Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3477206.3477458acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnanocomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Astrocytic control in in vitro and simulated neuron-astrocyte networks

Published: 17 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Astrocytes are involved in the information propagation in the brain by interacting with neurons. Computational modeling helps to study the underlying mechanisms for this communication deeply. In this work, we aimed to analyze how the number of astrocytes and the resulting astrocytic network structure affects neuronal activity. Therefore, we conducted in vitro experiments with microelectrode arrays and simulations with our previously published computational neuron-astrocyte network model side-by-side. In those, we included neuronal cultures without supplemented astrocytes and three conditions with co-cultures where different amounts of astrocytes were added. We then conducted a cross-correlation analysis between the single-channel spike trains and a graph analysis, which included the mean degree, mean shortest path, and the number of nodes, based on the highly correlated channels. Furthermore, we combined the cross-correlation network analysis of the simulated data and the structure of the astrocyte topology. Our experimental results showed that the spike rate was very variable and higher in cultures without added astrocytes than overall in co-cultures. In the co-cultures, the activity was elevated with an increasing number of astrocytes. Additionally, the spike rate was correlated with the mean degree of the neuronal network. This correlation was smaller with larger numbers of astrocytes in the culture. The simulations showed that the most active neurons were localized in the center of the network, which were, however, not always the most connected ones. The astrocytic activation was mainly driven by the vicinity to highly active neurons rather than from the activation through gap junctions. To conclude, the co-cultures with added astrocytes showed stabilization of neuronal activity. Furthermore, increasing the number of astrocytes led to a higher neuronal activity, indicating a feedback excitation loop between astrocytes and neurons.

References

[1]
Mahmood Amiri, Narges Hosseinmardi, Fariba Bahrami, and Mahyar Janahmadi. 2013. Astrocyte-neuron interaction as a mechanism responsible for generation of neural synchrony: a study based on modeling and experiments. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 34, 3 (2013), 489--504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-012-0432-6
[2]
Alfonso Araque, Vladimir Parpura, RP Sanzgiri, and PG Haydon. 1999. Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner. Trends in Neurosciences 22, 5 (1999), 208--215. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01349-6
[3]
Paola Bezzi, Giorgio Carmignoto, Lucia Pasti, Sabino Vesce, Daniela Rossi, Barbara Lodi Rizzini, Tullio Pozzant, and Andrea Volterra. 1998. Prostaglandins stimulate calcium-dependent glutamate release in astrocytes. Nature 391, 6664 (1998), 281--285. https://doi.org/10.1038/34651
[4]
Fernando J. Chaure, Hernan G. Rey, and Rodrigo Quian Quiroga. 2018. A novel and fully automatic spike-sorting implementation with variable number of features. Journal of Neurophysiology 120, 4 (2018), 1859--1871. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00339.2018 29995603.
[5]
Elena Dossi, Flora Vasile, and Nathalie Rouach. 2018. Human astrocytes in the diseased brain. Brain Research Bulletin 136 (2018), 139--156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.02.001 Molecular mechanisms of astrocyte-neuron signalling.
[6]
Isabella Farhy-Tselnicker and Nicola J. Allen. 2018. Astrocytes, neurons, synapses: A tripartite view on cortical circuit development. Neural Development 13, 1 (2018), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-018-0104-y
[7]
Barbara Genocchi, Kerstin Lenk, and Jari Hyttinen. 2020. Influence of Astrocytic Gap Junction Coupling on in Silico Neuronal Network Activity. In MEDICON 2019, IFMBE Proceedings. Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020, 480--487. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8
[8]
Suzana Herculano-Houzel. 2014. The glia/neuron ratio: How it varies uniformly across brain structures and species and what that means for brain physiology and evolution. Glia 62, 9 (2014), 1377--1391. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22683
[9]
Fikret Emre Kapucu, Jarno Tanskanen, Jarno Mikkonen, Laura Ylä-Outinen, Susanna Narkilahti, and Jari Hyttinen. 2012. Burst analysis tool for developing neuronal networks exhibiting highly varying action potential dynamics. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 6 (2012), 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00038
[10]
Kerstin Lenk, Barbara Genocchi, Michael T Barros, and Jari A.K. Hyttinen. 2021. Larger Connection Radius Increases Hub Astrocyte Number in a 3D Neuron-Astrocyte Network Model. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications (2021), 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMBMC.2021.3054890
[11]
Kerstin Lenk, Eero Satuvuori, Jules Lallouette, Antonio Ladrón-de Guevara, Hugues Berry, and Jari A. K. AK Hyttinen. 2020. A Computational Model of Inter-actions Between Neuronal and Astrocytic Networks: The Role of Astrocytes in the Stability of the Neuronal Firing Rate. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 13, January (2020), 92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2019.00092
[12]
Franziska Oschmann, Hugues Berry, Klaus Obermayer, and Kerstin Lenk. 2017. From in silico astrocyte cell models to neuron-astrocyte network models: Areview. Brain Research Bulletin 136 (2017), 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.01.027
[13]
Gertrudis Perea and Alfonso Araque. 2007. Astrocytes potentiate transmitter release at single hippocampal synapses. Science (New York, N.Y.) 317, 5841 (2007), 1083--6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144640
[14]
Mirko Santello, Nicolas Toni, and Andrea Volterra. 2019. Astrocyte function from information processing to cognition and cognitive impairment. Nature Neuroscience 22, 2 (2019), 154--166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0325-8
[15]
George M. Smith, Urs Rutishauser, Jerry Silver, and Robert H. Miller. 1990. Maturation of astrocytes in vitro alters the extent and molecular basis of neurite outgrowth. Developmental Biology 138, 2 (1990), 377--390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(90)90204-V
[16]
Arens Taga, Raha Dastgheyb, Christa Habela, Jessica Joseph, Jean-Philippe Richard, Sarah K. Gross, Giuseppe Lauria, Gabsang Lee, Norman Haughey, and Nicholas J. Maragakis. 2019. Role of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Spinal Cord Astrocytes in the Functional Maturation of Motor Neurons in a Multielectrode Array System. STEM CELLS Translational Medicine 8, 12 (dec 2019), 1272--1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0147
[17]
Michael Taynnan Barros, Sasitharan Balasubramaniam, and Brendan Jennings. 2015. Comparative End-to-End Analysis of Ca 2+ -Signaling-Based Molecular Communication in Biological Tissues. IEEE Transactions on Communications 63, 12 (2015), 5128--5142. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2487349
[18]
Gaetano Valenza, Luciano Tedesco, Antonio Lanata, Danilo De Rossi, and Enzo P asquale Scilingo. 2013. Novel Spiking Neuron-Astrocyte Networks based on nonlinear transistor-like models of tripartite synapses. Conference Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS (2013), 6559--6562. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6611058
[19]
Inkeri A. Välkki, Kerstin Lenk, Jarno E. Mikkonen, Fikret E. Kapucu, and Jari A. K. Hyttinen. 2017. Network-Wide Adaptive Burst Detection Depicts Neuronal Activity with Improved Accuracy. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 11 (2017), 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00040

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NANOCOM '21: Proceedings of the Eight Annual ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication
September 2021
179 pages
ISBN:9781450387101
DOI:10.1145/3477206
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. astrocytes
  2. graph analysis
  3. in vitro microelectrode arrays
  4. neurons
  5. simulations

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Academy of Finland
  • European Union?s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
  • European Union?s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme Marie Sklodowska-Curie

Conference

NANOCOM '21

Acceptance Rates

NANOCOM '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 13 of 22 submissions, 59%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 97 of 135 submissions, 72%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 111
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 01 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media