Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
American Studies, 2014
2015
Social historians have broadly defined two cycles of American history characterized by an efflorescence of social movements aiming to reform both the individual and the society at large: the Jacksonian Era, from the 1830s to the 1850s, and the Progressive Era, from the 1890s to the 1920s. The reform impulse thrived wherever there was a perceived vice, abuse or corruption of industrial civilization that needed to be changed, corrected or improved. Studies of “antebellum” and “progressive ” reforms have thus been made across a very broad spectrum of interests, from temperance and anti-prostitution crusades to housing and sanitation laws. However, it is only fairly recently, starting in the 1970s and 1980s, that historians have rediscovered the figure of the “health reformer ” (Whorton, 1982), frequently specializing in “food reform ” – or depending on the context “diet”, “dietetic ” or “dietary reform ” – that is the zealous drive to change the way Americans eat or grow foods, based o...
Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 2001
Modern society has brought with it many comforts and conveniences, yet when it comes to the United States’ health and nutrition, the advancements haven’t always been positive for your overall health. Doing things better, cheaper and faster may work well for manufacturing microprocessors but it doesn’t work well with the mind, body or spirit. The invention of factory farming, refined and processed pre-packaged food and fast food has come at a high price – your health. You can find your own way to good health by learning the basics of holistic health including what is safe and what is dangerous in modern food. With knowledge comes the empowerment to debunk misnomers from food and nutrition studies born out of conflicts of interest and to see through devious marketing from large food and beverage manufacturers focused only on one thing (and it’s not your health.) Consuming a diet filled with the “food like stuff” that has become a basic of today’s Standard American Diet (SAD), results in excess weight, illness, dis-ease and mental fog from the dangerous components of our food. As an unique individual, biochemically and spiritually, it’s important to find what works best for you. When you know the basics, you can seek out and find what foods, including amounts and combinations, work best for your individual body. It’s vital to experiment to find the right combination of food, exercise and spiritual nurturing so you not only feel great, you are the best, most dazzling version of you. Empowerment through knowledge will allow you to find your own way to a life of vibrant health and a trim, healthy body. Awareness of good nutrition is freedom from fad diets, counting calories and points, reading unhelpful nutritional labels and from confusion over misleading nutritional information in the media. Changing what you know and the way you eat and treat your mind, body and spirit will transform your life.
Healthy Foods, Healthy Diets, and Healthy Eating: Beyond Ethics and Political Philosophy, 2023
Barnhill and Bonotti is a terrific effort to provide a systematic method for appraising the ethical aspects, broadly understood, of regulations and policies connected to food, diet, and eating. In this commentary I purport to highlight the originality and the merits of the volume by considering what it doesn't accomplish in three of its parts. I first call attention to the specific construction of the subject matter, namely on the question whether to be at stake are eating behaviors, dietary patterns, or certain food items; while Barnhill and Bonotti do not problematize it, this question is arguably pivotal to design effective policies and to adequately assess them. Second, I discuss the technical concept of "constitutive evaluative standards," used by Barnhill and Bonotti to lay out their view, as this part of their work calls for an alignment with research on the philosophy of nutritional science and, more generally, philosophy of science. Finally, I take up the technical concept of "accessible reason," which plays a central role in ascribing the public status to reasons, advocating for a more thorough determination of this concept based on recent work in epistemology.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
British Food Journal, 1997
Reality instead of relativity, 2024
Revue Francaise De Psychanalyse, 2007
"Critical Thinking to Making, 2018 Fram Signature Event, RIT College of Art and Design", 2018
Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, 2024
کۆنفڕانسی نێودەوڵەتی شوێنەوار و کەلەپوری هەولێر, 2018
BARBOSA, Renata Cerqueira, 2023
Contemporary Political Theory, 2012
Revista Latinoamericana De Bioetica, 2009
Human Molecular Genetics, 2010
International Journal of Acarology, 2018
International Journal of Modern Physics D
Pubvet, 2017
Proceedings of SPIE, 2007
IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016
Abstract- und Posterband - 93. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e.V., Bonn Interface - Fokus Mensch im Zeitalter der technisierten Medizin