Deconfounding User Preference in Recommendation Systems through Implicit and Explicit Feedback
Authors: 
Yuliang Liang, Enneng Yang, Guibing Guo, Wei Cai, Linying Jiang, Xingwei WangAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 198, Pages 1 - 18
Abstract
Recommender systems are influenced by many confounding factors (i.e., confounders) which result in various biases (e.g., popularity biases) and inaccurate user preference. Existing approaches try to eliminate these biases by inference with causal graphs. However, they assume all confounding factors can be observed and no hidden confounders exist. We argue that many confounding factors (e.g., season) may not be observable from user–item interaction data, resulting inaccurate user preference. In this article, we propose a deconfounded recommender considering unobservable confounders. Specifically, we propose a new causal graph with explicit and implicit feedback, which can better model user preference. Then, we realize a deconfounded estimator by the front-door adjustment, which is able to eliminate the effect of unobserved confounders. Finally, we conduct a series of experiments on two real-world datasets, and the results show that our approach performs better than other counterparts in terms of recommendation accuracy.
References
[1]
Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Yang Qiu, Xiangnan He, Xin Xin, Liang Chen, Guli Lin, and Keping Yang. 2021. AutoDebias: Learning to debias for recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 21–30.
[2]
Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2023. Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 41, 3 (2023), 1–39.
[3]
Yizhou Dang, Enneng Yang, Guibing Guo, Linying Jiang, Xingwei Wang, Xiaoxiao Xu, Qinghui Sun, and Hong Liu. 2023. TiCoSeRec: Augmenting data to uniform sequences by time intervals for effective recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 36, 6 (2023), 2686–2700.
[4]
Chen Gao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, and Yong Li. 2022. Graph neural networks for recommender system. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM). 1623–1625.
[5]
Madelyn Glymour, Judea Pearl, and Nicholas P. Jewell. 2016. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. John Wiley & Sons.
[6]
Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. LightGCN: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 639–648.
[7]
Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). 173–182.
[8]
Nan Jiang and Lihong Li. 2016. Doubly robust off-policy value evaluation for reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR). 652–661.
[9]
Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30–37.
[10]
Dawen Liang, Rahul G. Krishnan, Matthew D. Hoffman, and Tony Jebara. 2018. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference (WWW). 689–698.
[11]
Dugang Liu, Pengxiang Cheng, Hong Zhu, Zhenhua Dong, Xiuqiang He, Weike Pan, and Zhong Ming. 2021. Mitigating confounding bias in recommendation via information bottleneck. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). 351–360.
[12]
Zhe Ma and Qiang Dong. 2021. Alleviating the unfairness of recommendation by eliminating the conformity bias. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2004, 1 (2021), 012008.
[13]
Benjamin M. Marlin and Richard S. Zemel. 2009. Collaborative prediction and ranking with non-random missing data. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). 5–12.
[14]
Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv:1807.03748. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.03748
[15]
Yuta Saito. 2020. Asymmetric tri-training for debiasing missing-not-at-random explicit feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 309–318.
[16]
Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Ashudeep Singh, Navin Chandak, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Recommendations as treatments: Debiasing learning and evaluation. In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR). 1670–1679.
[17]
Paras Sheth, Ruocheng Guo, Lu Cheng, Huan Liu, and Kasim Selçuk Candan. 2023. Causal disentanglement for implicit recommendations with network information. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 17, 7 (2023), 1–18.
[18]
Derun Song, Enneng Yang, Guibing Guo, Li Shen, Linying Jiang, and Xingwei Wang. 2024. Multi-scenario and multi-task aware feature interaction for recommendation system. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 18, 6 (2024), 142:1–142:20.
[19]
Adith Swaminathan and Thorsten Joachims. 2015. The self-normalized estimator for counterfactual learning. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vol. 28.
[20]
Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. JMLR 9, 86 (2008), 2579–2605.
[21]
Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Deconfounded recommendation for alleviating bias amplification. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1717–1725.
[22]
Yixin Wang and David M. Blei. 2019. The blessings of multiple causes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 114, 528 (2019), 1574–1596.
[23]
Yixin Wang, Dawen Liang, Laurent Charlin, and David M. Blei. 2020b. Causal inference for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). 426–431.
[24]
Zifeng Wang, Xi Chen, Rui Wen, Shao-Lun Huang, Ercan Kuruoglu, and Yefeng Zheng. 2020a. Information theoretic counterfactual learning from missing-not-at-random feedback. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). 1854–1864.
[25]
Shuyuan Xu, Juntao Tan, Shelby Heinecke, Vena Jia Li, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2023. Deconfounded causal collaborative filtering. ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems (TORS) 1, 4 (2023), 1–25.
[26]
Mengyue Yang, Quanyu Dai, Zhenhua Dong, Xu Chen, Xiuqiang He, and Jun Wang. 2021. Top-N recommendation with counterfactual user preference simulation. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM). 2342–2351.
[27]
Liuyi Yao, Zhixuan Chu, Sheng Li, Yaliang Li, Jing Gao, and Aidong Zhang. 2021. A survey on causal inference. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 15, 5 (2021), 1–46.
[28]
Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Tianxin Wei, Chonggang Song, Guohui Ling, and Yongdong Zhang. 2021. Causal intervention for leveraging popularity bias in recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 11–20.
[29]
Zihao Zhao, Jiawei Chen, Sheng Zhou, Xiangnan He, Xuezhi Cao, Fuzheng Zhang, and Wei Wu. 2021. Popularity bias is not always evil: Disentangling benign and harmful bias for recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE) 35, 10 (2021), 9920–9931.
[30]
Xinyuan Zhu, Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Xun Yang, Dingxian Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2024. Mitigating hidden confounding effects for causal recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE). DOI:
Index Terms
- Deconfounding User Preference in Recommendation Systems through Implicit and Explicit Feedback
Recommendations
Unifying explicit and implicit feedback for collaborative filtering
CIKM '10: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge managementMost collaborative filtering algorithms are based on certain statistical models of user interests built from either explicit feedback (eg: ratings, votes) or implicit feedback (eg: clicks, purchases). Explicit feedbacks are more precise but more ...
Comparison of implicit and explicit feedback from an online music recommendation service
HetRec '10: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender SystemsExplicit and implicit feedback exhibits different characteristics of users' preferences with both pros and cons. However, a combination of these two types of feedback provides another paradigm for recommender systems (RS). Their combination in a user ...
A latent pairwise preference learning approach for recommendation from implicit feedback
CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge managementMost of the current recommender systems heavily rely on explicit user feedback such as ratings on items to model users' interests. However, in many applications, it is very hard to collect the explicit feedback, while implicit feedback such as user ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 August 2024
Online AM: 18 June 2024
Accepted: 10 June 2024
Revised: 15 May 2024
Received: 09 July 2023
Published in TKDD Volume 18, Issue 8
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Science and technology projects in Liaoning Province
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 294Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)294
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in