Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3557991.3567788acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing micro-mobility services in pandemics for studying the 10-minutes cities concept in India using geospatial data analysis: an application

Published: 03 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Active micro-mobility decreases traffic, bolsters personal health, and helps communities thrive by protecting the environment Moreover, sustainable micro-mobility demand is expected to get boosted in the present and post-COVID society. In this work we highlight the micro-mobility modes of walkability and bicycling to city administrators controlling urban city-space, by adapting the mobility parameters and their use cases through a map-based interface. Software tools and web-based applications are introduced for easy policy decisions by city managers. Present study scope is circumscribed by exploration of different parameters in traditional and state of art data science models, for resource planning like cycle usage prediction and planning. These parameters show hazard safe-distance pedestrian flow, optimal resource planning, amenity reach (10 min cycling and walking distance) and mobility using walking and cycling modes. Parameters of the traditional Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics are also inspected, according to COVID social norms, to capture safe pedestrian flow density. Finally, the analysis of two case studies, of Bhubaneshwar city and New Delhi, in India, are discussed for policy suggestions to enhance mobility via sustainable micro-mobility modes. The developed system assists managers in decisions based on urban data intelligence, and at user end eases commute related mental tension, anxiety and dependencies. The developed application is running live on our server maintained at Edinburgh University.

References

[1]
Hatfield, J., & Boufous, S. (2016). The effect of non-recreational transport cycling on use of other transport modes: A cross-sectional on-line survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 220--231.
[2]
Osama, A., Sayed, T., & Bigazzi, A. Y. (2017). Models for estimating zone-level bike kilometers traveled using bike network, land use, and road facility variables. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 96, 14--28.
[3]
Popova, M. (2015, September 18). What Makes a Great City: A General Theory of Walkability. Brain Pickings. https://www.brainpickings.org/2012/11/15/walkable-city-jeff-speck/
[4]
Zarif, R., Pankratz, D., & Kelman, B. (2019). Small is beautiful Making micromobility work for citizens, cities, and service providers. Https://Www2.Deloitte.Com/. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/future-of-mobility/micro-mobility-is-the-future-of-urban-transportation.html
[5]
Pojani, D., Chen, J., Mateo-Babiano, I., Bean, R., & Corcoran, J. (2020). Docked and dockless public bike-sharing schemes: research, practice and discourse. In Handbook of Sustainable Transport. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[6]
Heineke, K., Kloss, B., & Scurtu, D. (2020, July 16). The future of micromobility: Ridership and revenue after a crisis. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/the-future-of-micromobility-ridership-and-revenue-after-a-crisis
[7]
Bradshaw, R., & Kitchin, R. (2021). Charting the design and implementation of the smart city: the case of citizen-centric bikeshare in Hamilton, Ontario. Urban Geography, 1--23.
[8]
MacDonald, E., Sanders, R., & Supawanich, P. (2008). The Effects of Transportation Corridors' Roadside Design Features on User Behavior and Safety, and Their Contributions to Health, Environmental Quality, and Community Economic Vitality: a Literature Review.
[9]
Helbing, D., Buzna, L., Johansson, A., & Werner, T. (2005). Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions. Transportation science, 39(1), 1--24.
[10]
Selim, S. Z., & Al-Rabeh, A. H. (1991). On the modeling of pedestrian flow on the Jamarat bridge. Transportation science, 25(4), 257--263.
[11]
Vermuyten, H., Beliën, J., De Boeck, L., Reniers, G., & Wauters, T. (2016). A review of optimisation models for pedestrian evacuation and design problems. Safety science, 87, 167--178.
[12]
Helbing, D., & Molnar, P. (1995). Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical review E, 51(5), 4282.
[13]
Moussaïd, M., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2011). How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6884--6888.
[14]
Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2009). Planning support systems best practice and new methods (Vol. 95). Springer Science & Business Media.
[15]
Lovelace, R., Goodman, A., Aldred, R., Berkoff, N., Abbas, A., & Woodcock, J. (2017). The Propensity to Cycle Tool: An open source online system for sustainable transport planning. Journal of transport and land use, 10(1), 505--528.
[16]
Talukdar, M. H., & Hossain, Z. (2011). PLANNING TOOLS THAT CAN BE USED TO FACILITATE URBAN SUSTAINABILITY. Management Research & Practice, 3(4).
[17]
Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga A. M., González, V. I., & Henao, C. A. (2020). Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, 310--334.
[18]
Shui, C. S., & Szeto, W. Y. (2020). A review of bicycle-sharing service planning problems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 117, 102648.
[19]
Kellstedt, D. K., Spengler, J. O., Foster, M., Lee, C., & Maddock, J. E. (2020). A scoping review of bikeability assessment methods. Journal of community health, 1--14.
[20]
Despite Popularity, Bike Share Programs Often Need Subsidies. (2016, March 24). Https://Www.Pewtrusts.Org/. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2016/03/24/despite-popularity-bike-share-programs-often-need-subsidies
[21]
Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., & Mazzei, A. (2014). Barriers to bikesharing: an analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 325--337.
[22]
Shen, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2018). Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(9), 686--700.
[23]
Chen, S. Y., & Lu, C. C. (2016). A model of green acceptance and intentions to use bike-sharing: YouBike users in Taiwan. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(4), 1103--1124.
[24]
Te Pai, J., & Pai, S. Y. (2015). User behaviour analysis of the public bike system in Taipei. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development, 3(2), 39--52.
[25]
Kass & Moses. (2020, November 16). Bike Sharing Benefits and Disadvantages. Kass & Moses. https://kassandmoses.com/bicycle/blog/bike-sharing-benefits-and-disadvantages
[26]
Fricker, C., & Gast, N. (2016). Incentives and redistribution in homogeneous bike-sharing systems with stations of finite capacity. Euro journal on transportation and logistics, 5(3), 261--291.
[27]
Lin, J. R., & Yang, T. H. (2011). Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 47(2), 284--294.
[28]
Lin, J.J., Yu, C.J., 2013. A bikeway network design model for urban areas. Transportation 40 (1), 1--24.
[29]
Strauss, J., Miranda-Moreno, L. F., & Morency, P. (2013). Cyclist activity and injury risk analysis at signalized intersections: A Bayesian modelling approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 9--17.
[30]
Wang, X., Lindsey, G., Hankey, S., & Hoff, K. (2014). Estimating mixed-mode urban trail traffic using negative binomial regression models. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 140(1), 04013006.
[31]
Hankey, S., Lindsey, G., Wang, X., Borah, J., Hoff, K., Utecht, B., & Xu, Z. (2012). Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 307--316.
[32]
Hankey, S., Lu, T., Mondschein, A., & Buehler, R. (2017). Spatial models of active travel in small communities: merging the goals of traffic monitoring and direct-demand modeling. Journal of Transport & Health, 7, 149--159.
[33]
Gehrke, S. R., & Reardon, T. G. (2020). Direct demand modelling approach to forecast cycling activity for a proposed bike facility. Transportation Planning and Technology, 1--15.
[34]
Kamel, M. B., & Sayed, T. (2020). The impact of bike network indicators on bike kilometers traveled and bike safety: A network theory approach. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2399808320964469.
[35]
Smith, H. (2011). A mathematical optimization model for a bicycle network design considering bicycle level of service (Doctoral dissertation).
[36]
Duthie, J., Unnikrishnan, A., 2014. Optimization framework for bicycle sharing service design. J. Transp. Eng. 140 (7), 04014028.
[37]
Sohn, K., 2011. Multi-objective optimization of a road diet network design. Transport. Res. A: Pol Pract. 45 (6), 499--511.
[38]
Mesbah, M., Thompson, R., Moridpour, S., 2012. Bilevel optimization approach to design of network of bike lanes. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2284, 21--28.
[39]
Lin, J.J., Yu, C.J., 2013. A bikeway network design model for urban areas. Transportation 40 (1), 1--24.
[40]
Landis, B. W. (1994). Bicycle interaction hazard score: a theoretical model (No. HS-042 006).
[41]
Kent, M., & Karner, A. (2019). Prioritizing low-stress and equitable bicycle networks using neighborhood-based accessibility measures. International journal of sustainable transportation, 13(2), 100--110.
[42]
Harkey, D. L., Reinfurt, D. W., & Knuiman, M. (1998). Development of the bicycle compatibility index. Transportation research record, 1636(1), 13--20.
[43]
Wagner, N., & Agrawal, V. (2014). An agent-based simulation system for concert venue crowd evacuation modeling in the presence of a fire disaster. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6), 2807--2815.
[44]
Antonini, G., Bierlaire, M., & Weber, M. (2006). Discrete choice models of pedestrian walking behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40(8), 667--687.
[45]
Boeing, G. (2017). OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65, 126--139.
[46]
Jose, W. (2018). Improving the Service Quality of Bike Sharing Systems via the Analysis of Real-Time User Data.
[47]
Feng, C., Hillston, J., & Reijsbergen, D. (2017). Moment-based availability prediction for bike-sharing systems. Performance Evaluation, 117, 58--74.
[48]
Almannaa, M. H., Elhenawy, M., & Rakha, H. A. (2020). Dynamic linear models to predict bike availability in a bike sharing system. International journal of sustainable transportation, 14(3), 232--242.
[49]
Schlote, A., Chen, B., & Shorten, R. (2014). On closed-loop bicycle availability prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(3), 1449--1455.
[50]
Jenkins, P., Farag, A., Wang, S., & Li, Z. (2019, November). Unsupervised representation learning of spatial data via multimodal embedding. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 1993--2002).
[51]
Mishra, S., Kushwaha, A., Aggrawal, D., & Gupta, A. (2019). Comparative emission study by real-time congestion monitoring for stable pollution policy on temporal and meso-spatial regions in Delhi. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 465--478.
[52]
Bike trip https://peacetech.epcc.ed.ac.uk/bike-trips
[53]
Bikeability App On Different Stations https://peacetech.epcc.ed.ac.uk/bike-index
[54]
General trends for bike trips and walkablity in city of Bhubaneswar. https://peacetech.epcc.ed.ac.uk/jobs
[55]
Mishra, S., Singh, N., & Bhattacharya, D. (2021). Application-based COVID-19 micro-mobility solution for safe and smart navigation in pandemics. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(8), 571, https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/8/571/htm
[56]
Trip planner https://peacetech.epcc.ed.ac.uk/trip-planner
[57]
BhubaneshwarOne https://bhubaneswarone.in/home/
[58]
SCIKIT-LEARN https://scikit-learn.org/stable/
[59]
Shared use mobility center SUMC, http://maps.sharedusemobilitycenter.org/sumc/

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The 15th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science (IWCTS 2022), Seattle, WA, USA - November 1, 2022SIGSPATIAL Special10.1145/3632268.363227314:1(12-18)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2023

Index Terms

  1. Assessing micro-mobility services in pandemics for studying the 10-minutes cities concept in India using geospatial data analysis: an application

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IWCTS '22: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science
    November 2022
    107 pages
    ISBN:9781450395397
    DOI:10.1145/3557991
    • Editors:
    • Andy Berres,
    • Kuldeep Kurte,
    • Haowen Xu
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. 10 minutes cities
    2. amenity reach
    3. bike-ability
    4. micro-mobility
    5. mobility parameters
    6. safe-distance pedestrian flow
    7. social force model
    8. walkability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • UKRI ESRC Impact acceleration grant, University of Edinburgh.
    • Marie Sk?odowska-Curie Actions COFUND: TRAIN@Ed

    Conference

    SIGSPATIAL '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 42 of 57 submissions, 74%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)64
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)The 15th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science (IWCTS 2022), Seattle, WA, USA - November 1, 2022SIGSPATIAL Special10.1145/3632268.363227314:1(12-18)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media