Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3486622.3493934acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Long-term Characterization of Political Communications on Social Media

Published: 13 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Social media play an important role in shaping political discourse, creating a public sphere that enables discussions, debates, and deliberations. Therefore, several studies analyzed and characterized the communication of politicians in social media through political and non-political short text messages. However, classifying short messages as political is not a trivial task, especially considering that political topics change regularly over time. While some politicians only share professional communications about their political agenda and activities, others prefer a more personal and informal approach, sharing communications about the most varied subjects, such as religion, sports, and their families. Thus, in this work, we propose a methodology to characterize the communication of Brazilian politicians over the years in terms of the amount of political and non-political messages they post. For this task, we collected more than 3M tweets from 914 Brazilian deputies from October 2013 to October 2019 (6 years span). We characterize their communications through a machine learning classifier that labels all tweets as political and non-political and is robust to concept drifts. We found that the main concept drifts occurred during important events of Brazilian politics, such as the impeachment of former president Dilma Rousseff in 2016 and presidential and municipal elections. Moreover, we characterize the explosive rise of the right seen just before the 2018 elections. Although left-wing politicians post more on social media, the participation of right-wing politicians is broader and more evenly distributed. Finally, we reveal the increase of public engagement over time, especially with the left and right political tweets.

References

[1]
Marcelo Santos Amaral and José Antonio Gomes de Pinho. 2017. Ideologias partidárias em 140 caracteres: uso do Twitter pelos parlamentares brasileiros. Revista de Administração Pública 51, 6(2017), 1041–1057.
[2]
Adam Badawy, Emilio Ferrara, and Kristina Lerman. 2018. Analyzing the digital traces of political manipulation: The 2016 Russian interference Twitter campaign. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2018 (2018), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508646 arxiv:1802.04291
[3]
Josemar Alves Caetano, Jussara Almeida, and Humberto T. Marques-Neto. 2018. Characterizing politically engaged users’ behavior during the 2016 us presidential campaign. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2018 (2018), 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508459
[4]
Albert Franca Josua Costa, Regis Antonio Saraiva Albuquerque, and Eulanda Miranda Dos Santos. 2018. A Drift Detection Method Based on Active Learning. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2018-July(2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489364
[5]
Council on Foreign Relations. 2018. WhatsApp’s Influence in the Brazilian Election and How It Helped Jair Bolsonaro Win. https://www.cfr.org/blog/whatsapps-influence-brazilian-election-and-how-it-helped-jair-bolsonaro-win
[6]
Régis Ebeling, Carlos Abel Córdova Sáenz, Jéferson Campos Nobre, and Karin Becker. 2020. Quarenteners vs. Chloroquiners: A framework to analyze how political polarization affects the behavior of groups. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, WI/IAT 2020, Melbourne, Australia, December 14-17, 2020, Jing He, Hemant Purohit, Guangyan Huang, Xiaoying Gao, and Ke Deng (Eds.). IEEE, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIIAT50758.2020.00031
[7]
Jason Gainous and Kevin M Wagner. 2014. Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Todd Graham, Marcel Broersma, and Karin Hazelhoff. 2013. Closing the gap? Twitter as an instrument for connected representation. Routledge Research in Political Communication (2013).
[9]
Will J. Grant, Brenda Moon, and Janie Busby Grant. 2010. Digital dialogue? australian politicians’ use of the social network tool twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science 45, 4 (2010), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.517176
[10]
Nathan Hartmann, Erick Fonseca, Christopher Shulby, Marcos Treviso, Jessica Rodrigues, and Sandra Aluisio. 2017. Portuguese Word Embeddings: Evaluating on Word Analogies and Natural Language Tasks. arxiv:1708.06025
[11]
Yu He, Jianxin Li, Yangqiu Song, Mutian He, and Hao Peng. 2018. Time-evolving text classification with deep neural networks. IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018-July(2018), 2241–2247.
[12]
Bartosz Krawczyk, Leandro L. Minku, João Gama, Jerzy Stefanowski, and Michał Woźniak. 2017. Ensemble learning for data stream analysis: A survey. Information Fusion 37(2017), 132–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.004
[13]
J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 arxiv:NIHMS150003
[14]
Peipei Li, Lu He, Haiyan Wang, Xuegang Hu, Yuhong Zhang, Lei Li, and Xindong Wu. 2018. Learning from Short Text Streams with Topic Drifts. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 48, 9 (2018), 2697–2711. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2017.2748598
[15]
Caio Machado, Beatriz Kira, Gustavo Hirsch, Nahema Marchal, Bence Kollanyi, Philip N Howard, Thomas Lederer, and Vlad Barash. 2018. News and political information consumption in Brazil: Mapping the first round of the 2018 Brazilian presidential election on Twitter. Computational Propaganda Project(2018).
[16]
David JC MacKay and David JC Mac Kay. 2003. Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge university press.
[17]
Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques and Camila MontÁlverne. 2016. How Important is Twitter to Local Elections in Brazil? A Case Study of Fortaleza City Council. Brazilian Political Science Review 10 (00 2016).
[18]
Roberta CN Moreira, Pedro OS Vaz-de Melo, and Gisele L Pappa. 2020. Elite versus mass polarization on the Brazilian impeachment proceedings of 2016. Social Network Analysis and Mining 10, 1 (2020), 1–23.
[19]
Lucas S. Oliveira, Pedro Vaz de Melo, Marcelo Amaral, and José Antônio Pinho. 2018. When Politicians Talk About Politics: Identifying Political Tweets of Brazilian Congressmen. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2018).
[20]
Lucas Santos De Oliveira, Pedro O. S. Vaz-de Melo, Marcelo S. Amaral, and José Antônio G. Pinho. 2020. Do Politicians Talk about Politics? Assessing Online Communication Patterns of Brazilian Politicians. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 3, 4, Article 19 (Sept. 2020), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3412326
[21]
Jose Ospina-Valencia. 2018. Is there a right-wing surge in South America?https://p.dw.com/p/36U9h
[22]
Maik Paixão, Rinaldo Lima, and Bernard Espinasse. 2020. Fake News Classification and Topic Modeling in Brazilian Portuguese. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, WI/IAT 2020, Melbourne, Australia, December 14-17, 2020, Jing He, Hemant Purohit, Guangyan Huang, Xiaoying Gao, and Ke Deng (Eds.). IEEE, 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIIAT50758.2020.00063
[23]
Joyojeet Pal. 2015. Banalities turned viral: Narendra modi and the political tweet. Television and New Media 16, 4 (2015), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415573956
[24]
Raquel Recuero, Felipe Bonow Soares, and Anatoliy Gruzd. 2020. Hyperpartisanship, Disinformation and Political Conversations on Twitter: The Brazilian Presidential Election of 2018. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 14, 1 (May 2020), 569–578. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/7324
[25]
S Savage, A Monroy-Hernandez, and Acm. 2015. Participatory Militias: An Analysis of an Armed Movement’s Online Audience. Proceedings of the 2015 Acm International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Cscw’15) (2015), 724–733. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675295 arxiv:arXiv:1502.02065v1
[26]
Tegjyot Singh Sethi and Mehmed Kantardzic. 2017. On the reliable detection of concept drift from streaming unlabeled data. Expert Systems with Applications 82 (2017), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.008
[27]
Márcio Silva, Lucas Santos de Oliveira, Athanasios Andreou, Pedro Olmo Vaz de Melo, Oana Goga, and Fabricio Benevenuto. 2020. Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on Facebook. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380109
[28]
Victor do Nascimento Silva and Regina Helena Alves Silva. 2019. Are Algorithms Affecting the Democracy in Brazil?. In INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ETHICAL ALGORITHMS.
[29]
Fábio Souza, Rodrigo Nogueira, and Roberto Lotufo. 2020. BERTimbau: pretrained BERT models for Brazilian Portuguese. In 9th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems, BRACIS, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, October 20-23 (to appear).
[30]
Andranik Tumasjan, Timm Oliver Sprenger, Philipp G Sandner, and Isabell M Welpe. 2010. Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment.ICWSM 10(2010), 178–185.
[31]
Heng Wang and Zubin Abraham. 2015. Concept drift detection for streaming data. In 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1–9.
[32]
Indre Zliobaite, Albert Bifet, Bernhard Pfahringer, and Geoffrey Holmes. 2014. Active learning with drifting streaming data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 25, 1(2014), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2236570

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Bubble reachers and uncivil discourse in polarized online public spherePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030456419:6(e0304564)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WI-IAT '21: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology
December 2021
698 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. concept-drift
  2. neural networks
  3. political communication
  4. text classification

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WI-IAT '21
Sponsor:
WI-IAT '21: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
December 14 - 17, 2021
VIC, Melbourne, Australia

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Bubble reachers and uncivil discourse in polarized online public spherePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030456419:6(e0304564)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media