Procedia Manufacturing
Volume 1, 2015, Pages 454–465
43rd Proceedings of the North American Manufacturing Research
Institution of SME http://www.sme.org/namrc
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge
in Turning Process
Guicai Zhang1 and Changsheng Guo2
1
2
United Technologies Research Center (China), Shanghai, China
United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT, USA
ZhangG@utrc.utc.com, GuoC@utrc.utc.com
Abstract
Machining process models can be used to predict cutting force/power and further optimize the process
parameters. In this work, a mechanistic cutting force model for turning processes is developed. In order
to accurately predict cutting forces, the cutting tool edge is discretized and an approach for calculating
the chip load corresponding to each discretized edge segment is developed. Approach for calculating
effective tool angles is also developed considering effects of the tool corner radius and the change of
feed direction. By using the yield shear stress of the work material, the friction angle between work
and tool material, the chip load and the effective tool angles for each tool edge segment, the
distributions of the turning forces and force intensity along the tool edge can be predicted. Turning
cases of straight turning, contour turning, taper turning and facing are tested and the model outputs
include the distributions of the instantaneous effective tool angles, chip load, cutting force coefficients
and force intensity. Test results for straight turning and contour turning operations are analyzed to
demonstrate the model capability. The distributions of force and force intensity on tool edge provide
useful information for prediction of turning forces/power and potential further prediction of tool
wear/life.
Keywords: Modeling, Cutting force, Turning process
1 Introduction
Turning is one of the most widely used processes in manufacturing operations. With the everincreasing applications to precision machining and the machining of difficult-to-machine materials, it
is more and more important to model turning process thus to predict cutting forces and to optimize the
process parameters.
Merchant pioneered the metal cutting mechanics for orthogonal cutting in about 70 years ago
(Merchant, 1944). His work laid down a solid foundation for the theoretical modeling of metal cutting
thereafter. Most of the fundamental work in early stage was on orthogonal metal cutting (Lee &
2351-9789 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the NAMRI Scientific Committee
doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.001
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
Shaffer, 1951) (Palmer & Oxley, 1959). Results on orthogonal cutting can be easily transformed to that
of oblique cutting which is the basis of models for all practical machining processes including turning.
In the past twenty years, the modeling of turning processes attracted more and more attention due to
the motivation of reduction of machining cost and improving product quality (Chandrasekharan,
Kapoor, & DeVor, 1995) (Reddy, DeVor, & Kapoor, 2001) (Song, 2006) (Kaymakci, 2009) (Gencoglu,
2011). In most of the published work, the chip load was divided into several zones and one or more of
the zones were discretized (Endres, 1990; Budak, 2007; Altintas, 2012). For the cutting force
coefficient models, some researchers used empirical model in which major factors such as rake angle,
cutting speed and chip thickness was considered and the coefficients for these factors were determined
by cutting experiments (Reddy, DeVor, & Kapoor, 2001). Some others used analytical models
incorporating tool rake angle and inclination angle, shear angle, friction angle between the tool and the
chip, yield shear stress of the work material, etc. (Altintas, 2012) (Song, 2006) (Kaymakci, 2009).
There is no literature available on investigating the distributions of cutting force and force intensity
along the tool edge, although this is useful for evaluating or modeling the detailed tool wear status.
Major factors affecting cutting forces include tool/work material properties, cutting process
parameters (chip load and cutting speed), and tool geometry. Effective tool angles change with the
changing of the feed direction and they also change drastically near the tool corner. In precision
machining or finishing machining, the depth of cut is small and the tool corner part may take most of
the work. It is desirable to model the turning process for predicting the distributions of effective tool
angles and the chip load along the tool edge, and thus to accurately predict the cutting forces.
In this work, a mechanistic cutting force model for turning processes is developed. In order to
accurately predict cutting forces, the cutting tool edge is discretized and an approach for calculating the
chip load corresponding to each discretized edge segment is developed. Approach for calculating
distributions of the effective tool angles is also developed considering effects of the tool corner radius
and the change of feed direction. By using the yield shear stress of the work material, the friction angle
between the work and the tool material, the chip load distribution and the effective tool angles for each
tool edge segment, the distributions of the cutting forces and force intensity along the tool edge was
predicted. Turning cases of straight turning, contour turning, taper turning and facing are tested. The
distributions of the effective tool angles and chip load, and the predicted force and force intensity
distributions are analyzed. The distributions of force intensity on tool edge provide useful information
for prediction of turning forces/power, optimization of cutting parameters and potential prediction of
tool wear/life.
2 Turning Model Development
The primary purpose of modeling cutting process is to predict cutting forces. With the knowledge
of cutting forces, the power consumption, cutting tool properties and metal part quality can be
estimated. The cutting process parameters can also be optimized based the prediction of cutting forces.
The measured cutting forces should include both the forces due to metal shearing and a tertiary
deformation process “ploughing” or “rubbing” at the flank of the cutting edge. It is convenient to
express the cutting forces as two parts: metal shear force part and edge force part (Altintas, 2012).
Ft K tc bh K te b ½
°
(1)
F f K fc bh K fe b ¾
°
Fr K rc bh K re b ¿
where ܨ௧ ǡ ܨ ǡ ܨ are the tangential, feed and radial forces respectively and ܭ௧ ǡ ܭ ǡܭ are the cutting
force coefficients in the three corresponding directions, ܭ௧ǡ ܭ ǡ ܭ are the edge force coefficients in
455
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
the three directions respectively, and ܾ is the width of cut (edge length) and ݄ is the uncut chip
thickness.
As the edge force coefficients are purely determined by cutting experiments, the most important
part of the cutting process modeling is to model the metal shear force. And the shear force modeling
includes two aspects: chip load modeling and the cutting force coefficients modeling. The chip load is
determined by the uncut chip thickness and the width of cut (or the feed rate and the depth of cut), the
geometry and the orientation of the tool and the workpiece. The modeling the cutting force coefficients
is determined by the material properties of the workpiece and the cutting tool, tool geometry, and the
cutting speed. The modeling of the chip load and the cutting force coefficients will be discussed in the
following sections.
2.1 Chip Load Model
The chip load model computes the instantaneous cutting area. The nominal cutting area is
determined by the uncut chip thickness and the width of cut (or the feed rate and the depth of cut). The
accurate computation of the cutting area is also affected by other factors such as the geometry of the
tool and the profile of the workpiece, the varying instantaneous feed direction, etc. The uncut chip
thickness is not constant along the tool edge considering the curved tool edge around the tool corner
and nonlinear tool path (e.g., contour turning).
In order to accurately compute the cutting areas and the chip load distribution along the working
tool edge, the tool edge is discretized. Figure 1 shows the approach of the edge discretization. After
discretizing the working tool edge, the chip load is divided into a series of subareas with the same
dimension in radial direction (݀ )ݔof the turning except the last one in the tool corner part (D), while
the axial dimensions of the subareas are the same (݀ )ݕfor the straight edge part (AB) and vary for the
tool corner part (BCDE). In this work, the discretization length ݀ ݔis 0.001 inch and ݀ ݕis related to
the feed rate and it changes with the location of the subareas (݀ ݕis equal to the feed per revolution for
the straight turning). With this discretization level, the simulation time is usually several seconds for
one turning step in a regular laptop PC (e.g., DELL Latitude E6430).
Edge position 1
Edge position 1
Edge position 2
Edge position 2
(a) Straight
(b) General
Figure 1: Discretization of the working tool edge
The tool approach angle ߰ (or the side cutting edge angle ߢ ሻmay change with the location on
the tool edge (due to the corner radius) and the changing of the feed direction. In the straight turning
shown in Figure 1(a), ߰ ൏ Ͳat point A and ߰ Ͳat point C, while ߰ ൌ ͻͲιሺߢ ൌ Ͳιሻat point
D. Figure 1(b) shows a more general case in which the instantaneous feed direction does not parallel to
the axial direction of the workpiece. In Figure 1(b) the tool approach angle ߰ and the side cutting
456
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
edge angle ߢ deviate from the nominal values even in the straight edge part (e.g., ߢீ ). The variation
of the tool approach angle, ߰, will result in variation of other tool angles such as the edge inclination
angle and the normal rake angle, thus result in the change of the cutting forces.
2.2 Shear Force Model
For a given chip load, the shearing components of the cutting forces are determined by the cutting
force coefficients. The cutting force coefficients for oblique cutting are shown in Equation 2
(Armarego & Uthaichaya, 1977) (Altintas, 2012). They are transformed from orthogonal cutting
equations by using the angles transformation shown from Equation 3 to Equation 7.
½
Ws
cos( E n D n ) tan O s tan K sin E n
°
K tc
sin I n
°
cos 2 (I n E n D n ) tan 2 K sin 2 E n
°
Ws
sin( E n D n )
(2)
°
K fc
¾
2
2
2
sin I n cos O s
cos (I n E n D n ) tan K sin E n °
°
cos( E n D n ) tan O s tan K sin E n
Ws
°
K rc
sin I n
°
cos 2 (I n E n D n ) tan 2 K sin 2 E n
¿
tan Os
tan D p cos\ r tan D f sin \ r
(3)
tan D o
tan D p sin \ r tan D f cos\ r
(4)
tan D n
tan D o cos O s
(5)
tan E n
tan E a cos O s
(6)
tan K
§ cos D n
·
tan Os ¨¨
sin D n ¸¸
I
E
tan(
)
n
n
©
¹
(7)
where ߰ is the tool approach angle, ߙ is the side rake angle, ߙ is the back rake angle, ߙ is the
orthogonal rake angle,ߙ is the normal rake angle,ߚis the friction angle from material test,ߚ is the
normal friction angle,߶ is the normal shear angle,ߣ௦ is the inclination angle, ߟ is the chip flow angle
and ߬௦ is the yield shear stress of work material. The definitions of the major turning tool angles are
shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Geometry of turning tool
457
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
3 Turning Force Model
By applying the above chip load model and shear force model to each discretized edge segment,
the distributions of the oblique forces are obtained. For different area elements, the directions of the
feed force and normal force may be different. They need to be converted to the XYZ directions in
turning operations. For the ݅ ௧ discretized edge segment we have the following equations (Equation 8).
dFxi
dFtci
dF yi
dF fci sin \ ri dFrci cos\ ri
dFzi
dF fci cos\ ri dFrci sin \ ri
(8)
where ݀ܨ௫ ǡ ݀ܨ௬ ǡ ݀ܨ௭ are the force elements in the tangential, radial and axial (feed) directions in the
lathe respectively, and ݀ܨ௧ ǡ ݀ܨ ǡ ݀ܨ are the tangential, feed and normal force elements in the
oblique cutting respectively, ߰ is the tool approach angle corresponding to the ݅ ௧ edge segment. The
total tangential force, radial force and axial force can be obtained by summing the force elements in the
same direction.
4 Case Studies and Results Analysis
A comprehensive turning case including straight turning, contour turning, taper turning and facing
operations are tested using the developed model. The tested case includes seven turning steps: 1)
straight turning; 2) contour turning; 3) straight turning; 4) facing; 5) taper turning; 6) straight turning;
7) facing. A diamond tool inset with a corner radius of 1.524 mm (0.06 inch) is used. The tool tip angle
is Ͳι and the nominal approach angle is െͳͷι. The workpiece material is AISI-1045 steel with
shearing stress of 693.4 MPa and the friction angle is 31.6° (Altintas, 2012). The tool insert and the
workpiece before and after the seven turning steps are shown in Figure 3. The engagement profiles
between the tool and the workpiece for all the seven steps are shown in Figure 4.
For the entire turning process, the model identifies the instantaneous cutting area first using the
information of the adjacent tool positions in each work revolution first, then computes and outputs the
distributions of the effective tool angles, the cutting parameters, the chip load and the cutting force
coefficients (i.e., the specific cutting forces) along the tool edge. In the following sections, the results
for the two representative steps (straight turning and contour turning) will be analyzed to illustrate the
model capability.
(a) Before
(b) After
Figure 3: Orientation between the tool and the
workpiece before and after turning
458
Figure 4: Tool-workpiece engagement profiles for all the
seven steps
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
4.1 Case 1: Straight Turning
Figure 5 shows the distributions of the tool approach angle, inclination angle, chip flow angle,
normal rake angle, normal friction angle and the normal shear angle for the straight turning step (Step
1). In the figure, line segments AB and BC correspond to the straight edge and the tool corner part
respectively. The turning point B is the tangential point between the straight edge and the tool corner.
It is shown that for the straight turning operation, these angles are constant in the straight edge part,
while they vary within the tool corner area. The normal friction angle and the normal shear angle have
a similar trend as the normal rake angle. For the straight turning, the distributions of the tool angles for
all workpiece revolutions are coincident.
C
B
A
C
B
A
(a) Approach angle
B
(b) Inclination angle
A
B
A
C
C
(c) Chip flow angle
B
(d) Normal rake angle
B
A
C
A
C
(e) Normal friction angle
(f) Normal shear angle
Figure 5: Tool angle distributions for straight turning
Figure 6 shows the distributions of the uncut chip thickness for all the revolutions in the first step
(straight turning with sixty revolutions in total). The engaging length of the tool edge increases with
459
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
time for the first ten revolutions, such that the distributions of the uncut chip thickness are also
changing correspondingly. From the tenth to the fifty-ninth revolution the thickness distributions are
coincident. While the chip thickness for the last revolution (the sixtieth) is significantly smaller than
that of the other revolutions as the feed amount is smaller than the nominal values when the tool
reaches the end of the tool path.
Figure 7 shows the distributions of the cutting areas for all the revolutions in the first step. From
the tenth revolution (Rev 10-59), the area distributions become constant (even). For the revolutions 1059, the trends of the area distributions are different from that of the distributions of uncut chip
thickness shown in Figure 6 as the area distribution is constant while the thickness is varying in the
tool corner part. Again, the area distribution for the last revolution (Rev 60) is smaller than that of the
other revolutions.
Rev 10-59
Rev 10-59
Rev 9
Rev 9
Rev 8
Rev 8
Rev 60
Rev 2
Rev 1
Figure 6: The distributions of the uncut chip
thickness for the first step (straight turning)
Rev 60
Rev 2
Rev 1
Figure 7: The distributions of the cutting areas
(Step 1)
As the values of the area distribution depend on the interval of the edge discretization, it makes
more sense to normalize the area distribution by using the lengths of the discretized edge segments.
The normalized area distributions are shown in Figure 8. And the corresponding length distributions of
the discretized edge segments of selected revolutions (Rev 5, 7, 9 and 11) are shown in Figure 9. It is
seen that the lengths of the discretized edge segments are not constant along the tool edge, as the edge
discretization is not in the tangential direction of the edge (it is perpendicular to the feed direction).
From the Section 2, the cutting forces contributed by the metal shear action are determined by the chip
load and the cutting coefficients (Equation 1). Figure 10 shows distributions of the tangential cutting
force coefficients of the first step (straight turning). It is seen that for straight turning operation, the
tangential cutting coefficients for all the revolutions are coincided. It is also seen that for the majority
of the tool corner part, the tangential cutting coefficients are smaller than that of the straight edge part.
This is due to that the effective normal rake angle at the most part of the corner is larger than that of
the straight edge part.
Figure 11 shows the distributions of the tangential cutting force for all the revolutions in Step 1.
The trend of the tangential force is similar to that of the tangential cutting coefficients after the tenth
revolution (Rev 10 – Rev 60). Also, as the discretized cutting force distributions depend on the interval
of the discretization, it is necessary to normalize it with discretized edge length to obtain the force
intensity similar to the normalization of the cutting areas. Force intensity reflects the load on unit edge
length of the cutting tool. Figure 12 shows the distributions of the tangential force intensity. The trends
of the force intensity distributions are similar to that of the distributions of the normalized cutting areas
shown in Figure 8.
460
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
Rev 10-59
Rev 9
Rev 8
Rev 60
Rev 2
Rev 1
Figure 8: The distributions of the normalized
cutting areas (Step 1)
Figure 9: The distribution of the discretized edge
length (Step 1)
Figure 10: The distributions of the tangential cutting coefficients (Step 1)
Rev 10-59
Rev 10-59
Rev 9
Rev 9
Rev 8
Rev 8
Rev 60
Rev 60
Rev 2
Rev 1
Figure 11: The distribution of tangential cutting
force (Step 1)
Rev 2
Rev 1
Figure 12: The distribution of the tangential
force intensity (Step 1)
4.2 Case 2: Contour Turning
In contour turning, the effective tool angles are affected by not only the tool edge profile but also
the changing of the feed direction. Figure 13 shows the distributions of the major tool angles for the
contour turning (Step 2). There are thirteen revolutions in total for the whole second step. In order to
depict the curves clearer, only data for odd revolutions are shown in the figures. It is shown that for the
contour turning operation, these angles are constant in the straight edge part at a time instance but they
change with time due to the nonlinear direction of the feed motion. For the tool corner part, the
461
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
effective tool angles change with both the feed direction and the positions on the tool corner (due to the
change of the side cutting edge angle). The length of the engaging tool edge changes (decreases for this
specific case) with time during the whole contour turning step due to the change of the feed direction,
as shown in Figure 14.
(a) Approach angle
(b) Inclination angle
(c) Chip flow angle
(d) Normal rake angle
(e) Normal friction angle
(f) Normal shear angle
Figure 13: Tool angle distributions for contour turning (Step 2)
Figure 15 shows the distributions of the uncut chip thickness for the odd revolutions in the second
step (contour turning). It is seen that the distributions of the uncut chip thickness are different f or
different revolutions due to the changing of the feed direction. Similar to that of the straight turning
case, the thickness of the last revolution (Rev 13) is significantly smaller than that of other revolutions
as the tool reaches the end of the tool path in this step. Similar trend will be seen in the plots for cutting
462
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
areas and forces shown in the following paragraphs. As some lines are too close to be distinguished,
zoomed-in plots are added in some of the following figures.
Figure 16 shows the distributions of the cutting areas for the odd revolutions in the Step 2. As the
engaging length of the tool edge is changing from revolution to revolution for the whole contour
turning step, the area distributions are also changing along the tool path. The normalized area
distributions are shown in Figure 17. It is seen that the uncut chip thickness and cutting areas for the
last revolution of the step are significantly smaller than that of other revolutions. Figure 18 shows the
length distributions of the discretized edge segments used for normalizing the cutting areas (only a few
selected revolutions, namely Rev 1, 5, 9, 13, are shown).
L as t revolution
F irs t revolution
Figure 14: The working part of the tool edge changes with time in contour turning
Figure 15: The distributions of the uncut chip
thickness (Step 2)
Figure 16: The distributions of the cutting areas
(Step 2)
Figure 17: The distributions of the normalized
cutting areas (Step 2)
Figure 18: The normalized distributions the
discretized edge length (Step 2)
463
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
Figure 19 shows the distributions of the tangential cutting coefficients of the odd revolutions in the
second step. It is seen that the trend of the tangential coefficients is changing from the first to the last
revolution. The varying trend is due to the changing of the feed direction. The trend of the cutting
coefficients for the last revolution is close to that of the straight turning shown in Figure 10, as the feed
direction of the last revolution in contour turning is close to that of the straight turning.
Figure 20 and Figure 21 show the distributions of the tangential cutting force and the force
intensity for Step 2. Again only the odd revolutions are shown for simplicity. The trend of the
tangential force for the last revolution (Rev 13) is similar to that of the straight turning shown in Figure
11. And the trends of the force intensity are similar to that of the normalized cutting areas.
Figure 19: The distributions of the tangential cutting force coefficients (Step 2)
Figure 20: The distributions of the tangential
cutting force (Step 2)
Figure 21: The distributions of the tangential force
intensity (Step 2)
In this section, modeling results for two typical turning operations (straight turning and contour
turning) are analyzed to demonstrate the model capability. The shear forces are determined by the chip
load and cutting coefficients. And the cutting force coefficients are determined by the tool angles and
the material properties. As the major outputs, the distributions of the tool angles, uncut chip thickness,
chip load, and the cutting coefficients are analyzed. The distributions of the tangential force and force
intensity along the tool edge will be useful for tool wear/life evaluation and analysis.
5 Conclusions
In this work, a mechanistic cutting force model for turning processes is developed. The model
identifies the cutting area distribution, and computes the instantaneous effective tool angles, cutting
464
Modeling of Cutting Force Distribution on Tool Edge in Turning Process
Zhang and Guo
parameters, cutting forces, force intensity and their distributions. The distribution of the force intensity
along the tool edge is a very important parameter as it reflects the force load variation and load time
history on the tool edge. The variation of the force intensity distribution with time/revolutions provides
valuable information for thermal modeling of turning process such as calculating heat flux and cutting
temperature distributions along cutting edge. The combined force intensity and thermal results can be
further used for tool wear/life analysis and prediction, and turning process optimization.
References
Altintas, Y. (2012). Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations,
and CNC Design, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Armarego, E. J., & Uthaichaya, M. (1977). A Mechanics of Cutting Approach for Force Prediction in
Turning Operations. Journal of Engineering Production, 1(1):1-18.
Chandrasekharan, V., Kapoor, S. G., & DeVor, R. E. (1995). A Mechanistic Approach to Predicting
the Cutting Forces in Drilling: with Application to Fiber-reinforced Composite Materials.
Journal of Engineering for Industry, 117:559-570.
Endres, W. J. (1990). A Dynamic Model of the Cutting Force System in the Turning Process. Proc.,
Symp. on Monitoring and Cont. for Mfg. Processes, ASME WAM, PED-44, (pp. 193-212).
Gencoglu, A. (2011). Physics Based Turning Process Simulation. Master's Thesis: The University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kaymakci, M. (2009). Generalized Modeling of Metal Cutting Mechanics. Master’s thesis: The
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Lee, E. H., & Shaffer, B. W. (1951). Theory of Plasticity Applied to the Problem of Machining.
Journal of Applied Mechanics, 18:405-413.
Merchant, M. E. (1944). Basic Mechanics of the Metal Cutting Process. Journal of Applied Mechanics,
66:168-175.
Palmer, W. B., & Oxley, P. L. (1959). Mechanics of Orthogonal Machining. Proceedings of the
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 173(24):623–654.
Reddy, R. G., DeVor, R. E., & Kapoor, S. G. (2001). A Mechanistic Force Model for Combined
Axial–Radial Contour Turning. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,
41:1551-1572.
Song, W. (2006). Development of Predictive Force Models for Classical Orthogonal and Oblique
Cutting and Turning Operations Incorporating Tool Flank Wear Effects. PhD Thesis:
Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
465