Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3625007.3627314acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Unexpected Attributed Subgraphs: a Mining Algorithm

Published: 15 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Graphs are ubiquitous in real-world data, ranging from the study of social interactions to bioinformatics or the modelling of physical systems. These real-world graphs are typically sparse, possibly large and frequently contain additional information in the form of attributes, making them a complex object to understand. Graph summarization techniques can help facilitate the discovery of hidden patterns in underlying data by providing an interesting subset of the interactions and available attributes, which we broadly call a pattern. However, determining what is considered interesting in this context is not straightforward. We address this challenge by designing an interestingness measure based on the information-theoretic measure of Unexpectedness, linking the concepts of relevance and Kolmogorov complexity. We design a pattern mining algorithm to provide a summary of the initial data in the form of a set of unexpected patterns, that is, patterns for which there is a drop between their expected complexity and the observed complexity. Experimental results on five real-world datasets with state-of-the-art methods demonstrate that our method exhibits a small number of diversified patterns, providing a human-readable summary of the initial attributed graph; we show that our summaries quantitatively outperforms attribute-only and interaction-only baselines as well as other pattern mining methods, reinforcing the need for methods dealing with attributed graphs. We visualize summaries extracted with our method, in order to qualitatively validate their readability.

References

[1]
T. Miller, "Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences," Artificial intelligence, vol. 267, pp. 1--38, 2019.
[2]
A. Perer and B. Shneiderman, "Integrating statistics and visualization: case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pp. 265--274, 2008.
[3]
M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook, "Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks," Annual review of sociology, pp. 415--444, 2001.
[4]
Y. Zhou, H. Cheng, and J. X. Yu, "Graph clustering based on structural/attribute similarities," Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 718--729, 2009.
[5]
H. Cheng, Y. Zhou, and J. X. Yu, "Clustering large attributed graphs: A balance between structural and attribute similarities," ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), vol. 5, no. 2, 2011.
[6]
P. Chunaev, "Community detection in node-attributed social networks: a survey," Computer Science Review, vol. 37, p. 100286, 2020.
[7]
F. Moser, R. Colak, A. Rafiey, and M. Ester, "Mining cohesive patterns from graphs with feature vectors," in Proceedings of the 2009 SIAM international conference on data mining, pp. 593--604, SIAM, 2009.
[8]
B. Boden, S. Günnemann, H. Hoffmann, and T. Seidl, "Mining coherent subgraphs in multi-layer graphs with edge labels," in Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 1258--1266, 2012.
[9]
M. Kuramochi and G. Karypis, "Frequent subgraph discovery," in Proceedings 2001 IEEE international conference on data mining, pp. 313--320, IEEE, 2001.
[10]
D. J. Hand, "Pattern detection and discovery," in Pattern detection and discovery, pp. 1--12, Springer, 2002.
[11]
W. Klösgen and J. M. Zytkow, Handbook of data mining and knowledge discovery. Oxford University Press, Inc., 2002.
[12]
J.-L. Dessalles, "Coincidences and the encounter problem: A formal account," in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (B. C. Love, K. McRae, and V. M. Sloutsky, eds.), (Austin, TX), pp. 2134--2139, Cognitive Science Society, 2008.
[13]
P. Maguire, P. Moser, R. Maguire, and M. T. Keane, "Seeing patterns in randomness: A computational model of surprise," Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 103--118, 2019.
[14]
J.-L. Dessalles, "Algorithmic simplicity and relevance," in Algorithmic Probability and Friends. Bayesian Prediction and Artificial Intelligence: Papers from the Ray Solomonoff 85th Memorial Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2011, pp. 119--130, Springer, 2013.
[15]
L. Geng and H. J. Hamilton, "Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 38, no. 3, 2006.
[16]
N. Zhang, Y. Tian, and J. M. Patel, "Discovery-driven graph summarization," in 2010 IEEE 26th international conference on data engineering (ICDE 2010), pp. 880--891, IEEE, 2010.
[17]
S. Fortunato, "Community detection in graphs," Physics reports, vol. 486, no. 3--5, pp. 75--174, 2010.
[18]
S. Günnemann, I. Färber, B. Boden, and T. Seidl, "Subspace clustering meets dense subgraph mining: A synthesis of two paradigms," in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 845--850, 2010.
[19]
F. Lemmerich, M. Becker, P. Singer, D. Helic, A. Hotho, and M. Strohmaier, "Mining subgroups with exceptional transition behavior," in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 965--974, 2016.
[20]
M. Kaytoue, M. Plantevit, A. Zimmermann, A. Bendimerad, and C. Robardet, "Exceptional contextual subgraph mining," Machine Learning, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 1171--1211, 2017.
[21]
A. Bendimerad, M. Plantevit, and C. Robardet, "Mining exceptional closed patterns in attributed graphs," Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1--25, 2018.
[22]
A. A. Bendimerad, M. Plantevit, and C. Robardet, "Unsupervised exceptional attributed sub-graph mining in urban data," in 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), IEEE, 2016.
[23]
T. De Bie, K.-N. Kontonasios, and E. Spyropoulou, "A framework for mining interesting pattern sets," ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 92--100, 2011.
[24]
A. Silberschatz and A. Tuzhilin, "On subjective measures of interestingness in knowledge discovery.," in KDD, vol. 95, pp. 275--281, 1995.
[25]
T. De Bie, "An information theoretic framework for data mining," in Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 564--572, 2011.
[26]
T. De Bie, "Subjective interestingness in exploratory data mining," in International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, pp. 19--31, Springer, 2013.
[27]
M. van Leeuwen, T. De Bie, E. Spyropoulou, and C. Mesnage, "Subjective interestingness of subgraph patterns," Machine Learning, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 41--75, 2016.
[28]
A. Bendimerad, A. Mel, J. Lijffijt, M. Plantevit, C. Robardet, and T. De Bie, "Sias-miner: mining subjectively interesting attributed subgraphs," Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 34, no. 2, 2020.
[29]
J. Deng, B. Kang, J. Lijffijt, and T. De Bie, "Mining explainable local and global subgraph patterns with surprising densities," Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 321--371, 2021.
[30]
S. Dasgupta and A. Gupta, "Discovering interesting subgraphs in social media networks," in 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 105--109, IEEE, 2020.
[31]
M. Alassad, B. Spann, and N. Agarwal, "Combining advanced computational social science and graph theoretic techniques to reveal adversarial information operations," Information Processing & Management, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 102385, 2021.
[32]
Y. Liu, T. Safavi, A. Dighe, and D. Koutra, "Graph summarization methods and applications: A survey," ACM computing surveys (CSUR), vol. 51, no. 3, 2018.
[33]
Y. Wu, Z. Zhong, W. Xiong, and N. Jing, "Graph summarization for attributed graphs," in 2014 International conference on information science, electronics and electrical engineering, vol. 1, pp. 503--507, IEEE, 2014.
[34]
M. Atzmueller, S. Doerfel, and F. Mitzlaff, "Description-oriented community detection using exhaustive subgroup discovery," Information Sciences, vol. 329, pp. 965--984, 2016.
[35]
D. J. Cook and L. B. Holder, "Substructure discovery using minimum description length and background knowledge," Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 1, pp. 231--255, 1993.
[36]
D. J. Watts, "Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon," American Journal of sociology, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 493--527, 1999.
[37]
S. Andrews, "In-Close, a Fast Algorithm for Computing Formal Concepts," in International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS), p. 15, 2009.
[38]
V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre, "Fast unfolding of communities in large networks," Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, vol. 2008, no. 10, p. P10008, 2008.
[39]
S. Lloyd, "Least squares quantization in pcm," IEEE transactions on information theory, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 129--137, 1982.
[40]
Q. Le and T. Mikolov, "Distributed representations of sentences and documents," in International conference on machine learning, pp. 1188--1196, PMLR, 2014.
[41]
T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, "Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907, 2016.

Index Terms

  1. Unexpected Attributed Subgraphs: a Mining Algorithm
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASONAM '23: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
      November 2023
      835 pages
      ISBN:9798400704093
      DOI:10.1145/3625007
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 March 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. complex networks
      2. pattern mining
      3. information theory

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • ANR IA
      • Hi!Paris

      Conference

      ASONAM '23
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      ASONAM '23 Paper Acceptance Rate 53 of 145 submissions, 37%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 116 of 549 submissions, 21%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 50
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media