Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3461353.3461370acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Street-level Air Quality Inference Based on Geographically Context-aware Random Forest Using Opportunistic Mobile Sensor Network

Published: 04 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability of air pollution in urban environments make air quality inference for fine-grained air pollution monitoring extremely challenging. Most of the existing work estimates the air quality using sparse measurements collected from a limited number of fixed monitoring stations or make use of computationally demanding physicochemical models simulating the source and fate of pollutants across multiple spatial scales. In this work, we propose a geographically context-aware random forest model for street-level air quality inference using high spatial resolution data collected by an opportunistic mobile sensor network. Compared with a traditional random forest model, the proposed method builds a local model for each location by considering the neighbors in both geographical and feature space. The model is evaluated on our real air quality dataset collected from mobile sensors in Antwerp, Belgium. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms a series of commonly used methods including Ordinary Kriging (OK), Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and Random forest (RF).

References

[1]
European Environment Agency.2020. Air quality in Europe: 2020 report.Publications Office.
[2]
Shin Araki, Masayuki Shima, and Kouhei Yamamoto. 2018. Spatiotemporal land use random forest model for estimating metropolitan NO2 exposure in Japan. Science of The Total Environment 634 (2018), 1269–1277.
[3]
N Kh Arystanbekova. 2004. Application of Gaussian plume models for air pollution simulation at instantaneous emissions. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 67, 4-5 (2004), 451–458.
[4]
Leo Breiman. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine learning 24, 2 (1996), 123–140.
[5]
Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (2001), 5–32.
[6]
Leo Breiman, Jerome H. Friedman, Richard A. Olshen, and Charles J. Stone. 2017. Classification And Regression Trees. Routledge. 216–265 pages.
[7]
Gongbo Chen, Shanshan Li, Luke D Knibbs, Nicholas AS Hamm, Wei Cao, Tiantian Li, Jianping Guo, Hongyan Ren, Michael J Abramson, and Yuming Guo. 2018. A machine learning method to estimate PM2. 5 concentrations across China with remote sensing, meteorological and land use information. Science of the Total Environment 636 (2018), 52–60.
[8]
Gongbo Chen, Yichao Wang, Shanshan Li, Wei Cao, Hongyan Ren, Luke D Knibbs, Michael J Abramson, and Yuming Guo. 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns of PM10 concentrations over China during 2005–2016: A satellite-based estimation using the random forests approach. Environmental Pollution 242 (2018), 605–613.
[9]
Lauraine G Chestnut, Joel Schwartz, David A Savitz, and Cecil M Burchfiel. 1991. Pulmonary function and ambient particulate matter: epidemiological evidence from NHANES I. Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal 46, 3(1991), 135–144.
[10]
Jelle Hofman, Roeland Samson, Steven Joosen, Ronny Blust, and Silvia Lenaerts. 2018. Cyclist exposure to black carbon, ultrafine particles and heavy metals: An experimental study along two commuting routes near Antwerp, Belgium. Environmental research 164 (2018), 530–538.
[11]
Jelle Hofman, Jeroen Staelens, Rebecca Cordell, Christoph Stroobants, N Zikova, SML Hama, KP Wyche, GPA Kos, Saskia Van Der Zee, KL Smallbone, 2016. Ultrafine particles in four European urban environments: Results from a new continuous long-term monitoring network. Atmospheric environment 136 (2016), 68–81.
[12]
Sami Kaivonen and Edith C-H Ngai. 2020. Real-time air pollution monitoring with sensors on city bus. Digital Communications and Networks 6, 1 (2020), 23–30.
[13]
Jochem O Klompmaker, Denise R Montagne, Kees Meliefste, Gerard Hoek, and Bert Brunekreef. 2015. Spatial variation of ultrafine particles and black carbon in two cities: Results from a short-term measurement campaign. Science of the Total Environment 508 (2015), 266–275.
[14]
Steven Latre, Philip Leroux, Tanguy Coenen, Bart Braem, Pieter Ballon, and Piet Demeester. 2016. City of things: An integrated and multi-technology testbed for IoT smart city experiments. In 2016 IEEE international smart cities conference (ISC2). IEEE, 1–8.
[15]
PanWei Liu, JunYu Zheng, ZhiCheng Li, LiuJu Zhong, XueSong Wang, 2010. Optimization of site locations of regional air quality monitoring network: methodology study.China Environmental Science 30, 7 (2010), 907–913.
[16]
Grant R McKercher and Jennifer K Vanos. 2018. Low-cost mobile air pollution monitoring in urban environments: a pilot study in Lubbock, Texas. Environmental technology 39, 12 (2018), 1505–1514.
[17]
Laina D Mercer, Adam A Szpiro, Lianne Sheppard, Johan Lindström, Sara D Adar, Ryan W Allen, Edward L Avol, Assaf P Oron, Timothy Larson, L-J Sally Liu, 2011. Comparing universal kriging and land-use regression for predicting concentrations of gaseous oxides of nitrogen (NOx) for the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). Atmospheric Environment 45, 26 (2011), 4412–4420.
[18]
Margaret A Oliver and Richard Webster. 1990. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information System 4, 3(1990), 313–332.
[19]
Xuening Qin, Ljiljana Platisa, Tien Huu Do, Evaggelia Tsiligianni, Jelle Hofman, Valerio Panzica La Manna, Nikos Deligiannis, and Wilfried Philips. 2019. Context-based analysis of urban air quality using an opportunistic mobile sensor network. In S-CUBE 2019, 10th EAI International Conference on Sensor Systems and Software. 285–300.
[20]
Joel Schwartz. 1989. Lung function and chronic exposure to air pollution: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES II. Environmental research 50, 2 (1989), 309–321.
[21]
Joris Van den Bossche, Jan Peters, Jan Verwaeren, Dick Botteldooren, Jan Theunis, and Bernard De Baets. 2015. Mobile monitoring for mapping spatial variation in urban air quality: Development and validation of a methodology based on an extensive dataset. Atmospheric Environment 105 (2015), 148–161.
[22]
Sotiris Vardoulakis, Bernard EA Fisher, Koulis Pericleous, and Norbert Gonzalez-Flesca. 2003. Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmospheric environment 37, 2 (2003), 155–182.
[23]
Laura E Venegas, Nicolás A Mazzeo, and Mariana C Dezzutti. 2014. A simple model for calculating air pollution within street canyons. Atmospheric Environment 87 (2014), 77–86.
[24]
Cort J Willmott, Clinton M Rowe, and William D Philpot. 1985. Small-scale climate maps: A sensitivity analysis of some common assumptions associated with grid-point interpolation and contouring. The American Cartographer 12, 1 (1985), 5–16.
[25]
KP Wyche, RL Cordell, KL Smallbone, P Lyons, SML Hama, PS Monks, J Staelens, J Hofman, C Stroobants, E Roekens, 2020. The spatio-temporal evolution of black carbon in the North-West European ‘air pollution hotspot’. Atmospheric Environment 243 (2020), 117874.
[26]
Jing Yang, Ya Zheng, Xi Gou, Ke Pu, Zhaofeng Chen, Qinghong Guo, Rui Ji, Haojia Wang, Yuping Wang, and Yongning Zhou. 2020. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 94 (2020), 91–95.
[27]
Bijan Yeganeh, M Shafie Pour Motlagh, Yousef Rashidi, and Hamidreza Kamalan. 2012. Prediction of CO concentrations based on a hybrid Partial Least Square and Support Vector Machine model. Atmospheric Environment 55 (2012), 357–365.
[28]
Yu Zheng, Furui Liu, and Hsun-Ping Hsieh. 2013. U-air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 1436–1444.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)ASTGC: Attention-based Spatio-temporal Fusion Graph Convolution Model for Fine-grained Air Quality AnalysisAir Quality, Atmosphere & Health10.1007/s11869-023-01369-216:9(1761-1775)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Fine-Grained Urban Air Quality Mapping from Sparse Mobile Air Pollution Measurements and Dense Traffic DensityRemote Sensing10.3390/rs1411261314:11(2613)Online publication date: 30-May-2022
  • (2022)Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable InsightsAtmosphere10.3390/atmos1306094413:6(944)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2022

Index Terms

  1. Street-level Air Quality Inference Based on Geographically Context-aware Random Forest Using Opportunistic Mobile Sensor Network
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICIAI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence
        March 2021
        246 pages
        ISBN:9781450388634
        DOI:10.1145/3461353
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 04 September 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Air quality inference
        2. Internet of Things (IoT)
        3. Machine learning
        4. Smart city

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        ICIAI 2021

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
        Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2023)ASTGC: Attention-based Spatio-temporal Fusion Graph Convolution Model for Fine-grained Air Quality AnalysisAir Quality, Atmosphere & Health10.1007/s11869-023-01369-216:9(1761-1775)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2023
        • (2022)Fine-Grained Urban Air Quality Mapping from Sparse Mobile Air Pollution Measurements and Dense Traffic DensityRemote Sensing10.3390/rs1411261314:11(2613)Online publication date: 30-May-2022
        • (2022)Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable InsightsAtmosphere10.3390/atmos1306094413:6(944)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2022

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media