Surg Radiol Anat (2010) 32:613–615
DOI 10.1007/s00276-009-0607-7
A N A T O M I C V A R I A T IO N S
A case of pentacuspid pulmonary valve
Sema Demircin · Nigar Keles-Coskun
Received: 26 October 2009 / Accepted: 1 December 2009 / Published online: 19 December 2009
Springer-Verlag 2009
Abstract A pentacuspid pulmonary valve is a rare
congenital anomaly. The present report describes a case of
pentacuspid pulmonary valve encountered during the autopsy
of a 50-year-old man with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The pentacuspid pulmonary valve had three relatively
equal cusps and two smaller cusps. In this case, a tricuspid
aortic valve was identiWed with normal structure and no
evidence of heart failure was found clinically or pathologically.
Keywords
anomalies
Pentacuspid pulmonary valve · Valve
Introduction
The pulmonary valve has three semilunar leaXets or cusps
attached by convex edges partly to the infundibular wall of
the right ventricle and partly to the beginning of the pulmonary trunk. The oYcial nomenclature of Terminologia Anatomica [22] refers to an anterior, a posterior and a septal
cusp, based on their position in the foetus. The position
changes with development and in the adult there are two
anterior cusps, right and left (valvula semilunaris dextra
and sinistra) and a posterior one (valvula semilunaris posS. Demircin
Council of Forensic Medicine,
Antalya Group Authority, Antalya, Turkey
S. Demircin
Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine,
Akdeniz University, 07059 Antalya, Turkey
N. Keles-Coskun (&)
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine,
Akdeniz University, 07070 Antalya, Turkey
e-mail: nigarc@akdeniz.edu.tr
terior) [9, 22]. Congenital anomalies of the semilunar
valves are rare and most often involve the presence of a
monocuspid [12], bicuspid [6, 11, 21] or quadricuspid [10,
12, 18, 19, 21, 23] valves of the pulmonary and aortic
valves. Apart from quadricuspid valves found in the setting
of the common arterial trunk, quadricuspid semilunar
valves are exceedingly uncommon, with the pulmonary
valve being aVected more frequently than the aortic valve.
When the pulmonary valve is involved, its abnormal architecture rarely alters the function of the valve and the anomaly often remains silent [15]. Bicuspid and quadricuspid
pulmonary valves are usually considered as minor cardiac
defects because of their clinical relevance [7].
Embryologically, by the fourth week of gestation, a pair
of bulbar ridges forms in the cephaled portion of the truncus arteriosus. Similar ridges form in the truncus arteriosus
which are continuous with the bulbar ridges. The spiral orientations of the bulbar and truncal ridges, possibly caused
by the streaming of blood from the ventricles, result in the
formation of a spiral aorticopulmonary septum when the
bulbar and the truncal ridges fuse. This septum divides the
bulbus cordis and truncus arteriosus into two arterial channels: aorta and pulmonary trunk. The results of experimental studies suggest that neural crest cells substantially
contribute to the development of the aorticopulmonary septum as well as to other parts of the heart [14]. By sixth
week, the division of arteriosus is completed, and then aorta
and pulmonary trunk begin to appear. The semilunar valves
are formed by mesenchymal outgrowth from the proliferations of two bulbar ridges and intercalated valvular swellings. Normally, three outgrowths bulge into the lumen of
the great vessel and develop into three semilunar cusps that
coapt in the centre of the valve oriWce. An abnormal number of cusps result from developmental changes in the early
stages of truncal separation [11, 17].
123
614
Fig. 1 Pulmonary valve with Wve cusps
According to literature, there has been no previous
report of a pentacuspid pulmonary valve. Hence, the present case is the Wrst report of such valve and can be embryogenetically interesting.
Case report
During the autopsy study of a 50-year-old male with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, the pulmonary valve was
dissected from the anterior part of the heart and a pentacuspid pulmonary valve was encountered. The pentacuspid
pulmonary valve had three relatively equal (2.5–3 cm)
cusps and two smaller (2 cm) cusps (Fig. 1). On the other
hand, the aortic valve was in normal anatomic structure. In
this case, no clinical or biological evidence of heart failure
was found. Moreover, no pulmonary stenosis and regurgitation were identiWed because of the diVerent pulmonary
valve structure.
Discussion
Usually, pulmonary valve has three leaXets, but some may
have two, four or more. The lesion is due to a failure in
development of the aorticopulmonary septum, and is almost
certainly linked to abnormal migration of cells into the
heart from the neural crest [1, 9]. The embryological base
of this pentacuspid pulmonary valve anomaly is not well
documented. Embryological observations in animals [7, 8]
and extrapolation of the explanations for quadricuspid aortic and pulmonary valves oVer several possibilities [3, 11,
21]. Although embryological development is a continuous
123
Surg Radiol Anat (2010) 32:613–615
process, three critical phases with regard to the supernumerary-cusped aortic or pulmonary valve can be recognised
[21]. According to Simonds [21] (1) supernumerary prevalvular pads in the embryological truncus arteriosus may
evolve in supernumerary-cusped aortic or pulmonary
valves after separation into aorta and pulmonary artery; (2)
a normal number of prevalvular pads in the truncus arteriosus may become excessively divided because of an abnormal dividing pattern of aorta and pulmonary artery, thereby
producing a supernumerary-cusped aortic or pulmonary
valve; (3) after normal separation of the aorta and pulmonary artery, the prevalvular pads might develop in an
abnormal way to form a supernumerary-cusped valve. The
Wrst or second explanation of Simonds [21] will become
more probable in the Boger’s case report [3]. In this paper,
we can speculate that the second or the third explanation is
more probable that the aortic valve was in normal structure
in the present case.
Embryological abnormal pulmonary valves are generally
linked with early stages of Fallot’s tetralogy [2]. They are
caused by an arrest in heart development and an abnormal
degree of coarctation of the aorta. The evidence from
embryos supports the general belief that abnormal pulmonary cusps of all ages, when not caused by infection, are of
congenital origin [20].
Quadricuspid semilunar valves seem to be far less common and are reported to occur nine times more frequently
in pulmonic valves than aortic valves [12]. Simonds [21]
could not Wnd a case of quadricuspid aortic valve in his own
series of 2,000 necropsies but in a review of the literature
he found two cases out of 25,666 necropsies—an incidence
of 0.008%. In another series of necropsies and echocardiograms, quadricuspid aortic valve was reported in the rates
of 0.008–0.013% [12]. In the available literature, pentacuspid valve is less reported than quadricuspid valve. Pentacuspid aortic valve diagnosed by transoesophageal
echocardiography was reported by Cemri et al. [4] and
Kamata et al. [13].
A case with a quadricuspid pulmonary valve with an
accessory coronary artery was reported by Rivett and Berry
[16]. Chiu et al. [5] reviewed the literature and found only
one case with pentacuspid truncal valve out of 301 cases. In
their report, they presented a diagram, which was useful,
about the relationships of the coronary oriWce to the truncal
valve according to various truncal rotations. No accessory
coronary artery was observed in the present case.
While quadricuspid pulmonary valves are infrequently
associated with serious clinical complications, the majority
of quadricuspid aortic valves are associated with clinically
signiWcant dysfunction, most commonly aortic insuYciency [4]. In our case, no clinical or pathological evidence
of heart failure was found, and we can speculate that the
abnormal cusp formations may have been embryologically
Surg Radiol Anat (2010) 32:613–615
Fig. 2 Schematic illustrations of probable mechanism of development
of a normal and b abnormal semilunar valves. PV pulmonary valve, AV
aortic valve. ModiWed schematic illustrations of Hirooka et al. [11]
caused by the possible abnormal proliferations of pulmonary truncus of the common trunk (Fig. 2).
According to our knowledge, in literature, although pentacuspid aortic valve had been reported, this is the Wrst
report of a pentacuspid pulmonary valve being identiWed
incidentally at an autopsy. We think that, in this case, the
pentacuspid pulmonary valve is a rare congenital anomaly.
Acknowledgments This study was supported by Akdeniz University
Research Foundation Antalya, Turkey. The authors wish to express
their deep gratitude to R. Yavuz Arican for his contributions to this
work.
References
1. Anderson RH, Webb S, Brown NA, Lamers W, Moorman A
(2003) Development of the heart: (3) formation of the ventricular
outXow tracts, arterial valves, and intrapericardial arterial trunks.
Heart 89:1110–1118
2. Anderson RH, Weinberg PM (2005) The clinical anatomy of
tetralogy of fallot. Cardiol Young 15:38–47
3. Bogers JJ, Aytug Z, Hendriks FF, Huysmans HA (1982) Quinticuspid aortic valve causing aortic valve incompetence and stenosis. Thorax 37:542–543
615
4. Cemri A, Cengel AT, Timurkaynak T (2000) Penta cuspid aortic
valve diagnosed by transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart
84:E9
5. Chiu IS, Wu SJ, Chen MR, Chen SJ, Wang JK (2002) Anatomic
relationship of the coronary oriWce and truncal valve in truncus
arteriosus and their surgical implication. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
123:350–352
6. Deshpande J, Desai M, Kinare S (1992) Persistent truncus arteriosus an autopsy study of 16 cases. Int J Cardiol 37:395–399
7. Fernández B, Fernández MC, Durán AC, López D, Martire A,
Sans-Coma V (1998) Anatomy and formation of congenital bicuspid and quadricuspid pulmonary valves in Syrian hamsters. Anat
Rec 250:70–79
8. Fernández B, Durán AC, Martire A, López D, Sans-Coma V
(1999) New embryological evidence for the formation of quadricuspid aortic valves in the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus).
J Comp Pathol 121:89–94
9. Gabella G (1995) In: Williams PL (ed) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn.
Churchill Livingstone, Great Britain, 1482 pp
10. Higashi N, Hirai K (1995) A case of congenital quadricuspid pulmonary valve. Kaibogaku Zasshi 70:347–348
11. Hirooka K, Hashimoto S, Tanaka N, Yamada N, Masuda Y, Hanatani A, Nakatani S, Yasumura Y, Miyatake K, Yamagishi M
(2001) Combined abnormalities of semilunar valves quadricuspid
pulmonary and bicuspid aortic valves. Circulation 103:E7
12. Janssens U, Klues HG, Hanrath P (1997) Congenital quadricuspid
aortic valve anomaly associated with hypertrophic nonobstructive
cardiomyopathy: a case report and review of the literature. Heart
78:83–87
13. Kamata S, Sakagoshi N, Ohata T, Sasako Y (2008) Successful surgical treatment of pentacuspid aortic valve with severe aortic
regurgitation. Jpn J Cardiovasc Surg 37:53–55
14. Moore KL, Persaud TVN (1993) The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 321 pp
15. Ricci M, Cohen G, Kocyildirim E, Khambadkone S, Elliott MJ
(2005) Transposition of the great arteries and quadricuspid pulmonary valve: an unusual combination. Ann Thorac Surg 79:1428–
1430
16. Rivett JR, Berry CL (1979) Aberrant coronary artery in association with quadricuspid pulmonary valve. Virchow’s Arch A
383:351–357
17. Sadler TW (1995) Langman’s medical embryology, 7th edn. Mass
Publishing Co. Williams and Wilkins, USA, pp 183–230
18. Shimada K, Kitagawa T, Tezuka M (1989) A supernumerary valvula in the pulmonary semilunar valve. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn
66:53–56
19. Shimada K, Yokoi A, Kitagawa T, Asuwa N, Ishii T (1990) A
supernumerary cusp in the human pulmonary valve. Surg Radiol
Anat 12:69–71
20. Shaner RF (1963) Abnormal pulmonary and aortic semilunar
valves in embryos. Anat Rec 147:5–14
21. Simonds JP (1923) Congenital malformations of the aortic and
pulmonary valves. Am J Med Sci 166:584–595
22. Terminologia Anatomica: International Anatomical Terminology
(1998) Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology. Thieme Stuttgart, New York, 77 pp
23. Yates A (1984) Editorial comment. J Cardiovasc Surg 25:254
123