
12
Other Sri Lanka Tamil
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
44
49
53
54
56
37
85
28
78
49
56
53
34
65
28
31
25
19
15
34
7
9
16
24
28
28
29
27
10
7
7
15
12
15
3
7
2
7
4
2
2
3
3
9
9
9
10
13
10
3
4
4
12
15
10
9
4
53
24
13
10
2
2
20
8
2
14
3
4
2
2
2
3
13
52
2
2
2
5
2
5
49
2
3
2
9
18
2
3
2
5
2
2
2
7
2
10
Up-Country Tamil response
Although the recent war has largely been viewed as a conflict arising from Tamil grievances the APRC
proposals have been drafted for the benefit of all the communities in Sri Lanka. Like other Tamils the
Up-Country Tamils share an increasing concern about the ‘Religious Rights’ provision rising to 60%
‘unacceptable’ in 2010 from 46% in 2009 (Tables 16 and 17). Their top priority remains ‘Language
Rights’ at 91% ‘essential or desirable’ in 2009 and 94% in 2010 (Tables 18 and 19). So like other
Tamils they will accept the reforms proposed by the APRC as a package (only 2% ‘unacceptable’ in
2010) providing their major concerns are dealt with.
Table 16. The Up-Country Tamil response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
Up-Country Tamil per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
42
45
30
42
47
32
88
19
74
23
62
41
51
66
27
22
25
22
26
28
6
6
17
32
21
22
20
18
18
17
13
15
11
20
5
6
4
12
9
22
11
7
2
4
8
8
5
6
2
1
8
2
6
2
1
60
2
3
3
5
2
10
11
16
11
5
11
1
2
1
22
3
11
8
5
50
26
14
2
2
6
6
2
7
2
4
5
2
Table 17. The Up-Country Tamil response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
Up-Country Tamil per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
44
38
37
58
34
49
79
42
79
35
52
37
63
67
23
23
16
21
13
20
12
4
8
17
20
23
10
12
12
17
15
2
8
11
2
2
4
14
7
18
6
8
2
1
5
3
24
3
1
0
2
12
6
6
4
1
11
8
13
4
11
1
2
46
0
5
3
1
6
3
9
13
13
13
10
17
5
6
7
17
13
15
12
10
71
15
4
0
0
9
11
Table 18. Up-Country Tamil priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2010)
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Up-Country Tamil per cent ‘essential or desirable’
Language Rights
Fundamental Rights
Law and Order
The Judiciary
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
The Powers of the President
Safeguards against secession
The Structure of the State
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
Amending the Constitution
Public Service
The Powers of Local Authorities
The Parliament
Electoral System
Religious Rights
94
91
84
83
76
73
71
69
67
64
63
60
55
55
25
Table 19. Up-Country Tamil priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2009)
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Up-Country Tamil per cent ‘essential or desirable’
Language Rights
Fundamental Rights
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
Amending the Constitution
Law and Order
Safeguards against secession
The Judiciary
The Powers of Local Authorities
The Structure of the State
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
Public Service
The Parliament
Electoral System
The Powers of the President
Religious Rights
12
91
87
86
79
79
73
72
69
67
61
60
53
52
47
46
Muslim response
Although the Muslim community were also split on ‘Religious Rights’ at 30% ‘essential’ and 17%
‘unacceptable’ in 2009 (Table 21) this concern, unlike their Tamil countrymen and women, seems to
have diminished at only 10% ‘unacceptable’ in 2010. Perhaps then it is not the ‘Religious Rights’ as
such that is the problem here but the special place Buddhism is given in the APRC proposals, the Tamil
defeat and a degree of associated Sinhala triumphalism?
But as Tamil speakers one of their top priorities is ‘Language Rights’ at 82% ‘essential or desirable’ in
2010 and 85% in 2009 (Tables 22 and 23). Clearly this problem needs to be addressed for the benefit of
all the minorities in Sri Lanka reviewed in this report.
Table 20. The Muslim response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
Muslim per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential Desirable Acceptable Tolerable Unacceptable
DK
45
48
33
38
37
28
67
47
53
32
47
39
35
46
37
29
27
28
22
44
15
19
29
32
31
34
31
37
8
11
19
21
19
17
10
13
8
19
13
13
14
8
2
5
12
4
2
4
5
9
8
6
4
7
5
2
5
5
6
3
13
5
1
10
7
1
5
6
4
4
2
4
7
5
3
2
3
2
5
5
4
10
5
40
32
16
4
2
7
Table 21. The Muslim response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
Muslim per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential Desirable Acceptable Tolerable Unacceptable
DK
29
25
22
28
28
25
49
30
47
28
33
34
24
35
39
36
42
43
30
33
36
32
35
36
42
40
37
38
17
17
17
13
16
20
8
9
10
16
10
9
11
11
3
10
4
4
4
8
2
9
2
9
4
7
11
4
4
2
5
3
11
2
1
17
3
3
1
1
4
3
7
10
10
9
11
13
4
3
4
9
9
9
13
10
27
45
13
4
0
10
13
Table 22. Muslim priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2010)
Muslim per cent ‘essential or desirable’
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Law and Order
The Structure of the State
Language Rights
Fundamental Rights
The Judiciary
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
Public Service
The Powers of Local Authorities
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
Amending the Constitution
Religious Rights
Safeguards against secession
Electoral System
The Parliament
The Powers of the President
83
82
82
82
78
77
73
72
72
66
66
66
64
60
59
Table 23. Muslim priorities for the APRC proposals (March 2009)
Muslim per cent ‘essential or desirable’
1st.
2nd.
3rd.
4th.
5th.
6th.
7th.
8th.
9th.
10th.
11th.
12th.
13th.
14th.
15th.
Language Rights
Fundamental Rights
The Judiciary
Public Service
Law and Order
All of the reform proposals taken together as a ‘package’
Amending the Constitution
The Structure of the State
The Parliament
Electoral System
Religious Rights
The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
Safeguards against secession
The Powers of the President
The Powers of Local Authorities
14
85
82
75
74
73
72
71
68
64
64
62
61
61
58
58
Support for reform
All these results are very good but if, for example, the people of Sri Lanka were asked to vote for them
in a referendum would the results be different? With this point in mind each person being interviewed
was asked if they would support this set of proposals as a simple ‘Yes’/ ‘No’ or ‘Don’t Know’ question
(Table 24).
Table 24. Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here?
Per cent (2010)
Sinhala
Tamil
Up Country Tamil
Muslim
Yes
83
84
86
80
No
9
7
12
13
DK
9
8
2
8
Per cent (2009)
Sinhala
Tamil
Up Country Tamil
Muslim
Yes
67
86
92
90
No
12
4
0
1
DK
21
10
8
9
For the Sinhala the results are significantly better up from 67% ‘Yes’ in 2009 to 83% ‘Yes’ in 2010 as
Sinhala ‘Don’t Knows’ move to the ‘Yes’ column. For the Tamils (86% to 84% ‘Yes’) and Up-Country
Tamils (92% to 86% ‘Yes’) the results are a little down in 2010 from 2009 but not significantly so. But
the Muslims have dropped ten points from 90% ‘Yes’ in 2009 to 80% ‘Yes’ in 2010 which brings them
more in line with other parties included in this poll. Nonetheless a stunning result over all with little or
no significant difference between Sinhala, Tamil, Up-Country Tamil and Muslim support for the APRC
proposals at an average of 83% ‘Yes’. Subject to some reservations over a couple of items a broad
consensus for constitutional reform has been achieved.
The question of leadership was also dealt with by asking, after all the other questions on the APRC
proposals had been asked, if the person being interviewed would change their view and switch from
‘No’ or ‘Don’t Know’ to ‘Yes’ if their leaders were for the proposals or if they would switch from ‘Yes’
to ‘No’ if they were against them. These results are given in Tables 25 to 32. The results are mixed with
no particular leader (President, Religious, Political) having any more significant effect on the outcome
than any other leader. However all these leaders do have the ability to influence support for the
proposals one way or another but as the ‘No’ and ‘Don’t Knows’ were so low for all the communities at
an average of only 17% the impact that they can have to raise support above the average of 83% is not a
great deal. They might be able to get above 90% but not much more than that. However, if all the leaders
worked together to undermine support for the APRC proposals their efforts would be felt. Together the
political elites of Sri Lanka could weaken the present consensus and reduce it to less than a simple
majority providing they worked together to this end. With little or no effort political reform is there for
the taking with the overwhelming support of the people or, with a concerted effort on the part of all the
political elites they could deny the people of Sri Lanka the prize they presently seek. The future of Sri
Lanka, as always, is in their hands.
15
Table 25. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
Sinhala per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
56
50
54
No
28
28
30
DK
16
22
16
62
16
22
Table 26. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
Sinhala per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
Yes
54
50
56
No
43
42
40
DK
3
8
4
44
50
6
Table 27. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
27
27
38
No
47
50
44
DK
27
24
18
35
32
32
Table 28. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
16
Yes
42
45
42
No
50
48
51
DK
9
8
8
37
54
9
Table 29. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
Up-Country Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
28
17
44
No
44
56
33
DK
28
28
22
28
39
33
Table 30. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
Up-Country Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
Yes
64
67
62
No
35
29
36
DK
2
4
3
60
38
2
Table 31. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
Muslim per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
37
44
44
No
44
30
33
DK
19
26
22
56
26
19
Table 32. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
Muslim per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
17
Yes
42
45
40
No
47
45
46
DK
11
10
14
48
38
14
Some further notes on Northern, Eastern and Tamils in the rest of Sri Lanka
Table 33 gives a breakdown of the support for the APRC proposals for the Tamils in the Northern and
Eastern Provinces and in the rest of Sri Lanka. They all support the proposals in a range from 77% ‘Yes’
in the North to 89% in the East and 90% in the rest of Sri Lanka. However when asked what impact their
respective leaderships might have on their decision the Tamils in the rest of Sri Lanka and East can be
significantly moved to change their opinions by as much as 67% from ‘Yes’ to ‘No’ with only 2%
‘Don’t Know’ in the East when their politicians are involved in the decision (Tables 35 and 37).
However the Tamils in the North are not quite so easily moved with 39% from ‘Yes’ to ‘No’ and 15%
‘Don’t Know’ when the views of their politicians are taken into account (Table 39). The lowest turn out
in recent elections was in the North suggesting the Tamils in that Province have little confidence in their
political parties at this time. Unlike the political elites who led the Tamils in the Eastern Province out of
a disastrous war to peace and political influence the Tamils in the North lost their leadership in a bloody
defeat and it may take them some years to find new leaders who they can trust. This observation is
further supported by the results from another questionnaire where support for the APRC proposals is
framed specifically in terms of being supported by the informant’s political party. In this case Eastern
Tamil support rises from 89% to 96%. However, when the same question is put to the Northern Tamils
support drops from 77% to 32% with a very significant 54% ‘Don’t Know’ which is very probably due
to the political parties in the North not yet being firmly established in the post war era (Table 40).
Critically, however, they do support the APRC proposals with only 7% rejecting the package as
‘unacceptable’ (Table 15), but any effort to manipulate their views in this regard may presently have
little effect or even be counterproductive.
Table 33. Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here?
Per cent
Eastern Tamil
Northern Tamil
Other SL Tamil
Yes
89
77
90
No
0
15
4
DK
11
8
6
Table 34. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:4
Other Sri Lanka Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
43
43
57
No
43
43
29
DK
14
14
14
43
43
14
Table 35. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
Other Sri Lanka Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
4
Yes
43
48
48
No
54
48
48
DK
3
5
5
41
54
5
As the number of persons saying ‘No’ or ‘Don’t Know’ was very low in this sample the results in this
table are not reliable.
18
Table 36. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:5
Eastern Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
71
71
71
No
14
71
DK
29
29
14
29
Table 37. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
Eastern Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
Yes
48
40
31
No
47
59
67
DK
5
2
2
26
71
3
Table 38. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:6
Northern Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
5
5
20
No
65
70
60
DK
30
25
20
20
40
40
Table 39. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
Northern Tamil per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
Yes
35
46
46
No
48
39
39
DK
17
15
15
43
40
17
Table 40. If the political party you are closest to supported a package of constitutional reforms for Sri
Lanka as outlined here, would you support it?
Per cent
Eastern Tamil
Northern Tamil
Other SL Tamil
5
Yes
96
32
84
No
0
14
13
DK
5
54
3
As the number of persons saying ‘No’ or ‘Don’t Know’ was very low in this sample the results in this
table are not reliable.
6
As the number of persons saying ‘No’ or ‘Don’t Know’ was very low in this sample the results in this
table are not reliable.
19
Political party response
As the SLFP is the President’s ruling party and has the largest number of seats in the Parliament it is to
be expected that their response to the APRC proposals (Table 41) most closely mirrors the response of
the Sinhala community in general (Table 4). This seems to be the case with significant percentages of
‘Don’t Knows’ in 2009 (Table 42) moving to the ‘essential’, ‘desirable’ and ‘acceptable’ columns in
2010 and the overall unacceptability of the package as a whole falling from 8% in 2009 to only 3% in
2010.
Table 41. The SLFP response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
SLFP
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
25
22
20
23
21
18
51
61
62
20
40
23
44
40
43
41
35
39
35
33
30
25
28
33
37
38
31
34
15
16
20
19
12
21
8
5
7
19
14
20
12
10
3
3
4
4
4
8
3
3
1
6
2
5
3
3
8
12
11
5
21
12
6
5
1
11
2
4
3
8
7
7
11
10
6
7
2
1
2
11
5
10
7
6
23
36
24
6
3
8
Table 42. The SLFP response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
SLFP per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
24
16
11
18
15
15
37
45
38
19
20
17
20
25
37
32
23
25
25
24
33
30
36
26
31
30
28
26
15
22
22
18
15
27
13
11
16
16
14
22
18
16
4
4
5
3
5
5
4
3
2
6
5
5
5
7
8
9
12
6
23
8
8
7
3
13
8
6
7
12
13
17
27
28
18
20
6
3
5
21
23
20
23
14
19
26
25
9
8
13
20
For the main opposition party, the UNP, there does not seem to be a great deal of difference between the
results for this question when asked in 2009 and 2010 with overall resistance to the package at only 3%
and 2% ‘unacceptable’ respectively (Tables 43 and 44). However, their enthusiasm seems to have waned
a little with those who consider the package to be ‘essential’ falling from 39% in 2009 to 29% in 2010.
They seem to have moved across to the ‘desirable’ column, which is now up from 29% in 2009 to 36%
in 2010. Similarly the JVP support for the APRC proposals has shown a decline from only 4%
‘unacceptable’ in 2009 going up to 9% ‘unacceptable’ in 2010 (Tables 45 and 46) and like the JVP and
UNP the SLMC support for these proposals is also a little down on last year from 0% ‘unacceptable’ in
2009 rising to 3% ‘unacceptable’ in 2010 (Tables 47 and 48) with significant shifts from the ‘essential’
column to the ‘desirable’ column for all three of these opposition parties.
Table 43. The UNP response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
UNP
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
35
32
27
32
41
20
60
49
61
30
45
26
42
43
33
32
32
29
29
36
30
22
27
31
32
42
29
33
16
17
11
16
11
21
4
5
7
18
13
15
14
11
1
5
7
6
2
8
2
3
1
4
1
3
5
3
8
6
10
5
11
7
4
18
1
5
2
3
2
4
7
9
13
13
6
9
1
2
4
12
7
11
8
7
29
36
19
6
2
8
Table 44. The UNP response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
UNP per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
29
23
24
34
28
27
53
43
59
29
40
31
38
43
29
26
24
26
28
22
29
20
20
25
24
26
19
24
18
22
18
16
13
21
9
7
12
21
17
23
13
12
7
12
10
7
10
13
2
5
3
11
5
7
10
7
7
4
11
7
13
4
2
20
0
5
4
1
5
4
10
13
13
10
7
13
5
5
5
8
10
12
15
10
39
29
16
6
3
6
21
Perhaps the explanation is quite simple. There has been a great deal of discussion about these proposals
since the end of the war particularly during the recent Presidential Election. Also the 2010 poll was
taken in March of this year between the Presidential and General Elections at a time when the party in
Government and their SLFP supporters felt confident about their future, including constitutional reform,
while the opposition parties, and their supporters, are not quite so willing to embrace change when they
are less certain about their political influence over the coming years. These results could change again
when the elections are all over but it seems very unlikely that they will change a great deal given their
stability from a time of war to a time of peace.
Table 45. The JVP response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
JVP
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
14
6
19
15
44
6
35
36
42
23
20
13
37
21
38
40
45
40
40
32
57
48
48
42
62
46
30
35
13
19
17
27
6
22
16
37
17
9
10
22
14
19
10
14
Tolerable
1
9
9
Unacceptable
35
27
17
13
10
32
DK
9
4
8
6
13
4
23
13
30
22
9
4
Table 46. The JVP response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
JVP per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
39
17
30
36
30
14
57
65
52
35
43
26
39
39
22
35
35
36
26
23
22
17
35
35
22
52
22
35
13
22
4
14
17
23
4
4
4
4
9
0
9
0
9
4
9
5
4
9
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
9
13
17
17
5
17
27
13
13
9
13
22
4
22
13
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
0
0
13
4
9
9
4
30
26
9
26
4
4
22
Table 47. The SLMC response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
SLMC
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
31
39
28
31
35
25
64
56
63
41
49
38
35
49
41
30
22
33
19
34
16
19
18
24
26
35
28
29
14
19
23
19
19
28
10
8
10
21
15
14
17
8
2
6
18
8
12
6
5
7
4
7
4
7
5
6
8
4
6
4
11
3
1
8
2
2
3
6
4
5
3
4
6
5
5
4
2
5
6
5
4
9
5
38
27
18
5
3
10
Table 48. The SLMC response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
SLMC per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
34
27
19
19
25
27
46
26
33
26
36
30
24
36
37
46
57
50
38
39
34
31
36
45
40
43
46
43
24
22
14
19
23
22
10
12
19
17
12
10
15
10
0
2
2
7
3
2
2
12
2
0
5
13
7
2
2
0
5
2
5
0
5
17
5
5
0
3
0
2
2
2
2
2
8
10
2
2
5
7
7
3
7
7
28
38
26
3
0
5
23
However, the results have changed considerably for the TNA up from only 3% ‘unacceptable’ in March
2009 to 11% ‘unacceptable’ in March 2010 (Tables 49 and 50). Similarly those opposed to ‘Safeguards
against secession’ has risen from only 5% in 2009 to 25% in 2010, but then it is also 28% for Tamils in
the Northern Province (Table 15). ‘Religious Rights’ are also up for the TNA supporters from 47%
‘unacceptable’ in 2009 to 66% in 2010 and 49% for Tamils in the Northern Province. Two factors may
explain these changes. Firstly that the sample now includes the Northern Province where most of the
TNA supports are to be found and secondly that the ‘Religious Rights’ issue, or rather the ‘pride of
place’ of Buddhism issue has strong political connotations for TNA supporters.
Table 49. The TNA response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
TNA
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
DK
45
52
41
39
53
49
77
14
63
32
66
50
26
33
23
24
30
29
24
26
9
7
20
21
19
29
22
28
14
10
13
13
7
9
13
6
12
24
6
13
14
15
3
3
3
3
4
6
13
6
5
8
6
4
2
66
2
3
3
5
8
8
6
6
40
17
16
9
7
8
3
3
9
7
1
25
10
3
13
5
6
3
8
11
8
Table 50. The TNA response to the APRC proposals (March 2009)
TNA per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential Desirable Acceptable Tolerable Unacceptable
DK
31
28
42
44
39
39
90
43
88
31
51
40
35
71
24
23
28
35
33
19
7
4
4
28
39
35
20
17
14
30
16
15
13
19
2
4
5
18
8
17
20
8
8
13
13
1
4
15
0
2
1
10
1
5
19
2
22
6
1
0
7
9
0
47
1
9
1
2
5
1
0
0
0
5
4
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
1
0
40
34
20
3
3
1
24
When asked the constitutional package question again in a simple ‘Yes/No’ format the pattern of
responses for the political parties remains much the same (Table 51). The SLFP come out with the
strongest support up from 68% ‘Yes’ in 2009 to 87% ‘Yes’ in 2010 followed by the UNP at 80% ‘Yes
(down from 85% in 2009), then the TNA at 78% (down from 90% in 2009), then the SLMC at 74%
(down from 88% in 2009) and finally the JVP at 69% ‘Yes’ in 2010 down from 83% in 2009. As before
these results are most likely a result of ongoing discourse on constitutional issues, the inclusion of the
Northern Province in the sample and government verses opposition electoral politics.
Table 51. Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here?
Per cent (2010)
SLFP
UNP
JVP
TNA
SLMC
Yes
87
80
69
78
74
No
6
11
27
17
14
DK
7
9
4
5
12
Per cent (2009)
SLFP
UNP
JVP
TNA
SLMC
Yes
68
85
83
90
88
No
10
3
4
2
5
DK
22
12
13
7
7
One more observation that was to be expected can be taken from this political party analysis. The SLFP
can be significantly moved to change their opinion in favour of the constitutional proposals by their
President, religious leaders and party (Table 52) while the UNP are more influenced by their party and
not so much by the President (Table 54). The same goes for the TNA (Table 58).
Table 52. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
SLFP per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
65
51
53
No
24
24
32
DK
11
25
15
65
17
18
Table 53. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
SLFP per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
25
Yes
50
49
56
No
47
44
41
DK
3
7
3
42
53
5
Table 54. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
UNP per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
15
22
40
No
50
51
36
DK
35
28
24
34
34
32
Table 55. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
UNP per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
Yes
52
48
49
No
45
43
42
DK
3
10
9
45
51
4
Table 56. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
JVP per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
46
92
No
100
54
8
46
8
DK
46
Table 57. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
JVP per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
26
Yes
50
24
9
No
50
61
92
DK
35
61
4
15
Table 58. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
TNA per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
28
No
81
91
62
DK
19
9
9
19
34
47
Table 59. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
TNA per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
Yes
43
31
33
No
52
64
62
DK
5
5
5
29
67
5
Table 60. If answer is ‘No’, ‘Don’t know’ or ‘No Response’ would you support a package of
constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
SLMC per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them?
Your religious leaders supported them?
The political party you are closest to supported them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to all supported them?
Yes
54
77
76
No
35
12
24
76
DK
12
12
24
Table 61. If answer is ‘Yes’ would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as
outlined here if:
SLMC per cent
President Mahinda Rajapaksa was against them?
Your religious leaders were against them?
The political party you are closest to was against them?
President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and
the political party you are closest to were all against them?
27
Yes
42
41
34
No
49
55
58
DK
8
4
8
38
51
11
A further note on the politics of ‘Religious Rights’
If it is the case that the problem with the ‘Religious Rights’ proposal is essentially political rather than
religious then it seems very likely that the reaction of Tamil speaking Christians and Sinhala speaking
Christians will be different if it is a political/ethnic problem but the same if it is a religious problem. An
analysis of these communities on this issue confirms support for the ‘political hypothesis’ with 39% of
Tamil speaking Christians considering these proposals to be ‘unacceptable’ and only 14% of Sinhala
speaking Christians sharing this view (Table 62). Additionally, the TNA ‘top’ this list at 66%
‘unacceptable’ suggesting it is a political issue for their supporters.
Table 62. Political, religious and ethnic response to the ‘Religious Rights’ provision in the APRC
proposals sorted in rank order by per cent ‘unacceptable’.
Religious Rights per cent
TNA
Up-Country Tamil7
Tamil8
Tamil Christian
UNP
Sinhala Christian
Muslim
SLMC
JVP
SLFP
Sinhala
7
Essential Desirable Acceptable Tolerable Unacceptable
14
19
22
43
49
46
47
56
36
61
64
7
6
11
3
22
25
19
19
48
25
25
6
6
7
10
5
4
13
8
9
5
5
7
6
8
4
3
11
9
7
3
2
66
60
50
39
18
14
10
8
8
5
2
DK
2
2
1
2
0
3
2
1
1
As the Up-Country Tamils were not directly involved in the Sri Lankan insurgency this result of 60%
‘unacceptable’ seemed to be too high. However, when those doing the interviews were asked about this
issue they pointed out that the survey work had been done in the largely Hindu Up-Country towns of
Hatton and Kotmale in the District of Nuwara Eliya where recent incidents had led to the raising of
religious tensions.
8
The Tamils represented here are a combination of Hindu and Christian Tamils. As the Christian Tamil
response to the ‘Religious Rights’ issue was 39% ‘unacceptable’ it necessarily follows that the Hindu
Tamil response to this question will be higher than the 50% recorded here.
28
Summary of results for the APRC proposals
Table 63 gives an island wide response to the APRC proposals. It was not possible to do this in March
2009, as access to the Northern Province was not possible before the end of the war. However, with the
benefit of a sample from all the Provinces in March 2010, including the Northern Province, it is now
possible to produce a weighted sample that is representative of Sri Lanka as a whole. At 25% ‘essential’,
34% ‘desirable’, 22% ‘acceptable’, 7% ‘tolerable’ and only 3% ‘unacceptable’ this is an excellent result
for the proposals taken together as a ‘package’ with only 8% ‘Don’t Know’. However, it should be
emphasised that when the same results are looked at from an ethnic perspective the special place for
Buddhism in the proposed constitution is presently a problem for Tamils at 50% ‘unacceptable’ (Table
11) and the future role of the President is a matter for concern for his SLFP supporters at 21%
‘unacceptable’ (Table 41).
Table 63. Sri Lanka response to the APRC proposals (March 2010)
Sri Lanka per cent
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Essential Desirable Acceptable Tolerable Unacceptable
DK
29
26
23
26
28
21
54
54
60
24
42
25
41
41
38
37
33
35
32
32
29
23
28
30
36
37
29
31
15
15
17
17
12
20
8
6
7
19
13
19
13
11
2
4
5
4
4
7
3
3
1
5
2
5
4
3
9
11
10
5
17
11
4
11
1
9
2
4
5
7
7
8
12
12
7
9
2
2
2
13
6
11
8
6
25
34
22
7
3
8
Similarly the result for Sri Lanka as a whole at 83% ‘Yes’, 9% ‘No’ and 8% ‘Don’t Know’ when asked
the more simple ‘Yes/No’ question regarding support for the constitutional package is very encouraging
(Table 64). The most important points to note here are that Sinhala and SLFP support has shifted from
the ‘Don’t Know’ column before the war to the ‘Yes’ column after the war and even the Northern
Tamils and TNA support the proposals at 77% and 78% ‘Yes’ respectively. However, when asked how
they felt about the proposals in the context of support from their political leaders the Northern Tamil
‘Yes’ dropped to only 32% with 14% ‘No’ and 54% ‘Don’t Know’ but when the Eastern Tamils were
asked the same question in the same context their ‘Yes’ rose from 89% to 96% (Table 40). Northern
Tamils, it would seem, need time to develop new political leaders who they can trust.
Table 64. Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here?
March
2010
Yes
No
DK
Sri
Lanka
83
9
8
March
2009
Yes
No
DK
Sri
Lanka
-
Sinhala
Tamil
83
9
9
84
7
8
Sinhala
Tamil
67
12
21
86
4
10
UC
Tamil
86
12
2
UC
Tamil
92
0
8
Muslim
80
13
8
Muslim
90
1
9
Eastern
Tamil
89
0
11
Northern
Tamil
77
15
8
Other
Tamil
90
4
6
Eastern
Tamil
-
Northern
Tamil
-
Other
Tamil
-
29
SLFP
UNP
JVP
TNA
SLMC
87
6
7
80
11
9
69
27
4
78
17
5
74
14
12
SLFP
UNP
JVP
TNA
SLMC
68
10
22
85
3
12
83
4
13
90
2
7
88
5
7
Problems
Before the end of the war in March 2009 all those being interviewed were asked to rate the importance
of 51 different problems collected from the different communities of Sri Lanka. However, in March
2010, after the war, it was no longer possible to ask questions about ‘The ongoing war’ or LTTE.
Similarly questions about the JVP and JHU in government could not be asked as the government had
been dissolved. So these items had to be cut from the questionnaire when it was repeated in March 2010
(Table 65).
Table 65. Problems asked in 2009 as being ‘Very significant’, ‘Significant’, ‘Of some significance’, ‘Of
little significance’ or ‘Of no significance at all’. Items struck through were not repeated in March 2010.
1. Unemployment
2. Lack of basic health care
3. The decline of the economy
4. Inflation
5. The ongoing war
6. Violence over the past 30 years
7. Escalating violence in the last 2 years
8. Fragmentation of the island into ‘cleared’ and ‘un-cleared’ areas
9. State aided colonization and change of demographics
10. Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
11. Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
12. The continued violence of the LTTE
13. It is not possible to kill the last Tiger
14. The LTTE can only be weakened by war
15. A defeated LTTE will give rise to new armed groups
16. Proliferation of armed paramilitary forces
17. The Police do not provide a police service for the public
18. The Police are predominately Sinhalese
19. The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
20. Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
21. Polarisation of civil society
22. Increasing number of IDPs
23. Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
24. Abuse of Human Rights by the LTTE
25. Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
26. Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
27. Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
28. Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
29. All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
30. Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
31. Failure to implement language rights
32. Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
33. Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
34. Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
35. Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
36. Politicisation of the public service
37. Disproportionate power exercised by JVP and JHU
38. Government leadership dependent on JVP and JHU
39. Corrupt politicians
40. Vested interests in ongoing conflict
41. Non-productive Peace Secretariat
42. Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
30
43. Politicians frequently changing party
44. Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
45. State control over media
46. The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
47. Failure to implement 13th Amendment
48. Failure to implement 17th Amendment
49. Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
50. The British Colonialism
51. Discrimination after independence
The full results for this question in 2009 and 2010 are given in the appendix in rank order of ‘Very
significant’ for the different ethnic groups in Sri Lanka, Eastern Tamils, Northern Tamils, Tamils in the
rest of Sri Lanka and the major political parties. However, to summarize, Table 66 lists the top 5
problems for the Sinhala in 2010 and Table 67 in 2009. The top 5 problems for the Tamils in 2010, are
given in Table 68 and in Table 69 for 2009.
Table 66. Top 5 problems for the Sinhala in 2010
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Sinhala per cent (2010)
Inflation
Corrupt politicians
Unemployment
The decline of the economy
Politicisation of the public service
Very Significant
68
64
62
54
53
Table 67. Top 5 problems for the Sinhala in 2009
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Sinhala per cent (2009)
Abuse of Human Rights by the LTTE
The continued violence of the LTTE
Vested interests in ongoing conflict
Violence over the past 30 years
It is not possible to kill the last Tiger
Very Significant
63
61
45
42
41
Lists of problems like these have been produced for many different conflicts around the world. Although
every list is different they all have one characteristic in common. If the items at the top of each
communities list is not addressed and the causes of the conflict remain in place then the conditions
required for long-term peace and stability will not be met. For example, in the Middle East the number
one priority for Israelis is security and for Palestinians it is a Palestinian state. If Israelis do not get
security and if Palestinians do not get a state there will not be peace in the Middle East.
Fortunately for the Sinhala of Sri Lanka their pre-war concerns have all been met. Their top 5 items in
March 2009 were ‘Abuse of Human Rights by the LTTE’ 1st at 63% ‘very significant’, followed by ‘The
continued violence of the LTTE’ 2nd at 61%, then ‘Vested interests in ongoing conflict’ 3rd at 45%,
‘Violence over the past 30 years’ 4th at 42% and ‘It is not possible to kill the last Tiger’ 5th at 41% ‘very
significant’. None of these questions could even be asked in March 2010 as, with the end of the war and
defeat of the LTTE none of them were relevant and in this context any attempt to ask these questions
was met with incredulity and the interview could not be completed. After the war in March 2010 the top
5 items for the Sinhala were ‘Inflation’ 1st at 68% ‘very significant’ followed by ‘Corrupt politicians’ 2nd
at 64% then ‘Unemployment’ 3rd at 62%, ‘The decline of the economy’ 4th at 54% and ‘Politicisation of
the public service’ 5th at 53% ‘very significant’. These are all problems of the economy and good
governance. If not dealt with the government may lose its popularity and electoral mandate but not much
more than that.
31
Table 68. Top 5 problems for the Tamils in 2010
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Tamil per cent (2010)
Unemployment
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Inflation
Violence over the past 30 years
Very Significant
66
62
61
60
59
Table 69. Top 5 problems for the Tamils in 2009
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Tamil per cent (2009)
Discrimination after independence
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Failure to implement language rights
Very Significant
66
63
62
60
60
In 2009 the top 5 problems for the Tamils were ‘Discrimination after independence’ 1st at 66% ‘very
significant’ followed by ‘Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their
problems’ 2nd at 63%, then ‘The failure of successive governments to find a political solution’ at 62%,
‘All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces’ 4th at 60% and ‘Failure to implement
language rights’ 5th also at 60% ‘very significant’. The government can take comfort from the fact that in
2010 this list has changed a little with ‘Unemployment’ now first on the Tamil list at 66% ‘very
significant’ and ‘Inflation’ 4th at 60%. So the government’s policy to stimulate the Sri Lankan economy
will go some way to resolving the problems of all Sri Lankans. However, the ‘Failure to provide Sri
Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems’ at 62% ‘very significant’ and ‘The
failure of successive governments to find a political solution’ at 61% remain the 2nd and 3rd priorities for
Tamils. Fortunately the government’s policies for constitutional reform as set out in the APRC proposals
are acceptable to the vast majority in all the communities of Sri Lanka. If the government were to bring
such reforms into law by the end of the year then it seems very likely that the constitutional problem
could be resolved and thus provide a political context within which the economic needs of the country
can be effectively addressed.
However policy makers should also be aware that there are some regional differences in Tamil priorities
and concerns. For the Tamils living in the Northern Province the top priorities remain issues of
constitutional and political reform both 1st and 2nd at 71% and 69% ‘very significant’ and
‘Unemployment’ 3rd at 64% (Table 70). However, in the East the passing of the war has given way to
slightly different priorities. For them ‘Violence over the past 30 years’ came 1st at 80% ‘very significant’
followed by ‘All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces’ 2nd also at 80%, then ‘Abuse
of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces’ 3rd at 74%, ‘The Armed
forces are predominately Sinhalese’ 4th and ‘Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment’ 5th
both at 70% ‘very significant’ (Table 71). As for the Tamils in the rest of the country their priorities are
not so very different to everyone else with an emphasis on issues of the economy and good governance
(Table 72).
Table 70. Top 5 problems for the Northern Tamils in 2010
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Northern Tamil per cent (2010)
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Unemployment
Violence over the past 30 years
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
32
Very Significant
71
69
64
64
64
Table 71. Top 5 problems for Eastern Tamils in 2010
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Eastern Tamil per cent (2010)
Violence over the past 30 years
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Very Significant
80
80
74
70
70
Table 72. Top 5 problems for other Tamils in the rest of Sri Lanka in 2010
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Other Sri Lanka Tamil per cent (2010)
Inflation
Unemployment
Corrupt politicians
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
The decline of the economy
Very Significant
79
72
69
68
68
Similarly the needs of the Muslim and Up-Country Tamils are a little different, as well as the priorities
of those who support the major political parties (SLFP, UNP, JVP, TNA and SLMC) but as would be
expected party priorities tend to follow ethnic and regional concerns (see appendix for full results).
If there is no Reform
One of the most welcome results from the pre-war and post-war analysis of the APRC proposals was the
fact that Sinhala support for these proposals rose from 67% ‘Yes’ in March 2009 to 83% ‘Yes’ in March
2010 (Table 64). This was achieved by significant numbers of ‘Don’t Knows’ moving to the ‘Yes’
column in post-war Sri Lanka. Similarly when asked what they ‘think will happen if there is no reform
of the constitution to deal with the problems of the past’ the Sinhala who said they ‘Don’t Know’ in
2009 have now clearly expressed their view that there will be a political, economic and social cost to pay
(Table 73 and 74). In 2009 8% of Sinhala considered it ‘very probable’ that ‘The LTTE or new militant
groups will start terrorist actions again’ rising to 15% in 2010 (18% ‘probable’ and 34% ‘possible’) with
‘Don’t Knows’ falling from 25% in 2009 to only 6% in 2010.
Table 73. Sinhala concerns if there is no reform in 2010.
Sinhala per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
16
19
30
21
7
7
19
18
24
25
9
6
10
15
37
18
11
10
15
18
34
16
11
6
16
17
34
16
10
8
33
Table 74. Sinhala concerns if there is no reform in 2009.
Sinhala per cent (2009)
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
7
18
19
25
13
18
7
18
22
23
15
15
7
20
23
16
9
25
8
21
21
14
11
25
11
16
19
18
13
24
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make peace
will be lost for a generation
Following the same pattern of support for the APRC proposals there is little difference between the 2009
and 2010 results for this question for the Tamils at 41% ‘very probable’ in both 2009 and 2010 but a
slight drop in concern (and support for the APRC proposals – Table 64) for Muslims at 44% ‘very
probable’ in 2009 and 31% in 2010. Clearly there is a relationship between a persons support for the
APRC proposals and their concern for the future of Sri Lanka although this concern is felt more strongly
amongst Tamils than Sinhala (Table 75).
Table 75. Concerns if there is no reform in 2010 as per cent ‘Very probable’.
Per cent ‘Very
probable’ (2010)
The international
community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan
economy will not
develop
India will continue
to be involved in
the affairs of Sri
Lanka
The LTTE or new
militant groups will
start terrorist
actions again
The present
opportunity to
make peace/lasting
solution will be
lost for a
generation
Sinhala
Tamil
North
Tamil
East
Tamil
Other
Tamil
UC
Tamil
Muslim
SLFP
16
44
36
50
48
37
26
16
27
9
45
19
19
51
40
67
50
49
27
19
30
19
64
23
10
39
27
38
53
24
31
10
23
23
42
33
15
41
37
59
32
47
31
16
24
19
53
33
16
54
53
62
48
51
30
16
26
14
65
24
34
UNP JVP TNA SLMC
Those for or against the APRC proposals in Sri Lanka
The results of this poll suggest that approximately 10% of the population of Sri Lanka are opposed to the
APRC proposals and that this 10% are a feature of both the Sinhala and Tamil communities, but clearly
not for the same reasons. So who are these 10% and what are their characteristics? In an effort to answer
this question a battery of demographic questions were asked at the end of the questionnaire not only to
ensure a good sample but also to explore the attitudes of those who supported or who did not support
constitutional reform. Table 76 lists these questions and demographic variables along with their
correlation coefficients for all those who said ‘No’ to the APRC proposals. These are quite easy to
interpret. If the coefficient is positive (+) then the variable in question is a characteristic of those who
said ‘No’. However if the coefficient is negative (-) then the variable is a characteristic of those who said
‘Yes’. Finally if the coefficient has one asterisk* then it is ‘significant’ and if it has two asterisks** it is
‘very significant’. (Copies of the questions used can be found in the appendix)
Variable
Gender (male)
Age
Type of area (urban)
Income
Education
Central
North Central
Northern
Eastern
North Western
Sabaragamuwa
Southern
Uva
Western
SLFP
UNF
JVP
TNA
SLMC
Importance of religion
Importance of own ethnic group
Importance of being Sri Lankan
Contact with other ethnic group
Democratic value
Victim of conflict
Sinhala ‘No’ (N=882)9
0.041
0.044
0.011
-0.071*
-0.012
0.043
-0.077*
-0.029
0.053
-0.063
0.002
-0.031
0.055
0.019
-0.111**
0.04
0.116**
-0.072*
-0.111**
-0.096**
-0.015
-0.125**
0.084*
Tamil ‘No’ (N=477)
0.039
0.024
-0.094*
0.042
0.108*
-0.107*
-0.03
0.252**
-0.122**
-0.015
0.029
-0.033
-0.072
-0.05
-0.078
-0.015
0.147**
-0.021
-0.168**
0.002
-0.259**
-0.244**
-0.066
0.089
There is a slight but insignificant positive correlation with gender suggesting males are a little more
likely to say ‘No’ to the APRC proposals than females. This is to be expected, as males tend to be
slightly more involved in conflicts and confrontation then females but not significantly so. Age does not
seem to be an important factor but there is a significant negative correlation for being urban and being a
Tamil who might say ‘No’ to the APRC proposals. So Tamils who might say ‘No’ tend to be rural. They
also tend to be from the Northern region, are better educated and are associated with the TNA. No
surprise there except perhaps for education. But the Tamils who are most likely to say ‘Yes’ to the
APRC proposals and who are most definitely NOT in the ‘No camp’ are the Tamils in the East. As
indicated in the ‘Problems’ section of this report there are significant differences between the Tamils of
the North and the Tamils of the East (Tables 70 and 71).
9
Comparisons of the value of the correlation coefficients can only be made within each group (Sinhala
or Tamil) but not between each group as the number in each group (N) is not the same.
35
From the available data the Sinhala who are most likely to say ‘No’ tend to be associated with the JVP
while those who would be most strongly ‘Yes’ live in the North Central region, might be a little poorer
and vote for the President’s party the SLFP. Significantly the importance of religion does NOT correlate
with saying ‘No’ for either the Sinhala or Tamils. Religious ‘radicalisation’ does play a role in other
conflicts around the world but this does not seem to be a feature of the conflict here according to this
data. However, the politics of religion may be a different matter as noted earlier in this report (see Table
62). Being Sinhala correlates with saying ‘Yes’ to the APRC proposals as does being Sri Lankan for
both Sinhala and Tamils. A lack of contact between Tamils and Sinhala may be a problem in Sri Lanka
as Tamils who do not have such contact are more likely to say ‘No’ to the APRC proposals. For Sinhala
democratic values correlates with saying ‘Yes’ but being a victim of the conflict, for them, also
correlates with saying ‘No’.
Those who know and understand Sri Lanka society better than this author will no doubt be able to add
more meaning and appreciation to the numbers briefly reviewed here. The important point to be made,
however, is that now that the whole of Sri Lanka is open to the kind of social research undertaken in this
poll such research will be able to make a positive contribution to peace making, peace building and
reconciliation in the future.
36
Opposition to progressive reform outside Sri Lanka
The years of careful negotiation by the members of the APRC, including informal discussions with
parties outside the APRC process, has led to the formulation of a set of proposals that are equally
acceptable to all the communities in Sri Lanka. This program of research has now been able to explore
and describe that support (or lack of support where applicable) in much detail pointing out the problems
where they exist.
Throughout the years of similar negotiations in Northern Ireland there was a considerable lack of
understanding of what was really going on in Northern Ireland in the USA. There many Americans of
Irish descent continued to support the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and their aspiration for a united
Ireland with little knowledge or appreciation of the power sharing arrangements being negotiated under
the terms of the Belfast Agreement. Similarly, it seems to be the case that the Tamil diaspora are not
fully aware of the efforts of the APRC to find a constitutional solution to their country’s problems. In
contrast to the detailed APRC proposals tried and tested here (Table 3) the members of the Tamil
community around the world were recently provided with the following statement in what they called a
Tamil Referendum:
‘I aspire to the formation of the independent and sovereign state of Tamil Eelam in the contiguous north
and east territory of the island of Sri Lanka on the basis that the Tamil speaking people in the island of
Sri Lanka make a distinct nation, have a traditional homeland and have the right to self determination.’
They were then asked to ‘Mark a cross (X) in the appropriate box’ which provided for only a ‘Yes’ or a
‘No’ response. These polls or referenda were held in Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany,
Italy, Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland for a total turnout of 207,058 votes cast out of a possible
323,500 to produce a combined result of 99.68% for the Tamil Eelam proposition and only 0.32%
against (Table 77).
Table 77. Results of the Tamil Referendum in April 2010
Country
Australia
Canada
Denmark
France
Germany
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Switzerland
UK
Total
Total Polled
8,154
48,583
4,147
31,148
23,089
3,680
2,750
5,633
16,441
64,692
207,058
‘Yes’ per cent
99.38
99.82
99.49
99.86
99.41
98.79
99.67
99.11
99.80
99.71
99.68
‘No’ per cent
0.62
0.18
0.51
0.14
0.59
1.21
0.33
0.89
0.20
0.29
0.32
It was very important that the Belfast Agreement was put to the people of both Northern Ireland and the
Republic of Ireland (the South of Ireland) in a referendum to give the peace agreement political
legitimacy. In that referendum held on May 22nd 1998, 71% of the people of Northern Ireland voted
‘Yes’ and in a public opinion poll conducted on behalf of the parties in the negotiations, just 2 weeks
before the agreement was signed by the British and Irish governments on Good Friday 1998, 77% said
they would support the agreement. The opposition of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), who were
able to get their members to vote against it, can explain the drop of 6% between the results of the poll
and the referendum. So the poll was very accurate.
The results for the test of the APRC proposals in Sri Lanka are certainly as good as if not better than the
results for the Belfast Agreement poll, and in Northern Ireland the people there were able to make peace
37
on the strength of those results. Hopefully, now that the elections are over in Sri Lanka the new
government will take steps to bring the APRC proposals into constitutional law. With effective
implementation all the people of Sri Lanka can reasonably expect to share in all the benefits that will
inevitably flow from the peace and stability that these reforms can bring. Referendums that only offer
the options of independence for Tamil Elam or the status quo can’t achieve this. Neither of these two
options is what is wanted in Sri Lanka now. The people there are prepared to move on. However, it
remains an open question as to whether or not the political leadership in Sri Lanka will take this
opportunity to resolve the ‘national question’ once and for all. As far as the people are concerned this
door is open. Given the unprecedented electoral mandate handed to the President and his government by
the people they are now in an exceptionally strong position to lead them through.
38
Appendix
Questionnaire and additional results for questions 1 and 2 not given above
Political Reform in Sri Lanka
Good morning/afternoon/evening my name is _____ from _____ At this critical time we are conducting
a survey of public opinion to find out what the people of Sri Lanka believe needs to be done to bring
lasting peace and stability to the island.
The Research is being carried out by the staff of Social Indicator in Colombo.
The Survey involves interviewing two thousand people from all parts of Sri Lanka to complete a
representative sample in terms of age, gender, social class, political and ethnic affiliation and
geographical area.
Topics covered include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
The range of problems faced by the people
What you think will happen if reforms are not put in place
The major elements of possible reforms for achieving lasting peace and stability
Your views on some of these reforms
Your views about yourself
And finally some questions that tell us where you fit into our sample
All your answers will be kept completely confidential.
39
1. The Problems
People from different communities often hold very different views about the current problems faced by
them. Here is a list of some of the problems given to our research team from the different regions of Sri
Lanka. Which problems do you consider to be ‘Very significant’, ‘Significant’, ‘Of some significance’,
‘Of little significance’ or ‘Of no significance at all’.
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
10
Sinhala per cent (2010)
Inflation
Corrupt politicians
Unemployment
The decline of the economy
Politicisation of the public service
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Lack of basic health care
Violence over the past 30 years
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Politicians frequently changing party
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Increasing number of IDPs
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
State control over media
Polarisation of civil society 10
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
The British Colonialism
Failure to implement language rights
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Discrimination after independence
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Divisions among civic organisations, political groups and media
40
Very Significant
68
64
62
54
53
52
50
44
42
42
41
38
37
36
32
32
28
27
27
26
25
23
20
19
19
17
15
15
14
13
13
13
13
13
12
10
9
8
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
39th
40th
41st
42nd
43rd
44th
45th
46th
47th
48th
49th
Sinhala per cent (2009)
Abuse of Human Rights by the LTTE
The continued violence of the LTTE
Vested interests in ongoing conflict
Violence over the past 30 years
It is not possible to kill the last Tiger
The ongoing war
The LTTE can only be weakened by war
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Corrupt politicians
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
The decline of the economy
The British Colonialism
Polarisation of civil society
Failure to implement language rights
Non-productive Peace Secretariat
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Inflation
Unemployment
State aided colonization and change of demographics
A defeated LTTE will give rise to new armed groups
Proliferation of armed paramilitary forces
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Politicisation of the public service
Discrimination after independence
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Lack of basic health care
The Police do not provide service for the public
Politicians frequently changing party
State control over media
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Increasing number of IDPs
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Government leadership dependent on JVP and JHU
Disproportionate power exercised by JVP and JHU
41
Very Significant
63
61
45
42
41
37
32
32
31
25
25
20
20
19
19
18
18
18
18
17
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
12
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
9
8
8
8
7
6
6
3
2
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
Tamil per cent (2010)
Unemployment
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Inflation
Violence over the past 30 years
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Failure to implement language rights
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Corrupt politicians
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
State control over media
Increasing number of IDPs
The decline of the economy
Discrimination after independence
Politicisation of the public service
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Polarisation of civil society
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Lack of basic health care
Politicians frequently changing party
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
The British Colonialism
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
42
Very Significant
66
62
61
60
59
58
58
58
56
55
55
55
55
54
53
52
51
51
50
50
49
47
44
42
41
41
40
36
35
35
34
33
30
26
24
22
21
14
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
39th
40th
41st
42nd
43rd
44th
45th
46th
47th
48th
49th
Tamil per cent (2009)
Discrimination after independence
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Failure to implement language rights
The ongoing war
Violence over the past 30 years
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
State control over media
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
State aided colonization and change of demographics
A defeated LTTE will give rise to new armed groups
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Proliferation of armed paramilitary forces
Non-productive Peace Secretariat
Increasing number of IDPs
Politicisation of the public service
Unemployment
Vested interests in ongoing conflict
It is not possible to kill the last Tiger
The Police do not provide service for the public
The continued violence of the LTTE
The British Colonialism
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Inflation
Government leadership dependent on JVP and JHU
The decline of the economy
Disproportionate power exercised by JVP and JHU
Corrupt politicians
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Politicians frequently changing party
Polarisation of civil society
Abuse of Human Rights by the LTTE
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
The LTTE can only be weakened by war
Lack of basic health care
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
43
Very Significant
66
63
62
60
60
59
54
53
53
52
51
50
50
49
46
46
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
38
37
37
36
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
28
28
25
25
24
22
22
21
20
20
20
17
14
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
Up-Country Tamil per cent (2010)
Inflation
Failure to implement language rights
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Corrupt politicians
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Unemployment
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The decline of the economy
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Lack of basic health care
Discrimination after independence
Violence over the past 30 years
State control over media
Politicisation of the public service
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Politicians frequently changing party
Polarisation of civil society
Increasing number of IDPs
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
The British Colonialism
44
Very Significant
78
77
75
71
67
67
66
65
63
63
63
59
59
58
58
57
57
54
52
51
50
50
50
47
47
40
40
35
33
33
28
27
27
25
21
19
15
12
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
39th
40th
41st
42nd
43rd
44th
45th
46th
47th
48th
49th
Up-Country Tamil per cent (2009)
Violence over the past 30 years
The ongoing war
State control over media
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Failure to implement language rights
Disproportionate power exercised by JVP and JHU
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
A defeated LTTE will give rise to new armed groups
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Discrimination after independence
Government leadership dependent on JVP and JHU
Proliferation of armed paramilitary forces
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Corrupt politicians
The continued violence of the LTTE
The Police do not provide service for the public
Vested interests in ongoing conflict
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Abuse of Human Rights by the LTTE
Inflation
The decline of the economy
It is not possible to kill the last Tiger
Polarisation of civil society
Politicisation of the public service
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Politicians frequently changing party
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
The LTTE can only be weakened by war
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Increasing number of IDPs
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The British Colonialism
Unemployment
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Non-productive Peace Secretariat
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Lack of basic health care
45
Very Significant
80
79
73
72
71
65
64
62
62
62
61
60
59
59
58
56
52
50
47
47
47
42
41
40
39
38
38
37
35
31
31
31
31
31
30
30
26
22
22
22
21
19
19
16
16
13
13
10
5
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
Muslim per cent (2010)
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Unemployment
Violence over the past 30 years
Inflation
The decline of the economy
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Corrupt politicians
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
State control over media
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Politicisation of the public service
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Lack of basic health care
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Failure to implement language rights
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Polarisation of civil society
Increasing number of IDPs
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Discrimination after independence
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Politicians frequently changing party
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
The British Colonialism
46
Very Significant
53
50
50
48
45
44
43
43
42
42
41
41
41
40
40
38
37
37
37
36
35
34
34
34
33
32
29
27
26
25
24
24
23
23
22
22
19
12
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
39th
40th
41st
42nd
43rd
44th
45th
46th
47th
48th
49th
Muslim per cent (2009)
The continued violence of the LTTE
Abuse of Human Rights by the LTTE
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
It is not possible to kill the last Tiger
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Violence over the past 30 years
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
The ongoing war
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Proliferation of armed paramilitary forces
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to implement language rights
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
A defeated LTTE will give rise to new armed groups
The Police do not provide service for the public
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Politicisation of the public service
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Vested interests in ongoing conflict
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Discrimination after independence
The LTTE can only be weakened by war
Government leadership dependent on JVP and JHU
Disproportionate power exercised by JVP and JHU
Corrupt politicians
State control over media
Unemployment
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Non-productive Peace Secretariat
Inflation
The decline of the economy
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Increasing number of IDPs
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Politicians frequently changing party
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Polarisation of civil society
The British Colonialism
Lack of basic health care
47
Very Significant
57
55
54
53
52
51
51
50
49
48
48
46
45
44
44
43
43
42
40
40
40
39
37
37
37
37
37
35
34
33
33
33
32
31
31
31
28
27
25
25
23
23
22
20
19
17
17
17
9
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
Other Sri Lanka Tamil per cent (2010)
Inflation
Unemployment
Corrupt politicians
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
The decline of the economy
Failure to implement language rights
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Lack of basic health care
Politicisation of the public service
State control over media
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Increasing number of IDPs
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Politicians frequently changing party
Polarisation of civil society
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Violence over the past 30 years
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Discrimination after independence
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
The British Colonialism
48
Very Significant
79
72
69
68
68
66
63
62
59
57
57
52
48
48
47
47
46
46
44
44
43
43
43
43
41
41
37
37
37
36
25
24
24
23
23
22
14
11
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
Eastern Tamil per cent (2010)
Violence over the past 30 years
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Unemployment
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Increasing number of IDPs
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Inflation
Discrimination after independence
Corrupt politicians
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Politicians frequently changing party
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
State control over media
Polarisation of civil society
Failure to implement language rights
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
The decline of the economy
Politicisation of the public service
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Lack of basic health care
The British Colonialism
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
49
Very Significant
80
80
74
70
70
67
66
63
62
60
60
58
56
55
55
51
51
50
46
46
45
44
43
40
40
40
39
38
35
34
31
28
26
25
25
21
19
16
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
Northern Tamil per cent (2010)
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Unemployment
Violence over the past 30 years
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Failure to implement language rights
Discrimination after independence
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
State control over media
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Politicisation of the public service
Inflation
Polarisation of civil society
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Increasing number of IDPs
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Corrupt politicians
The decline of the economy
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Lack of basic health care
Politicians frequently changing party
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The British Colonialism
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
50
Very Significant
71
69
64
64
64
63
62
59
56
56
55
52
51
51
51
49
48
48
48
48
47
45
44
42
42
39
36
34
34
30
30
29
28
28
20
16
15
7
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
SLFP per cent (2010)
Inflation
Corrupt politicians
Unemployment
The decline of the economy
Politicisation of the public service
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Violence over the past 30 years
Lack of basic health care
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Politicians frequently changing party
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Increasing number of IDPs
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
The British Colonialism
Polarisation of civil society
State control over media
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to implement language rights
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Discrimination after independence
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
51
Very Significant
66
61
59
54
51
49
47
46
44
42
41
37
36
34
33
32
30
28
27
26
25
23
22
21
20
18
18
17
17
16
16
16
15
15
14
14
11
10
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
UNP per cent (2010)
Inflation
Corrupt politicians
Unemployment
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Politicisation of the public service
The decline of the economy
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
State control over media
Lack of basic health care
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Politicians frequently changing party
Violence over the past 30 years
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Polarisation of civil society
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Failure to implement language rights
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Increasing number of IDPs
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Discrimination after independence
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
The British Colonialism
52
Very Significant
70
66
63
61
55
54
54
51
51
48
47
44
43
40
38
38
35
33
32
31
30
29
28
28
28
28
27
26
22
21
21
20
20
18
16
15
15
14
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
JVP per cent (2010)
Unemployment
Inflation
Politicisation of the public service
Corrupt politicians
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
The decline of the economy
Lack of basic health care
Politicians frequently changing party
State control over media
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Violence over the past 30 years
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Failure to implement language rights
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Increasing number of IDPs
Polarisation of civil society
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
The British Colonialism
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Discrimination after independence
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
State aided colonization and change of demographics
53
Very Significant
80
64
59
58
58
47
46
40
40
38
37
37
35
33
32
28
28
27
26
25
25
25
20
19
17
17
16
16
16
16
14
13
12
12
10
7
6
4
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
TNA per cent (2010)
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Violence over the past 30 years
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
Discrimination after independence
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to implement language rights
Corrupt politicians
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Unemployment
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
State aided colonization and change of demographics
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
Politicisation of the public service
State control over media
Polarisation of civil society
Increasing number of IDPs
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Politicians frequently changing party
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
Inflation
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
The decline of the economy
The British Colonialism
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Lack of basic health care
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
54
Very Significant
82
77
77
77
77
76
75
74
72
70
69
67
66
63
61
61
60
60
59
58
57
55
54
46
46
44
43
42
39
35
34
33
33
32
29
24
20
15
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
32nd
33rd
34th
35th
36th
37th
38th
SLMC per cent (2010)
Failure to provide Muslims with a constitutional solution to their problems
Failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice
Failure to provide Sri Lankan Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
Lack of free and fair elections including manipulation
Violence over the past 30 years
Failure to implement language rights
Corrupt politicians
Abuse of Human Rights by Paramilitary groups associated with government forces
State control over media
Unemployment
Increasing number of IDPs
Inflation
State aided colonization and change of demographics
The Police do not provide a police service/adequate service for the public
Heightened ethnic polarisation in politics and life
Abuse of Human Rights by the Armed forces
Abuse of Human Rights by the Police
All Tamils being treated like terrorists by the security forces
Dominance of Sinhalese in public sector employment
The decline of the economy
The Police are predominately Sinhalese
Lack of basic health care
Failure to protect historic Hindu sites
The Armed forces are predominately Sinhalese
Failure to provide Upcountry Tamils with a constitutional solution to their problems
The failure of successive governments to find a political solution
Failure to implement 13th Amendment
Failure to protect historic Buddhist sites in the North and East
Politicisation of the public service
Polarisation of civil society
Increasing number of refugees leaving Sri Lanka
Failure to implement 17th Amendment
Upcountry Tamils do not own their own homes
Discrimination after independence
Public Institutions corrupted for political purposes
Politicians frequently changing party
Devolution of power to North and East will lead to the break up of Sri Lanka
The British Colonialism
55
Very Significant
56
53
53
53
51
50
50
48
47
46
46
45
45
45
44
43
43
42
40
39
38
37
36
36
36
36
36
35
35
34
31
28
26
26
23
23
19
12
2. If there is no Reform
Q2.From the different possibilities listed below what do you think will happen if there is no reform of
the constitution to deal with the problems of the past. Please indicate which ones you consider to be
‘Very probable’, ‘Probable’, ‘Possible’, ‘Improbable’ or ‘Very improbable’.
Sinhala per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Sinhala per cent (2009)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make peace
will be lost for a generation
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
16
19
30
21
7
7
19
18
24
25
9
6
10
15
37
18
11
10
15
18
34
16
11
6
16
17
34
16
10
8
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
7
18
19
25
13
18
7
18
22
23
15
15
7
20
23
16
9
25
8
21
21
14
11
25
11
16
19
18
13
24
56
Tamil per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Tamil per cent (2009)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make peace
will be lost for a generation
Up-Country Tamil per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Up-Country Tamil per cent (2009)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make peace
will be lost for a generation
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
44
27
14
5
3
6
51
26
13
4
2
4
39
28
18
4
4
6
41
19
21
5
6
9
54
22
12
4
4
4
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
44
26
19
3
3
4
55
21
17
3
1
3
34
28
24
8
1
4
41
22
19
3
1
14
52
22
14
2
1
8
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
37
29
16
4
7
7
49
26
13
4
4
5
24
35
19
6
7
9
47
14
17
6
9
7
51
25
9
3
4
7
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
35
21
18
12
10
5
63
10
9
10
4
4
51
18
13
7
4
6
58
15
4
7
6
9
67
12
6
4
6
5
57
Muslim per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Muslim per cent (2009)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make peace
will be lost for a generation
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
26
39
18
9
4
5
27
23
31
11
5
4
31
27
15
12
10
7
31
24
21
10
7
7
30
32
20
6
4
8
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
45
32
11
4
0
7
49
31
10
5
1
4
24
38
23
4
1
11
44
27
13
1
2
13
36
38
12
3
1
10
58
Other Sri Lanka Tamil per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Eastern Tamil per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Northern Tamil per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
48
25
8
7
5
8
50
24
13
6
4
2
53
21
12
5
7
3
32
20
19
9
15
6
48
22
10
4
10
6
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
50
33
7
2
2
6
67
23
3
2
1
4
38
37
16
4
2
4
59
19
14
2
1
6
62
31
5
2
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
36
25
27
5
2
5
40
30
20
4
1
6
27
28
27
5
4
10
37
18
27
3
2
14
53
15
19
6
2
5
59
1
SLFP per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
UNP per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
JVP per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
16
16
31
23
7
7
19
17
25
26
9
5
10
15
37
18
11
8
16
18
32
16
12
6
16
18
32
17
11
6
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
27
30
21
12
3
7
30
24
18
17
5
7
23
25
21
13
9
9
24
21
27
12
10
6
26
26
26
7
7
9
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
9
43
26
17
4
19
30
23
23
4
23
19
45
9
4
19
44
33
4
14
28
49
60
4
4
TNA per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
SLMC per cent (2010)
The international community will not
invest in Sri Lanka
The Sri Lankan economy will not
develop
India will continue to be involved in the
affairs of Sri Lanka
The LTTE or new militant groups will
start terrorist actions again
The present opportunity to make
peace/lasting solution will be lost for a
generation
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
45
24
15
5
6
4
64
15
8
3
3
6
42
25
18
5
3
7
53
16
21
3
3
3
65
17
5
4
3
6
Very
probable
Probable
Possible
Improbable
Very
improbable
DK
19
44
27
10
23
21
44
10
1
2
33
25
14
16
9
4
33
22
27
9
6
4
24
36
23
8
6
4
61
1
3. A Program for Reform
With regards to the future peace and stability of Sri Lanka I am now going to present you with a number
of reforms on a series of cards. For each option you will be asked to indicate which ones you consider to
be ‘Essential’, ‘Desirable’, ‘Acceptable’, ‘Tolerable’ or ‘Unacceptable’ and for the purposes of this poll
‘Essential’, ‘Desirable’, ‘Acceptable’, ‘Tolerable’ and ‘Unacceptable’ mean:
‘Essential’ – You believe this option is a necessary part of a secure, stable and better future for the
island and should be fully implemented.
‘Desirable’ – This option is not what you would consider to be ‘Essential’, but you think this option, or
something very similar to it, is a good idea and should be put into practice.
‘Acceptable’ – This option is not what you would consider to be ‘Desirable’, if you were given a choice,
but you could certainly ‘live with it’.
‘Tolerable’ – This option is not what you want. But, as part of a secure, stable and better future, you
would be willing to put up with it.
‘Unacceptable’ – This option is totally unacceptable under any circumstances. You would not accept it,
even as part of a secure, stable and better future for the island.
(VERSION 1 - Neutral)
You may use each of the terms ‘Essential’, ‘Desirable’, ‘Acceptable’, ‘Tolerable’ and ‘Unacceptable’ as
many times as you wish in each question.
(VERSION 2 - President)
If President Mahinda Rajapaksa strongly supported these proposals please indicate your support using
the terms ‘Essential’, ‘Desirable’, ‘Acceptable’, ‘Tolerable’ and ‘Unacceptable’ as many times as you
wish in each question.
(VERSION 3 - Religious)
If your religious leaders strongly supported these proposals please indicate your support using the terms
‘Essential’, ‘Desirable’, ‘Acceptable’, ‘Tolerable’ and ‘Unacceptable’ as many times as you wish in
each question.
(VERSION 4 - Political)
If the political party you are closest to strongly supported these proposals please indicate your support
using the terms ‘Essential’, ‘Desirable’, ‘Acceptable’, ‘Tolerable’ and ‘Unacceptable’ as many times as
you wish in each question.
62
SHOW CARDS 1 to 14
15. The Structure of the State – Powers will be divided between the centre and the provinces under
a unitary state.
16. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces – These powers will be clearly defined in two
separate lists. One for the Centre and one for the Provinces.
17. The Parliament - Will consist of two houses. The House of Representatives directly elected by
the people and the Senate elected by the Provincial Legislators with each Province having the
same number of Senators.
18. Amending the Constitution – Amendments affecting the powers of the Provinces can only be
made if a majority of Senators from each of the Provinces votes in favour together with not less
than two thirds of a joint session of both houses. Amending certain specific articles will also
require approval by the people at a referendum.
19. The Powers of the President – The Executive Presidency will cease to exist at the end of the
incumbent’s term and be replaced by the Westminster system with a Prime Minister enjoying
majority support in the House of Representatives.
20. The Powers of Local Authorities – The Local Authorities will have powers to make by-laws in
respect of subjects listed separately in the Constitution.
21. Language Rights – The Tamil and Singhala languages will have parity of status as national and
official languages and as languages of the courts. English can also be used for official purposes
where it is expedient to do so. Singhala and Tamil shall be the medium of instruction at the
school level as well as English if facilities are available. Singhala, Tamil and English shall be
used at institutes of higher education.
22. Religious Rights – Buddhism shall have ‘pride of place’ with religious freedom for all citizens
being guaranteed.
23. Fundamental Rights – Individual and Group Rights will be recognized including the equality of
all citizens and the protection of all persons before the law.
24. Electoral System – The House of Representatives and Provincial Legislators will be elected on a
mixed system of first past the post and proportional representation.
25. The Judiciary – Will be independent of the Executive. The Court of Appeal will function with
Divisions in the Provinces along with the Provincial High Courts.
26. Public Service – There will be separate services for the Centre and the Provinces with certain
categories of officers classified as all island services. The Village, Divisional and District levels
of administration will all come under the Provinces. As far as is practical the Public Service will
reflect the composition of the population and it will be independent.
27. Safeguards against secession – The Constitution will provide for adequate safeguards against
attempts by any Province to succeed from the State.
28. Law and Order - There will be a Sri Lanka police officers service consisting of senior officers
from all ethnic groups. Policing will be devolved to the Provinces with certain powers retained
by the centre. National security will be the responsibility of the centre.
63
SHOW CARDS 1 to 14…
Essential
Desirable
Acceptable
Tolerable
Unacceptable
1. The Structure of the State
2. The Powers of the Centre and Provinces
3. The Parliament
4. Amending the Constitution
5. The Powers of the President
6. The Powers of Local Authorities
7. Language Rights
8. Religious Rights
9. Fundamental Rights
10. Electoral System
11. The Judiciary
12. Public Service
13. Safeguards against secession
14. Law and Order
15. All of the reform proposals taken together
as a ‘package’
Q4 (VERSION 1) Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined
here? Yes/No
(VERSION 2) If President Mahinda Rajapaksa strongly supported a package of constitutional reforms
for Sri Lanka as outlined here, would you support it? Yes/No
(VERSION 3) If your religious leaders strongly supported a package of constitutional reforms for Sri
Lanka as outlined here, would you support it? Yes/No
(VERSION 4) If the political party you are closest to strongly supported a package of constitutional
reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here, would you support it? Yes/No
Q5 (VERSION 1 ONLY) If answer is ‘No’ or ‘Don’t know’ or No Response:
Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
1) President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported them? Yes/No
2) Your religious leaders supported them? Yes/No
3) The political party you are closest to supported them? Yes/No
4) President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and the political party you are closest to all
supported them? Yes/No
Q6 (VERSION 1 ONLY) If answer is ‘Yes’:
Would you support a package of constitutional reforms for Sri Lanka as outlined here if:
1) President Mahinda Rajapaksa did not support them? Yes/No
2) Your religious leaders did not support them? Yes/No
3) The political party you are closest to did not support them? Yes/No
4) President Mahinda Rajapaksa, your religious leaders and the political party you are closest to all did
not support them? Yes/No
64
Q7 Please tell me how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"Democracy may have problems buts it's better than any other form of government."
(Do you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with this statement?)
1. Strongly agree
2. Agree
3. Disagree
4. Strongly disagree
98. Don’t know/Not sure
99. No response
SECTION III: DEMOGRAPHICS
1. Sex:
1. Male
2. Female
2. Religion:
1. Buddhism
2. Hinduism
3. Islam
4. Roman Catholicism
5. Christianity (Non-RC)
6. Other _________
2.1. Which of the following BEST describes the importance of religion on your life?
1. It’s the most important thing in my life
2. It’s very important but it doesn’t dominate my life
3. It’s somewhat important in my life.
4. It’s not very important in my life
5. It’s not at all important in my life
3. Age: ________________
4. Ethnicity:
1. Sinhala
2. Tamil
3. Up-country Tamil
4. Muslim
5. Burgher
5. Other _________
4.1. How important is being (use group from question 4) to the way you think of yourself, very important,
important, neither important or unimportant, not very important, or not important at all?
1. Very important
2. Important
3. Neither important or unimportant
4. Not very important
5. Not important at all
65
4.2. And how important is being Sri Lankan to the way you think of yourself, very important, important,
neither important or unimportant, not very important, or not important at all?
1. Very important
2. Important
3. Neither important or unimportant
4. Not very important
4.3. How often you tend to come into contact with people from other ethnic groups?
1. Daily
2. Once a week
3. Once a month
4. Once a year
5. Rarely/Never
5. First language:
1. Sinhala
2. Tamil
3. English
4. Other _________
6. Occupation of the respondent (SINGLE CODE ONLY)
1. Executives, Managerial and
Administrative Professionals
2. Professionals
3.
Technicians
and
Associate
Professionals
4. Clerk
5. Travel, Restaurant, Protective
Service Workers and Sales Workers
6. Agricultural and fisheries workers
7. Students
8. Housewife
9. Retired
10. Business
11. Self employed
12. Elementary Occupations
13. Unemployed
14. Other
7. Could you please tell me your educational qualifications? (SINGLE CODE ONLY)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Cannot read and write
Literate but no formal education
Up to grade 5
Grade 6-9
Up to O’ Level
O’ Level
Up to Advanced Level
8.Advanced Level
9.Vocationally trained
10.Technically trained
11.Professional
12.Undergraduate
13.Graduate and above
8. Total monthly income of the household:
1. Below Rs 5000
2. Rs 5001-Rs 10,000
3. Rs 10,001-Rs 15,000
4. Rs 15,001-Rs 20,000
5. Rs 20,001-Rs 25,000
6. Rs 25,001 & above
66
9. Please tell me that in your view, which political party is the closest to your personal political
ideologies?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
SLFP
UNF
JVP
JHU
TNA
SLMC
EPDP
UCPF
NFF
NUA
Other _______________________________
10. Can you tell me if you have ever:
Conditions
a. Had a family member fight in the
conflict?
b. How about your friends or neighbours?
Have any of them had a family member
fight in the conflict?
c. Have you or any family member been
physically injured, killed, or disappeared in
the conflict?
d. How about your friends or neighbours?
e. Have you or anyone in your family had
property damaged or lost land in the
conflict?
f. Have you ever experienced any loss or
limitation of your rights as a result of the
conflict?
Yes
No
2
Don’t
know/Not sure
98
No
response
99
1
1
2
98
99
1
2
98
99
1
2
98
99
1
2
98
99
1
2
98
99
1
2
98
99
67
1. RESPONDENT’S NAME:
2. ADDRESS:
3. TEL NO:
4. PROVINCE
1
Central
2
North Central
3
Northern
4
Eastern
5
North Western
6
Sabaragamuwa
7
Southern
8
Uva
9
Western
5. DISTRICT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Colombo
Gampaha
Kalutara
Kandy
Matale
Nuwara Eliya
Galle
Matara
Hambantota
Batticaloa
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Ampara
Trincomalee
Kurunegala
Puttalam
Anuradhapura
Polonnaruwa
Badulla
Moneragala
Ratnapura
Vavuniya
Mannar
Jaffna
6. DIVISIONAL SECRETARIAT:
7. GN:
8. TYPE OF AREA:
1. Rural
2. Urban
9. LGB:
10.DATE:
11.START TIME:
THANK YOU!
68
12.END TIME: