RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005; 19: 3416–3418
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/rcm.2183
RCM
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor-in-Chief
Sir,
Determination of arecoline (areca nut
alkaloid) and nicotine in hair by highperformance liquid chromatography/
electrospray
quadrupole
mass
spectrometry
The areca nut (or betel nut), composed
of the sliced nut (areca nut) of the areca
palm (Areca catechu), the leaf of the betel
pepper (Piper betle), cut tobacco and
lime is the fourth most commonly
used drug in the world after tobacco,
alcohol and caffeine.1 It is commonly
consumed as betel quid (folded leaf
package) chewing or betel nut smoking
by Asian populations (both men and
women) and Asian communities living
in Europe and North America.2,3 Different chemical compounds have been
identified in the nut, but arecoline, the
principal alkaloid from the areca nut, is
thought to be responsible for a central
cholinergic stimulation and monoamine transmission, which then activates
both sympathetic and parasympathetic
effects.4 Chewing areca nut on a
habitual basis is known to be deleterious to human health, especially in
relation to the risk of the development
of oral cancer.5,6
Recently, we developed and validated a high-performance liquid
chromatography method with mass
spectrometric detection to determine
arecoline in the meconium of newborns
from betel chewer mothers to assess
fetal exposure to this alkaloid and in
the placenta, to be associated with
studies on the morphology of placental
tissue from consumer mothers.7 Two
adverse birth outcomes were observed
within the six newborns, whose meconium was positive to arecoline and
focal inflammatory changes in the
amniochorial membranes (focal acute
chorioamnionitis) were observed in
placentas originating from these two
cases.8
Whereas meconium is a biological
matrix for assessing chronic exposure
to xenobiotics during the prenatal
period, hair is used to reveal repetitive
exposure not only in newborns, but
also in children and adults.9 For this
reason, we sought to develop a digestion and extraction procedure for arecoline and nicotine (the hair biomarker
for consumption of tobacco, which is
usually present in betel preparations)
in keratin matrix combined with
the analysis of the extracts by highperformance liquid chromatography/
electrospray quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS) methodology
already validated for meconium, cord
serum and urine.7 Figure 1 shows the
structures of analytes under investigation together with the internal standard
(IS) used.
Hair samples, collected from chronic
betel nut consumers, were cut at the
scalp in the vertex region and the entire
strand was washed three times (2 min)
with 3 mL dichloromethane in an ultrasonic waterbath and allowed to dry at
room temperature.
Washed hair specimens were then
pulverized with a ball mill (Retsch,
Haan, Germany) for 10 min at 90
amplitude units. The 50 mg of pulverized hair were added to 5 mL of IS
working solution (10 mg/mL) and incubated with 2 mL 12 M NaOH at 408C for
18 h. After the incubation, the alkaline
mixture was extracted with 5 mL
chloroform/isopropanol (95:5, v/v)
by vortex-mixing for 2 min and centrifuging at 2000 g for 5 min. The organic
layer was transferred to another tube
containing 2.5 mL 0.5 M HCl. The tube
was vortex-mixed for 2 min, centrifuged at 2000 g for 5 min, and the
organic layer discarded. The acidic
layer was neutralized with 1 mL 1 M
NaOH and made alkaline with 2 mL
NH4Cl saturated solution adjusted to
pH 9.5 with concentrated ammonia.
Re-extraction with 5 mL of chloroform/
isopropanol (95:5, v/v) was finally
conducted for 5 min. The organic phase
was evaporated to dryness under a
stream of nitrogen and the residue was
dissolved in 100 mL of 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 4.3) solution. A 20 mL
volume was injected onto the LC
column. When the concentrations of
the analytes in hair were higher than
those in the calibration curve range,
samples were re-injected after appropriate dilution in mobile phase.
Chromatographic separation was
achieved by an LC system (Agilent
1100 series HPLC system; Agilent
Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA)
equipped with a C18 reversedphase column (Phenomenex Luna
C18, 150 4.6 mm 3 mm; Chemtek
Analytica, Anzola, Emilia, Italy),
using a 10 mM ammonium acetate
(pH 4.3)/acetonitrile (90:10, v/v)
Figure 1. Molecular structures of arecoline, nicotine and the
internal standard, pilocarpine.
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Letter to the Editor
solution as a mobile phase at a flow rate
of 0.5 mL/min. The mass spectrometer
(Agilent 1100 series G1946D) was
operated in positive ESI mode using
selected ion monitoring (SIM) acquisition. The following ESI conditions were
applied: drying gas (nitrogen) heated
at 3508C at a flow rate of 10.0 L/h;
nebulizer gas (nitrogen) pressure of
40 psi; capillary voltage 1500 V, fragmentor voltage (applied to the exit
end of the capillary) 110 V, dwell time
139 ms, and mass peak width 0.10 min.
Characteristic ions were m/z 156, 140,
and 118 for arecoline, 163, 132 and 106
for nicotine, and m/z 209, 96 and 95 for
pilocarpine. The protonated molecules
at m/z 156 for arecoline, m/z 163 for
nicotine, and m/z 209 for pilocarpine
were selected for quantification.
Chromatograms of an extract of
drug-free hair sample spiked with IS
only (A), an extract of drug-free hair
sample spiked with 1 ng/mg arecoline
and nicotine (B) and an extract of hair
sample from betel nut consumer (C) are
shown in Fig. 2.
The method was tested in a 3-day
validation protocol, following the
accepted criteria for bioanalytical
method validation.10 Selectivity, recov-
ery, matrix effect, linearity, precision,
accuracy, limits of detection and quantification were assessed. Calibration
standards containing 0.3, 1, 2, 4 and
10 ng arecoline/mg hair and 0.8, 2, 4, 8
and 15 ng nicotine/mg hair were prepared daily for each analytical batch by
adding suitable amounts of methanolic
working solutions to 50 mg drug-free
hair. Quality control (QC) samples of
8.0 ng/mg arecoline and 12.0 ng/mg
nicotine (high level), 3.2 ng/mg arecoline and 6.8 ng/mg nicotine (medium
level), and 0.5 ng/mg arecoline and
1.2 ng/mg nicotine (low level) were
prepared in drug-free hair, aliquoted
and stored at 208C. Over-curve samples containing 20 ng arecoline and
nicotine/mg hair were prepared, to be
tested for accuracy and precision once
diluted 5 and 10 times. Peak area ratios
between compounds and the IS were
used for weighted (1/concentration)
least-squares
regression
analysis
(SPSS, version 9.0.2 for Windows).
Absolute analytical recoveries were
calculated by comparing the peak areas
obtained when QC samples were analyzed by adding the analytical reference standards in the extract of drugfree hair prior to and after the extrac-
3417
tion procedure (four replicates at each
concentration). For an evaluation of
matrix effects, the peak areas of
extracted blank samples spiked with
standards at three QC concentration
levels after the extraction procedure
were compared with the peak areas of
pure diluted substances. Five replicates at each of the QC concentrations
added to blank hair and over-curve
samples after appropriate dilution
were analyzed for the determination
of intra-assay precision and accuracy.
The inter-assay precision and accuracy
were determined for three independent experimental assays. Five replicates of blank hair samples were used
to calculate the limits of detection and
quantification. Standard deviation
(SD) of the mean noise level over the
retention time window of each analyte
was used to determine the limit of
detection (LOD ¼ 3 SD) and the limit of
quantification (LOQ ¼ 10 SD). The
LOQ value was tested for precision
and accuracy variation to be better than
20%.
The method exhibited good linearity
along the calibration range studied.
Mean calibration curves (n ¼ 3), presented the following parameters: slope
Figure 2. SIM chromatograms of protonated molecules of (A) an extract of 50 mg drug-free hair sample spiked with
internal standard only; (B) an extract of 50 mg drug-free hair sample spiked with 50 ng arecoline and nicotine; and (C) an
extract of 50 mg hair sample from a betel nut consumer containing 1.10 ng/mg hair arecoline and 8.02 ng/mg hair nicotine.
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005; 19: 3416–3418
3418
Letter to the Editor
day) and four betel quid chewing
women are shown in Table 2. Although
these data are preliminary and the
number of analyzed samples does not
allow any definite conclusion (precise
number of betel nut cigarettes was
unknown in men, nor the time of quid
chewing in women), it can be noted
that the level of arecoline present in
hair from women (mean SD: 1.27
0.20 ng/mg hair) is significantly higher
than that measured in hair from men
(mean SD: 0.61 0.52 ng/mg hair).
Conversely, hair nicotine shows a
trend toward higher values in men
(mean SD: 11. 73 11.86 ng/mg hair)
than in the samples from women
(mean SD: 4.71 3.62 ng/mg hair).
One plausible hypothesis is that betel
quid, normally placed in the mouth
and held against the mucosa of the
buccal cheek and molar teeth to be
episodically chewed to extract juice,
releases more arecoline than that made
available by smoking a betel nut cigarette in a few minutes. The reason for
the higher content of hair nicotine in
men is that the majority of them also
smoke tobacco cigarettes while women
from our study declared to be nonsmokers. In addition, betel quid and
betel nut cigarettes probably contain
1.7614, intercept 0.2021, determination
coefficient (r2) 0.9997 for arecoline;
slope 4.8943, intercept 3.8387, determination coefficient (r2) 0.9937 for nicotine. Absolute analytical recoveries
(mean SD) ranged from 81.2 2.6%
for arecoline to 79.2 2.1% for nicotine.
With respect to the matrix effect, the
comparison between peak areas of
analytes spiked in extracted blank
samples versus those for pure diluted
standards showed less than 10% analytical signal suppression due to coeluting endogenous substances. The
intra- and inter-assay precision and
accuracy data are presented in Table 1.
Over-curve samples, tested for accuracy and precision after diluting 5 and
10 times, gave values always better
than 10% relative standard deviation
(RSD) and Error %. The LODs were 0.09
and 0.24, and LOQs were 0.30 and
0.80 ng/mg hair for arecoline and
nicotine, respectively. Coefficients of
variation for precision and accuracy at
the LOQ were always better than 20%.
The method presented here has been
applied to the analysis of hair samples
from 11 chronic areca nut consumers
(range: 2–35 years of consumption).
Data from the seven men declaring
betel nut smoking (more than once per
Table 1. Intra- (n ¼ 5) and inter-assay (n ¼ 15) precision and accuracy obtained
from analytes under investigation
Intra-assay
Compounds
Inter-assay
Concentration
ng/mg hair
Precision
(RSD%)
Accuracy
(Error %)
Precision
(RSD%)
Accuracy
(Error %)
0.5
3.2
8.0
1.2
6.8
12.0
4.00
4.84
8.07
3.70
1.93
3.33
4.23
4.71
2.62
6.11
0.94
9.36
4.91
4.79
4.70
3.96
2.44
2.27
3.78
2.77
1.41
4.44
1.15
5.44
Arecoline
Nicotine
Table 2. Arecoline and nicotine content in hair samples from drug consumers
Sample
Sex
Type of consumption
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
F
M
F
M
M
M
F
M
F
M
M
Betel quid chewing
Betel nut smoking
Betel quid chewing
Betel nut smoking
Betel nut smoking
Betel nut smoking
Betel quid chewing
Betel nut smoking
Betel quid chewing
Betel nut smoking
Betel nut smoking
Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Arecoline ng/mg
hair
Nicotine ng/mg
hair
1.18
0.81
1.26
0.33
0.30
0.41
1.10
1.71
1.55
0.35
0.36
1.72
33.02
1.44
5.37
12.46
2.44
8.02
5.50
7.65
22.25
1.06
different amounts of areca nut and cut
tobacco. These observations should
be confirmed in a higher number of
individuals consuming different preparations of areca nut and with data on
the number of times per day that the
subjects are consuming the drug.
In conclusion, for the first time,
arecoline, the major alkaloid of areca
nut, has been determined in hair from
consumers by a simple, reliable and
validated LC/MS method after alkaline digestion of keratin matrix and
liquid–liquid extraction of analytes.
The results suggest that hair can be a
non-invasive biological matrix for
monitoring chronic use of areca nut
preparations.
Emilia Marchei1, Abhilasha Durgbanshi2,
Silvia Rossi1, Óscar Garcia-Algar3,
Piergiorgio Zuccaro1
and Simona Pichini2*
1
Department of Drug Research and
Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di
Sanitá, Rome, Italy
2
Department of Criminology and
Forensic Sciences, Dr. H.S. Gour
University, Sagar, India
3
Paediatric Service, URIE, Hospital del
Mar, and Universitat Autònoma,
Barcelona, Spain
*Correspondence to: S. Pichini, Istituto
Superiore di Sanità, V.le Regina Elena
299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
E-mail: pichini@iss.it
REFERENCES
1. Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S.
Addict. Biol. 2002; 7: 77.
2. Winstock A. Addict. Biol. 2002; 7: 133.
3. Warnakulasuriya S. Addict. Biol.
2002; 7: 127.
4. Chu NS. Addict. Biol. 2002; 7: 111.
5. Chang YC, Yang SF, Tai KW, Chou
MY, Hsieh YS. Oral Oncol. 2002; 38:
195.
6. Warnakulasuriya S, Trivedy C,
Peters TJ. Br. Med. J. 2002; 324: 799.
7. Pichini S, Pellegrini M, Pacifici R,
Marchei E, Murillo J, Puig C, Vall
O, Garcia-Algar O. Rapid Commun.
Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 1958.
8. Garcia-Algar O, Vall O, Alameda F,
Puig C, Pellegrini M, Pacifici R,
Pichini S. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed. 2005; 90: F276.
9. Villain M, Cirimele V, Kintz P. Clin.
Chem. Lab. Med. 2004; 42: 1265.
10. Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical
Method Validation, US Department
of Health and Human Services,
Food and Drug Administration,
May 2001. Available: http://www.
fda.gov/cder/guidance/
4252fnl.htm.
Received 8 July 2005
Revised 4 September 2005
Accepted 4 September 2005
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005; 19: 3416–3418