DOI: 10.1111/jwas.12854
EDITORIAL
Seaweed aquaculture—From historic trends to
current innovation
From February 9 to 12, 2020, we organized a special session at the Aquaculture of America meetings held at the
Hawai'i Convention Center in Honolulu on the island of Oahu. The session, entitled “Seaweed aquaculture – from
historic trends to current innovation” included over 20 presenters. The session encompassed the breadth of seaweed research that has arisen in the last decade and beyond. It spanned topics from seaweed tank and pond cultivation, off-shore design and deployment, genetics and strain selection, algae education, uses and processing of algae
for food, feed and biofuel, and the compounding challenges facing this developing industry. Currently, the global seaweed industry is valued at more than US $11 billion, and is dominated by production in Asian countries including
China, Indonesia, Korea, and Japan (FAO, 2020). Almost 97% of this global supply is aquaculture-sourced seaweeds
(Costa-Pierce, 2021; Costa-Pierce & Chopin, 2021; Piconi, Veidenheimer, & Bob, 2020).
Globally, seaweed production is undergoing expansion and has grown yearly at 8% since 2014 (FAO, 2020).
Countries in Europe and the Americas are gaining traction in large-scale cultivation efforts with recent commercial
activity (García-Poza et al., 2020; Kim, Stekoll, & Yarish, 2019; Kim, Yarish, Hwang, Park, & Kim, 2017). Results from
a recent study on the European mariculture sector emphasized the considerable potential for sustainable development after addressing the existing economic, social, and environmental challenges (Araújo et al., 2021). In North
America, seaweed harvest accounts for less than 0.001% of total global seaweed production, while in 2019 the total
U.S. edible seaweed market was around 7 million kg of dry weight (Piconi et al., 2020). Nonetheless, edible seaweed
aquaculture production has increased and is projected to continue growth, with the states of Maine and Alaska leading the overall U.S. market share (Kim et al., 2019; Piconi et al., 2020). Both states span large coastal areas and have
working waterfronts with developed maritime industries and mariculture focus on several species of kelp including
Macrocystis pyrifera, Saccharina latissima, and Alaria marginata (Grebe, Byron, Brady, St. Gelais, & Costa-Pierce, 2021;
Raymond & Stekoll, 2021, Stekoll, Peeples, & Raymond, 2021).
Seaweeds offer a promising source of bioenergy production and can help mitigate the need for food, feed, and
biofuel over the coming decades. An ecosystem-based approach to expanding seaweed cultivation operations is both
critical and achievable. The last 15 years have seen a push for mariculture practices that address ecological sustainability and integrating several production species such as the case of integrated multi trophic aquaculture (IMTA)
(Abreu et al., 2009; Park, Shin, Do, Yarish, & Kim, 2018; Park, Kim, et al., 2021; Park, Shin, et al., 2021). Research
shows that seaweed aquaculture in the ocean can be carried out sustainably with ecological engineering (Chopin
et al., 2001; Chopin & Tacon, 2021) and taking into consideration the value and use of existing marine resources
(Araújo et al. 2021). Seaweed aquaculture can be carried out sustainably within the principles of ecological aquaculture, which mimics the form and function of natural ecosystems, are sophisticated, knowledge-based, farming ecosystems embedded into the larger context of social systems (Barrington, Ridler, Chopin, Robinson, &
Robinson, 2010; Costa-Pierce, 2021; Valderrama, Cai, Hishamunda, & Ridler, 2013). Similarly, ecological aquaculture
principles can be applied to seaweed farms in the planning, designing, developing, monitoring, and evaluating stages
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of World Aquaculture
Society.
1004
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jwas
J World Aquac Soc. 2021;52:1004–1008.
EDITORIAL
1005
in ways that preserve and enhance the form and functions of the natural and social environments in which they are
situated (Costa-Pierce, 2021).
The culture of seaweeds and mollusks is progressively acknowledged for the ecosystem services they offer outside the delivery of food and feed, including nutrient uptake and habitat creation (Kim, Kraemer, & Yarish, 2014; Park
et al., 2021; Langton et al., 2019; Theuerkauf et al., 2021), as well as water filtration and the attenuation and stabilization of wave energy in coastal areas (Alleway et al., 2019). However, at this time, market development, valuation,
and quantification of these services are still underdeveloped (Naylor et al., 2021) as U.S. federal, state, and community programs need to be implemented to provide economic incentives for farmers (Duarte, Wu, Xiao, Bruhn, &
Krause-Jensen, 2017). Designing profitable and environmentally sustainable systems that couple nutrient removal
capacity with high growth and productivity on the farm will encourage stakeholder investment and increase the
value of the seaweed aquaculture sector (Buschmann et al., 2017; Chopin & Tacon, 2021; Park, Kim, et al., 2021;
Park, Shin, et al., 2021). Highlighting and monetizing ecosystem services provided by seaweeds and other extractive
organisms (such as filter-feeding bivalves) that can convert dissolved inorganic and suspended organic nutrients into
bioenergy (Kim et al., 2014; Kim, Kraemer, & Yarish, 2015; Rose et al., 2015; Wu, Zhang, Yarish, He, & Kim, 2018)
are critical. Furthermore, coastal seaweed farms are not only capable of acting as CO2 sinks but also act as a refugia
for calcifying species from ocean acidification (Wu, Kim, Huo, Zhang, & He, 2017; Xiao et al., 2021) and have the
potential to enhance marine biodiversity (Naylor et al., 2021; Theuerkauf et al., 2021). They can also be a source of
animal feeds to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants (Vijn et al., 2020).
Considerations must be taken on the environmental risks associated with seaweed farming in the light of climate
change, specifically the onset of pathogens, epibionts, and grazers as aquaculture farms expand in capacity
(Buschmann et al., 2017; Mateo et al., 2020). Alteration of population genetics and a broader alteration of the
physiochemical environment pose risks and a certain level of uncertainty (Cottier-Coo et al. 2016; Campbell
et al., 2019). For aquaculture to continue scaling, it is important to observe and select native species that are resilient
under different climate change scenarios (Kübler, Dudgeon, & Bush, 2021). Understanding the genetic diversity of
wild seaweed populations is vital not only for preserving biodiversity but also for breeding and commercialization of
strains that are thermally tolerant, high yielding, adapted to low nutrient conditions, and disease resistant (Mao
et al., 2020; Wade et al., 2020). Observation of heritability of genetic and phenotypic traits over many generations
allows for selecting and identifying seaweed best suited for production on both land-based and off-shore farm performance (Augyte, Yarish, Redmond, & Kim, 2017; Umanzor et al., 2021; Zertuche-González et al., 2021). Various
techniques can be implemented to improve harvesting and extend the growing season for seaweeds (Grebe
et al., 2021). Finally, domestication of seaweed for the production of high-yield cultivars cannot be done without a
thorough understanding of the metagenomics and metabolomics for the expression of certain relevant phenotypic
traits and the application of genomic improvement strategies (DeWeese & Osborne, 2021).
Challenges to overcome to move the industry forward include establishing cryopreservation techniques,
processing facilities, developing markets, and partnerships among research, industry, state, and federal legislators to
develop best management practices, among others. Working on value-chain additions for seaweed biomass is essential, including applications in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and as feed-based ingredients as a long-term sustainable solution to enteric methane emissions (Vijn et al., 2020; Yang, Huo, Yee, & Yarish, 2021). In the search for
alternatives to fossil-fuel-based products, many extracts from seaweed can contribute to the production of bioplastics. Working with state and federal agencies and aquaculture extension officers to develop appropriate regulatory frameworks to ensure safe handling and food safety standards and sustainability certification can help
consumers make fair decisions about local products. Changing public perception of the negative effects of aquaculture can be achieved through outreach and educational events that highlight the economic benefits to coastal communities and blue economic development. Educating youth on the many applications of algal cultivation through
mez, Nalley, &
courses at community colleges, online training, and K–12 curriculum development (Levine, Gerk, Go
Nalley, 2021) will foster industry development. Continuing research on the marine spatial planning tools for best site
selection to support policies and mitigate user conflicts, marine infrastructures such as with the NOAA Aqua-mapper
EDITORIAL
1006
within their Coastal Aquaculture Planning Portal (CAPP) are also critical (https://coastalscience.noaa.gov/research/
marine-spatial-ecology/coastal-aquaculture-planning-portal-capp/).
Simona Augyte1,2
Jang K. Kim1,3
Charles Yarish1
1
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Stamford, Connecticut, USA
2
Ocean Era Inc., Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, USA
3
Department of Marine Science, Incheon National University, Incheon, Korea
ORCID
Jang K. Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-6768
RE FE R ENC E S
Abreu, M. H., Varela, D. A., Henríquez, L., Villarroel, A., Yarish, C., Sousa-Pinto, I., & Buschmann, A. H. (2009). Traditional
vs. integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of Gracilaria chilensis C. J. Bird, J. McLachlan & E. C. Oliveira: Productivity and
physiological performance. Aquaculture, 293(3–4), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.03.043
Alleway, H. K., Gillies, C. L., Bishop, M. J., Gentry, R. R., Theuerkauf, S. J., & Jones, R. (2019). The ecosystem services of
marine aquaculture: Valuing benefits to people and nature. Bioscience, 69(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/
biy137
n, F., Sánchez Lo
pez, J., Azevedo, I. C., Bruhn, A., Fluch, S., … Ullmann, J. (2021). Current status
Araújo, R., Vázquez Caldero
of the algae production industry in Europe: An emerging sector of the blue bioeconomy. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7,
1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.626389
Augyte, S., Yarish, C., Redmond, S., & Kim, J. K. (2017). Cultivation of a morphologically distinct strain of the sugar kelp,
Saccharina latissima forma angustissima, from coastal Maine, USA, with implications for ecosystem services. Journal of
Applied Phycology, 29, 1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1102-x
Barrington, K., Ridler, N., Chopin, T., Robinson, S., & Robinson, B. (2010). Social aspects of the sustainability of integrated
multi-trophic aquaculture. Aquaculture International, 18(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9236-0
Hernández-González, M. C., … Critchley, A. T. (2017). Seaweed
Buschmann, A. H., Camus, C., Infante, J., Neori, A., Israel, A.,
production: Overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity. European Journal of
Phycology, 52(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1365175
Campbell, I., Macleod, A., Sahlmann, C., Neves, L., Funderud, J., Øverland, M., … Stanley, M. (2019). The environmental risks
associated with the development of seaweed farming in Europe- prioritizing key knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00107
Chopin, T., Buschmann, A. H., Halling, C., Troell, M., Kautsky, N., Kraemer, G. P., … Neefus, C. (2001). Integrating seaweeds
into marine aquaculture systems: A key toward sustainability. Journal of Phycology, 986(37), 975–986.
Chopin, T., & Tacon, A. G. J. (2021). Importance of seaweeds and extractive species in global aquaculture production.
Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 29(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1810626
Costa-Pierce, B. A. (2021). The principles and practices of ecological aquaculture and the ecosystem approach to aquaculture. World Aquaculture, 52(1), 25–31.
Costa-Pierce, B. A. & Chopin, T. (2021). The hype, fantasies and realities of aquaculture development globally and its new
geographies. World Aquaculture. pp.23–35.
DeWeese, K. J., & Osborne, M. G. (2021). Understanding the metabolome and metagenome as extended phenotypes: The
next frontier in macroalgae domestication and improvement. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.org/
10.1111/jwas.12782
Duarte, C. M., Wu, J., Xiao, X., Bruhn, A., & Krause-Jensen, D. (2017). Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change
mitigation and adaptation? Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, 100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00100
FAO (2020). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. In Sustainability in action. Rome: FAO. https://doi.org/10.
4060/ca9229en
García-Poza, S., Leandro, A., Cotas, C., Cotas, J., Marques, J. C., Pereira, L., & Gonçalves, A. M. M. (2020). The evolution road
of seaweed aquaculture: Cultivation technologies and the industry 4.0. International Journal of Environmental Research
and Public Health, 17(18), 6528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186528
EDITORIAL
1007
Grebe, G. S., Byron, C. J., Brady, D. C., St. Gelais, A. T., & Costa-Pierce, B. A. (2021). The effect of distal-end trimming on
Saccharina latissima morphology, composition, and productivity. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.
org/10.1111/jwas.12814
Kim, J. K., Kraemer, G. P., & Yarish, C. (2014). Field scale evaluation of seaweed aquaculture as a nutrient bioextraction strategy in Long Island sound and the Bronx River estuary. Aquaculture, 433, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aquaculture.2014.05.034
Kim, J. K., Kraemer, G. P., & Yarish, C. (2015). Use of sugar kelp aquaculture in Long Island sound and the Bronx River estuary for nutrient extraction. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 531, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11331
Kim, J. K., Stekoll, M., & Yarish, C. (2019). Opportunities, challenges and future directions of open-water seaweed aquaculture in the United States. Phycologia, 58(5), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2019.1625611
Kim, J. K., Yarish, C., Hwang, E. K., Park, M., & Kim, Y. (2017). Seaweed aquaculture: Cultivation technologies, challenges and
its ecosystem services. Algae, 32(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2017.32.3.3
Kübler, J. E., Dudgeon, S., & Bush, D. (2021). Climate change challenges and opportunities for seaweed aquaculture in
California, USA. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society.
Langton, R., Augyte, S., Price, N., Forster, J., Noji, T.Grebe, G., St. Gelais, A., Byron, C. J. (2019). An Ecosystem Approach to
the Culture of Seaweed. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-195, 24 p.
mez, S. M., Nalley, J. O., & Nalley, M. M. (2021). The algae foundation® and algae technology
Levine, I. A., Gerk, C. L., Go
educational consortium. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12817
Mao, X., Augyte, S., Huang, M., Hare, M. P., Bailey, D., Umanzor, S., … Jannink, J. L. (2020). Population genetics of sugar kelp
throughout the northeastern United States using genome-wide markers. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 694. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00694
Mateo, J. P., Campbell, I., Cottier-Cook, E. J., Luhan, M. R. J., Ferriols, V. M. E. N., & Hurtado, A. Q. (2020). Analysis of
biosecurity-related policies governing the seaweed industry of The Philippines. Journal of Applied Phycology, 32, 2009–
2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02083-7
Naylor, R. L., Hardy, R. W., Buschmann, A. H., Bush, S. R., Cao, L., Klinger, D. H., … Troell, M. (2021). A 20-year retrospective
review of global aquaculture. Nature, 591(7851), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6
Park, J.-S., Shin, S., Wu, H., Yarish, C., & Kim, J. (2021). Evaluation of nutrient bioextraction by seaweed and shellfish aquaculture in Korea. Journal of World Aquaculture Society. http://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12786
Park, M., Shin, S. K., Do, Y. H., Yarish, C., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Application of open water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture
to intensive monoculture: A review of the current status and challenges in Korea. Aquaculture, 497, 174–183. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.07.051
Park, M. S., Kim, J. K., Shin, S., Min, B. H., & Samanta, P. (2021). Trophic fractionation in an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture off Tongyoung Coast: A stable isotope approach. Aquaculture, 536, 736454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.
2021.736454
Piconi, P., Veidenheimer, R., & Bob, C. (2020). Edible seaweed market analysis.
Raymond, A. E. T., & Stekoll, M. S. (2021). Conditions for staggering and delaying outplantings of the kelps Saccharina
latissima and Alaria marginata for mariculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society.
Rose, J. M., Bricker, S. B., Deonarine, S., Ferreira, J. G., Getchis, T., Grant, J., … Yarish, C. (2015). Encyclopedia of sustainability
science and technology. In A. R. Meyers (Ed.), (pp. 1–33). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-49392493-6_944-1
Stekoll, M. S., Peeples, T. N., & Raymond, A. E. T. (2021). Mariculture research of Macrocystis pyrifera and Saccharina latissima
in Southeast Alaska. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12765
Theuerkauf, S. J., Barrett, L. T., Alleway, H. K., Costa-Pierce, B. A., St. Gelais, A., & Jones, R. C. (2021). Habitat value of
bivalve shellfish and seaweed aquaculture for fish and invertebrates: Pathways, synthesis and next steps. Reviews in
Aquaculture, raq.12584. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12584
Umanzor, S., Li, Y., Bailey, D., Augyte, S., Huang, M., Marty-Rivera, M., … Lindell, S. (2021). Comparative analysis of morphometric traits of farmed sugar kelp and skinny kelp, Saccharina spp., strains from the Northwest Atlantic. Journal of the
World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12783
Valderrama, D., Cai, J., Hishamunda, N. & Ridler, N.. (2013). Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming.
Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 580. Rome, FAO. 204 pp.
Vijn, S., Compart, D. P., Dutta, N., Foukis, A., Hess, M., Hristov, A. N., … Kurt, T. D. (2020). Key considerations for the use of
seaweed to reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7(December), 1–9. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fvets.2020.597430
Wade, R., Augyte, S., Harden, M., Nuzhdin, S., Yarish, C., & Alberto, F. (2020). Macroalgal germplasm banking for conservation, food security, and industry. PLoS Biology, 18(2), 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000641
Wu, H., Kim, J. K., Huo, Y., Zhang, J., & He, P. (2017). Nutrient removal ability of seaweeds on Pyropia yezoensis aquaculture
rafts in China's radial sandbanks. Aquatic Botany, 137, 72–79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.11.011
1008
EDITORIAL
Wu, H., Zhang, J., Yarish, C., He, P., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Bioremediation and nutrient migration during blooms of Ulva in the
Yellow Sea, China. Phycologia, 57(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.2216/17-32.1
Xiao, X., Agustí, S., Yu, Y., Huang, Y., Chen, W., Hu, J., … Duarte, C. M. (2021). Seaweed farms provide refugia from ocean
acidification. Science of the Total Environment, 776, 145192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145192
Yang, H., Huo, Y., Yee, J. C., & Yarish, C. (2021). Germplasm cryopreservation of macroalgae for aquaculture breeding and
natural resource conservation: A review. Aquaculture 544, 737037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737037
n, J. M., &
Zertuche-González, J. A., Sandoval-Gil, J. M., Rangel-Mendoza, L. K., Gálvez-Palazuelos, A. I., Guzmán-Caldero
Yarish, C. (2021). Seasonal and interannual production of sea lettuce (Ulva sp.) in outdoor cultures based on commercial
size ponds. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12773