LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
ISSN: 2565-5205 (print)
© LEC, Pokhara University
Research Article
Policy and Practices of E-Waste Management in Nepal: An Emerging Challenge
Rewoti Ram Pantha1*, Yutthapong Pianroj, Kuaanan Techato, Saroj Gyawali
Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University (Hat Yai campus),
Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110 Thailand
*Corresponding mail:6410930161@psu.ac.th
Received: April 4, 2023
Revised: April 12, 2023
Accepted: June 28, 2023
Abstract
E-waste management is an immediate matter of concern for every country of the world as it not only pollutes
the environment but also very toxic and hazardous to the health of living beings. Major challenges to its
management come from lack of understanding of the scope and depth of the management methods, legislation
relating to e-waste and socio-economic issues of the country. These challenges can be resolved only if publicprivate partnership goes hand in hand with knowledge of the consequences of improper disposal practices. The
reuse and recycle of e-waste is to be disseminated backed by the proper Regulatory Framework.
Keywords:E-waste, E-waste management, E-waste management in Nepal, E-waste Regulatory Framework, Ewaste in Nepal.
1. Introduction
management
1.1 Background
environmental restrictions in developed countries. As
The world of today is characterized by strong
a result, the cost of processing hazardous waste
international competition and rapid technological
increased. The so-called developed nations adopted a
advancement [1]. Population growth, expansion of
strategy to shift the burden of decaying e-devices to
areas and economic activities are major inheritant
the underdeveloped and developing countries with
characteristics of urbanization resulting in the growth
slight refurbishing as a result, illegal trading started
volume of municipal solid waste (MSW) which
to take place at cheaper prices in developing nations.
creates an ever-increasing major global concern. In
1.3 billion tonnes of solid garbage are produced
low-income nations, managing municipal solid waste
annually in cities, which was 680 million tonnes a
(MSW) is critical for protecting human health and the
decade ago, according to statistics from the World
environment. Kerere et al. (2018) claim that in the
Bank [5]. Earth's generation of solid waste will have
Guiyu region, people of surrounding settlements may
been doubled by 2025, with 53 percent of the growth
be exposed to significant quantities of hazardous
coming from low- and lower-middle-income nations.
compounds and soil contamination [2, 3].
South Asian countries generate 70 million tonnes of
In order to enjoy a lavish life, people are heavily
solid trash each year, ranging from 0.12 to 5.1 kg per
dependent on electrical and electronic equipment
person every day-1 [5,6]. Across the globe, the cost
(EEE). The global Electronic-Web (E-Web) is thus
of garbage management has constantly increased. It
established as a result of increased demand and
was valued at US$205 billion in 2010, and it is
consumption for EEEs [3]. E-waste has beenoverrun,
expected to be worth US$375 billion by 2025.
and its handling has emerged as one of the world's
Kathmandu has been facing waste management
most pressing problems [4]. In the late 1980s, the
issues since 1970, despite producing only 0.66 kg of
dangers
MSW per individual each day [6]. 64.24 percent of
posed
by
e-waste
development
and
28
led
to
the
issuance
of
strict
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
the domestic waste in Kathmandu is made up of
1.3 Methodology
plastics (15.96%), paper and paper products (8.66%),
This paper is entirely derived using the various
glass (3.75%), metals (1.72%), textiles (3.4%),
relative articles and information available on the
rubber and leather (1.12%), and others (1.15%) [6].
topic in public domain. The consideration has been
(Asian Development Bank, 2013). In Kathmandu,
towards various emerging nations, having e-waste
commercial
non-governmental
management challenge such as India, China, and
organizations, or NGOs, collect and transport 30% of
Malaysia, and attempt has been made to identify the
MSW, whilst informal scavenging handles 10% of
major issues in dealing with e-waste. Finally, some
SWM and formal recycling is non-existent (Nippon
relative techniques have been presented that may be
Koei Co. Ltd. and Yachiyo Engineering Co. Ltd.,
useful to limit the production of e-waste and
2007).Despite spending US$2.71 per capita per year
maximize its amount that can be recycled. The
on SWM, equivalent to 1.01 percent of GDP, the
majority of relevant literature of the issue that
majority of countries spend less than 1% of GDP on
supports the review's purpose is studied, and a
SWM. The results exceed those of their South Asian
conclusion is reached based on that analysis to
counterparts [6] and those suggested for low- and
uncover the methods of solving these challenges for
middle-income cities (i.e., spending no more than 0.5
e-waste disposal.
percent of GNP on SWM) [7].
1.4 Limitations of the Study
firms
and
In Nepal, the average efficiency of collecting MSW is
a. The paper is based on the secondary data.
62%; however, only 37% of it is actually disposed.
b. Conclusion may not be valid for all, as this study
is based on the literature review only.
The efforts to organize SWM in Kathmandu were
moved from the local government to the national
2. Literature Review
government, to donor organizations, and then back to
This chapter entails the finding and conclusion of
the municipalities, according to a 2013 study by the
different credible and published article, research,
Asian Development Bank, or ADB. As a result, the
study, reports conducted by various individuals and
majority of e-waste in Nepal originates from
institutions from countries that have a similar
households, businesses, and the government, which
demographic, socio-economic and environmental
either import equipment with a short lifespan,
background as Nepal to know exact scenario of the e-
obsolete technology, or other similar items.
waste management issues.
1.2 Objective of the study
According
The fundamental questions that are answered in this
sustainable SWM should not only be given high
review are:
importance, but also must go beyond technical
difficulties
a. To investigate the challenges for e-waste
to
to
Zurbrügg
et.al.,
incorporate
integrated
multiple
and
critical
sustainabile components to ensure the success of any
management in Nepal
solid waste project by strengthening legislation and
b. To suggest the Regulatory Framework that are
norms and emphasizing waste transportation and
feasible in Nepalese context
However, the overarching goal of our investigation is
disposal technology.
to determine the ramifications of resolving these
The Solid Waste Management National Policy was
issues for e-waste management.
passed by the Nepalese government in 1996. Every
local authority, particularly municipalities, was
29
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
required by this program to establish a separate
realistic, and measurable goals that could link to the
sanitation unit that included SWM. The Kathmandu
then existing SWM procedure.
city and 15 municipalities have dedicated sanitation
Even
or SWM departments, according to Nippon Koei Co.
developing
Ltd. and Yachiyo Engineering Co. Ltd. (2005). The
combining the then existing waste legislation, the
remaining towns' public health and sanitation
timing and influence on SWM National Policy, some
departments, which are in charge of sweeping and
foreign partner seemed interested in reviving
waste collection, have merged. Many individuals
previous projects, such as SWMRMC. The central
have questioned the fundamental principle of
government attempted to prepare this policy, ignoring
improving SWM structure and effectiveness by
earlier policies which remained unimplemented,
establishing a centrally recognized body to support
according to Joshi (personal communication, 21 July
municipalities' efforts.
2007) and Thapaliya (personal communication, 21
According to Thapa and Devkota (1999), a new
July 2007).
national agency, as anticipated in the SWM National
When SWMRMC was on the verge of bankruptcy it
Policy 1996, would create a variety of difficulties in
had 900 sweepers earning wages comparable to those
managing local resources to handle SWM and would
paid
ultimately undermine efforts to promote resource
implemented a new regulation as a backdoor attempt
centralization and strengthen self-governance [8].
to save the company. Municipal officials in
The GTZ offered Kathmandu Valley communities
Kathmandu claim that although NR140 million was
two options before stopping aid in 1993: clean and
spent to retire these kuchikars from SWMRMC,
collect rubbish or adopt SWMRMC and be
crucial tasks outlined in the policy objectives, like
reimbursed for sweeping and collection charges. The
developing building-integrated SWM strategies, have
Environmental Policy and Action Plan, 1993, which
not yet been actually completed (Joshi, Mainali, and
empowered municipal wards to collect waste and
Manandhar, personal communication, 2007)[9,10].
dispose at fixed points or municipal landfills.
In
The government established the Kathmandu Valley
Assessment Guidelines for SWM Projects in Nepal’s
Development
39
Municipalities (NEIA Guidelines for SWM Projects
three
in Nepali Municipalities) were issued. According to
representatives from local governments. Even though
the guidelines, municipalities in Nepal should
decentralization was the objective, SWM was given
perform an initial environmental evaluations (IEEs)
to the Ministry of Local Development (MLD) [9].
and environmental impact assessments (EIAs) before
The Kathmandu administration, which was making
commencing any SWM projects [10]. Even though
an effort to control waste, made consistent progress
there are regulations, Kathmandu has not yet
without
strategy.
completely implemented SWM programs. The
Recognizing the urgent need to regulate SWM in
technical staff member for the GLS's building
Kathmandu, the commission recommended a GTZ
projects addressed to a query regarding the nature of
Fact-Finding Mission to look into SWM in Nepal in
the IEE and EIA conducted for the Gokarna Landfill
1996. The mission's findings revealed the need for a
Site and Sisdol Landfill Site by claiming that it
new national policy with broad, integrated, accurate,
lacked the appropriate academic training to perform
ministries
Council,
and
fully
which
secretaries
adopting the
but
comprised
only
previous
30
though
to
2005,
a
the
study
comprehensive
industrial
the
above
workers,
National
recommended
national
the
policy
government
Environmental
Impact
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
these examinations and evaluations (SLS). As a
mixed with solid waste considering that should be the
result, a Japanese expert was consulted for the GLS
responsibility of the manufacturers or the retailers to
technical assessment [11,12].
manage. The Swiss ICT Industry Association has
Globally, 2050 million tonnes of e-waste are expected
adopted a policy that specifies the invoice of any new
to be wasted each year, whereas, Asia accounts for
electronic item must include charge to cover the
approximately
recycling case from 1 to 20 euros as applicable.
12
million
tonnes
(Greenpeace
International, 2005). Despite the fact that per capita
Japan was the first nation to develop both the
e-waste creation in India and China is less than 1
"Revised Law for Promotion of Effective Utilization
kilogram per year, the total volume of e-waste
of Resources" and the "Specifies Home Appliance
generated
and
Recycling Law" (SHARL) for LHA was Japan. The
industrialized countries are the main producers of e-
consumer is obligated by these laws to pay collection
waste. The United States is the world's largest e-
and recycling fees after leaving the products at the
waste generator, according to the USEPA (2009),
collection station or retailer. Using a coupon system
with 3.16 million tons created in 2008.
where customers pay a fee for the waste, the E-waste
Many metals are found in electrical and electronic
recycling system for household appliances was
goods, many of which are toxic to people and
designed in Japan.
ecosystems. Metal ions make up more than 60% of e-
The Norwegian legislation provides a special
waste, with hazardous metals accounting for only 2.7
procedure for dealing with e-waste, such as requiring
percent. Because harmful compounds such as
that the distributor or the local government entity
aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), bismuth (Bi), cadmium
handle it for free. The treatment of electronic waste
(Cd), chromium (Cr), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), lead
was
(Pb), and antimony (As) are included in these wastes,
(Management and Handling) rules up to 2010.
effective waste management (collection, storage,
Because there are important concerns and negative
recycling, and disposal) is required (Sb). E-waste
consequences of e-waste on the environment and
collection in 2017 is expected to surpass 17,730
human health [13, 14].
metric tonnes, according to the Department of
India campaigned for the development of a
Environment (The Himalayan Times, 2017).
comprehensive strategy to address the hazards
International accords, like the Basel Convention,
associated with e-waste and its growing concern.
Stockholm Conference, and EU Directives (WEEE
According to the Environmental Protection Act
and Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS)),
(EPA) of 1986, the Government of India started
were developed to minimize the unlawful exports of
enforcing the first E-waste (Management and
hazardous waste due to the enormous consequences
Handling) Rules in 2011. Everyone involved in
of the increasing piles of e-waste.
production, distribution, sale, purchase, or processing
Switzerland has been found adopting coercive
was subject to the rules. The guidelines were laid
initiatives towards framing appropriate regulation to
forth in order to reduce the amount of dangerous
promote recovering of WEEE, take back approach
waste that needed to be disposed of by collecting,
and the ordinance on the return schemes and disposal
disassembling,
of EEE (ORDEA) in 1998 to ascertain that any
sorting, and recycling materials.
is
enormous
[12].
Developed
defunct or outdated (e-waste) devices should not be
31
governed
under
handling,
the
Hazardous
transporting,
Trash
storing,
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
3. Characterization of waste
of risk assessment and be able to discuss the
In emerging economies, waste collection systems are
evolution of the analysis' assumptions on an equal
usually overcrowded, and dumpsites are unregulated
footing.
and poorly managed. The problem is becoming worse
5. E-Waste Management in Nepal: An Emerging
[15, 16]. Due to inadequate institutions, increasing
Challenge
urbanization, and ongoing insufficient resources,
Electronic waste, or e-waste, refers to discarded
waste management is a regular issue in many nations
electrical or electronic devices or appliances that are
and towns. Trash treatment is influenced by all of
no longer usable to their owners. E-waste is
these challenges as well as a lack of understanding of
detrimental because, depending on their state and
the many components of the waste management
density, individual components of various electronic
hierarchy [16]. Industrial waste management remains
goods contain toxic substances. Simultaneously, the
a challenge in the developed world even though
global increase of end-of-life and near-end-of-life
nearly all industrialized nations and communities
ICT equipment is raising considerable worry. If not
have established an appropriate waste management
properly treated, the chemical substances they
systems and regulations.
contain have the potential to harm both the
According to the European Waste Catalogue, defining
environment and human health. By repurposing,
rubbish's
it
as
refurbishing, or recycling this e-waste, it can be
hazardous,
or
managed in an environmentally sustainable manner,
completely non-hazardous are indeed the primary
causing less harm to the ecosystem. As a result, in
elements in defining garbage. Absolute hazardous
compliance with evolving global best practices and
entries are hazardous because of the method by
standards,
which they were produced, but non-hazardous
essential.
absolute entries are problematic because of the
E-waste is classified as used electronics that are
process by which they were created.
required for recycling involving material recovery,
4. Risk assessment of Waste management
re-sale,
The systematic process of evaluating the potential
Informal e-waste processing in underdeveloped
risks associated with a planned waste management
countries can have serious health repercussions and
operation or attempt is referred to as risk analysis in
contaminate the environment. Cadmium, beryllium,
the field of waste management [4,17]. Successful
lead, and brominated flame retardants, among other
collaborations between corporations, the general
things,
public, state regulators, and other stakeholders
components
require environmental risk communication skills. As
communities in both developed and developing
more risk-based decisions are made in environmental
countries have challenges with e-waste recycling and
management, understanding the science behind risk
disposal. To safeguard the environment and the well-
assessment is becoming increasingly critical for all
being of individuals and animals, offering quality for
stakeholders
the management and treatment of industrial waste
composition
completely
hazardous,
involved.
and
categorizing
partially
To
encourage
public
responsible
re-furbishment,
may
be
such
e-waste
re-use,
present
as
in
CPUs.
management
or
interested parties must understand the core concepts
32
destruction.
electronic
Employees
must be implemented and maintained.
participation in environmental decision-making, all
is
waste
and
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
Figure 1: Developing Countries E-Waste Classification/Management System [17].
E-waste is a sort of waste that is currently wreaking
regularly exchanged across national borders.
havoc on the global environment. Used electronics
E-waste production is on the rise, especially in
that are intended for reuse, refurbishing, or salvage
developing countries that lack the financial and other
recycling
via
disposal,
or
resources to properly dispose of it. Technology, on
e-waste.
In
the other hand, is constantly improving; new
developing nations, informal e-waste processing has
technologies are faster, smaller, and easier to use than
the potential to harm human health and contaminate
ever before. What about that old phone, computer, or
the environment. Hazardous substances such as
camera you upgraded to a newer and better model.
cadmium, lead, beryllium, and brominated flame
We live in a consumerist world where new
retardants may be present in electronic debris, such as
technology, which is purchased, improved, and
CPUs.
developing
replaced on a regular basis. Because of the appealing
countries, the recycling and disposal of e-waste can
economic incentives provided by increased electronic
pose significant health dangers to workers and
output and e-waste exports from wealthy to
communities [18].
impoverished countries, the e-waste problem is
abandonment
The
In
words
material
are
both
recovery,
referred
to as
industrialized
"management,"
and
"challenging,"
and
rapidly expanding.
"Nepal" spring to mind when thinking of e-waste.
The total amount of e-waste produced in 2014 was
Any electronic equipment or product that has reached
anticipated to be over 41 million tons, with a 3-5
the end of its usable life cycle is referred to as
percent yearly increase rate [20]. Because of the
electronic garbage, or e-waste [17]. Trash Electrical
presence of several harmful compounds in e-waste, it
and Electronic Equipment, or e-waste, is a sort of
is considered dangerous. These waste materials
development trash (WEEE). According to Hotta et
contain high levels of non-recyclable concentrated
al., e-waste is one of the world's fastest-growing
lead, cadmium, and beryllium. Burning this garbage
waste streams, and "Asia has become the engine of
is harmful to one's health and releases toxic
world garbage generation" [19]. The problem of e-
substances
waste is no longer limited to domestic concerns
cellphones,
because electronic equipment and E-waste are
refrigerators, air conditioners, and other electronic
33
into
the
radios,
atmosphere.
Cellphones,
televisions,
computers,
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
devices are increasingly used, resulting in increased
resources,
e-waste creation in the country. As a result, effective
management technologies, and infrastructure are all
e-waste management seems essential for the nation.
issues that affect waste management. In mid-2018, a
5.1 Nepal's current situation
fast assessment of SWM procedures was carried out
The right to live in a clean environment is guaranteed
in several municipalities throughout seven provinces
by the constitution of Nepal. The Environment
of Nepal. Daily, 0.39 kg of municipal solid waste was
Protection Act, 1997, was drafted and converted into
generated per resident.
law in 1997. The preamble of the legislation intends
Organic waste accounted for 43.6 percent of MSW,
to hasten the passage of legal requirements that will
while paper and paper products accounted for 22.7
ensure a clean and healthy environment. Minimizing
percent, plastic accounted for 13.8 percent, glass
the negative impacts that environmental deterioration
accounted for 6.4 percent, metals accounted for 2.7
is anticipated to have on humans, wildlife, plants,
percent, textiles accounted for 3 percent, rubber and
ecosystems, and physical artifacts. Protecting the
leather accounted for 1.3 percent, and other
environment through effective use and management
accounted for 6.6 percent [18,21]. Waste recycling
of natural resources, while keeping in mind that
and energy recovery, according to this analysis, have
sustainable development is only possible through
greater promise. Despite its potential, trash recycling
inescapable interdependencies.
in Nepal is still in its infancy and controlled by the
A proponent must complete an Initial Environmental
informal sector. Scrap merchants and recycling
Examination (IEE) and an Environmental Impact
companies, which are part of the informal or small-
Assessment (EIA) as required by law. The Act lays
scale formal private sector, play an important role in
out the rules for preventing and controlling pollution.
recycling. Because just a few hundred of Nepal's
The Act defines the position, responsibilities, and
thousands of scrap merchants and small-scale
powers of the relevant Environment Inspector. The
recycling firms are registered, most recycling efforts
Environment Protection Act, which includes, no
and earnings go unnoticed.
mention of e-waste remediation, has been used by the
These recycling options are similarly limited to the
Nepal government to deal with all environmental
Terai region, allowing hill and mountain towns to
challenges. In Nepal, there are currently no legal
fend for themselves in terms of recycling. New
systems in place to deal with the growing problem of
recycling enterprises are springing up in Nepal,
electronic waste disposal. Developing countries like
which is a welcome development compared to
Nepal are vulnerable due to lack of inventory data, e-
previous arrangements that saw waste items collected
waste
improved
and sent to Indian recycling organizations. As a
technologies for environmentally sound management.
result, Nepalese recycling methods should be
Local governments in Nepal are responsible for waste
formalized and scaled up, with the informal sector
management, which includes planning, financing,
being incorporated in recycling efforts.
and implementing waste management services. Only
The present improvement in electronics has expanded
national institutions are responsible for creating
the usage of technology, particularly in Telecom/ICT,
waste management policies and providing technical
and the low initial cost and unplanned obsolescence
support. At the national and local levels, waste
of electrical and electronic equipment has resulted in
management is now a low priority. Financial
a
management
policies,
and
34
human
problem
with
resource
expertise,
e-waste
in
waste
Nepal.
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
Telecommunication/ICT devices, as well as their
and infrastructure needed for environmentally sound
electrical and electronic components, are in high
e-waste management is a matter of serious concern.
demand and have a limited lifespan. The ubiquitous
Most of the industrialized countries have legislation
usage of electrical and electronic equipment in our
requiring electronic manufacturers and importers to
day-to-day operations, as well as the disposal of
accept back outdated electronic equipment at their
obsolete
end-of-life based on the notion of extended producer
equipment,
is
posing
a
growing
environmental threat.
responsibility. The implementation of EPR in
6. Expected outcome
developing countries has become critical due to the
Developing nations face significant challenges in
current high level of transboundary e-waste migration
addressing with e-waste, which is either domestically
into developing countries and the lack of basic or
produced or illegally imported as "used" equipment,
state-of-the-art
to close the so-called "digital gap." The lack of
facilities.
recycling
and
waste
disposal
policies, legal instruments, regulations, technology,
Figure 2: Schematic chart showing different recycling patterns of solid wastes in Nepal [17]
Sustainable urban mining of e-waste has expanded to
The key causes of the growing trend of E-waste are
be a considerable global issue in order to achieve the
socio-economic
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) agenda,
improvement.
especially Goal 3 (Water and Sanitation Health), Goal
environmental concerns and hurdles to appropriate
8 (Decent Work & Economic Growth), Goal 11
management in Nepal are the rising trend of e-waste
(Sustainable Cities and Communities), and Goal 12
generation and the lack of regulatory provisions.
(Responsible
Production)[9]
Given the potential for harmful eco-toxicological
(UNEMG, 2018). In light of this, it has been
repercussions, an e-waste management legislative
determined that explanation of suitable management
instrument covering e-waste handling, storage,
systems, treatment alternatives, and safe disposal of
transportation, recycling, and disposal is urgently
electronic waste are urgently needed in Nepal and
needed.
Consumption
and
other developing nations.
35
development
Two
of
the
and
technical
most
important
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
Figure 3: Model e-waste management system
Various non-governmental bodies in Nepal have
2. V. N. Kyere, K. Greve, S. M. Atiemo, D. Amoako,
initiated various e-waste management initiatives and
I. J. Aboh, B. S. Cheabu. Contamination and
published related documents. Other trade and
health risk assessment of exposure to heavy metals
industry groups throughout the world are also
in soils from informal E-waste recycling site in
establishing best practices for dealing with e-waste.
Ghana. Emerging Sci. J.6, 428-436(2018).DOI:
There is a need for a model framework for e-waste
10.28991/esj-1235 2018-01162.
management that considers the national context as
3. International Telecommunication Unit (ITU).
well as any current legal, regulatory, and policy
Circular Economy including E-waste (2017). //
framework.
policy
www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/
framework based on the concepts of sustainable
2020/05/Pages/q7.aspx
A
unified
legislative
and
study
groups
/2017-
development, green ICT, and the circular economy
4. S. Arya, S. Kumar, E-waste in India at a Glance:
can make e-waste management system. The current
Current Trends, Regulations, Challenges and
e-waste scenario evaluates existing challenges and
Management
concerns in e-waste management, taking into
Production,
consideration International trends and practices, to
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122707
develop an implementable e-waste policy and
5.
Awuchi,
Strategies,
Chinaza
Journal
Godswill;
of
Cleaner
Hannington
regulatory framework in Nepal.
Twinomuhwezi; Awuchi, Chibueze Gospel; Igwe,
References
Victory Somtochukwu; Amagwula, Ikechukwu
1. A. Gharaei, S. A. H. Shekarabi, M. Karimi, E.
Otuosorochi-
Industrial
Waste
Management,
Pourjavad, A. Amjadian. An integrated stochastic
Treatment, and Health Issues: Wastewater, Solid,
EPQ model under quality and green policies:
and Electronic Wastes, (2020).
generalized
cross
decomposition
under
the
6. Bishnu B. Khatri, E-Waste Management: An
separability approach. Int. J. Sys. Sci. Oper.
Emerging Challenge in Nepal, Central Department
Logistics (2019).
of Rural Development, Tribhuvan University
DOI:10.1080/23302674.2019.1656296.
(TU), Kathmandu, Nepal.
36
R. R. Pantha et al. /LEC Journal 2023, 5(1): 28-37
7. Ahsan Shamim, Ali Mursheda K, and Islam Rafiq.
Engineering, 2(9), XX (2017).
E-Waste Trading Impact on Public Health and
15. S. Ghosh, (eds) Solid Waste Policies and
Ecosystem Services in Developing Countries.
Strategies: Issues, Challenges, and Case Studies.
8. A. Khatoon.Waste Management—A Case Study in
Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
Nepal (2020).
981-15-1543-917
9. United Nation Environment Management Group
16. Associated Chambers of Commerce of India
(UNEMG).The United Nations and E-waste.
(ASSOCHAM), India. 76% of E-waste workers
System wide action on addressing the full life
suffer from respiratory ailments: Study Report
cycle of electrical and electronic equipment. 1-
(2015).https://www.assocham.org/ news detail-
40(2018).https://unemg.
print. php?id=4989.
Org/
wp-content/
uploads/2018/11/INF1.pdf.
17. J. G. Adhikari et al., Urgency of Proper E-waste
10. L. N. Rao.Environmental impact of uncontrolled
Management Plan in Nepal: An Overview. Nepal
disposal of E-wastes. Int. J.Chem Technol. Res. 6,
Journal of Science and Technology, 19(1), 107-
1343-1353(2014).
118(2020).
http://www.nswai.com/docs/Environmental%20Im
18. M. Ali, W. Wang, N. Chaudhry, and Y. Geng.
pact%20of%20Uncontrolled%20Disposal%20of%
Hospital
20E-Wastes.pdf.
countries: A mini-review.
waste
management
in
developing
11. I. C. Nnoroma, O. Osibanjo. Overview of
19. S. A. H. Shekarabi, A. Gharaei, M. Karimi.
electronic waste (e-waste) management practices
Modelling and optimal lot-sizing of integrated
and legislations, and their poor applications in the
multi-level multi-wholesaler supply chains under
developing countries.
the shortage and limited warehouse space:
12. A. Shaikh, J. Khandare. E-Waste Practices and
generalised outer approximation, Int. J. Systems
Regulations.
Sci. Operations & Logistics M., XX(x), xx-xx
13. C. P. Baldé, V. Forti, V. Gray, R. Kuehr, P.
(2019).DOI: 10.1080/ 23302674.2018. 1435835.
Stegmann. The Global E-waste Monitor-2017.
20. K. Stuart, G. S. Alex, B. Mutahunga, A. E.
United Nations University (UNU), International
Dobson, and E. Wilkinson. A Whole Systems
Telecommunication Union (ITU) & I nternational
Approach to Hospital Waste Management in Rural
Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/
Uganda.
Vienna.(2017). \\https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/
21. U. Kumar, D. N. Singh, E-Waste Management
UNU:6341/Global-Ewaste_Monitor_2017
through
_electronic_ single pages_.pdf
Communication
14. M. Vijarania et al.. Challenges and Strategies for
Regulations;
Engineering,
Electronics
Department
&
of
Science & Technology, GWP Ranchi, Tharpakna,
E-waste Management in Developing Countries.
Ranchi 834001SBTE, Patna.
Open Access International Journal of Science and
37