doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4106 available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on
J. Mol. Biol. (2000) 303, 77±91
Probing the Catalytic Mechanism of GDP-4-keto-6deoxy-D-mannose Epimerase/Reductase by Kinetic
and Crystallographic Characterization of
Site-specific Mutants
Camillo Rosano1, Angela Bisso2, Gaetano Izzo1, Michela Tonetti2
Laura Sturla2, Antonio De Flora2 and Martino Bolognesi1*
1
Department of Physics-INFM
and Advanced Biotechnology
Center-IST, University of
Genova Largo Rosanna Benzi
10 I-16132 Genova, Italy
2
Department of Experimental
Medicine, Section of
Biochemistry, University of
Genova, Viale Benedetto XV 1
I-16132 Genova, Italy
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose epimerase/reductase is a bifunctional
enzyme responsible for the last step in the biosynthesis of GDP-L-fucose,
the substrate of fucosyl transferases. Several cell-surface antigens, including the leukocyte Lewis system and cell-surface antigens in pathogenic
bacteria, depend on the availability of GDP-L-fucose for their expression.
Therefore, the enzyme is a potential target for therapy in pathological
states depending on selectin-mediated cell-to-cell interactions. Previous
crystallographic investigations have shown that GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-Dmannose epimerase/reductase belongs to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase protein homology family. The enzyme active-site
region is at the interface of an N-terminal NADPH-binding domain and
a C-terminal domain, held to bind the substrate. The design, expression
and functional characterization of seven site-speci®c mutant forms of
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose epimerase/reductase are reported here.
In parallel, the crystal structures of the native holoenzyme and of three
mutants (Ser107Ala, Tyr136Glu and Lys140Arg) have been investigated
Ê resolution, based on synchrotron data
and re®ned at 1.45-1.60 A
(R-factors range between 12.6 % and 13.9 %). The re®ned protein models
show that besides the active-site residues Ser107, Tyr136 and Lys140,
whose mutations impair the overall enzymatic activity and may affect
the coenzyme binding mode, side-chains capable of proton exchange,
located around the expected substrate (GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose)
binding pocket, are selectively required during the epimerization and
reduction steps. Among these, Cys109 and His179 may play a primary
role in proton exchange between the enzyme and the epimerization
catalytic intermediates. Finally, the additional role of mutated active-site
residues involved in substrate recognition and in enzyme stability has
been analyzed.
# 2000 Academic Press
*Corresponding author
Keywords: GDP-L-fucose; enzyme structure; short-chain dehydrogenase;
NADP; epimerization
Introduction
C.R. and A.B. contributed equally to this work.
Abbreviations used: GMD, GDP-D-mannose 4,6dehydratase; GMER, GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose
epimerase/reductase; RED, reductase, epimerase,
dehydrogenase superfamily; SDR, short-chain
dehydrogenase, reductase family; TLC, thin-layer
chromatography; TFA, tri¯uoroacetic acid; UGE,
UDP-galactose 4-epimerase.
E-mail address of the corresponding author:
bolognes@®sica.unige.it
0022-2836/00/010077±15 $35.00/0
Substantial evidence has accumulated in the past
few years on the key role that glycoconjugates play
in cell-to-cell interaction and adhesion processes,
both in prokaryotes and in higher organisms (Feizi
& Childs, 1987; Feizi, 1990; Zhang et al., 1997).
In particular, some glycoconjugates containing the
6-deoxy-hexose L-fucose, the Lewis system antigens, have been shown to be the selectin ligands,
involved in leukocyte and tumor cell adhesion to
# 2000 Academic Press
78
the endothelium, as well as in development (Feizi
& Childs, 1987; Brandley et al., 1990; Varki, 1994;
Lowe, 1997). Lack of constituent L-fucose from
these glycoconjugates, as observed in the human
genetic syndrome LAD II (leukocytes adhesion
de®ciency type II), leads to impaired binding to
selectins, and eventually to severe symptoms, such
as immunode®ciency and psychomotor retardation
(Etzioni, 1992; Phillips et al., 1995). Oligosaccharide
structures containing L-fucose are involved in
microorganism and pathogen interactions with
host tissues, as observed for Helicobacter pylori,
where the expression of antigens related to the
Lewis system contributes to molecular mimicry
with the host and to the development of an autoimmune response (Appelmelk et al., 1997).
In vivo, L-fucose is made available for insertion
into cell-surface antigens as GDP-L-fucose, the substrate of fucosyl transferases. The biosynthesis of
this nucleotide-sugar molecule occurs via a threestep metabolic pathway, common to both bacterial
and animal cells, starting from GDP-D-mannose
(Ginsburg, 1960, 1961; Tonetti et al., 1998a). The
®rst reaction in the pathway is the elimination of a
water molecule from GDP-D-mannose, catalyzed
by GDP-D-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (Sturla et al.,
1997; Sullivan et al., 1998; Somoza et al, 2000), leading to the formation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-Dmannose (see Figure 1). This intermediate undergoes subsequent epimerization reactions at the C-3
and C-5 hexose ring centers, leading to a change
from the D to the L-con®guration, followed by an
NADPH-dependent reduction on C-4. Both epimerase and reductase reactions are catalyzed by a
single enzyme, GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose
epimerase/reductase (GMER) (Tonetti et al., 1996),
which was recognized as the long-known protein
FX (Morelli & De Flora, 1977). Recent studies have
shown that GMER can support the epimerization
of the substrate also in the absence of NADPH
from the incubation mixture, indicating independence of the epimerization and of the reduction
reactions (Menon et al., 1999).
Inspection of amino acid sequences indicates
that GMER belongs to the continuously expanding
family of short-chain dehydrogenase/reductases
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
(SDRs), a protein homology family hosting
enzymes involved in different biological functions
such as alcohol, hydroxyprostaglandin, hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, dihydropteridin reductase,
carbonyl reductase and UDP-galactose epimerase
(UGE) (Persson et al., 1991; Varughese et al., 1994;
JoÈrnvall et al., 1995; Gosh et al., 1995; Tanaka et al.,
1996a,b; Ensor & Tai, 1996; Thoden et al., 1997;
Benach et al., 1998), which display conservation of
a residue triad (Ser, Tyr and Lys) at their catalytic
centers. In more general evolutionary terms,
GMER, together with UGE and homologous SDR
enzymes, is a component of the reductase-epimerase-dehydrogenase (RED) protein homology superfamily (Labesse et al., 1994).
GMER from Escherichia coli, obtained as recombinant protein, has been crystallized in our laboratory, both as the apoenzyme and in a complex
with NADP, and its X-ray structure has been
Ê resolution (Tonetti et al., 1998b;
elucidated at 2.1 A
Rizzi et al., 1998). Similar results were obtained
independently by Somers et al. (1998). Both studies
have shown that wild-type GMER is associated in
a dimeric structure in the crystalline state, closely
matching the quaternary structure observed in
homologous SDRs (Gosh et al., 1995; Benach et al.,
1998). Each GMER subunit (321 amino acid residues; see Figure 2) is composed of two domains,
that can be de®ned as mostly N-terminal (ca. 190
residues, adopting a Rossmann fold topology;
Branden & Tooze, 1991; Rizzi et al., 1998), and
mostly C-terminal (ca 100 residues). An extended
NADP coenzyme molecule is properly located at
the Rossmann fold topological switch-point, next
to the domain interface. Moreover, an evident cleft
Ê 3), present in the C-terminal domain
(>200 A
region, hosting 25 ordered water molecules in the
inhibitor-free holoenzyme, has been proposed as
the substrate-binding site, based on homology
modeling studies (Rizzi et al., 1998; Somers et al.,
1998; Somoza et al., 2000). The crystallographic
analyses have shown that the GMER active-site
region is located at the domain interface, close to
the nicotinamide reducing end and to the evolutionarily conserved residues Ser107, Tyr136 and
Lys140 (see Figure 2).
Figure 1. The GDP-L-fucose
biosynthetic pathway and the
products obtained after NaBH4
reduction of the intermediate
compounds. GMD, GDP-D-mannose 4,6 dehydratase; GMER, GDP4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose epimerase/reductase; R-, GDP.
79
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Results
Epimerase and reductase activities in
GMER mutants
Figure 2. Ribbon representation of the GMER
subunit structure, displaying the N and the C-terminal
domains (lower and upper in the Figure, respectively)
and the active-site cleft (central). The bound NADP
coenzyme (in yellow) and the active-site residues
Ser107, Tyr136 and Lys140 (purple) are displayed.
This Figure was drawn with DINO (Philippsen, 2000
http://www.bioz.unibas.ch/ xray/dino).
Crystallization of GMER ternary complexes, containing the coenzyme and substrate-like inhibitors,
has so far proved elusive (Rizzi et al., 1998; Somers
et al., 1998). In the absence of direct crystallographic evidence, a study of the enzyme's catalytic
mechanism must therefore rely on rational modeling of substrate binding, on the design of sitespeci®c mutants and on the analysis of their
functional properties. In this context, we have
undertaken a systematic investigation on GMER
active-site mutants, focusing on the residues held
responsible for the catalytic activity, or its assistance, and on those likely involved in substrate
recognition. Here, we report kinetic and functional
data for seven different GMER mutants, together
with the crystal structures of three of these, and
of the wild-type holo-enzyme, all determined
Ê and 1.60 A
Ê resolution.
between 1.45 A
Wild-type and mutant GMER forms were overexpressed in E. coli and puri®ed to homogeneity as
GST-fusion proteins. The GST-Tag was then
removed by proteolytic cleavage. High levels of
expression were obtained for both wild-type and
mutant proteins. One liter of bacterial culture
yielded approximately 30 mg of pure wild-type
GMER, while the yield for mutants ranged
between 10 and 20 mg per liter of culture. The puri®ed proteins were found to be homogeneous by
SDS-PAGE, migrating as single bands, with an
apparent molecular mass of approximately 3536 kDa. Purity and stability of the substrate GDP4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose were determined by
HPLC and electrospray-mass spectroscopic analysis, showing the absence of residual GDP-D-mannose and that the compound was stable for at least
one month when stored at ÿ80 C.
Total enzymatic activities (epimerase plus
reductase) were analyzed for wild-type and
mutant enzymes by monitoring absorbance at
340 nm to determine initial rates of NADPH oxidation, or by analysis of GDP-L-fucose production
by HPLC. The kinetic constants for wild-type
GMER enzymatic reaction and for the seven
mutant enzymes are listed in Table 1. The catalytic
activity was severely affected in all mutants, with
the exception of Arg187Ala, whose kcat was lower
by approximately twofold as compared to the
wild-type enzyme. The Tyr136Glu mutant proved
to be completely inactive; Lys140Arg exhibited a
20-fold reduction in kcat, while the other mutants
featured an activity below 0.1 % of that of wildtype protein. A slight Km increase for both
NADPH
and
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose
(between two- and threefold) was measured for
Lys140Arg GMER, while a sixfold increase in Km
for the substrate was observed for the Arg187Ala
mutant (see Table 1). Conversely, it was not possible to measure Km values towards the substrate
for the Lys140Ser and His179Asn mutants, since
their rate versus substrate concentration plots
exhibited a roughly biphasic rather than hyperbolic
pro®le; this anomaly suggests the presence of
different conformational forms of the mutant
enzymes featuring different af®nities for GDP-4keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose.
In order to follow the effects of the individual
mutations on GMER epimerase activity, formation
of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-L-galactose was monitored
by means of TLC. Upon chemical reduction and
hydrolytic removal of the dinucleotide moiety,
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose is expected to produce D-rhamnose and 6-deoxy-D-talose (see
Figure 1), while the epimerization intermediate
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-L-galactose yields L-fucose
and 6-deoxy-L-glucose. When wild-type GMER
was incubated in the absence of NADPH, after
80
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of wild-type and mutant GMER forms
NADPH
GMER form
Wild-type
Ser107Ala
Cys109Ala
Tyr136Glu
Lys140 Ser
Lys140Arg
His179Asn
Arg187Ala
Vmax (mmol/hour
per mg)
kcat (s )
Km (mM)
kcat/Km
(sÿ1 mMÿ1)
738.9 16.3
0.808 0.019
0.137 0.007
ND
0.494 0.025
36.7 2.0
0.703 0.080
320 9.2
7.08 0.16
0.00774 0.00018
0.00131 0.00007
0.00473 0.00024
0.351 0.019
0.00673 0.00077
3.06 0.09
14.1 1.3
10.0 0.9
7.7 1.5
ND
18.5 3.3
42.8 4.6
11.1 2.3
9.1 1.1
502 58
0.774 0.088
0.170 0.042
0.256 0.059
8.20 1.32
0.606 0.194
336 50
ÿ1
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-mannose
kcat/Km
Km (mM)
(sÿ1 mMÿ1)
38.6 4.4
15.3 0.3
26.2 1.6
ND
85.3 11.4
250 26
183 25
0.506 0.022
0.05 0.006
4.11 0.77
12.2 1.6
Data were obtained spectrophotometrically by measuring NADPH oxidation as the change in absorbance at 340 nm, at 25 C. ND,
not detectable.
NaBH4 reduction, equal amounts of both 6-deoxyglucose and fucose were formed, together with
rhamnose and 6-deoxytalose (see Figure 3), indicating the partial formation of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-Lgalactose via the epimerase reaction, as observed
previously (Menon et al., 1999). On the other hand,
when NADPH was added to the reaction mixture,
fucose was the only product observed, as expected.
TLC analyses showed that the GMER mutants
Lys140Ser, Cys109Ala, Tyr136Glu and His179Asn
are not endowed with epimerase activity under the
incubation mixture conditions (see Figure 3). A
very low epimerase activity was detectable when
enzyme concentrations higher than 200 mg/ml
were employed. When the Lys140Arg mutant,
which in the experimental conditions used displays
also a residual reductase activity, was incubated
in the presence of NADPH, the formation of both
6-deoxy-glucose and fucose was observed. However, in this case, the different yields in fucose and
6-deoxy-glucose, which are expected to be formed
in equal amounts after chemical reduction of the
Figure 3. TLC analysis of the products obtained after chemical reduction of the intermediate compounds GDP-4keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-L-galactose. GMER 14C-labeled substrate (250 mM) was incubated at
37 C with 5 mg/ml wild-type and mutant enzymes, either in the presence or absence of 1 mM NADPH. At different
time-points, aliquots were withdrawn and the enzymes were heat-inactivated. Samples were subjected to chemical
reduction and hydrolysis as described in the text. The Figure represents samples after ®ve minutes of incubation.
Standard sugars were co-chromatographed with samples and detected by a colorimetric method. Radioactive compounds were detected and quanti®ed by autoradiography using the Packard Cyclone Phosphor Storage system.
(Data for GMER Cys109Ala mutant not shown).
81
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
4-keto group, indicate that fucose derives partly
from the enzyme reductase activity and partly
from chemical reduction of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-Lgalactose, which accumulates during the course of
the reaction. The Ser107Ala mutant featured a signi®cant epimerase activity, revealed by formation
of both 6-deoxy-glucose and fucose, even when no
residual reductase activity could be observed
under the conditions used for incubation, where
5 mg/ml of protein was used (see Figure 3). It is
interesting that epimerization was observed mainly
when NADPH was added to the incubation mixture, suggesting that even if NADPH is not used
for the reduction of the 4-keto group, it has an
indirect effect on the ef®ciency of the epimerization
reaction. When the samples were not treated with
NaBH4, no formation of 6-deoxy-hexoses could be
detected, con®rming the lack of reductase activity
for the Ser107Ala mutant, under the adopted
experimental conditions. Lastly, the Arg187Ala
mutant displayed an epimerase activity comparable to that of the wild-type protein (data not
shown).
To address the role of the coenzyme in the epimerization reaction, we analyzed the GDP-4-keto6-deoxy-L-galactose formation rates for the wildtype enzyme and the Ser107Ala mutant, in the presence of both NADPH or NADP. As shown in
Figure 4(a) and (b), the presence of the coenzyme
affected the initial epimerization rates signi®cantly
in both wild-type and mutant GMER. In particular,
the lack of reductase activity for the Ser107Ala
mutant allowed to demonstrate that the effect of
NADPH on the epimerization reaction is more substantial than that of NADP. For wild-type GMER,
the initial rates of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-L-galactose
formation were 18.0 mmol/hour per mg and 127.5
mmol/hour per mg, for the apoenzyme or for
GMER in the presence of NADP, respectively. For
the Ser107Ala mutant, the rates were 7.2, 67.4 and
132 mmol/hour per mg for the apoenzyme, for
GMER supplemented with NADP and with
NADPH, respectively. The equilibrium of the epimerization reaction between GDP-4-keto-6-deoxyD-mannose and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-L-galactose,
determined for both the apoenzyme and for the
enzyme supplemented with NADP, was approximately 50:50 for both wild-type and Ser107Ala
mutant GMER.
Wild-type GMER maintained its enzymatic
activity for several weeks, when stored in phosphate-buffered saline, at 4 C, at concentrations
higher than 10 mg/ml. In a similar way the
Lys140Arg, Ser107Ala and Arg187Ala mutants displayed limited loss of their enzymatic activity,
upon storage at 4 C for up to three weeks. On the
contrary, the Lys140Ser and His179Asn mutants
were highly unstable and became almost completely inactive in less than one week. Stability of the
Tyr146Glu and Cys109Ala mutants could not be
determined because their initial activity was too
low.
Figure 4. (a) TLC analysis of samples obtained after
incubation of wild-type and Ser107Ala GMER for 15
minutes at 37 C with 250 mM 14C-labeled GDP-4-keto-6deoxy-D-mannose, either alone or in the presence of
1 mM NADP or NADPH. Experimental conditions
were as described for Figure 3. (b) Effects of NADP
and NADPH on the rate of the epimerization reaction
for wild-type and the Ser107Ala mutant. GDP-4-keto-6deoxy-L-galactose production in the incubation mixture
was derived by fucose and 6-deoxy-glucose formation
determined by TLC analysis, as described above.
Crystal structures of wild-type GMER and of
its mutants at atomic resolution
Table 2 lists the X-ray data collection (in the
Ê resolution range) and the ®nal crystal1.45-1.60 A
lographic re®nement statistics (R-factors vary
between 12.6 % and 13.9 %) for the three holo-
82
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Table 2. X-ray data collection and re®nement statistics
Completeness (%)
Ê)
l (A
Unique reflections
Redundancy
Rmerge (%)
I/s(I) overall
I/s(I) outer shell
Resolution range used in
Ê)
refinement (A
Total number of non-hydrogen
protein atoms
Number of water molecules
Number of atoms in non-water
solvent peaks
Number of coenzyme atoms
R-factor
R-free
rmsd from ideal geometry
Ê)
Bond lengths (A
Ê)
Bond angles (A
Ê)
Planes (1-4) (A
Ê 2)
Averaged B-factors (A
Main-chain
Side-chain
Water molecules
Coenzyme
Ê)
Cruickshank DPI (A
Wild-type GMER
Ser107Ala
Tyr136Glu
Lys140Arg
99.1
0.855
80,994
4.5
5.7
14.8
Ê)
5.5 (1.48-1.45 A
10.0-1.45
99.1
0.844
60,724
9.0
4.0
20.5
Ê)
2.9 (1.63-1.60 A
10-1.60
99.3
0.844
60,793
6.2
4.3
9.7
Ê)
2.1 (1.63-1.60 A
10-1.60
98.8
0.902
73,654
8.4
16.2
8.64
Ê)
2.45 (1.53-1.50 A
12-1.50
2502
2497
2497
2497
379
31
325
36
352
34
425
30
48
0.127
0.167
48
0.138
0.182
48
0.139
0.180
48
0.126
0.162
0.015
0.032
0.032
0.016
0.035
0.037
0.017
0.038
0.031
0.014
0.029
0.028
23.4
28.5
52.7
41.9
0.047
25.5
30.9
48.4
45.7
0.068
26.5
30.7
51.7
43.1
0.069
21.9
26.4
45.0
38.2
0.052
GMER mutants analyzed, including information
on the reference GMER wild-type structure, re®ned
Ê resolution (Rosano et al., 2000). Inspection
at 1.45 A
of the re®ned models shows that all residues (for
each protein structure) lie within the allowed
Ramachandran plot regions, with close to ideal
values for the stereochemical parameters, as analyzed by PROCHECK (Engh & Huber, 1991;
Wallace et al., 1995). Continuous and clearly interpretable electron density is available for all mutant
proteins in the Lys3-Gln316 protein region. Residue Ala2 could be modeled in the electron density
of the wild-type native protein only, while residue
118 is always found as cis-proline. The NADP
coenzyme electron density is well de®ned in all the
structures analyzed, with the exception of the nicotinamide ring, whose carboxamide substituent can
be properly located only in the Tyr136Glu and
Lys140Arg mutants. Moreover, the Lys140Arg
mutant structure shows a substantial conformational readjustment (a shift of approximately
Ê ) in the ribose-nicotinamide end of the coen10 A
zyme. Clear electron density is present for more
than 320 water molecules, for Tris molecules and
for sulfate ions in each of the re®ned structures
(see Table 2). In all re®ned structures, electron density accounting for a small unidenti®ed molecule is
present next to the protein regions Glu67-Ala71
and Ser176-Ser 178. The estimated atomic coordinate error (Cruickshank DPI; Murshudov et al.,
Ê for all the re®ned structures.
1997) is <0.1 A
Inspection of the re®ned model and electron
density shows that the Ser107Ala mutation has
minor effects on the structure of its protein sur-
roundings. Signi®cant side-chain conformational
changes are observed at Cys109, Ile110 and Met162
(Met162 is spatially close to Ile110); in particular,
the modi®ed side-chain conformation of Cys109
may be responsible for the modest solvent-accessiÊ 2). The backbone conforbility of Ala107 (11 A
mation in the 108-111 segment is partly affected.
Minor side-chain readjustments are present also at
Asn133 and His179, while the active site-solvent
structure is mostly coincident with that observed
in the wild-type holoenzyme. Although the Ser107Ala mutation affects one of the three recognized
GMER catalytic residues, neither Tyr136 nor
Lys140 side-chain conformation is perturbed. Similarly, the NADP coenzyme molecule displays a
conformation that is coincident with that of the
wild-type enzyme, although a precise orientation
of the nicotinamide ring cannot be assigned due to
poor electron density for this part of the coenzyme.
The Tyr136Glu mutant structure shows clearly
de®ned electron density for the mutated residue,
fully compatible with a Glu side-chain whose Ca
and Cb atoms are essentially coincident with those
of Tyr136 in the wild-type GMER structure (see
Figure 5(a)). On the other hand, the glutamate carboxylate group is shifted towards the solvent space
and held in its positions by hydrogen bonds to
Ê ), and potentially to Asn72
Asn133 ND2 (3.30 A
Ê ) and Cys109 SG (3.63 A
Ê ). Moreover,
OD1 (3.53 A
Glu136 OE2 is hydrogen bonded through bridging
water molecules to the carbonyl groups of Gly67
(through Wat36) and Lys65 (through Wat230). The
Tyr136Glu substitution affects signi®cantly the
side-chain conformation of residues Val66, Cys109,
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Lys140 and His179, all surrounding the nicotinamide end of the bound coenzyme. The protein
backbone structure is shifted in the Phe104-Leu110
Ê with respect
segment, with a deviation of ca 1 A
to the wild-type enzyme, at residue Cys109.
83
Clear conformational readjustment is observed
at C-2 and C-3 of the N-ribose (N- identi®es the
nicotinamide-end of NADP), which moves to ®ll
a cavity left by the Tyr136Glu substitution. As
a result, Lys140 NZ can hydrogen bond to the
Figure 5. (a) Stereo view of the Tyr136Glu mutant active-site region including the mutated residue and part of the
neighboring amino acid residues involved in the GMER catalytic mechanism. For reference, the NADP molecule
(blue) fully de®ned in the mutant electron density is displayed overlaid upon its own structure in the wild-type
enzyme (yellow). Helix a-E, in the mutant structure, is displayed as a blue ribbon. (b) Stereo view of the Lys140Arg
mutant active-site region in an orientation comparable to that of (a), with the same colour conventions. The space®lling nucleotide-sugar molecule highlights the expected substrate-binding mode, as inferred from homology
modeling based on the structure of the UGE:UDP-glucose:NADH complex (Thoden et al., 1997; Rizzi et al., 1998;
Somers et al., 1998). This Figure was drawn with MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991).
84
Ê ) and O-30 atoms (3.03 A
Ê ),
N-ribose O-20 (2.84 A
while Glu136, which is solvent-accessible only for
Ê 2, is hydrogen bonded to the N-ribose O-20
14 A
atom via a bridging water molecule (Wat129). The
nicotinamide ring is well de®ned in the electron
density, and displays an intramolecular hydrogen
bond between the carboxamide N atom and the
bridging b-phosphate group. Moreover, the nicotinamide carboxamide O atom is hydrogen bonded
Ê ). The
to the Leu166 peptidic N atom (3.25 A
NADP binding region is characterized by
substantial redistribution of the ordered water molecules as compared to wild-type GMER structure.
The third mutant structure analyzed, bearing the
substitution of the catalytic residue Lys140 with an
arginyl side-chain, shows substantial perturbation
of the active-site region, despite the conservation of
a positively charged residue at position 140 (see
Figure 5(b)). In fact, the presence of the bulky guanidino group of Arg140, which would potentially
collide with the N-ribose ring, forces the ribosenicotinamide segment of NADP to rotate by
about 120 around the ribose-phosphate bonds, in
the direction of the solvent. The mutated Arg140
residue, which matches the side-chain conformation of Lys140 in the wild-type enzyme, is
Ê ) and,
hydrogen bonded to Tyr136 OH (3.01 A
through four active-site water molecules, to Leu61,
Ala63, Glu87 and to a phosphate group of the
coenzyme. Side-chain readjustments can be found
at residues Leu105, Cys109, Met162 and His179,
the latter being hydrogen bonded to the nicotinic
Ê ). As observed for the
carboxamide O atom (3.01 A
other mutants, the protein main chain displays a
signi®cant deviation from the wild-type protein
structure in the Phe104-Ile110 segment (about
Ê at the Ca atom of Gly106). Moreover, the
1.9 A
ordered water molecules surrounding the coenzyme are structured quite differently as compared
to the other GMER structures examined, as a result
of the internal cavity left by the shift of the NADP
ribose-nicotinamide segment.
As listed in Table 2, one Tris molecule and three
sulfate ions were located on the molecular surface
of the re®ned structures. In particular, the Tris molecule is located next to residues Arg21, His170 and
Trp311, in an inter-domain location. Next, one of
the sulfate anions, common to all the re®ned structures, is electrostatically linked to His11, Arg12 (to
which it is also hydrogen bonded) and to Arg20.
The constant presence of the anion may prevent
direct interaction of Arg12 with the NADP ribose
Ê away from the Arg12
phosphate, which is kept 7 A
guanidino group. A distinct case concerns a small
molecular compound, of unknown origin, constantly observed between the GMER N and Cterminal domains in the region between residues
Gly67-Ala71 and Ser176-Ser178. In all the re®ned
structures, the electron density accounting for such
a ligand displays a constant shape, reminiscent of
an ethyl phosphate molecule. One end of the
liganded compound, displaying tetrahedral atomic
structure, provides hydrogen bonding to residue
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Lys262 of a symmetry-related GMER molecule. In
the Lys140Arg mutant, which shows a modi®ed
NADP conformation in this region, the putative
ethyl phosphate molecule can still be clearly recognized, but rotated by about 180 with respect to
the other re®ned structures, in interaction with the
nicotinamide carboxamide N atom. Related to such
modi®ed binding mode, shifting the location of
the putative phosphate group, Lys262 of the
symmetry-related GMER molecule adopts two
alternative conformations.
Discussion
The wealth of structural and mutational data
available on members of the SDR homology family
(Gosh et al., 1994, 1995; Thoden et al., 1996a,b,c,
1997; Breton et al., 1996; Tanaka et al., 1996a,b;
Benach et al., 1998), has indicated that the GMER
catalytic mechanism is based on the concerted
action of residues Ser107, Tyr136 and Lys140.
These residues are spatially close, and fall next to
the NADP N-ribose, to the nicotinamide ring and
to the expected 4-ketopyranose substrate binding
site (Rizzi et al., 1998; Somers et al., 1998). In wildtype GMER, Tyr136 OH atom is hydrogen bonded
Ê ), Lys140
to the 30 OH atom of the N-ribose (2.76 A
Ê)
NZ is hydrogen bonded to both 20 OH (2.93 A
0
Ê
and 3 OH (2.96 A) atoms, but the two catalytic
residues are not mutually hydrogen bonded (the
Ê ). More136 OH to 140 NZ distance being 4.28 A
over, the Tyr136 OH and Lys140 NZ side-chain
atoms cannot hydrogen bond to Ser107, the third
Ê
catalytic residue, whose OG atom is about 4.38 A
Ê away, respectively (see Figures 2 and
and 6.97 A
6). A very similar structural organization is conserved in the active site of homologous enzymes
active on related substrates, including GMD, the
enzyme preceding GMER in the GDP-L-fucose biosynthetic pathway, in UGE, but also in more distantly related SDRs active on substrates other than
nucleotide-sugars (Varughese et al., 1994; Tanaka
et al., 1996a,b; Gosh et al., 1995; Benach et al., 1998;
Somoza et al., 2000; Thoden et al., 1996a,b).
The epimerization reaction catalyzed by GMER
occurs at the C-3 and C-5 centers of the 4-ketopyranose substrate (see Figure 1). From a mechanistic
viewpoint, the active-site structure suggests that,
due to the role played by the Lys140 positive
charge (lowering the pKa of Tyr136 to ca 6.1),
Tyr136 OH may act as a general acid/base with
respect to the substrate 4-keto center, during catalysis (Jornvall et al., 1995; Liu et al., 1997). Tyr136 is
held to donate/accept a proton to/from the substrate C-4 oxygen atom, promoting the transition
between keto/enolic forms at this center (and
therefore at the adjacent C-3 or C-5), required for
the two epimerization reactions. In this key action,
Tyr136 is likely assisted by the hydrogen bonding
capabilities of neighboring residues Ser107, Ser108
and Cys109. Moreover, Tyr136 can assist the
reduction step of the epimerized intermediate,
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-L-galactose, by donating a
proton to the 4-keto group, concerted with the
stereospeci®c hydride transfer from NADPH to the
pyranose C-4 center (Burke & Frey, 1993; Menon
et al., 1999).
In this mechanistic context, the catalytic center
Ser107Ala mutation, re¯ected by minor structural
perturbation of the wild-type GMER structure, is
found to decrease the kcat value for the overall
enzymatic reaction by a factor of 1000, with very
moderate decrease in Km values for NADPH and
for the substrate. Thus, whereas Ser107 appears to
be a key residue for catalysis, it plays a secondary
role in coenzyme and substrate binding (see
Table 1). Hydrogen bonding between Ser107 and
the coenzyme nicotinamide ring is structurally
possible in wild-type GMER (see Figure 5(a)), but
cannot be ®rmly established due to conformational
disorder displayed by the nicotinamide ring in the
crystal structure. In the homologous enzyme UGE,
Ser124, the Ser107 structurally equivalent residue,
has been shown to be involved in hydrogen bonding to the nicotinamide carboxamide group, in an
NAD(H) redox-dependent manner (Thoden et al.,
1997). Mutation of UGE Ser124 to Thr maintains an
active enzyme, whereas virtually inactive forms
are obtained for the Ser124Ala or Ser124Val residue substitutions, which impair proton exchange
capabilities (Liu et al., 1997). In a similar way the
Thr133Val mutation, in the structurally equivalent
site of GMD, reduces the kcat value by 3000-fold,
leaving the Km values for NADP and for the substrate almost unaltered (Somoza et al., 2000). All
these data are consistent with two complementary
roles for Ser107 in the GMER catalytic mechanism.
On one hand, Ser107 may assist proton exchange
between Tyr136 and the substrate, likely supported
by Ser108 or Cys109. On the other, Ser107 may
play a structural role, stabilizing the nicotinamide
orientation required for the NADPH to substrate
stereospeci®c hydride transfer, in the reduction
step. In this respect, a Ser107 to nicotinamide
hydrogen bond may be favored in a lower polarity
environment, when both NADPH and the substrate are bound. In dihydropteridine reductase,
the presence of Ala135 (Varughese et al., 1994),
instead of Ser at this site, is compensated by a
trapped water molecule, which may provide the
required proton exchange capabilities. However,
no trapped water molecule is present in the GMER
Ser107Ala mutant (holoenzyme) at a structural
location compatible with the role played by the
Ser107 OG atom.
The Ser107Ala mutant is nevertheless endowed
with epimerase activity (both in the presence of
oxidized or reduced coenzyme; see Figures 3 and
4). Such an observation would suggest that stabilization of the enediol intermediates required to
achieve epimerization at the C-3 and C-5 substrate
centers does not require a protein OH group at this
site, in keeping with the minor effects that the
Ser107Ala mutation has on substrate recognition.
In this respect, it should be considered that the
85
nearby residues Ser108 and Cys109, both spatially
close to the proposed 4-ketopyranose binding site,
are also valid candidates for proton shuttling
between the enzyme and the substrate, and may
provide stabilization of the substrate or reaction
intermediate(s) during the catalytic cycle. Residues
Ser107, Ser108 and Cys109 are at the base of a
round protein surface pocket, whose outer rim is
essentially de®ned by residues Asn72, Lys113,
Glu130, Asn133, His179 and Ly283, having the
nicotinamide moiety at the ¯oor (see Figures 5 and
6). Modeling indicates that the substrate 4-ketopyranose ring may be located in the pocket, with C-3,
C-4 and C-5 centers facing Ser107, Ser108, Cys109
and His179 residues (Rizzi et al., 1998). Although
Ser108 and Cys109 are not strongly conserved in
related SDR enzyme sequences, they are present in
human erythocyte enzyme FX, which also displays
a two-center epimerase activity, and align with
Thr115 and Cys116 in the murine transplantation
antigen P35B (Tonetti et al., 1996; Szikora et al.,
1990). Moreover, residue Glu135 of GMD, which is
structurally equivalent to Cys109 of GMER, has
been proposed to act as a base during the GDPmannose 4,6-dehydratase reaction (Somoza et al.,
2000).
Impairment of the catalytic activity in the
Cys109Ala GMER mutant, which however maintains virtually unaltered Km values for NADPH
and for the substrate, is in keeping with the proton
exchange role for Cys109, proposed above. Moreover, the lack of epimerase activity shown by the
Cys109Ala mutant, as opposed to conservation of
the epimerase activity displayed by the Ser107Ala
mutant GMER, supports such a proton shuttle role
for Cys109 as opposed to a nicotinamide-orienting
role (during NADPH reduction of the epimerized
intermediate GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-L-galactose) for
Ser107. In particular, we note that Cys109 may
display a lowered pKa value, resulting from a
strong Cys109 SG - - - Ser107 OG hydrogen bond,
constantly present in the pertinent GMER wildtype or mutant structures analyzed here (see
Figures 5 and 6).
Related to the discussion on residues assisting
catalysis, and in agreement with the known lability
of the C-3 proton during epimerization, a complementary general acid/base role may be played
by residue His179, which, in modeling studies,
falls next to the C-2 and C-3 centers of the 4-ketopyranose substrate ring (see Figure 6; Chang et al.,
1988; Rizzi et al., 1998; Somers et al., 1998; Somoza
et al., 2000). Such a role is supported by the present
analysis, which shows a 1000-fold loss of total
activity for the His179Asn mutant, with very modest decrease in Km for NADPH. Moreover,
mutation of His179 impairs the GMER epimerase
activity, suggesting that a multi-residue proton
donor/acceptor array is required in the strict
neighborhood of the pyranose ring to promote the
epimerization reaction and/or stabilize the different keto-enolic intermediate forms. In fact,
mutations of residue Lys140 (into Arg or Ser),
86
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Figure 6. Stereo view of the proposed binding mode for a nucleotide-sugar molecule (shown as a space-®lling
model) relative to active-site residues discussed in the text. The C-2 and C-3 centers can be recognized as those closest
to His179 side-chain; the C-4 center falls next to the nicotinamide carboxamido group.
which is structurally farther away and unlikely to
interact directly with the substrate pyranose ring,
do not affect the epimerase activity signi®cantly
(see Figure 6).
The Tyr136Glu mutation has evident structural
effects, which are localized within the GMER active
site despite the unusual residue substitution and
the buried location of the affected site (see
Figure 5(a)). Accommodation of a negatively
charged Glu residue at site 136 is in keeping with
the proposed ionization state of Tyr136, and with
its electrostatic coupling to Lys140 in the wild-type
enzyme. Therefore, the structural perturbations
observed in the Tyr136Glu mutant can be mainly
ascribed to the steric and hydrogen bonding effects
exerted by the mutated residue on its surroundings. In this respect, it should be noted that, unlike
residue Tyr136, Glu136 is connected to the
N-ribose only through a bridging water molecule,
loosing an SDR conserved protein-coenzyme interaction. This fact is re¯ected by different sugar
puckering modes of the N-ribose, which is present
as C-20 -endo, C-30 -exo in the mutant (versus C-20 -exo,
C-30 -endo in wild-type GMER). Nevertheless, the
catalytic residue Lys140 maintains the same pair of
hydrogen bonds (to N-ribose 20 OH and 30 OH
groups) observed in the wild-type GMER (see
Figure 5(a)).
The total loss of activity in Tyr136Glu GMER
can be related to the following considerations (see
Figures 5 and 6). The structural environment in the
4-ketopyranose ring binding site is perturbed in
such a way that the general acid/base residue at
site 136 cannot be properly positioned for proton
transfer to the C-4 oxygen atom during the different steps of the catalytic cycle. Moreover, Glu136 is
expected to display a pKa value lower by at least
two pH units as compared to that of Tyr136, possibly too acid to provide equally ef®cient proton
donor and acceptor capabilities during catalysis.
Several different mutations of the catalytic center
Tyr residue, the only truly invariant residue in the
whole SDR family, failed to provide signi®cantly
active enzymes in UGE, Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase and in dihydropteridine reductase,
stressing the requirement for a properly positioned
general acid/base group within hydrogen bonding
distance from the substrate reactive center (Chen
et al., 1993; Cols et al., 1993; Varughese et al., 1994;
Liu et al., 1997).
The two mutations engineered at site 140
(Lys140Arg and Lys140Ser) affect quite differently
the GMER catalytic activity (with 20-fold and 1500fold drops, respectively). Inspection of the crystal
structure shows that in the Lys140Arg mutant
these effects may be related to the increased size of
residue Arg140, which perturbs the active-site
structure, particularly at the NADP ribose-nicotinamide end, resulting in a direct hydrogen bonding interaction between Arg140 and Tyr136 (see
Figure 5(b)). Perturbation of the coenzyme binding
mode is re¯ected by the Km value for NADPH in
the Lys140Arg mutant, as opposed to that of the
Lys140Ser mutant (Table 1), where the smaller
87
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Ser140 residue is unlikely to alter the coenzyme
binding mode. On the other hand, the Arg140 positive charge supports maintenance of the electrostatic coupling with Tyr136, and should keep the
Tyr136 pKa value within the useful range for catalysis as a general acid/base residue. In fact, inspection of the kcat values given in Table 1 shows that
the residual activity of the Lys140Arg mutant is
signi®cant and 75-fold higher than in the Lys140Ser mutant, despite some loss of substrate af®nity.
Lastly, residue Arg187 is located at the upper
part of the proposed substrate-binding cleft (see
Figures 2 and 6), next to the guanine-ring site
suggested by modeling. Although some conformational readjustment in this region may be
required to improve the enzyme-substrate ®t,
mutation of residue Arg187 to Ala increases the
substrate Km by approximately sixfold, suggesting
the net contribution of this residue to substrate recognition, presumably through hydrogen bonding
to guanine hetero-atoms (Rizzi et al., 1998). On the
other hand, in accordance with the substantial
distance of Arg187 from the coenzyme binding site
Ê ), no effect on the Km value for NADPH is
(>19 A
observed. Sequence alignment of GMER and UGE
shows that the Arg187 equivalent residue in UGE
is Val, a residue variation that may be related to
the different substrate speci®cities displayed by the
two homologous enzymes (whose sites recognize
guanine and uridine bases, respectively), but also
to other residue substitutions in this area. On the
other hand, residue Arg209, which is located in the
central part of the proposed GMER substrate cleft,
is conserved in UGE, where it plays an electrostatic
and hydrogen bonding role in recognition of the
substrate pyrophosphate bridge.
The functional data here presented allow us to
make some distinction between the epimerase and
reductase activities in GMER. The structural data
indicate that the two enzymatic reactions may be
based on a common subset of the active-site residues, centered around Tyr136. Maintenance of
residual epimerase activity in wild-type GMER
(even in the absence of NADP) is in keeping with
the essentially conserved active-site structure and
location of residues Cys109, Tyr136, His179 and
Lys140, observed in the crystal structure of the
apoenzyme (Rizzi et al., 1998). On the other hand,
a fully structured active site with ideal dielectric
environment, linked to the presence of bound
NADPH (and substrate), is required for the
achievement of the full epimerase activity, as compared to apo-GMER. In fact, our data show that
additional epimerase ef®ciency, relative to the
apoenzyme, can be gained also in the presence of
NADP, i.e. in a non-reducing but properly structured holo-GMER active center. Moreover, the epimerase reaction ef®ciency in the Ser107Ala mutant
is dependent on the presence of either NADP or
NADPH (see Figure 4(b)). Such observations may
be related to different active-site structuring, electrostatic charges, conformations or mobilities
achieved by the oxidized versus reduced nicotin-
amide ring, which would support increasingly
productive binding modes for the substrate (or catalytic intermediates) pyranose ring relative to residues Cys109, Tyr136 and His179. Remarkably, no
NADP effect on the epimerization reaction catalyzed by GDP-fucose synthetase (an alternative
name for GMER) was reported by Menon et al. in a
recent characterization of the wild-type enzyme
(Menon et al., 1999).
As a whole, the mutational studies presented
here show that the active tertiary and quaternary
structures of GMER can support a wide range of
amino acid substitutions, while preserving rather
strictly the enzyme's wild-type fold, a prerequisite
for site-directed mutagenesis characterization of
the catalytic mechanism. In this respect, we note
that decreased stability has been observed for only
two GMER mutants, which affect the active site
electrostatics. In fact, unlike the Tyr136Glu mutant,
which maintains the Tyr136 negative charge, both
the meta-stable Lys140Ser and His179Asn mutants
remove a positive charge from the active site, with
possible effects on the local enzyme structure, as
re¯ected by failure to grow crystals of the latter
mutants under the common physicochemical conditions employed in this study.
In view of the key role played in the de novo biosynthesis of GDP-L-fucose and, as consequence, of
fucosylated glycoconjugates, GMER is a potential
target for the therapeutical treatment of pathological conditions arising from abnormal selectinmediated cell-to-cell interaction processes. These
include acute and chronic in¯ammation, graft
rejection and metastatic states. The elucidation of
GMER catalytic mechanism, together with identi®cation of the residues involved in substrate recognition and enzymatic activity, is the basis for the
rational development of inhibitory molecules to be
used in the development of leads.
Materials and Methods
Cloning of bacterial GMER
Wild-type GMER was overexpressed in E. coli as
described by Tonetti et al. (1998a). Gene-speci®c primers
(TibMolBiol, Genova, Italy), containing EcoRI and XhoI
restriction sites in sense and antisense primers, respectively, were used to amplify the GMER gene, using puri®ed E. coli K12 genomic DNA as template. The PCR
fragment was puri®ed by agarose gel, digested with
EcoRI and XhoI, and ligated in pGEX-6-P1 vector (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Milan, Italy). The construct
obtained was used to transform E. coli strain JM109
and to express the recombinant GST-fusion protein as
described by Sturla et al. (1997).
Site-directed mutagenesis
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by the
unique site elimination technique (Deng & Nikoloff,
1992), using the U.S.E. Mutagenesis Kit from AmershamPharmacia Biotech and following the manufacturer's
instructions. Mutagenesis was performed directly on
pGEX-6P-1 vector containing the full-length coding
88
sequence of GMER (Tonetti et al., 1998a), annealed with
the selection primer, which substitutes the unique restriction site in the plasmid DNA, and with the target mutagenic primer, which introduces the desired mutations
into the GMER DNA. The selection primer was pGEX
U.S.E. Selection Primer (PstI to SacII) and was obtained
from Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech. Target mutagenic
primers, obtained from TibMolBiol, were FPLC-puri®ed
and were 30 to 32 bases in length. Plasmids containing
the mutated restriction site (SacII instead of PstI) were
analyzed by DNA sequencing to verify the presence of
the desired mutations in the GMER coding region. DNA
sequencing was performed by M-Medical (Florence,
Italy). The vectors containing the correct mutation were
used to trasform E. coli JM109 strain; the colonies that
produced the greatest amount of protein were used to
express the mutant enzymes as inducible GST-fusion
proteins. Protein expression was performed as described
(Sturla et al., 1997), except that the bacterial cells were
grown at 22 C, both before and after induction with
0.1 mM IPTG. Wild-type and mutant GMERs were puri®ed to homogeneity by af®nity chromatography as
described by Tonetti et al. (1998a), and the GST-tag
was removed using Pre-Scission Protease (AmershamPharmacia). Proteins were concentrated using YM10
ultra®ltration membrane (Amicon, Millipore, Milan,
Italy) to a ®nal concentration above 10 mg/ml. The
recombinant proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
(Laemmli, 1970), followed by Coomassie blue staining to
check their purity.
Synthesis of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose
Unless otherwise speci®ed, all reagents were obtained
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Synthesis of GDP-4keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose was performed from GDP-Dmannose using recombinant human GDP-D-mannose 4,6
dehydratase (GMD) (Bisso et al., 1999). Reaction mixtures
containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 150 mM NaCl,
1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 150 mg/ml GMD, and 1 mM GDP-D-mannose, or
GDP-[U-14C]-D-mannose (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech,
speci®c activity 10.6 GBq/mmol) were incubated for 45
minutes at 37 C. Samples were heat-denatured at 100 C
for one minute and centrifuged to remove precipitated
proteins. Reaction products were analyzed by HPLC
using a C18 (Bondapack column (Waters, Milford, MA;
3.9 mm 300 mm, 10 mm particle size), as described by
Tonetti et al. (1996). Electrospray mass spectrometry was
performed by direct ¯ow injection of the sample through
a Valco valve into the atmospheric pressure ionization
electrospray ion source of the mass spectrometer (5989A
single quadrupole Hewlett-Packard Engine). The spectra
were performed in the negative ion mode in a range
including the expected molecular mass. The mixture
used as eluent was water/methanol/tri¯uoroacetic acid
(TFA), 49.5:49.5:1 (by vol.), the drying gas was nitrogen
and the capillary exit voltage was set at ÿ200 V. GDP-4keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose was stored at ÿ80 C in small
aliquots.
Enzymatic assays
Spectrophotometric assays of the reductase activity
were performed using a Beckman DU 640 spectrophotometer, equipped with a cell-holder maintained at
25 C, by monitoring NADPH disappearance as a change
in absorbance at 340 nm. Reaction mixtures contained
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 150 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM
MgCl2, with different concentrations of NADPH (ranging
from 2.5 to 250 mM) and of GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose (ranging from 10 to 750 mM), in a total volume of
350 ml. Reactions were initiated by addition of GMER
and initial rates were recorded. The kinetic parameters
for wild-type and mutant enzymes were determined by
using at least six substrate concentrations, for both
NADPH and GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose. Km and
Vmax values were determined using a non-linear
regression method. To con®rm the speci®city of the reaction for both wild-type and mutant enzymes, the identity
of the product GDP-L-fucose was con®rmed by HPLC
and TLC analyses. To evaluate the epimerase activity,
14
C-labeled GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose (see above)
at saturating concentration (250 mM), was incubated at
37 C with wild-type or mutant GMER, in the presence
of 2.5 mM MgCl2, either with or without 1 mM
NADP(H). Incubation mixtures were then reacted with
1 mg/ml NaBH4, for one hour at room temperature, and
acid-hydrolyzed by addition of 5 % (v/v) TFA (incubation for 15 minutes at 100 C). Samples were vacuumdried, suspended in 1 ml of water and desalted using
0.5 g of Amberlite MB-150 (Sigma) for each milliliter of
incubation. Samples were vacuum-dried again and TLC
analysis was performed on Silica-gel 60 TLC plates
(Merck, Milan, Italy), pre-treated as described (Tonetti
et al. 1996). TLC plates were developed four times using
an acetonitrile/water (95:5, v/v) mixture. Standard
unlabeled sugars were chromatographed together with
samples and detected with a diphenylamine/aniline/
phosphoric acid reagent (Chaplin, 1994). The radiolabeled compounds were detected and quanti®ed by
autoradiography using the Cyclone System (Packard,
Milan, Italy).
Crystallographic analyses
Crystals of native and mutant GMER forms were
grown as described by Tonetti et al. (1998b), with slight
adjustments according to the mutant species considered.
In particular, protein solutions ranging from 11 to
20 mg/ml were equilibrated against 1.5 M lithium sulfate, 0.1 M Mes or Tris buffers (pH 6.5-7.8) at 21 C,
yielding trigonal bipyramidal crystals (ca 0.25 mm per
edge) within one week. All crystals grown for GMER
mutant forms proved isomorphous with the wild-type
protein crystals (trigonal space group P3221,
Ê , c 74.9 A
Ê , g 120 , one GMER mola b 103.0 A
ecule per asymmetric unit). High-resolution X-ray diffraction data for the wild-type protein were collected
using synchrotron radiation (ELETTRA, beam line
Ê , 100 K). X-ray diffracXRD1, Trieste, Italy; l 0.855 A
tion data for the GMER Tyr136Glu and Ser107Ala
mutants were collected at the EMBL/DESY synchrotron
source (beam line BW7A, Hamburg, Germany;
Ê , 100 K). The Lys140Arg mutant data were
l 0.844 A
collected at ESRF (beam line ID14-1, Grenoble, France;
Ê , 100 K). A summary of the X-ray data collecl 0.902 A
tion statistics is provided in Table 2. Holo-GMER (wildtype and mutant) crystals were prepared from the
apoenzyme crystals by soaking in NADP-containing
solutions. For the purpose of cryoprotection, the mother
liquor solution was supplemented with 20 % (v/v) glycerol. Diffracted intensities were integrated and scaled,
in all cases, using the HKL program suite (Otwinowski
et al., 1997).
Crystal structure analyses were carried out starting
Ê wild-type GMER
with phases calculated from the 2.1 A
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
structure previously determined (PDB code 1bws; Rizzi
et al., 1998), omitting the NADP molecule, solvent and
the relevant mutated side-chain. Crystallographic re®nement of the GMER native and mutant structures was
performed using the program REFMAC (CCP4 suite,
Murshudov et al., 1997). Rigid-body re®nement of the
1bws model (determined at 300 K) was preliminarily
Ê resolution range. Subperformed in the 30.0-3.5 A
sequently, alternate cycles of positional re®nement and
model inspection/rebuilding were performed, based on
the O program suite (Jones et al., 1991). When re®nement
of the protein component was at convergence, the
mutated side-chains and the NADP molecule were
modeled in the respective electron density peaks,
followed by additional individual B-factor and atomic
coordinate re®nement cycles, with water and solvent
molecule location, until convergence was achieved at the
maximum resolution. Eventually, individual anisotropic
B-factors were re®ned for all NADP complexes. Final
statistics for all the re®ned structures are reported in
Ê resolution
Table 2. A preliminary account on the 1.45 A
structure of wild-type GMER has been reported (Rosano
et al., 2000).
Protein Data Bank accession codes
Atomic coordinates and structure factors for the
Ê resolution wild-type holo-GMER structure and
1.45 A
for the Ser107Ala, Tyr136Glu and Lys140Arg mutants
have been deposited with the RCSB Protein Data Bank,
with accession codes 1E6U, 1E7Q, 1E7R, 1E7S, respectively Berman et al. (2000).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Italian
Ministry for University, Scienti®c and Technological
Research (``Structural bases and functional consequences
of cell-surface recognition processes'' and PRIN 98 ``Molecular mechanism of intercellular communication'') and
CNR (Target Project ``Biotechnology'', to M.B. and M.T.).
We are grateful to Professor Menico Rizzi (Universita'
del Piemonte Orientale) for helpful comments and to Dr
Gianluca Damonte (DIMES, University of Genova) for
mass spectroscopy analysis. Finally, support from the
synchrotron radiation facilities (ELETTRA-Trieste, ESRFGrenoble and EMBL/DESY-Hamburg) is acknowledged.
References
Appelmelk, B. J., Negrini, R., Moran, A. P. & Kuipers,
E. J. (1997). Molecular mimicry between Helicobacter
pylori and the host. Trends Microbiol. 5, 70-73.
Benach, J., Atrian, S., Gonzalez-Duarte, R. & Ladestein,
R. (1998). The re®ned crystal structure of Drosophilia
Ê resollebanonensis alcohol dehydrogenase at 1.9 A
ution. J. Mol. Biol. 282, 383-399.
Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G.,
Bhat, T. N. & Weisseg, M. (2000). The Protein Data
Bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 235-242.
Bisso, A., Sturla, L., Zanardi, D., De Flora, A. & Tonetti,
M. (1999). Structural and enzymatic characterization
of human recombinant GDP-D-mannose-4,6-dehydratase. FEBS Letters, 456, 370-374.
89
Branden, C. & Tooze, J. (1991). Alpha/Beta structures.
In Introduction to Protein Structure, 2nd edit.,
pp. 47-66, Garland Publishing Inc., New York.
Brandley, B. K., Swiedler, S. J. & Robbins, P. W. (1990).
Carbohydrate ligands of the LEC cell adhesion
molecules. Cell, 63, 861-863.
Breton, R., Housset, D., Mazza, C. & Fontecilla-Camps,
J. C. (1996). The structure of a complex of human
17b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase with estradiol
and NADP identi®es two principal targets for the
design of inhibitors. Structure, 4, 905-915.
Burke, J. R. & Frey, P. A. (1993). The importance of
binding energy in catalysis of hydride transfer by
UDP-galactose 4-epimerase: a 13C and 15N NMR
and kinetic study. Biochemistry, 32, 13220-13230.
Chang, S., Duerr, B. & Serif, G. (1988). An epimerasereductase in L-fucose synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 263,
1693-1697.
Chaplin, M. F. (1994). Monosaccharides. In Carbohydrate
Analysis: A Pratical Approach, pp. 1-42, IRL Press,
Oxford.
Chen, Z., Jiang, J. C., Lin, Z.-G., Lee, W. R., Naker, M. E.
& Chang, S. H. (1993). Site-speci®c mutagenesis of
Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase: evidence for
involvement of tyrosine-152 and lysine-156 in catalysis. Biochemistry, 32, 3342-3346.
Cols, N., Marfany, G., Atrian, S. & Gonzalez-Duarte, R.
(1993). Effect of site-directed mutagenesis on conserved positions of Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase. FEBS Letters, 319, 90-94.
Deng, W. P. & Nickoloff, J. A. (1992). Site directed mutagenesis of virtually any plasmid by eliminating a
unique site. Anal. Biochem. 200, 81-88.
Engh, R. & Huber, R. (1991). Accurate bond and angle
parameters for X-ray structure re®nement. Acta
Crystallog. sect. A, 47, 392-400.
Ensor, C. M. & Tai, H. (1996). Site-directed mutagenesis
of the conserved serine 138 of human placental
NAD-dependent 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase to an alanine results in an inactive
enzyme. Biochem. Biophys. Research Communications,
220, 330-333.
Etzioni, A., Frydman, M., Pollack, S., Avidor, I., Phillips,
M. L. & Paulson, J. C. (1992). Brief report: recurrent
severe infections caused by a novel leukocyte
adhesion de®ciency. New Engl. J. Med. 327, 17891792.
Feizi, T. (1990). The major blood group ABO(H) determining genes are isolated. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15,
330-331.
Feizi, T. & Childs, R. A. (1987). Carbohydrates as antigenic determinants of glycoproteins. Biochem. J. 245,
1-11.
Ginsburg, V. (1960). Formation of guanosine diphosphate L-fucose from guanosine diphosphate D-mannose. J. Biol. Chem. 235, 2196-2201.
Ginsburg, V. (1961). Studies on the biosynthesis of guanosine diphosphate L-fucose. J. Biol. Chem. 236,
2389-2393.
Gosh, D., Wawrzak, Z., Weeks, C. M., Duax, W. L. &
Erman, M. (1994). The re®ned three-dimensional
structure of 3a,20b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
and possible roles of the residues conserved in
short-chain dehydrogenases. Structure, 2, 629-640.
Gosh, D., Pletnev, V. Z., Zhu, D.-W., Wawrzak, Z.,
Duax, W. L., Pangborn, W., Labrie, F. & Lin, S. X.
(1995). Structure of estrogenic 17b-hydrosysteroid
dehydrogenase at 2.20 resolution. Structure, 3, 503513.
90
Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W. & Kjeldgaard, M.
(1991). Improved methods for building protein
models in electron density maps and the location of
errors in these models. Acta Crystallog. sect. A, 47,
110-119.
JoÈrnvall, H., Persson, B., Krook, M., Atrian, S.,
Gonzalez-Duarte, R., Jeffery, J. & Ghosh, D.
(1995). Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR).
Biochemistry, 34, 6003-6013.
Kraulis, P. J. (1991). MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce
both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 24, 946-950.
Labesse, G., Vidal-Cros, A., Chomilier, J., Gaudry, M. &
Mornon, J. P. (1994). Structural comparisons lead to
the de®nition of a new superfamily of NAD(P)(H)accepting
oxidoreductase:
the
single-domain
reductase/epimerase/dehydrogenase (the ``RED''
family). Biochem. J. 304, 95-99.
Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins
during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage
T4. Nature, 227, 680-685.
Liu, Y., Thoden, J. B., Kim, J., Berger, E., Gulik, A. M.,
Ruzicka, F. J., Holden, H. M. & Frey, P. A. (1997).
Mechanistic roles of tyrosine 149 and serine 124 in
UDP-galactose 4-epimerase from Escherichia coli.
Biochemistry, 36, 10675-10684.
Lowe, J. B. (1997). Selectin ligands, leukocyte traf®cking,
and fucosyltransferase genes. Kidney Int. 51, 14181426.
Menon, S., Stahl, M., Kumar, R., Xu, G. Y. & Sullivan,
F. X. (1999). Stereochemical course and steady state
mechanism of the reaction catalyzed by the GDPfucose synthetase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem.
274, 26743-26750.
Morelli, A. & De Flora, A. (1977). Isolation and partial
characterization of a NADP and NADPH-binding
protein from human erythrocytes. Arch. Biochem.
Biophys. 179, 698-705.
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. (1997).
Re®nement of macromolecular structures by
the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallog.
sect. D, 53, 240-257.
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Processing of X-ray
diffraction data collected in oscillation mode.
Methods Enzymol. A276, 307-326.
Persson, B., Rook, K. & JoÈrnvall, H. (1991). Characteristic
of short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase and related
enzymes. Eur. J. Biochem. 200, 537-543.
Phillips, M. L., Schwartz, B. R., Etzioni, A., Bayer, R.,
Ochs, H. D., Paulson, J. C. & Harlan, J. M. (1995).
Neutrophil adhesion in leukocyte adhesion
de®ciency syndrome type 2. J. Clin. Invest. 96, 28982906.
Rizzi, M., Tonetti, M., Vigevani, P., Sturla, L., Bisso, A.,
De Flora, A., Bordo, D. & Bolognesi, M. (1998).
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose epimerase/reductase from Escherichia coli, a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of GDP-L-fucose, displays the structural
characteristics of the RED protein homology superfamily. Structure, 6, 1453-1465.
Rosano, C., Izzo, G., Sturla, L., Bisso, A., Tonetti, M. &
Bolognesi, M. (2000). The high resolution structure
of
GDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose
epimerase/
reductase. Croatica Chem. Acta. In the press.
Somers, W. S., Stahl, M. L. & Sullivan, F. X. (1998).
GDP-fucose synthetase from Escherichia coli: structure of a unique member of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family that catalyzes two
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
distinct reactions at the same active site. Structure,
6, 1601-1612.
Somoza, J. R., Menon, S., Schmidt, H., Joseph-McCarthy,
D., Dessen, A., Stahl, M. L., Somers, W. S. &
Sullivan, F. X. (2000). Structural and kinetic analysis
of Escherichia coli GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase
provides insights into the enzyme's catalytic mechanism and regulation by GDP-fucose. Structure, 8,
123-135.
Sturla, L., Bisso, A., Zanardi, D., Benatti, U., De Flora,
A. & Tonetti, M. (1997). Expression, puri®cation
and characterization of GDP-D-mannose 4,6-dehydratase from Escherichia coli. FEBS Letters, 412, 126130.
Sullivan, F. X., Kumar, R., Kriz, R., Stahl, M., Xu, G.,
Rouse, J., Chang, X., Boodhoo, A., Potvin, B. &
Cummings, D. (1998). Molecular cloning of human
GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase and reconstitution of
GDP-fucose biosynthesis in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 273,
8193-8202.
Szikora, J. P., Van Pel, A., Brichard, V., Andre, M., Van
Baren, N., Henry, P., De Plaen, E. & Boon, T.
(1990). Structure of the gene of tum- transplantation
antigen P35B: presence of a point mutation in the
antigenic allele. EMBO J. 9, 1041-1050.
Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Tanabe, T., Yoshimoto, T.,
Tsuru, D. & Mitsui, Y. (1996a). Crystal structures of
the binary and ternary complexes of 7a-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli.
Biochemistry, 35, 7715-7730.
Tanaka, N., Nonaka, T., Nakanishi, M., Deyashiki, Y.,
Hara, A. & Mitsui, Y. (1996b). Crystal structure of
the ternary complex of mouse lung carbonyl
Ê resolution: the structural origin
reductase at 1.8 A
of coenzyme speci®city in the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family. Structure, 4, 33-45.
Thoden, J. B., Frey, P. A. & Holden, H. M. (1996a).
Crystal structure of the oxidized and reduced forms
of UDP-galactose 4-epimerase isolated from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry, 35, 2557-2566.
Thoden, J. B., Frey, P. A. & Holden, H. M. (1996b).
Molecular structure of the NADH/UDP-glucose
abortive complex of UDP-galactose 4-epimerase
from Escherichia coli: implications for the catalytic
mechanism. Biochemistry, 35, 5137-5144.
Thoden, J. B., Frey, P. A. & Holden, H. M. (1996c). High
resolution X-ray structure of UDP-galactose 4-epimerase complexed with UDP-phenol. Protein Sci. 5,
2149-2161.
Thoden, J. B., Hegeman, A. D., Wesenberg, G.,
Chapeau, M. C., Frey, P. A. & Holden, H. M.
(1997). Structural analysis of UDP-sugar binding to
UDP-galactose 4-epimerase from Escherichia coli.
Biochemistry, 36, 6294-6304.
Tonetti, M., Sturla, L., Bisso, A., Benatti, U. & De Flora,
A. (1996). Synthesis of GDP-L-fucose by the human
FX protein. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27274-27279.
Tonetti, M., Sturla, L., Bisso, A., Zanardi, D., Benatti, U.
& De Flora, A. (1998a). The metabolism of 6-deoxyhexoses in bacterial and animal cells. Biochimie, 80,
923-931.
Tonetti, M., Rizzi, M., Vigevani, P., Sturla, L., Bisso, A.,
De Flora, A. & Bolognesi, M. (1998b). Preliminary
crystallographic investigations of recombinant GDP4-keto-6-deoxy-D-mannose
epimerase/reductase
from E. coli. Acta Crystallog. sect. D, 54, 684-686.
Varki, A. (1994). Selectin ligands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.
USA, 91, 7390-7397.
GDP-L-fucose Biosynthesis
Varughese, K. I., Xuong, N. H., Kiefer, P. M., Matthews,
D. A. & Whiteley, J. M. (1994). Structural and
mechanistic characteristics of dihydropteridine
reductase: a member of the Tyr-(Xaa)3-Lys-containing family of redictases and dehydrogenases. Proc.
Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 5582-5586.
Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M.
(1995). LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic
91
diagrams of protein-ligand interaction. Protein Eng.
8, 127-134.
Zhang, L., Radziejewska-Lebrecht, J., KrajeweskaPietrasik, D., Toivanen, P. & Skurnik, M. (1997).
Molecular and chemical characterization of the
lipopolysaccharide O-antigen and its role in the
virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:8.
Mol. Microbiol. 23, 63-76.
Edited by K. Nagai
(Received 15 May 2000; received in revised form 7 August 2000; accepted 15 August 2000)