Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Forums

bug

Sort:
ThunderCarrot

DoubtingDave

This is not a bug. In this case, white timed out and the game was drawn by insufficient material. 

"What happens if, for example, white has all the pieces and black has just one king but white runs out of time? In this case, since the player with the black pieces can not checkmate with just the king, the game is also declared drawn. This is very important to point out, as running out of time will not always mean losing the game—sometimes it's a draw." 

https://support.chess.com/article/352-how-do-draws-work

EthanC

No bug here...

FireMasterA

He means it's not a timeout. if you look at the clock, he has 0.07 seconds left AKA 7 milliseconds. Chess.com shouldn't count that as a timeout... if he was skilled enough he would have premoved and won. Also, his opponent has 4 milliseconds left. It IS a bug.

aviation18

My opponent ran out of time. Why was it a draw? - Chess.com Member Support and FAQs

FireMasterA
6942isverybigbrain wrote:

Yes, it does. Thanks!

Ziryab
ayrokx wrote:

He means it's not a timeout. if you look at the clock, he has 0.07 seconds left AKA 7 milliseconds. Chess.com shouldn't count that as a timeout... if he was skilled enough he would have premoved and won. Also, his opponent has 4 milliseconds left. It IS a bug.

 

The clock shows 0.7, not 0.07. Seven milliseconds would be 0.007. What it shows is 7/10 of a second. A millisecond is 1/1000 of a second.

 

The post that followed yours answered the OP’s question in any case.

plux
reachvidur wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
ayrokx wrote:

He means it's not a timeout. if you look at the clock, he has 0.07 seconds left AKA 7 milliseconds. Chess.com shouldn't count that as a timeout... if he was skilled enough he would have premoved and won. Also, his opponent has 4 milliseconds left. It IS a bug.

 

The clock shows 0.7, not 0.07. Seven milliseconds would be 0.007. What it shows is 7/10 of a second.

do not give us a lecture bro

do not be a troll, bro.

your comment literally contributes nothing to the discussion.

(and, he's right).

Abhigyan2014
I lost by timeout, but the game record shows I had time left! What is going on?

If you have ever won or lost a game on time, then gone to the game report to analyze your mistakes, you may have noticed something a bit odd. Take a look at this blitz game I lost for example: 

file-QcPjOUWouD.pngIt says that my opponent won on time (I timed out) and yet, I still have 4 seconds on my clock. What is going on here? Does this mean there was an issue with my clock or my connection that caused me to time out early? 

No, there is nothing wrong with the clocks, this is simply the way that games are recorded into the archive. 

Every time each player makes a move, a 'snapshot' of the game is taken. When you go into the moves list, you can see the state of the clocks at each snapshot, after each move was made. However, if you don't make a move in time, no snapshot is taken. 

What you are seeing in the screenshot above, and in any game you look at in the archive, is the state of the game after the final recorded move was played. Since the final move in this case was played by my opponent, the final recording of my clock shows that I have 4 seconds left, which is how much time I had at the moment my opponent played his move. 

So there is nothing to worry about with your clock, it is showing that time because that's how much time you had when the final snapshot of the game was taken! 

 
 
Abhigyan2014

guys there is no bug every time each move is played a screensnot is taken when 30 sec is done and no move is played the screensnot is not taken which cases time to stop and the time canot run again so it's time out because the time canot run again