Research on improving driver's situational awareness in automatic driving by vibration information
Authors: 
xin xin, Hang Dong, Guo Xiang, Yushu Yang, Xinyuan Chen, 
Wei LiuAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 117 - 128
Abstract
This paper explores the ways to improve driver’s awareness in the case of automatic driving. The first study uses the experimental method to study whether there is a significant difference in the improvement of situational awareness of drivers when they are distracted by performing secondary tasks through voice and vibration. The results show that the driver’s situational awareness score of transmitting environmental information through vibration is significantly higher than that of sound; the second experimental took the content of information transmitted as a variable to study whether there was a significant difference in the improvement of drivers’ situational awareness when vibration transmitted different information. The results of this study explore a method to combine the application of vibration information with the demand for automatic driving. By comparing the vibration information and voice information, this study found that it is feasible to transmit the hazards in the environmental information to the driver through vibration. Compared with voice information, it can significantly improve the driver’s situational awareness and help the driver to establish an understanding of the surrounding environment So as to improve the quality of taking over and promote driving safety.
References
[1]
Klaus Bengler, Klaus Dietmayer, Berthold Farber, Markus Maurer, Christoph Stiller, and Hermann Winner. 2014. Three decades of driver assistance systems: Review and future perspectives. IEEE Intelligent transportation systems magazine 6, 4 (2014), 6–22.
[2]
Jeff K Caird and William J Horrey. 2011. Twelve practical and useful questions about driving simulation. Handbook of driving simulation for engineering, medicine, and psychology 2 (2011).
[3]
Jeff K Caird, Chelsea R Willness, Piers Steel, and Chip Scialfa. 2008. A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 40, 4 (2008), 1282–1293.
[4]
Yujia Cao, Frans Van Der Sluis, Mariët Theune, Rieks op den Akker, and Anton Nijholt. 2010. Evaluating informative auditory and tactile cues for in-vehicle information systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 102–109.
[5]
Marine Capallera, Quentin Meteier, Emmanuel de Salis, Leonardo Angelini, Stefano Carrino, Omar Abou Khaled, and Elena Mugellini. 2019. Secondary task and situation awareness, a mobile application for semi-autonomous vehicle. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine. 1–10.
[6]
SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee 2021. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. SAE Standard J 3016 (2021), 1–16.
[7]
Thomas A Dingus, Feng Guo, Suzie Lee, Jonathan F Antin, Miguel Perez, Mindy Buchanan-King, and Jonathan Hankey. 2016. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 10 (2016), 2636–2641.
[8]
Mica R Endsley. 1988. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting, Vol. 32. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 97–101.
[9]
Mica R Endsley. 2017. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. In Situational awareness. Routledge, 9–42.
[10]
Mica R Endsley, Daniel J Garland, Richard L Wampler, and Michael D Matthews. 2000. Modeling and measuring situation awareness in the infantry operational environment. Technical Report. TRW Systems Integration Group Fairfax va Systems Div.
[11]
MR Ensley. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors 37 (1995), 85–104.
[12]
Frank Flemisch, Matthias Heesen, Tobias Hesse, Johann Kelsch, Anna Schieben, and Johannes Beller. 2012. Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations. Cognition, Technology & Work 14, 1 (2012), 3–18.
[13]
Victoria Gitelman, Doron Balasha, Roby Carmel, Limor Hendel, and Fany Pesahov. 2012. Characterization of pedestrian accidents and an examination of infrastructure measures to improve pedestrian safety in Israel. Accident Analysis & Prevention 44, 1 (2012), 63–73.
[14]
Leo J Gugerty. 2017. Situation awareness during driving: Explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory. In Situational Awareness. Routledge, 379–404.
[15]
Markus Hofbauer, Christopher B Kuhn, Lukas Püttner, Goran Petrovic, and Eckehard Steinbach. 2020. Measuring driver situation awareness using region-of-interest prediction and eye tracking. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM). IEEE, 91–95.
[16]
Peter Hofmann and Gerhard Rinkenauer. 2013. Response preparation in a lane change task. Ergonomics 56, 2 (2013), 268–281.
[17]
T Hummel, M Kühn, J Bende, and A Lang. 2011. Advanced driver assistance systems: An investigation of their potential safety benefits based on an analysis of insurance claims in Germany. German Insurance Association Insurers Accident Research, Research Report FS 3 (2011).
[18]
A Hamish Jamson, Natasha Merat, Oliver MJ Carsten, and Frank CH Lai. 2013. Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies 30 (2013), 116–125.
[19]
Niu Jianwei, Sun Yipin, and Qin Hua. 2018. A study of drivers’ momentary situational awareness during driving switching. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Transportation Science and Engineering Edition 42, 3 (2018), 6.
[20]
F. Laquai, F. Chowanetz, and G. Rigoll. 2011. A large-scale LED array to support anticipatory driving. In IEEE International Conference on Systems.
[21]
Marion Maestracci, François Prochasson, Aurélie Geffroy, and Florian Peccoud. 2012. Powered two-wheelers road accidents and their risk perception in dense urban areas: case of Paris. Accident Analysis & Prevention 49 (2012), 114–123.
[22]
Dawn C Marshall, John D Lee, and P Albert Austria. 2007. Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: Annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human factors 49, 1 (2007), 145–157.
[23]
M Martens, J Pauwelussen, A Schieben, F Flemisch, N Merat, S Jamson, and R Caci. 2008. Human Factors’ aspects in automated and semi-automatic transport systems: State of the art. European Commission, City Mobil Deliverable D3 2 (2008).
[24]
Laura Walker Renninger and Jitendra Malik. 2004. When is scene identification just texture recognition?Vision research 44, 19 (2004), 2301–2311.
[25]
Joseph Andreas Urhahne. 2016. Who is driving my car. Development and analysis of a control transition strategy for collaborative automated congestion driving. Enschede: University of Twente (2016).
[26]
Trent W Victor, Joanne L Harbluk, and Johan A Engström. 2005. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8, 2 (2005), 167–190.
[27]
Willem Vlakveld, Nicole van Nes, Jonathan de Bruin, Luuk Vissers, and Merle van der Kroft. 2018. Situation awareness increases when drivers have more time to take over the wheel in a Level 3 automated car: A simulator study. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 58 (2018), 917–929.
[28]
Marcel Walch, Tobias Sieber, Philipp Hock, Martin Baumann, and Michael Weber. 2016. Towards cooperative driving: Involving the driver in an autonomous vehicle’s decision making. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications. 261–268.
[29]
Christopher D Wickens. 2020. Processing resources and attention. In Multiple-task performance. CRC Press, 3–34.
[30]
Xin Xin, Yiji Wang, Nan Liu, Wenmin Yang, Hang Dong, and Wei Liu. 2021. Research on In-Vehicle Haptic Interactions as Crucial Resources for Driver Perceptions. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 373–388.
[31]
Xin Xin, Yiji Wang, Guo Xiang, Wenmin Yang, and Wei Liu. 2021. Effectiveness of Multimodal Display in Navigation Situation. In The Ninth International Symposium of Chinese CHI. 50–62.
[32]
Xin Xin, Min Zhao, Moli Zhou, Siyao Lu, Yishan Liu, Daisong Guan, Qianyi Wang, and Yuezhou Zhang. 2019. A literature review of the research on take-over situation in autonomous driving. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 160–169.
[33]
Kathrin Zeeb, Axel Buchner, and Michael Schrauf. 2015. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident analysis & prevention 78 (2015), 212–221.
Index Terms
- Research on improving driver's situational awareness in automatic driving by vibration information
Recommendations
Exploring the Impact of Interpretable Information Types on Driver's Situational Awareness and Performance During Driving Take-Over
Cross-Cultural DesignAbstractIn Level 3 (L3) autonomous driving, the system issues a take-over request to the driver if the Automated Driving System (ADS) fails or operates outside its design domain. The driver must takeover control and resume vehicle operation. This study ...
1st Workshop on Situational Awareness in Semi-Automated Vehicles
AutomotiveUI '16 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsThis workshop will focus on the problem of occupant and vehicle situational awareness with respect to automated vehicles when the driver must take over control. It will explore the future of fully automated and mixed traffic situations where vehicles ...
Designing for Enhancing Situational Awareness of Semi-Autonomous Driving Vehicles
AutomotiveUI '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications AdjunctAutonomous driving technology is evolving quickly, and self-driving cars are fast becoming a reality. In the level 2 autonomous driving stage, the system will take full control of the vehicle. The driver must monitor the driving and be prepared to ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2022
342 pages
ISBN:9781450398695
DOI:10.1145/3565698
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 12 February 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
Chinese CHI 2022
Chinese CHI 2022: The Tenth International Symposium of Chinese CHI
October 22 - 23, 2022
Guangzhou, China and Online, China
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 40 submissions, 43%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 40Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)40
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format