This is Why I Like Them: Exploring the Perceived Appeal of Social Media Influencers vs. Traditional Mass Media
Pages 106 - 109
Abstract
Social-media influencers (SMIs) have created a wide range of content and research has shown that SMIs are perceived as credible by media consumers, and advertising by them can lead to higher user engagement than traditional advertising generally achieves. However, the factors that render SMIs more appealing than traditional media from an audience perspective have been underexplored. Using a grounded approach, we looked at the perceived appeal of SMIs of various types vs. traditional media by conducting semi-structured interviews with 20 of the former’s audience members. Our preliminary findings suggest that such appeal can be divided into four types: 1) initiative to summarize takeaways from multiple sources, 2) high independence and low interference, 3) distinctive and diverse networks and connections, and 4) relatability and applicability. This typology of appeal uncovers how SMIs have formed new media use patterns, and hopefully inform the design opportunities of social media platforms.
References
[1]
2022. How Many Influencers are There in 2022? - EarthWeb. https://earthweb.com/how-many-influencers-are-there/ Section: Resources.
[2]
Fatima Abdulaziz Al-Emadi and Imene Ben Yahia. 2020. Ordinary celebrities related criteria to harvest fame and influence on social media. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (2020).
[3]
Nils S Borchers. 2019. Social media influencers in strategic communication., 255–260 pages.
[4]
Rebecca K Britt, Jameson L Hayes, Brian C Britt, and Haseon Park. 2020. Too big to sell? A computational analysis of network and content characteristics among mega and micro beauty and fashion social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Advertising 20, 2 (2020), 111–118.
[5]
Jean Burgess and Joshua Green. 2018. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. John Wiley & Sons.
[6]
Published by Statista Research Departmentand Nov 10. 2021. Global Social Media Influencer follow rate 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1274296/global-internet-user-follow-any-social-media-influencer/
[7]
Emer Byrne, John Kearney, and Claire MacEvilly. 2017. The role of influencer marketing and social influencers in public health. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 76, OCE3 (2017).
[8]
Colin Campbell and Justine Rapp Farrell. 2020. More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons 63, 4 (2020), 469–479.
[9]
Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. sage.
[10]
Chih-Ping Chen. 2016. Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube. Journal of Consumer culture 16, 1 (2016), 232–254.
[11]
Stuart Cunningham and David Craig. 2017. Being ‘really real’on YouTube: authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainment. Media International Australia 164, 1 (2017), 71–81.
[12]
John W Dimmick. 2002. Media competition and coexistence: The theory of the niche. Routledge.
[13]
Elmira Djafarova and Chloe Rushworth. 2017. Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in human behavior 68 (2017), 1–7.
[14]
Karen Freberg, Kristin Graham, Karen McGaughey, and Laura A Freberg. 2011. Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public relations review 37, 1 (2011), 90–92.
[15]
Sophia Gaenssle and Oliver Budzinski. 2021. Stars in social media: New light through old windows?Journal of Media Business Studies 18, 2 (2021), 79–105.
[16]
Jan-Frederik Gräve. 2017. Exploring the perception of influencers vs. traditional celebrities: are social media stars a new type of endorser?. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Social Media & Society. 1–5.
[17]
Liselot Hudders, Steffi De Jans, and Marijke De Veirman. 2021. The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising 40, 3 (2021), 327–375.
[18]
Raja Ahmed Jamil and Abdul Qayyum. 2021. Word of mouse vs word of influencer? An experimental investigation into the consumers’ preferred source of online information. Management Research Review(2021).
[19]
Elihu Katz, Jay G Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch. 1973. Uses and gratifications research. The public opinion quarterly 37, 4 (1973), 509–523.
[20]
Susie Khamis, Lawrence Ang, and Raymond Welling. 2017. Self-branding,‘micro-celebrity’and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity studies 8, 2 (2017), 191–208.
[21]
Jung Ah Lee and Matthew S Eastin. 2021. Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (2021).
[22]
Jung Ah Lee, Sabitha Sudarshan, Kristen L Sussman, Laura F Bright, and Matthew S Eastin. 2022. Why are consumers following social media influencers on Instagram? Exploration of consumers’ motives for following influencers and the role of materialism. International Journal of Advertising 41, 1 (2022), 78–100.
[23]
Alice Marwick. 2015. You may know me from YouTube. A companion to celebrity 333 (2015).
[24]
Valentin Niebler. 2020. ‘YouTubers unite’: collective action by YouTube content creators.
[25]
Bahiyah Omar and Wang Dequan. 2020. Watch, share or create: The influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. (2020).
[26]
Jiwoon Park, Ji Min Lee, Vikki Yiqi Xiong, Felix Septianto, and Yuri Seo. 2021. David and Goliath: when and why micro-influencers are more persuasive than mega-influencers. Journal of Advertising 50, 5 (2021), 584–602.
[27]
Essi Pöyry, Matilde Pelkonen, Emma Naumanen, and Salla-Maaria Laaksonen. 2021. A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. In Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication. Routledge, 103–118.
[28]
Rebecca Raby, Caroline Caron, Sophie Théwissen-LeBlanc, Jessica Prioletta, and Claudia Mitchell. 2018. Vlogging on YouTube: the online, political engagement of young Canadians advocating for social change. Journal of Youth Studies 21, 4 (2018), 495–512.
[29]
John D Rayburn and Philip Palmgreen. 1984. Merging uses and gratifications and expectancy-value theory. Communication research 11, 4 (1984), 537–562.
[30]
Joachim Scholz. 2021. How consumers consume social media influence. Journal of Advertising 50, 5 (2021), 510–527.
[31]
Wondwesen Tafesse and Bronwyn P Wood. 2021. Followers’ engagement with instagram influencers: The role of influencers’ content and engagement strategy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 58 (2021), 102303.
[32]
Demetris Vrontis, Anna Makrides, Michael Christofi, and Alkis Thrassou. 2021. Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies 45, 4 (2021), 617–644.
[33]
Joanna C Yau and Stephanie M Reich. 2019. “It’s Just a Lot of Work”: Adolescents’ Self-Presentation Norms and Practices on Facebook and Instagram. Journal of research on adolescence 29, 1 (2019), 196–209.
Index Terms
- This is Why I Like Them: Exploring the Perceived Appeal of Social Media Influencers vs. Traditional Mass Media
Recommendations
I Like Their Autonomy and Closeness to Me: Uncovering the Perceived Appeal of Social-Media Influencers
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe proliferation of influencers on social-media platforms has drawn considerable research attention, particularly in the field of marketing. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding among HCI and communication researchers of what leads these social-...
Trust in social media brands and perceived media values: A survey study in China
AbstractChinese social media platforms such as WeChat, TikTok (Douyin in Chinese), and Weibo have become increasingly popular, attracting large amounts of loyal users in and outside of China. Borrowing theories on brand trust and perceived ...
Highlights- Chinese social media brands such as WeChat and Tiktok attract trusting users worldwide.
Social media user classification: based on social capital expectation, susceptibility, and compulsion loop
ICEC '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic CommerceSocial media such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are originally developed as communication tools among individuals for private conversations. Through the platforms, people share photos, stories and news with their social media friends to interact ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2022
318 pages
ISBN:9781450391900
DOI:10.1145/3500868
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 08 November 2022
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CSCW '22
Sponsor:
CSCW '22: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
November 8 - 22, 2022
Virtual Event, Taiwan
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 170Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)62
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format