Review of the Air Force Academy
No.2 (48)/2023
WIRELESS TRANSMITTER FOR OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
WITH FREQUENCY-MODULATED LASER CARRIER
Marian PEARSICĂ, Laurian GHERMAN
"Henri Coanda" Air Force Academy, Braşov, Romania (marianpearsica@yahoo.com, lauriang@gmail.com)
DOI: 10.19062/1842-9238.2023.21.2.7
Abstract: Interest in the use of unguided optical systems is growing, due to the development
of wireless mobile and indoor communication systems as well as the applications of lasers in
space technology. The proposed laser transmitter, with frequency-modulated carrier, represents
the optical transmitter of a wireless optical communication system, for transmitting audio signals
on laser carriers, which can be used both inside buildings and outside, for distances estimated
according to system parameters. In the paper are presented elements of design of the electrical
diagram of principle, as well as analysis by SPICE simulation of the designed circuit. The results
obtained by SPICE simulation synthesize the operation of the laser transmitter, allowing an
optimization of the parameters of the component circuits.
Keywords: wireless transmitter, laser carrier, MF modulator, optical transmitter
1. INTRODUCTION
Optical communication systems offer a broad spectrum of possibilities due to the
diverse modulation and detection methods [3,6], types of optical channels, and operating
conditions. This encompasses interior optical communication systems, primarily utilizing
laser diodes and light-emitting diodes as optical sources for transmission [5,8,10]. The
modulation process involves the excitation mechanism, wherein the optical signal is
modulated with a pulse-modulated subcarrier.
Unguided optical communications find applications both indoors and in external short
links [1,2,4]. Designing outdoor optical communication systems requires consideration of
the significant atmospheric attenuation variations due to changing weather conditions.
The input information undergoes encoding and is applied to a modulator excitation
device, steering the electro-optical modulator. This modulator, positioned inside or
outside the laser cavity, modulates the laser beam.
The modulated laser beam is collimated by the transmitting optical antenna, traverses
the transmission medium (such as vacuum space, atmosphere, controlled atmosphere
guide, or optical fiber), and is captured by the receiving optical antenna [1,7,9]. The
concentrated laser radiation is then directed to an optical receiver. At the photodetector's
output, an electrical signal is obtained through direct detection or heterodyne detection,
which undergoes further processing in a radio receiver. The resulting signal is decoded,
yielding the output information.
The modulation of the optical carrier distinguishes itself from radio frequency carrier
modulation due to different processes, characteristics, and parameters of the
optoelectronic devices involved.
53
Wireless Transmitter for Optical Communication with Frequency-Modulated
Laser Carrier
Frequency modulation offers a notable advantage as its inherent detection scheme
eliminates noise, provided the received signal surpasses noise sources.
Transmitting information through frequency variations, rather than amplitude
changes, ensures a noise-resistant signal at the audio receiver, particularly in the presence
of electromagnetic interference and scintillations.
2. PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION
The core of the laser transmitter is a voltage-controlled oscillator, comprising an
integration circuit and a hysteresis comparator [3]. This element executes frequency
modulation of audio signals (20Hz-16kHz), generating a pulsed signal output with a
frequency ranging from 140kHz to 260kHz, with the carrier signal frequency set at
200kHz.
The FM modulator [3,6], a voltage-controlled oscillator, switches the laser diode
between two discrete current levels, incorporating encoded information into the laser
diode driver's signal. This process generates a frequency-modulated subcarrier wave,
essentially a position pulse modulation (PPM) signal operating at around 100kHz. The
supply current to the laser diode is adjustable within the range of 0-20mA.
A voltage regulator provides the supply current to the laser diode via the laser driver,
resulting in the emission of coherent, wavelength laser beams with specific
characteristics. The laser diode emits optical pulses synchronized with the PPM
subcarrier. The audio amplifier circuit amplifies and isolates the input signal, transmitting
it to the modulation circuit.
The voltage-controlled oscillator, operating at a frequency of 200kHz, comprises an
integrator (CI3) and a hysteresis comparator circuit (CI4), serving a critical role in the
modulation process (Fig. 1).
FIG. 1. Wiring diagram of the voltage-controlled oscillator
The reference voltage (Vr2) of the hysteresis comparator has been set at 5Vcc. The
comparator output voltage is, Vo ∈ {VoH ; VoL } where, VoH = 12V and VoL = −12V . The
comparator switches when V+ = Vr 2 . Current I (FIG. 1) is determined with the relations:
R
VoH − Vin VoH − Vr 2
V ( R + R8 ) − VoH R6
R
=
⇒ Vin = r 2 6
= Vr 2 1 + 6 − VoH 6
R6 + R8
R8
R8
R8
R8
For integration levels, the following values are obtained:
R
R
VPL = Vr 2 1 + 6 − VoH 6 ≅ 4,3V
R8
R8
I=
54
(1)
(2)
Review of the Air Force Academy
No.2 (48)/2023
R
R
VPH = Vr 2 1 + 6 − VoL 6 ≅ 6,7V
R8
R8
(3)
The upper integration limit is given by the VPH voltage plus the voltage falling on
diode D1, resulting in approximately 6,7V, as seen from the waveforms obtained by
simulation. The high-frequency transistor T1, connected in bypass to the integration
capacitor C5, provides the discharge path of the capacitor, which discharges completely in
a very short time, fixed to 0,5µs .
The voltage at the output of the integrator, for Vout = 0 (Vout is the voltage at the output
of the audio amplification circuit), is given by:
Vint = −
1
6
Vr1dt =
⋅ t = 6,7V
∫
R15C5
100 ⋅ 10 3 ⋅ C5
(4)
For a subcarrier frequency of 200kHz and taking into account the discharge time of
the integration capacitor, the integration time results, t = 4,5µs .
Through the audio signal amplification circuit (achieves frequency-dependent
amplification at 20dB/dec), the audio signal frequency is practically converted into a
voltage level ( Vout ≠ 0 ), which is applied to the integrator input, summing up with the DC
voltage Vr1 = −6V . Thus, depending on the Vout value, the integration slope changes,
resulting in frequency modulation of the 200kHz subcarrier.
The voltage at the output of the integrator, for, Vout ≠ 0 is given by:
Vint = −
1
1
1
Vr1dt −
Vout dt = −
∫
∫
R15C5
R14C5
RC5
∫ (V
r
+ Vout ) dt = 6,7V
(5)
The maximum amplitude of the Vout signal (obtained at the frequency of 16kHz) has
been set at 2V (above this value the distortion of the signal that controls the power supply
of the laser diode is observed). Substituting in relation (5) and taking into account the
phase of the audio signal, results in the maximum time, respectively, the minimum
integration time: t min = 3,3µs ; t max = 6,6 µs .
The limit frequencies of the FM-modulated subcarrier shall be determined:
1
≅ 260kHz
Tmin
1
=
≅ 140kHz
Tmax
Tmin = t min + t desc = 3,8µs ⇒
f max =
(6)
Tmax = t max + t desc = 7,1µs ⇒
f min
(7)
The division circuit (bistable type D) (CI6A – FIG. 2) divides the frequency of the Vo
signal by 2 and restores symmetry. It follows that the signal frequency at the output of the
frequency divider is between 70kHz and 130kHz.
3. SPICE ANALYSIS OF DESIGNED SUBSYSTEMS
The SPICE analysis diagram of the laser transmitter for audio signals, with frequencymodulated subcarrier, is shown in Fig. 2.
55
Wireless Transmitter for Optical Communication with Frequency-Modulated
Laser Carrier
The frequency simulation was performed taking into account the transfer functions of
the analyzed circuits. Time domain analysis was performed over several periods of time,
obtaining waveforms for electrical signals in the circuit.
+VCC
-VCC
-12Vdc
VCC
12Vdc
0
T1
BF547/PLP
OUT
3
VLaser
R2
560
500
0
0
IN
R1
RV1
ADJ
CI1
LM317K
2
1
-VCC
240
DSTM1
R10
CI5A
1k
R8
1
R5
+
1k
V+
1N4148
Vref
5Vdc
+VCC
LM311/301/TI
OUT
C7
4.7n
7
+
CI3
6
0
D
Q
CLK Q
1
2
0
6
CI4
-VCC
0
0
3
CD4069UB
T2
BF547/PLP
D3
1N4148
R6
V+
OUT
3
Rg
10k
+VCC
D1
V-
4
500
V-
LF347/301/TI
2
-
15k
5
2
4
40p
-VCC
CI6A
CD4013A
6
10k
RESET SET
C5
S1
+VCC
R4
0
PARAMET ERS:
0
f = 15k
-VCC
R13
160k
R15
4
FREQ = {f }
0
100k
R14
100k
4
.16k
LF347/301/TI
3
0
-
OUT
+
CI7
V+
.1u
22
7
V4
VOFF = 0
VAMPL = 200m
1
V-
R12
C11
2
6
3
RV2
10k
SET = 0.5
0
Laser
D4
1N5817
C17
4.7u
3
2
RV3
10k
R23
62.5
R3
1k
1
out
-VCC
in
VLaser
R16
10k
R17
10k
SET = 0.75
R11
10k
1
D5
1N5817
T4
BF547/PLP
+VCC
0
0
0
0
FIG. 2. SPICE Analysis Diagram of the Laser Transmitter
Figure 3 shows the frequency response of the audio signal amplification circuit. It is
noticed that the amplification of audio signals is 20dB/dec, the maximum amplification
of 60dB, obtaining at a frequency of about 20kHz.
FIG. 3. Frequency analysis of audio signal amplification circuit
56
Review of the Air Force Academy
No.2 (48)/2023
Below are presented the waveforms for the analyzed circuit, namely: the signal from
the output of the amplifier circuit (Vout – violet), the signal from the integrator output (Vint
– blue), the signal from the comparator output (Vo – red) and the supply voltage of the
laser diode (green).
Figure 4 shows the waveforms for Vout = 0 . It is noticed that in this case the
oscillation frequency of the oscillator controlled in voltage is 200kHz, and the frequency
of the laser supply current is 100kHz. The maximum voltage at the integrator output is
6,1V and the laser supply voltage is 2,5V, resulting in a maximum supply current of
40mA.
FIG. 4. Waveforms for Vout = 0
Figures 5 and 6 show waveforms for Vout ≠ 0 ( V AMPL = 200mV ) , at modulating audio
signal frequencies of 5kHz and 16kHz, respectively.
FIG. 5. Waveforms for Vout ≠ 0 , f = 5kHz
FIG. 6. Waveforms for Vout ≠ 0 , f = 16kHz
From the analysis of the waveforms presented it can be seen that the frequency of the
MF subcarrier depends on the frequency of the audio signal, which varies between 70kHz
and 130kHz.
57
Wireless Transmitter for Optical Communication with Frequency-Modulated
Laser Carrier
Figure 7 shows the waveforms for a V AMPL = 250mV (f = 16kHz) input signal applied
to the input of the amplifier circuit. The amplitude of the signal applied to the input of the
integrator circuit (CI3), through the resistive divider made with RV3, represents 1/4 of the
signal at the output of the line amplifier (CI7). It is noticed that the line amplifier
saturates, which has the effect of distorting the received signal. The higher the voltage at
the output of the line amplifier, the more distorted the received signal will be.
FIG. 7. Waveforms for V AMPL = 250mV , f = 16kHz
Figure 8 shows waveforms for a 500mV audio signal with a frequency of 16kHz.
Stronger saturation of the line amplifier is observed.
FIG. 8. Waveforms for V AMPL = 500mV , f = 16kHz
CONCLUSIONS
The configuration of a laser transmitter is fundamentally dictated by the chosen optical
modulation method, the transmission medium, and the targeted range. In this context,
frequency modulation has been selected as the modulation method, with the Medium
Frequency (MF) frequency-modulated signal adopting Pulse Position Modulation (PPM).
The PPM signal is characterized by pulsed signals, where the pulse position is
proportionate to the amplitude of the analog modulating signal. Specifically, the MF
signal is derived from the Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) signal, generating pulses with
a fixed duration corresponding to the rising edge of the PWM signal pulses. This
mechanism results in pulses whose positioning is contingent upon the analog input signal.
Following an in-depth SPICE analysis, conducted for a subcarrier frequency of 200kHz
and established reference voltage levels Vr1 (–6Vcc) and Vref at the comparator CI4 (5Vcc),
it was determined that the maximum amplitude of the signal at the output of the audio
amplification circuit should be carefully controlled to avoid distortion of the MF signal.
58
Review of the Air Force Academy
No.2 (48)/2023
The frequency-modulated carrier operates above the audio frequency band,
strategically positioned outside the frequency bands associated with ambient noise
perception. This placement minimizes the impact of potential sources of disturbances, as
these disturbances exhibit low levels in the pass band of a meticulously designed receiver
operating at ultrasonic frequencies. Additionally, the frequency-modulated subcarrier
displays robust immunity to detecting nonlinearity in photodetectors.
The waveforms obtained through SPICE simulations, both in the time domain and
frequency domain (amplitudes, periods, amplifications, etc.), correspond remarkably well
with the theoretical results derived during the design phase. This alignment serves as a
robust verification of the functionality and stability of the proposed system. Moreover, the
designed system underwent experimental validation, demonstrating a commendable
concordance between the experimental and theoretical results obtained during the design
phase, as well as alignment between the experimentally acquired waveforms and those
obtained through SPICE simulation. This comprehensive validation process underscores
the reliability and efficacy of the designed laser transmitter system.
REFERENCES
[1] H. Henniger and O. Wilfert, An Introduction to Free-Space Optical Communications, Radioengineering,
vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 203-2012, June 2010;
[2] S. Hranilovic, Wireless Optical Communication Systems, McMaster University, Hamilton, Springer
Science Ontario, Canada, 2006;
[3] M. Carter, Laser Pointer Audio Modulator - Laser Beam Detector/Demodulator, Available:
http://www.maxcarter.com; www.maxmcarter.com/lasrstuf/lasermodulator.html;
[4] A.K. Majumdar and J.C. Ricklin, Free-Space Laser Communications. Principles and Theory, New York
(USA), Springer, 2008;
[5] L.U. Khan, Visible light communication: Applications, architecture, standardization and research
challenges, Digital Communication Networks, vol. 3(2) pp. 78-88, 2016;
[6] G. Yan, W. Min and D. Weifeng, Performance Research of Modulation for Optical Wireless
Communication System, Journal of Networks, vol. 6, no. 8, August 2011;
[7] N. N. Puşcaş, Sisteme de comunicaţii optice, Editura Matrix Rom, Bucureşti, 2006;
[8] S. Dimitrov and H. Haas, Principles of LED Light Communications: Towards Networked Light Fidelity,
Cambridge University Press, March 2015;
[9] Z. Ghassemlooy, P. Luo and S. Zvanovec, Optical Camera Communications, Springer, pp 547-568,
2016;
[10] P.H. Pathak, X. Feng, P. Hu and P. Mohapatra, Visible light communication, networking, and sensing:
a survey, potential and challenges, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 20472077, 2015.
59