Indian Journal of Career and Livelihood Planning
Journal of the Indian Association for Career and Livelihood Planning (IACLP)
Volume 1, Issue 1, April 2012
Needs and Needs Assessment in Career Guidance and
Counselling: Lack of Scientific Exploration
and Justification?
Jolanta Kavale
Abstract
Almost all modern societies agree that career guidance and counselling should be offered based on
the needs of those who apply for the service. Thus, proper and timely application of needs
assessment becomes an indispensable part of developing as well as evaluating career guidance and
counselling interventions, programs or policies. However, it is argued that there is a lack of scientific
exploration and justification towards understanding of needs and how they should be assessed. This
leads to misinterpretation and an ambiguous understanding of needs in career guidance and
counselling. This paper provides an overview of the conceptualisation of needs as well as needs
assessment from neighbouring disciplines. A particular focus is on the incorporation of needs
assessment in the area of career guidance and counselling.
Keywords: needs, needs assessment, career guidance
Introduction
Need is the most frequently used
normative
concept
associated
with
development and human wellbeing. Wiggins
(1987, p. 4) states that ―…the political
administrative process as we know it in Europe
and North America could scarcely continue
(could scarcely even conclude an argument)
without constant recourse to the idea of need.‖
Similarly, McLeod (2011) noted that the
concept of need has a central role to play in
policy-making.
Following the statement above, ―need‖
is increasingly seen as the key normative term
serving as an anchor for various policyinitiated
career
guidance
projects,
programmes or single career guidance and
counselling interventions. Scientific research,
policy as well as career counsellors in their
practice are aiming at providing career
guidance services which meet the needs of the
applicants or at least are oriented to
applicants‘ needs. Countries have initiated
legal acts and guidelines which included the
term ―need‖ as the key normative reference
point for policy definitions of lifelong career
guidance services.
For instance The
Department of Education in the UK specified
that ―the overall objective of an effective
careers education and guidance programme is
to enable learners to manage their own career
development successfully, confidently and with
due respect and care for their own needs,
those of others and of their wider communities‖
(Department of Education [DE] Entitlement
Framework Circular, 2005). In India, the Jiva
project ―has been designed to address the
livelihood planning needs of Indian young
people through relevant and culturally
grounded
career
counselling
services‖
(Arulmani, 2010). In Germany, the National
Forum for Guidance in Education, Career and
Employment agreed that the general aim of
the National Forum is to promote the
professional delivery of guidance in education,
vocational training and employment sectors in
Germany, to give stimulation for the (further)
development of guidance services which meet
the different users‘ needs (NFB, 2006).
Similarly in another EU country, Lithuania,
among seven quality assurance indicators of
career guidance, one criteria of ―Expedience‖
specifically addresses the importance of
service based on needs: ―Expedience—the
services correspond to individual needs of
inhabitants and society‖ (Baltriene &
Augutiene,
2006).
Internationally,
the
European Centre for the Development of
Vocational Training (CEDFOP) emphasized
that career guidance services ―should be
widely accessible on a lifelong basis, to serve
the needs of individuals, the economy and
wider society‖ (CEDEFOP, 2009, p. 13).
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jolanta Kavale, Technische Universität Dortmund, Research
School Education and Capabilities: Hauert 14a D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
email kavale@ifs.tu-dortmund.de
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
28
Needs and needs assessment
Apart from countries and institutions, career
counsellors are focused on obtaining the
resources for intake needs assessment in
order to better understand their applicants and
their performance deficiencies.
The persistent dominance of the term
―need‖ as a normative term in the scientific and
policy discourse as well as in the practice of
career guidance and counselling, raises the
importance of proper and timely application of
needs measurement or needs assessment.
This can be seen as an indispensable part of
developing as well as evaluating career
guidance interventions, programs or policies.
However, it is believed that there is a lack of
scientific justification towards understanding of
―need‖ and how it should be assessed in the
field of career guidance and counselling.
Background
This paper draws on selected work in
the area of career guidance which focused on
needs and needs assessment of career
guidance participants. As often demonstrated
by the research, ―need‖ can be widely
interpreted
by
the
career
guidance
researchers, as ―attitude‖, ―perceived solution
to a problem‖, ―belief‖ or ―wish‖. Often, the
ones whose needs are being measured are
asked by the researchers to identify their own
deficiencies and thus to describe their ―needs‖
in the form of beliefs of what is good or what is
desired. The career guidance research by
Gonzalez in Spain on the career education
needs of secondary school students employed
a ―needs assessment instrument‖ which aimed
at ―assessing youth attitudes and beliefs about
work as well as their career plans‖ (Gonzales,
1997, p. 215). In Canada, Witko, Bernes,
Magnusson, and Bardick (2005) explored the
career guidance needs of high school students
using the Comprehensive Career Needs
Survey by Magnusson and Bernes (2001).
Throughout the study, the borderline between
needs and wants is blurred. Indeed, one
article from this study was titled ―Senior high
school career planning: What students want‖.
The authors specifically emphasized the
importance of assessing needs by ―hearing
directly from the students, rather than inferring
what it is that they need‖ (Witko et al., 2005, p.
37). However, the notion that perceived or felt
needs are an appropriate and useful
mechanism for managing needs is doubted by
various
philosophers
and
researchers.
Particularly, McLeod (2011) argues against the
view that one can know one‘s own needs (as
J. Kavale
one can know some kinds of desires) by
feeling them.
Among the researchers who sought
more objective indicators which could signify
the need for career guidance and counselling
services were Fouad et al. (2006). In their
study titled ―need, awareness, and use of
career services for college students‖, the
researchers distinguish between measuring
need, and measuring the levels of awareness
and the use of career guidance services. They
provide a diagnostic type of testing format,
aiming to determine the gaps or needs by
measuring the study participants‘ levels of
psychological distress, and of psychological
well-being. The researchers concluded that
the study demonstrated that students ―have
career decision difficulties and psychological
distress, indicating a need for career
counselling and career services‖ (Fouad et al.,
2006, p. 416, emphasis is mine). The
assumption that the needs can be detected
mainly by third persons, by the symptoms
observed or reported is expressed by McLeod
(2011).
Based on that argument, if, for
instance, one knows the level of psychological
distress in healthy people under normal or
relaxed circumstances, then higher levels of
psychological distress, particularly if correlated
with lack of career information or ability to
engage in meaningful conversations on the
pertinent issues with trusted people, can be
described as needs requiring career guidance
and counselling.
On the other hand, a
moderately higher level of distress may also
serve as an opportunity to concentrate and
actively generate high stake decisions about a
person‘s life and career goals or future career
directions. In general, it may be noted that as
a result of the lack of exploration of the
concept of ―need‖, career guidance and
counselling research has often resulted in
respondents giving answers about their wants,
levels of satisfaction, beliefs, hopes or
preferences. Such an approach provides little
or no scientific knowledge about the nature
and scope of needs in the career guidance
field. It also prevents successful planning of
career guidance interventions where the
interventions are intended to be based on
more objective outcomes rather than wants
and desires.
The scientific studies on ―needs‖
actually list a number of so called satisfiers
(Mallmann, 1980). For instance, ―education
may be regarded as a satisfier of the need for
understanding‖ (Jackson, Jager, & Stagl,
2004). In career guidance needs research, the
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
29
Needs and needs assessment
satisfiers which are often labelled as ―needs‖
are information and advice, professional
guidance and a comprehensive career
curriculum (Witko et al., 2005). Other ―needs‖
inputs and satisfiers include additional help
with finding jobs and careers, understanding
the guidance programme, developing selfunderstanding, career awareness, exploration
and planning, interpersonal relationships,
value clarification, selection of courses and
acquisition
of
decision-making
skills
(Chuenyane, 1983). Compared to inputs or
satisfiers in the career guidance field, much
less is known about gaps in outcomes, for
instance, decreased levels of psychological
distress,
improved
school
or
work
performance, higher family-work balance.
Real needs and the relationship between
needs as objective deficiencies and the means
offered to satisfy them remain uninvestigated.
The Challenge of Defining and Assessing
Needs:
Need
versus
Desire
and
Dissatisfaction
Although the assessment of ―felt needs‖
in the form of beliefs about what is good or
desired by the person carries a positive notion
of inclusiveness and democratic participation,
it does not solve the problem of ―adaptive
preferences‖; Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen
argues that subjective perceptions of utility
―can be moulded by social conditioning and a
resigned acceptance of misfortune‖ (Sen,
1991, p. 133). This kind of acceptance and
even choice to remain in an unfavourable
environment
should
be
considered
beforehand. Particularly, in the presence of
the claim that people ―should be the experts of
their own condition‖ (Clarke, Newman, Smith,
Vidler, & Westmorland, 2007, p. 61) one
should still be knowledgeable about the
―comfort of misery‖ before asking vulnerable
groups about their felt deficiencies.
Moreover, it is further argued that even
dissatisfaction which is often assumed to be a
sign of need, does not necessarily indicate an
objective lack or deficiency. According to
Nussbaum (2007) ―people may also become
accustomed to having more than others, and
they may protest if those unequal privileges
are curtailed; but their great dissatisfaction
does not dispose of the question of equal
justice‖ (p.14). Thus, it is evident that there is
a wide room for interpretation of the term
―need‖ as well as methodological problems
regarding
the
application
of
needs
assessments. It is clear that there is no
common understanding related to these
J. Kavale
normative terms and scholars such as McLeod
(2011) have called for ―a more promising
epistemology of need than has so far been
contained in the literature‖. This problem
signals that there should be a broader
scientific exploration and justification towards
understanding of ―need‖ in the area of career
guidance and counselling. A review of how
need is conceptualized and analysed in other
disciplines could provide useful insights.
The Concept of “Need” in Neighbouring
Disciplines
Although largely taken for granted by
career guidance and counselling research and
policy analysis, the concept of ―need‖ is
explicitly analysed in different areas of social,
economic and medical research and
philosophy studies. However, even in such
areas as social policy research which analyses
the social word with its language and thinking,
it is admitted that despite its centrality ―the
concept of needs was largely taken for granted
in social policy analysis until the 1980s‖ (Lister,
2010, p. 167). Moreover, even nowadays the
politics of needs interpretation is still observed,
and whose expertise decides what is counted
as a need, is a contested area (Lister, 2010).
It remains a challenging problem for needs
research to define a need. Clarke and Langan
(1998, p. 260) further state ―though the
condition of being in need may be regarded as
self-evident, the question of how the needs of
different individuals, or groups of individuals,
are met in our society is not so straightforward.
It is immediately apparent that there is
considerable scope for conflict over the ways
in which society defines and meets the needs
of particular individuals or sections of society.‖
Addressing the lack of scientific
exploration of the concept of ―needs‖ and what
it means to be ‗in need‘ Dean (2010), Doyal
and Gough (1991), Lister (2010), and Watkins,
West-Meiers and Visser (2012), for example,
explicitly analyse the concept of needs and
needs assessment. The majority of these
authors distinguished between needs and
wants and provided a classification of needs:
thin and thick (Dean, 2010); basic and
intermediate (Doyal & Gough, 1991);
individual, organisational and societal needs
(Watkins et al., 2012).
Despite the explicit analysis and
dedication towards making the concept of
need more transparent, some of the works
mentioned above add even more confusion to
the issue of needs conceptualisation and
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
30
Needs and needs assessment
interpretation. For instance, Lister (2010) by
providing highly valuable real-life examples on
the interrelationship of societal and individual
needs somehow adds more perplexity towards
interpreting needs. Lister (2010) provides an
example of a societal problem related to
several cases of homicide committed by the
mentally ill.
The situation evoked
governmental reaction to enforce supervised
chemical treatment on people with mental
illness. The mental health charities expressed
the contradictory belief that such action will
lead to a greater reliance on chemical
treatment as the easy option, whereas
stopping the medication can lead to improved
quality of life among the mentally ill. According
to Lister (2010), this particular example,
illustrates the clash of needs of individuals with
mental health problems as interpreted by the
government
versus
mental
health
campaigners. However, more than the clash
of different interpretations of need, notice the
different perceived solutions or satisfiers in this
example. Following such alternative logic,
there is only one need—the need to stop
homicide. It is highly unlikely that mental
health activists will be opposed to recognizing
this need. Therefore, the clash exists only in
terms of different solutions offered by the
government and the activists. In this particular
case, the activists seem to be addressing the
need in a more systemic and strategic way
than the government.
Similar misinterpretations of what is
need and how it can be assessed are present
in
other
similar
ontologies
and
conceptualisations of human need, without
even considering a bigger number of empirical
studies on ―needs‖ where the concept of needs
is addressed only implicitly if presented at all.
Nevertheless, there are some additional
resources for those career guidance and
counselling researchers and practitioners who
would like to apply needs assessment in their
work.
Needs and Needs Assessment: The
Alternative Model
Roger Kaufman places significant
attention on the conceptual analysis of the
term ―need‖ by noting that the correct
understanding of the word ―need‖ is ―critical in
creation of a better world‖ (Kaufman, OakleyBrowne, Watkins, & Leigh, 2003, p. 113).
―How ‗need‘ is defined is pivotal in determining
how objectives are selected‖ (Watkins &
Kaufman, 1996, p. 11). Kaufman was the first
to urge always using ―need‖ as a noun and
J. Kavale
never as a verb (Kaufman, 1997; Kaufman,
2006; Kaufman, Rojas, & Mayer, 1993) for ―to
use ‗need‘ as a verb, is to see it as a means‖
(Kaufman & Grise, 1995, p. 12). Using needs
as a verb means ―to jump from unwarranted
assumptions
to
foregone
conclusions‖
(Kaufman et al., 2003, p. 116).
In a recent book published by the World
Bank titled ―A guide to assessing needs:
Essential tools for collecting information,
making decisions, and achieving development
results‖ Watkins et al. (2012) define need as
gap in results.
Needs are seen as the
differences between current achievements and
desired accomplishments (see Figure 1).
Real, objective needs are described
through discrepancies of present and desired
accomplishments.
Assuming that ―what
should be‖ is the desired result and ―what is‖ is
the data which indicates the current status of
the results, the definition of need is the gap
that emerges between ‗what should be‘ and
‗what is‘ (Kaufman et al., 2003). Thus, needs
are directly related to the objectives we have.
According to Kaufman, if need is a gap in
results, than there are three type of needs—
one each for gaps in outcomes (gaps in
societal
needs),
outputs
(gaps
in
organisational results) and products (gaps in
individual results). In this framework, nonresults, that is gaps in process or inputs, are
referred to as quasi-needs (Kaufman,1990).
Most complex problems (Kaufman et al., 2003)
require identification of needs at multiple
levels. For instance low school performance
of one student may indicate the need on the
individual
level
(e.g.,
unhappy
love
relationship—need
for
reciprocation
in
romantic relationships), organizational level
(e.g., frequent change of teaching staff—need
for a low turnover of teaching staff) or even
societal level (e.g., economic or/and ecological
crisis—need for economic stability). In many
cases, the needs occur on many levels
simultaneously.
Thus, by applying needs
assessments one could systemically address
needs at multiple levels in order to view the
whole complexity of the problem, rather than
attempt to reduce the complexity by focusing
on the immediate parts of the problem.
Needs assessments are proactive,
before-the-fact identification of the gaps
between current results and the desired ones.
It is a series of results-based comparisons
between what is and what should be or could
be. In general, it can be stated that needs
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
31
Needs and needs assessment
J. Kavale
Figure 1. Needs as Gaps in Results.
Adapted with permission from R. Kaufman, A. M. Rojas, and H. Mayer (1993, p. 4).
assessments are important to improving the
quality of decisions: ―In all cases, needs
assessment offers a careful process for
assessing gaps between current results and
desired results (that is, needs) and then for
applying that information to identify the
available options so that decisions can be
made‖ (Watkins et al., 2012, p. 3). In relation
to evaluation, needs assessments serve a
different function, for they are used to answer
questions such as ‗what would be necessary
to deliver?‘ rather than, ‗did we deliver what we
set out to deliver?‘ (Kaufman, 1990).
The attempt to objectively measure
needs might be criticised in terms that it does
not allow any subjective participation of
individuals. However, as stated earlier, people
very often have unequal capabilities in
recognizing and objectively assessing their
own needs. A similar example is given by
Endacott (1997): ―the nurse on night duty who
is feeling sleepy at 4 a.m. will probably need to
sleep but may as well state ‗I need a cup of
coffee‘ as she feels that the coffee may help
her to remain awake for the remainder of the
shift‖. Endacott goes on to cite Attwood and
Ellis who say, ―real needs can be defined as
those which are objective deficiencies that
actually exist and may or may not be
recognized by the one who has the need‖ (as
cited in Endacott, 1996, p. 474). Similarly, a
person who spent all his life in the poor district
of an impoverished country will not necessarily
express a need for a career. He or she is also
not likely to identify the potential satisfiers:
career guidance and counselling services
which may lead to the successful career.
Needs and Needs Assessment in the Area
of Career Guidance: The Challenges
It can be assumed that needs
assessment in the area of career guidance
and counselling remains a challenge for
scientists, policymakers and practitioners.
This is particularly so because lifelong career
guidance and counselling are conceptualised
as complex interventions within open systems,
with needs not only belonging to individuals,
but also to organisations and societies
(IAEVG, 2009; OECD, 2004; Watts, 1999).
Even school-based career guidance, which
was earlier focused primarily on the young
person‘s wishes and desires, is now seen as
the action field of numerous stakeholders:
businesses, schools, employment agencies,
parents, universities and colleges, and
community initiatives. All these stakeholders
declare their own needs in the area of schoolbased career guidance in pursuing their own
developmental goals.
Kaufman et al. (2003) define complex
intervention as large scale intervention or ―…a
method for involving the whole system, internal
and external clients in the strategic thinking
and change process‖ (p. 95). Career guidance
and counselling is more often addressed from
the open system perspective and viewed as a
complex intervention.
Such concepts as
―stakeholders‖ and their ―needs‖ become
central terms in the scientific discourse as well
as the dominating theme in policy documents.
Therefore, what has been previously
proclaimed in silence—that the purpose of
career guidance and counselling is to ensure
that not only individual needs but also the
needs of the whole society must be met—now
is declared more and more openly. Such a
tendency is observed in the European Lifelong
Guidance Policy Network (ELGPN, 2010)
report:
―Over the last decade increasing
attention has been given to guidance at
European and national levels. It is recognised
as a crucial dimension of lifelong learning,
promoting both social and economic goals: in
particular, improving the efficiency and
effectiveness of education, training and the
labour market through its contribution to
reducing drop-out, preventing skill mismatches
and boosting productivity‖ (ELGPN, 2010, p.
7).
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
32
Needs and needs assessment
J. Kavale
Hence, career guidance and counselling
in the broadest sense are now perceived as a
system and means to provide not only for
individual but also organisational and societal
development. Such a shift in career guidance
perceptions and conceptualisation moves
away from ―single provider-client‖ type of
services, towards viewing career guidance as
a complex system of stakeholders (e.g.
families, businesses, schools, community
members, NGOs, state institutions etc.).
Assessing needs at mega (society), macro
(organisations/institutions)
and
micro
(individual) levels is assumed to be required.
This, in turn, creates demands among
practitioners for certain competencies in the
area of need recognition and assessment.
Discussion and Conclusion
The question of what are the needs of
individuals, families, other organisations and
societies which can be potentially satisfied by
career guidance and counselling, seems to be
a pertinent one. However, it is also important
to emphasise that ―what the clients may want
in guidance is in fact not what they need‖
(Plant, 2011).
It seems that only by
appropriate and timely identification of needs,
adequate, sustainable and cost-effective
career guidance solutions can be offered.
Thus, needs assessment is viewed as the first
and inevitable step in planning of career
guidance and counselling interventions.
However, it can be assumed that needs
assessment in the area of career guidance
and counselling remains a challenge for
researchers, policy makers and practitioners.
Moreover, needs are not clearly defined also in
other social disciplines. The approach to
needs interpretation and assessment by
Kaufman (e.g., Kaufman, 1997, 2006) seems
to be a useful framework, from which career
guidance and counselling could borrow
epistemological and methodological ideas.
This includes a systems view in which there is
a multi-level needs assessment. It is our
proposal that the overall aim should be to
provide deeper and wider exploration of needs
and needs assessment in the area of career
guidance and counselling by applying different
theoretical
and
empirical
resources.
Subsequently, after reaching this aim,
appropriate training for practitioners could be
introduced.
About the author: Jolanta Kavale has an M. Ed. degree in Career Designing. She has recently submitted her PhD thesis on
Career Guidance Development in Schools to the Technische Universität, Dortmund, Germany.
References
Arulmani, G. (2010). The Jiva Approach to Career Guidance and Counselling: An Indian Model
(Project Report). Bangalore: The Promise Foundation.
Baltreniene, Z., & Augutiene, I. (2006). Project for the most effective use of national manpower
resources. Lithuania: Quality Assurance in Youth Career Consultancy.
Cedefop. (2009). Professionalising career guidance: Practitioner competences and qualification
routes in Europe (Cedefop Panorama Series, 164). Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications
of the European Communities.
Chuenyane, Z. M. (1983). Career guidance needs assessment of black secondary school students in
the Transvaal province of the Republic of South Africa. International Journal for the
Advancement of Counselling, 6, 271-280.
Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, D., & Westmorland, L. (2007). Creating citizen-consumers.
London: Sage.
Clarke, J., & Langan, M. (1998). Review. In M. Langan (Ed.), Welfare: Needs, rights and risks.
London and New York: Routledge.
Dean. (2010). Understanding human need. Bristol: Policy Press.
Department of Education Entitlement Framework Circular. (2005). Retrieved from
http://www.deni.gov.uk/2005_18-entitlement_framework-initial_guidance.pdf.
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
33
Needs and needs assessment
J. Kavale
Doyal, L., & Gough. I. (1991). A theory of human need. New York: Guilford.
ELGPN. (2010). Lifelong guidance policies: Work in progress (A report on the work of the European
Lifelong Guidance Policy Network 2008–10). New Zealand: International Centre for Career
Development and Public Policy.
Endacott, R. (1997). Clarifying the concept of need: A comparison of two approaches to concept
analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 471-476.
Fouad, N. A., Guillen, A., Harris-Hodge, E., Henry, C., Novakovic, A. & Terry, S. (2006). Need,
awareness, and use of career services for college students. Journal of Career Assessment,
14, 407-420.
Gonzalez, M. P. (1997). Career education needs of secondary school graduates from Asturias,
Spain. Journal of Career Development, 23(3), 215–229.
IAEVG. (2009). Light and dark times–-The value of career guidance in an economic crisis. Retrieved
from http://www.iaevg.org/iaevg/nav.cfm?lang=2&menu=1&submenu=7.
Jackson, T., Jager, W., & Stagl, S. (2004). Beyond insatiability: Needs theory, consumption and
sustainability. In L. A. Reisch & I. Røpke (Eds.), The ecological economics of consumption (pp.
79-110). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kaufman, R. (1990). Relating evaluation and needs assessment. Human Resource Development
Quarterly, 1(4), 405-408.
Kaufman, R., Rojas, A. M., Mayer, H. (1993). Needs assessment: A user's guide.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Kaufman, R. (1997). Needs assessment basics. In R. Kaufman, S. Thiagarajan, & P. MacGillis (Eds.),
The handbook for performance improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer.
Kaufman, R. (2006). 30 seconds that can change your life: A decision-making guide for those who
refuse to be mediocre. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Kaufman, R., & Grise, P. (1995). Auditing your educational strategic plan: Making good things better.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Kaufman, R., Oakley-Browne, H., Watkins, R., & Leigh, D. (2003). Strategic planning for success:
Aligning people, performance, and payoffs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer.
Kaufman, R., Rojas, A. M., & Mayer, H. (1993). Needs assessment: A user's guide. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Lister, R. (2010). Understanding theories and concepts in social policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Magnusson, K., & Bernes, K. (2001). Expressed career planning needs of youth in grades 7 to 12. In
H. Suzin (Ed.), Natcon Papers 2001. Toronto, ON: Career Centre, University of Toronto.
Mallmann, C. A. (1980). Society, needs, and rights: A systematic approach. In K. Lederer (Ed.),
Human needs: A contribution to the current debate (pp. 37-54). Cambridge: Oelenschlager.
McLeod, S. K. (2011). Knowledge of need. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19(2), 211230.
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
34
Needs and needs assessment
J. Kavale
NFB. (2006). National Forum for Guidance in Education, Career and Employment Mission Statement,
NFB. Retrieved from
http://www.forum-beratung.de/cms/upload/English/Mission_Statement_English.pdf.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Constitutions and capabilities: Perception against lofty formalism, supreme
court foreword. Harvard Law Review, 121, 4-97.
OECD. (2004). Career guidance and public policy: Bridging the gap. Paris: Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development.
Plant, P. (2011). Quality assurance and evidence in career guidance in Europe: Counting what is
measured or measuring what counts? International Journal for Educational and Vocational
Guidance, 11(2), 1-14.
Sen, A. K. (1991). Gender and co-operative conflicts. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Watkins, R., & Kaufman, R. (1996). An update on relating needs assessment and needs analysis.
Performance Improvement Journal, 35(10), 10-13.
Watkins, R., West-Meiers, M., & Visser, Y. (2012). A guide to assessing needs: Tools for collecting
information, making decisions, and achieving development results. Washington, DC: World
Bank.
Watts, A. G. (1999). The economic and social benefits of guidance. Educational and Vocational
Guidance Bulletin, 63, 12–19.
Wiggins, D. (1987). Claims of need. In D. Wiggins (Ed.), Needs, values, truth: Essays in philosophy
(pp. 1-57). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Witko, K., Bernes, K. B., Magnusson, K., & Bardick, A. D. (2005). Senior high school career planning:
What students want. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6, 34–49.
IJCLP Volume 1, Issue 1
35