Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3614419.3643997acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Social Group Differences in the Social Media Discussion about ChatGPT and Bing Chat

Published: 21 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This paper investigates how social media discussions evolved after the release and adoption of large language models by a wider public, with a focus on ChatGPT and the integration of a GPT model into Bing. The study aims to explore how social factors impact the way in which NLP technologies are perceived in social media posts. Using the official Twitter API, we collected a dataset of English and German tweets posted between November 30, 2022, and February 19, 2023. The study employs sentiment analysis and demographic prediction, the results reveal that tweets mentioning ‘Bing’ (related to the integration of a GPT model) were more likely to be negative compared to tweets about ‘ChatGPT’, with female users relatively more likely to express negative sentiment. The sentiment of tweets varied by language and whether an account belonged to an organization or not. This study provides insights into how social factors shape the discourse around NLP technologies on Twitter.

References

[1]
Francesco Barbieri, Luis Espinosa Anke, and Jose Camacho-Collados. 2022. XLM-T: Multilingual Language Models in Twitter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyond. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, 258–266. https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.27
[2]
Federico Bianchi, Vincenzo Cutrona, and Dirk Hovy. 2022. Twitter-Demographer: A Flow-based Tool to Enrich Twitter Data. In Proceedings of the The 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 289–297. https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-demos.29
[3]
Billy Chow, Andrew; Perrigo. 2023. The AI Arms Race Is On. Start Worrying. https://web.archive.org/web/20230224195702/https://time.com/6255952/ai-impact-chatgpt-microsoft-google/
[4]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805 arXiv:1810.04805 [cs].
[5]
Mubin Ul Haque, Isuru Dharmadasa, Zarrin Tasnim Sworna, Roshan Namal Rajapakse, and Hussain Ahmad. 2022. "I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856 arXiv:2212.05856 [cs].
[6]
Dirk Hovy and Diyi Yang. 2021. The Importance of Modeling Social Factors of Language: Theory and Practice. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 588–602. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.49
[7]
Christoph Leiter, Ran Zhang, Yanran Chen, Jonas Belouadi, Daniil Larionov, Vivian Fresen, and Steffen Eger. 2023. ChatGPT: A Meta-Analysis after 2.5 Months. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2302.13795
[8]
Alan Mislove, Sune Lehmann, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, and J. Rosenquist. 2011. Understanding the Demographics of Twitter Users. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 5, 1 (2011), 554–557. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14168
[9]
Sudheesh R, Muhammad Mujahid, Furqan Rustam, Rahman Shafique, Venkata Chunduri, Mónica Gracia Villar, Julién Brito Ballester, Isabel de la Torre Diez, and Imran Ashraf. 2023. Analyzing Sentiments Regarding ChatGPT Using Novel BERT: A Machine Learning Approach. Information 14, 99 (sep 2023), 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090474
[10]
Yankang Su and Zbigniew J. Kabala. 2023. Public Perception of ChatGPT and Transfer Learning for Tweets Sentiment Analysis Using Wolfram Mathematica. Data 8, 1212 (2023), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8120180
[11]
Viriya Taecharungroj. 2023. “What Can ChatGPT Do?” Analyzing Early Reactions to the Innovative AI Chatbot on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 7, 1 (March 2023), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035
[12]
Zijian Wang, Scott Hale, David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Przemyslaw Grabowicz, Timo Hartman, Fabian Flöck, and David Jurgens. 2019. Demographic Inference and Representative Population Estimates from Multilingual Social Media Data. In The World Wide Web Conference (San Francisco, CA, USA) (WWW ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2056–2067. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313684

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WEBSCI '24: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference
May 2024
395 pages
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Websci '24
Sponsor:
Websci '24: 16th ACM Web Science Conference
May 21 - 24, 2024
Stuttgart, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 80
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)80
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media