Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3679318.3685376acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Investigating Persona Viewing Behavior: An Eye-Tracking Study on Portrait-Format Persona Profile

Published: 13 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The study offers empirical evidence on how users visually interact with digital personas. Conducting an eye-tracking study in a major news organization's premises, we analyzed the fixations of 29 participants interacting with a standard portrait-format persona profile. Our analysis of 87 repetitions calculates significant transitions between the persona information elements using n-grams from (a) when the profile is first encountered, to (b) when the profile is presented for the second time, and (c) after the participants are familiar with the profile, seeing it for the third time. Collectively, there are a small number of statistically significant transitions, suggesting an L pattern of persona-viewing behavior, and the L pattern holds regardless of the repetition. Results have implications for the design of persona profiles by placing persona information to accommodate users’ natural viewing tendencies.

References

[1]
Christos Amyrotos, Panayiotis Andreou, and Panagiotis Germanakos. 2021. Human-centred Persona Driven Personalization in Business Data Analytics. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, June 21, 2021. ACM, Utrecht Netherlands, 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450614.3462241
[2]
Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Soon-gyo Jung, Joni Salminen, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2018. Customer segmentation using online platforms: isolating behavioral and demographic segments for persona creation via aggregated user data. Social Network Analysis and Mining 8, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-018-0531-0
[3]
Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Joni Salminen, Soon-gyo Jung, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2018. Imaginary People Representing Real Numbers: Generating Personas from Online Social Media Data. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB) 12, 3 (2018).
[4]
Anne Aula, Päivi Majaranta, and Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2005. Eye-Tracking Reveals the Personal Styles for Search Result Evaluation. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2005, September 12, 2005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1058–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/11555261_104
[5]
Panos Balatsoukas and Ian Ruthven. 2012. An eye-tracking approach to the analysis of relevance judgments on the Web: The case of Google search engine. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 63, 9 (September 2012), 1728–1746. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22707
[6]
Judit Bar-Ilan, Kevin Keenoy, Mark Levene, and Eti Yaari. 2009. Presentation bias is significant in determining user preference for search results—A user study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 60, 1 (January 2009), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20941
[7]
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom and Andrew Schall (Eds.). 2014. Eye Tracking in User Experience Design (1 edition ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam ; Boston.
[8]
Tanja Blascheck, Markus John, Steffen Koch, Leonard Bruder, and Thomas Ertl. 2016. Triangulating User Behavior Using Eye Movement, Interaction, and Think Aloud Data. In Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA ’16), 2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2857491.2857523
[9]
Susanne Bødker, Ellen Christiansen, Tom Nyvang, and Pär-Ola Zander. 2012. Personas, people and participation: challenges from the trenches of local government. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers: Volume 1 - PDC ’12, 2012. ACM Press, Roskilde, Denmark, 91. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347649
[10]
Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems 30, 1–7 (1998), 107–117.
[11]
Georg Buscher, Edward Cutrell, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2009. What Do You See when You'Re Surfing?: Using Eye Tracking to Predict Salient Regions of Web Pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’09), 2009. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518705
[12]
Chris Chapman and Russell P. Milham. 2006. The Personas’ New Clothes: Methodological and Practical Arguments against a Popular Method. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, October 01, 2006. 634–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000503
[13]
Alan Cooper. 1999. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (1 edition ed.). Sams - Pearson Education, Indianapolis, IN.
[14]
Nick Craswell, Onno Zoeter, Michael Taylor, and Bill Ramsey. 2008. An Experimental Comparison of Click Position-bias Models. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM ’08), 2008. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/1341531.1341545
[15]
Soussan Djamasbi, Marisa Siegel, Tom Tullis, and Rui Dai. 2009. Tracking users’ viewing pattern. SIGHCI 2009 Proceedings (2009), 16.
[16]
Andrew Duchowski. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Springer Science & Business Media.
[17]
Emory James Edwards, Cella Monet Sum, and Stacy M. Branham. 2020. Three Tensions Between Personas and Complex Disability Identities. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020. 1–9.
[18]
Sanne Elling, Leo Lentz, and Menno De Jong. 2012. Combining concurrent think-aloud protocols and eye-tracking observations: An analysis of verbalizations and silences. IEEE transactions on professional communication 55, 3 (2012), 206–220.
[19]
Madhavi Ganapathiraju, Vijayalaxmi Manoharan, and Judith Klein-Seetharaman. 2004. BLMT: statistical sequence analysis using N-grams. Applied bioinformatics 3, (2004), 193–200.
[20]
Rosella Gennari, Alessandra Melonio, Mehdi Rivi, and Maristella Matera. 2021. Physical or on the cloud: play with IoTgo and design smart things. In CEUR Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Games-Human Interaction (GHItaly 2021) and Multi-Party Interaction in eXtended Reality (MIXR 2021) Co-Located with CHItaly, 2021. .
[21]
Joseph H. Goldberg, Mark J. Stimson, Marion Lewenstein, Neil Scott, and Anna M. Wichansky. 2002. Eye Tracking in Web Search Tasks: Design Implications. In Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA ’02), 2002. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/507072.507082
[22]
Kim Goodwin. 2009. Designing for the Digital Age: How to Create Human-Centered Products and Services (1 edition ed.). Wiley, Indianapolis, IN.
[23]
Laura Granka, Matthew Feusner, and Lori Lorigo. 2008. Eye Monitoring in Online Search. In Passive Eye Monitoring, Riad I. Hammoud (ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75412-1_16
[24]
Jonathan Grudin and John Pruitt. 2002. Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement. In Proceedings of Participation and Design Conference (PDC2002), 2002. Sweden, 8.
[25]
Zhiwei Guan and Edward Cutrell. 2007. An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2007. ACM, 417–420. Retrieved May 10, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240691
[26]
Jonna Häkkilä, Mikael Wiberg, Nils Johan Eira, Tapio Seppänen, Ilkka Juuso, Maija Mäkikalli, and Katrin Wolf. 2020. Design Sensibilities-Designing for Cultural Sensitivity. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, 2020. 1–3.
[27]
Miguel Angelo Hemzo. 2023. Defining the Persona: Segmentation and Targeting. In Marketing Luxury Services: Concepts, Strategy, and Practice. Springer, 75–94.
[28]
Charles G. Hill, Maren Haag, Alannah Oleson, Chris Mendez, Nicola Marsden, Anita Sarma, and Margaret Burnett. 2017. Gender-Inclusiveness Personas vs. Stereotyping: Can We Have it Both Ways? In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference, 2017. ACM Press, 6658–6671. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025609
[29]
Kenneth Holmqvist, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka, and Joost Van de Weijer. 2011. Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. OUP Oxford. Retrieved November 30, 2023 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5rIDPV1EoLUC&oi=fnd&pg=PT23&dq=Eye+tracking:+A+comprehensive+guide+to+methods+and+measures&ots=_y_zRXtOtI&sig=4ptPXqj5LVhfsgbiooC35OjaxAE
[30]
Steve Howard. 1995. User interface design and HCI: identifying the training needs of practitioners. SIGCHI Bull. 27, 3 (July 1995), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/221296.221302
[31]
T. W. Howard. 2015. Are Personas Really Usable? Communication Design Quarterly Review 3, 2 (2015), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2752853.2752856
[32]
Fariz Ikhwantri, Jan Wira Gotama Putra, Hiroaki Yamada, and Takenobu Tokunaga. 2023. Looking deep in the eyes: Investigating interpretation methods for neural models on reading tasks using human eye-movement behaviour. Information Processing & Management 60, 2 (March 2023), 103195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103195
[33]
Bernard J. Jansen, Soon-gyo Jung, and Joni Salminen. 2020. From flat file to interface: Synthesis of personas and analytics for enhanced user understanding. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 57, 1 (October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.215
[34]
Bernard J. Jansen, Zhe Liu, and Zach Simon. 2013. The effect of ad rank on the performance of keyword advertising campaigns. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 64, 10 (October 2013), 2115–2132. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22910
[35]
Bernard J. Jansen, Joni Salminen, and Soon-gyo Jung. 2020. Data-Driven Personas for Enhanced User Understanding: Combining Empathy with Rationality for Better Insights to Analytics. Data and Information Management 4, 1 (2020), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0005
[36]
Bernard J. Jansen, Joni Salminen, Soon-gyo Jung, and Hind Almerekhi. 2022. The illusion of data validity: Why numbers about people are likely wrong. Data and Information Management (September 2022), 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2022.100020
[37]
Soon-gyo Jung, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Moeed Ahmad, Lene Nielsen, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2017. Persona Generation from Aggregated Social Media Data. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’17), 2017. ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA, 1748–1755.
[38]
Soon-Gyo Jung, Joni Salminen, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, and B. J. Jansen. 2018. Automatically Conceptualizing Social Media Analytics Data via Personas. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2018), June 25, 2018. San Francisco, California, USA.
[39]
Soon-Gyo Jung, Joni Salminen, and Bernard Jansen. 2021. Implementing Eye-Tracking for Persona Analytics. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, 2021. 1–4.
[40]
Soon-Gyo Jung, Joni Salminen, and Bernard Jansen. 2021. Persona Analytics: Implementing Mouse-Tracking for an Interactive Persona System. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2021. 1–8.
[41]
Yvonne Kammerer and Peter Gerjets. 2010. How the Interface Design Influences Users’ Spontaneous Trustworthiness Evaluations of Web Search Results: Comparing a List and a Grid Interface. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA ’10), 2010. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743736
[42]
Qing Ke, Jia Tina Du, Yuexi Geng, and Yushan Xie. 2023. Studying health anxiety related attentional bias during online health information seeking: Impacts of stages and task types. Information Processing & Management 60, 5 (September 2023), 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103453
[43]
Se Young Kim, Hahyeon Park, Hongbum Kim, Joon Kim, and Kyoungwon Seo. 2022. Technostress causes cognitive overload in high-stress people: Eye tracking analysis in a virtual kiosk test. Information Processing & Management 59, 6 (November 2022), 103093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103093
[44]
Lori Lorigo, Maya Haridasan, Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir, Ling Xia, Thorsten Joachims, Geri Gay, Laura Granka, Fabio Pellacini, and Bing Pan. 2008. Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 59, 7 (May 2008), 1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20794
[45]
Tara Matthews, Tejinder Judge, and Steve Whittaker. 2012. How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’12, 2012. ACM Press, Austin, Texas, USA, 1219. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208573
[46]
Tomasz Miaskiewicz and Kenneth A. Kozar. 2011. Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design Studies 32, 5 (2011), 417–430.
[47]
T. Mijač, M. Jadrić, and M. Ćukušić. 2018. The potential and issues in data-driven development of web personas. In 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), May 2018. 1237–1242. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400224
[48]
Steve Mulder and Ziv Yaar. 2006. The User is Always Right: A Practical Guide to Creating and Using Personas for the Web. New Riders.
[49]
Vidhya Navalpakkam, LaDawn Jentzsch, Rory Sayres, Sujith Ravi, Amr Ahmed, and Alex Smola. 2013. Measurement and Modeling of Eye-mouse Behavior in the Presence of Nonlinear Page Layouts. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’13), 2013. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488471
[50]
Huy Tien Nguyen and Minh Le Nguyen. 2018. Multilingual opinion mining on YouTube – A convolutional N-gram BiLSTM word embedding. Information Processing & Management 54, 3 (May 2018), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.02.001
[51]
Lene Nielsen. 2019. Personas - User Focused Design (2nd ed. 2019 edition ed.). Springer, New York, NY.
[52]
Lene Nielsen, Kira Storgaard Hansen, Jan Stage, and Jane Billestrup. 2015. A Template for Design Personas: Analysis of 47 Persona Descriptions from Danish Industries and Organizations. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development 7, 1 (2015), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijskd.2015010104
[53]
Lene Nielsen, Joni Salminen, Soon-Gyo Jung, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2021. Think-Aloud Surveys. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2021. Springer, Cham, 504–508.
[54]
Lene Nielsen and Kira Storgaard Hansen. 2014. Personas is applicable: a study on the use of personas in Denmark. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2014. ACM, 1665–1674.
[55]
Sharon Oviatt. 2006. Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: designing interfaces that help people think. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2006. ACM, 871–880. Retrieved May 29, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1180831
[56]
Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 1999. Information foraging. Psychological review 106, 4 (1999), 643.
[57]
Svenja Polst and Phil Stüpfert. 2019. A Comprehensive Persona Template to Understand Citizens’ Mobility Needs. In HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems, Heidi Krömker (ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22666-4_22
[58]
John Pruitt and Tamara Adlin. 2006. The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design (1 edition ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston.
[59]
Manuele Reani, Niels Peek, and Caroline Jay. 2018. An investigation of the effects of n-gram length in scanpath analysis for eye-tracking research. In Proceedings of the 2018 acm symposium on eye tracking research & applications, 2018. 1–8.
[60]
Sandra P. Roth, Alexandre N. Tuch, Elisa D. Mekler, Javier A. Bargas-Avila, and Klaus Opwis. 2013. Location matters, especially for non-salient features–An eye-tracking study on the effects of web object placement on different types of websites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 3 (March 2013), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.001
[61]
Joni Salminen, Kathleen Guan, Lene Nielsen, Soon-gyo Jung, Shammur Absar Chowdhury, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2020. A Template for Data-Driven Personas: Analyzing 31 Quantitatively Oriented Persona Profiles. In Human Interface and the Management of Information. Designing Information. HCII 2020., S. Yamamoto and H. Mori (eds.). Springer, Copenhagen, Denmark, 125–144.
[62]
Joni Salminen, Soon-gyo Jung, Shammur Absar Chowdhury, Sercan Sengün, and Bernard J Jansen. 2020. Personas and Analytics: A Comparative User Study of Efficiency and Effectiveness for a User Identification Task. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20), 2020. ACM, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376770
[63]
Joni Salminen, Soon-Gyo Jung, and Bernard Jansen. 2022. Developing Persona Analytics Towards Persona Science. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’22), March 22, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511144
[64]
Joni Salminen, Soon-gyo Jung, Lene Nielsen, Sercan Şengün, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2022. How does varying the number of personas affect user perceptions and behavior? Challenging the ‘small personas’ hypothesis! International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 168, (December 2022), 102915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102915
[65]
Joni Salminen, Ying-Hsang Liu, Sercan Sengun, João M. Santos, Soon-gyo Jung, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2020. The Effect of Numerical and Textual Information on Visual Engagement and Perceptions of AI-Driven Persona Interfaces. In IUI ’20: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, March 17, 2020. ACM, Cagliary, Italy, 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377325.3377492
[66]
Joni Salminen, Lene Nielsen, Soon-Gyo Jung, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, and Bernard J Jansen. 2018. “Is More Better?”: Impact of Multiple Photos on Perception of Persona Profiles. In Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2018), April 21, 2018. Montréal, Canada.
[67]
Joni Salminen, Joao M. Santos, Haewoon Kwak, Jisun An, Soon-gyo Jung, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2020. Persona Perception Scale: Development and Exploratory Validation of an Instrument for Evaluating Individuals’ Perceptions of Personas. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 141, (April 2020), 102437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102437
[68]
Joni Salminen, Sercan Sengün, Soon-Gyo Jung, and Bernard Jansen. 2021. Comparing Persona Analytics and Social Media Analytics for a User-Centric Task Using Eye-Tracking and Think-Aloud. In CHItaly 2021: 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter, 2021. 1–8.
[69]
Joni Salminen, Sercan Sengun, Soon-gyo Jung, and Bernard J Jansen. 2019. Design Issues in Automatically Generated Persona Profiles: A Qualitative Analysis from 38 Think-Aloud Transcripts. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR), March 13, 2019. ACM, Glasgow, UK, 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298942
[70]
Joni Salminen, Sercan Şengün, João M. Santos, Soon-gyo Jung, Lene Nielsen, and Bernard Jansen. 2023. The Choice of a Persona: An Analysis of Why Stakeholders Choose a Given Persona for a Design Task. In HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48038-6_18
[71]
Sonia Setia, Verma Jyoti, and Neelam Duhan. 2020. HPM: A Hybrid Model for User's Behavior Prediction Based on N-Gram Parsing and Access Logs. Scientific Programming 2020, (November 2020), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8897244
[72]
Junko Shirogane, Atsuko Eguchi, Hajime Iwata, and Yoshiaki Fukazawa. 2020. Identifications of Webpage Layout Patterns Based on Lines of Vision. In Knowledge-Based Software Engineering: 2020, Maria Virvou, Hiroyuki Nakagawa and Lakhmi C. Jain (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53949-8_10
[73]
Sav Shrestha, Kelsi Lenz, Barbara Chaparro, and Justin Owens. 2007. “F” Pattern Scanning of Text and Images in Web Pages. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2007. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1200–1204.
[74]
Frode Volden and Ole E. Wattne. 2023. Wayfinding and Navigation in the Outdoors: Quantitative and Data Driven Development of Personas and Requirements for Wayfinding in Nature. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2023. Springer, 199–210.
[75]
Kang Wang, Shen Wang, and Qiang Ji. 2016. Deep eye fixation map learning for calibration-free eye gaze tracking. In Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, 2016. ACM, 47–55. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2857515

Index Terms

  1. Investigating Persona Viewing Behavior: An Eye-Tracking Study on Portrait-Format Persona Profile
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            NordiCHI '24: Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
            October 2024
            1236 pages
            ISBN:9798400709661
            DOI:10.1145/3679318
            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            Published: 13 October 2024

            Check for updates

            Author Tags

            1. Eye Tracking
            2. Persona
            3. User Analytics
            4. User Experience Research

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Funding Sources

            Conference

            NordiCHI 2024

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 56
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)56
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)56
            Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            View options

            PDF

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format.

            HTML Format

            Login options

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media