research-article

For You, or For"You"?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTok

Authors:

Bryan SemaanAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

Article No.: 252, Pages 1 - 34

https://doi.org/10.1145/3432951

Published: 05 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Online communities provide spaces for people who are vulnerable and underserved to seek support and build community, such as LGBTQ+ people. Today, some online community spaces are mediated by algorithms. Scholarship has found that algorithms have become deeply embedded in the systems that mediate our routine engagements with the world. Yet, little is known about how these systems impact those who are most vulnerable in society. In this paper, we focus on people's everyday experiences with one algorithmic system, the short video sharing application TikTok. TikTok recently received press that it was suppressing and oppressing the identities of its growing LGBTQ+ user population through algorithmic and human moderation of LGBTQ+ creators and content related to LGBTQ+ identity. Through an interview study with 16 LGBTQ+ TikTok users, we explore people's everyday engagements and encounters with the platform. We find that TikTok's For You Page algorithm constructs contradictory identity spaces that at once support LGBTQ+ identity work and reaffirm LGBTQ+ identity, while also transgressing and violating the identities of individual users. We also find that people are developing self-organized practices in response to these transgressions and violations. We discuss the implications of algorithmic systems on people's identity work, and introduce the concept of algorithmic exclusion, and explore how people are building resilience following moments of algorithmic exclusion.

References

[1]

Salem Hamed Abdurrahim, Salina Abdul Samad, and Aqilah Baseri Huddin. 2018. Review on the effects of age, gender, and race demographics on automatic face recognition. The Visual Computer 34, 11 (2018), 1617--1630.

Digital Library

[2]

Tawfiq Ammari and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Understanding and Supporting Fathers and Fatherhood on Social Media Sites. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1905--1914. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702205

Digital Library

[3]

Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing Pregnancy Loss on Facebook: A Decision-Making Framework for Stigmatized Disclosures on Identified Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3173574.3173732

Digital Library

[4]

Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2018. Social Support, Reciprocity, and Anonymity in Responses to Sexual Abuse Disclosures on Social Media. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 5, Article 28 (Oct. 2018), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234942

Digital Library

[5]

Benedict Anderson. 2006. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso books.

[6]

Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Diva Smriti, Brenna McNally, Evan Golub, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2019. Stranger Danger! Social Media App Features Co-Designed with Children to Keep Them Safe Online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boise, ID, USA) (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 394--406. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323133

Digital Library

[7]

Paul Baker and Amanda Potts. 2013. 'Why do white people have thin lips'' Google and the perpetuation of stereotypes via auto-complete search forms. Critical Discourse Studies 10, 2 (2013), 187--204.

[8]

David Beer. 2009. Power through the algorithm' Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society 11, 6 (2009), 985--1002.

[9]

Sam Biddle, Paulo Victor Ribeiro, and Tatiana Dias. 2020. Invisible Censorship: TikTok Told Moderators to Suppress Posts by "Ugly" People and the Poor to Attract New Users. The Intercept (2020).

[10]

Patrick Biernacki and Dan Waldorf. 1981. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological methods & research 10, 2 (1981), 141--163.

[11]

Pa'ko Bilić. 2016. Search algorithms, hidden labour and information control. Big Data & Society 3, 1 (2016), 2053951716652159.

[12]

Rena Bivens and Oliver L Haimson. 2016. Baking gender into social media design: How platforms shape categories for users and advertisers. Social Media & Society 2, 4 (2016), 2056305116672486.

[13]

Courtney Blackwell, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. 2015. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New media & society 17, 7 (2015), 1117--1136.

[14]

Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 24 (Dec. 2017), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134659

Digital Library

[15]

Elena Botella. 2019. TikTok Admits It Suppressed Videos by Disabled, Queer, and Fat Creators. Slate (2019).

[16]

Geoffrey Bowker. 1994. Information mythology: The world of/as information. Information acumen: The understanding and use of knowledge in modern business (1994), 231--247.

[17]

danah m boyd and Nicole B Ellison. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2007), 210--230.

Digital Library

[18]

Engin Bozdag. 2013. Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology 15, 3 (2013), 209--227.

Digital Library

[19]

Ethan Bresnick. 2019. Intensified Play: Cinematic study of TikTok mobile app. (04 2019).

[20]

William Bridges. 2004. Transitions: Making sense of life's changes.

[21]

Meredith Broussard. 2018. Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press.

[22]

Taina Bucher. 2012. Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 14, 7 (2012), 1164--1180.

[23]

Taina Bucher. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20, 1 (2017), 30--44.

[24]

Judith Butler. 2011. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

[25]

Matthew Carrasco and Andruid Kerne. 2018. Queer Visibility: Supporting LGBT+ Selective Visibility on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173824

Digital Library

[26]

John Cheney-Lippold. 2018. We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. NYU Press.

[27]

Louise Kloos Comfort. 2007. Shared risk: Complex systems in seismic response. Emerald Group Publishing.

[28]

Juliet Corbin, Anselm L Strauss, and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research. sage.

[29]

Kelley Cotter. 2019. Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society 21, 4 (2019), 895--913.

[30]

Shelley L Craig and Lauren McInroy. 2014. You can form a part of yourself online: The influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health 18, 1 (2014), 95--109.

[31]

Jonathon Cummings, J Lee, and Robert Kraut. 2006. Communication technology and friendship during the transition from high school to college. Computers, phones, and the Internet: Domesticating information technology (2006), 265--278.

[32]

Avery Dame. 2013. 'I'm your hero' Like me'?: The role of 'expert'in the trans male vlog. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2, 1 (2013), 40--69.

[33]

Jeroen JH Dekker. 1990. The fragile relation between normality and marginality. Marginalization and institutionalization in the history of education. Peadegogica Historica 26, 2 (1990), 12--29.

[34]

Bipin C. Desai. 2019. Privacy in the Age of Information (and Algorithms). In Proceedings of the 23rd International Database Applications Engineering Symposium (Athens, Greece) (IDEAS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331076.3331089

Digital Library

[35]

Michael Ann DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeffery T. Hancock, Megan French, and Sunny Liu. 2018. How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What It Means for How We Study Self-Presentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173694

Digital Library

[36]

Michael Ann DeVito, Darren Gergle, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2017. 'Algorithms Ruin Everything': #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3163--3174. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025659

Digital Library

[37]

Michael Ann DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2018. 'Too Gay for Facebook': Presenting LGBTQ+ Identity Throughout the Personal Social Media Ecosystem. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 44 (Nov. 2018), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274313 [38] Jill P Dimond, Casey Fiesler, and Amy S Bruckman. 2011. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 413--421.

Digital Library

[38]

Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2019. Moderation Practices as Emotional Labor in Sustaining Online Communities: The Case of AAPI Identity Work on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 142.

Digital Library

[39]

Jack Drescher. 2015. Out of DSM: Depathologizing homosexuality. Behavioral Sciences 5, 4 (2015), 565--575.

[40]

Stefanie Duguay. 2017. Identity modulation in networked publics: Queer women's participation and representation on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine. Ph.D. Dissertation. Queensland University of Technology.

[41]

Stefanie Duguay. 2019. 'There's no one new around you?: Queer Women's Experiences of Scarcity in Geospatial Partner-Seeking on Tinder. In The Geographies of Digital Sexuality. Springer, 93--114.

[42]

Brianna Dym, Jed R. Brubaker, Casey Fiesler, and Bryan Semaan. 2019. 'Coming Out Okay': Community Narratives for LGBTQ Identity Recovery Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 154 (Nov. 2019), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359256

Digital Library

[43]

Nicole B Ellison, Lindsay Blackwell, Cliff Lampe, and Penny Trieu. 2016. 'The Question Exists, but You Don't Exist With It?: Strategic Anonymity in the Social Lives of Adolescents. Social Media & Society 2, 4 (2016), 2056305116670673. [45] Erik H Erikson. 1994. Identity and the Life Cycle. WW Norton & Company.

[44]

Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I ?like' It, Then I Hide It: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2371--2382. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858494

Digital Library

[45]

Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. 'I Always Assumed That I Wasn't Really That Close to [Her]': Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153--162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556

Digital Library

[46]

Martha S Feldman and Brian T Pentland. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative science quarterly 48, 1 (2003), 94--118.

[47]

Tania Ferfolja. 2007. Schooling cultures: Institutionalizing heteronormativity and heterosexism. International Journal of Inclusive Education 11, 2 (2007), 147--162.

[48]

Byrne Fone. 2000. Homophobia: A history. Macmillan. [51] Viktor Gecas. 1982. The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology 8, 1 (1982), 1--33.

[49]

Anthony Giddens. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford university press.

[50]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of 'platforms'. New Media & Society 12, 3 (2010), 347--364.

[51]

Erving Goffman et al. 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth London.

[52]

Luke Goode. 2009. Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society 11, 8 (2009), 1287--1305.

[53]

Michael Green, Ania Bobrowicz, and Chee Siang Ang. 2015. The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community online: discussions of bullying and self-disclosure in YouTube videos. Behaviour & Information Technology 34, 7 (2015), 704--712.

Digital Library

[54]

Anatoliy Gruzd, Barry Wellman, and Yuri Takhteyev. 2011. Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist 55, 10 (2011), 1294--1318.

[55]

Christine Hagar and Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2005. Crisis, farming and community. Journal of Community Informatics 3 (2005), 41.

[56]

Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1176--1190. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675152

Digital Library

[57]

Oliver L Haimson, Avery Dame-Griff, Elias Capello, and Zahari Richter. 2019. Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Feminist Media Studies (2019), 1--17.

[58]

Oliver L Haimson and Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2016. Constructing and enforcing" authentic" identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday 21, 6 (2016).

[59]

Melissa Hamilton. 2019. The sexist algorithm. Behavioral Sciences & The Law 37, 2 (2019), 145--157.

[60]

Lynn Hancock. 2006. Community safety and social exclusion. Community Safety: Critical perspectives on policy and practice (2006), 201--217.

[61]

Ole Hanseth and Kalle Lyytinen. 2010. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology 25, 1 (2010), 1--19.

[62]

Donna Haraway. 1994. A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. The postmodern turn: New perspectives on social theory (1994), 82--115.

[63]

Jean Hardy and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a Desiring User: Discourse, Rurality, and Design in Location-Based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998347

Digital Library

[64]

Peter Hart-Brinson. 2018. The gay marriage generation: How the LGBTQ movement transformed American culture. NYU Press.

[65]

Bettina Heinz, Li Gu, Ako Inuzuka, and Roger Zender. 2002. Under the rainbow flag: Webbing global gay identities. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 7, 2--3 (2002), 107--124.

[66]

Gregory M Herek. 2004. Beyond 'homophobia': Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research & Social Policy 1, 2 (2004), 6--24.

[67]

Alex Hern. 2019. TikTok's local moderation guidelines ban pro-LGBT content. The Guardian (2019).

[68]

John Herrman. March 10, 2019. How TikTok Is Rewriting the World. The New York Times (March 10, 2019).

[69]

Herminia Ibarra and Jennifer L Petriglieri. 2010. Identity work and play. Journal of Organizational Change Management (2010).

[70]

Infrastructure. n.d. Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Merriam-Webster.

[71]

Shagun Jhaver, Yoni Karpfen, and Judd Antin. 2018. Algorithmic anxiety and coping strategies of Airbnb hosts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 421. [75] Matthew Kay, Cynthia Matuszek, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3819--3828. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520

Digital Library

[72]

Sharful Islam Khan, Mohammed Iftekher Hussain, Shaila Parveen, Mahbubul Islam Bhuiyan, Gorkey Gourab, Golam Faruk Sarker, Shohael Mahmud Arafat, and Joya Sikder. 2009. Living on the extreme margin: social exclusion of the transgender population (hijra) in Bangladesh. Journal of health, population, and nutrition 27, 4 (2009), 441.

[73]

Vanessa Kitzie. 2019. 'That looks like me or something i can do': Affordances and constraints in the online identity work of US LGBTQ+ millennials. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70, 12 (2019), 1340--1351.

Digital Library

[74]

Brendan F Klare, Mark J Burge, Joshua C Klontz, Richard W Vorder Bruegge, and Anil K Jain. 2012. Face recognition performance: Role of demographic information. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 7, 6 (2012), 1789--1801.

Digital Library

[75]

Christopher A. Le Dantec, Robert G. Farrell, Jim E. Christensen, Mark Bailey, Jason B. Ellis, Wendy A. Kellogg, and W. Keith Edwards. 2011. Publics in Practice: Ubiquitous Computing at a Shelter for Homeless Mothers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1687--1696. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979189

Digital Library

[76]

Charlotte P. Lee, Paul Dourish, and Gloria Mark. 2006. The Human Infrastructure of Cyberinfrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Banff, Alberta, Canada) (CSCW '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 483--492. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180950

Digital Library

[77]

Jing Li. 2018. Studies on Douyin app Communication in Social Platforms: Take Relevant Douyin Short Videos and Posts on Microblog as Examples.

[78]

Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, knock. Who's there' The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, 3 (2012), 330--345.

[79]

Shang Liu, Zenzhong Chen, Hongyi Liu, and Xinghai Hu. 2019. User-Video Co-Attention Network for Personalized Micro-video Recommendation. In WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference (WWW '19). ACM Press, New York, NY, 3020--3026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313513

Digital Library

[80]

Yunfei Lu, Linuyn Yu, Peng Cui, Chengxi Zang, Renzhe Xu, Yihao Liu, Lei Li, and Wenwu Zhu. 2019. Uncovering the Co-driven Mechanism of Social and Content Links in User Churn Phenomena. In KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (KDD '19). ACM Press, New York, NY, 3093--3101. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330736

Digital Library

[81]

Zhicong Lu. 2019. Live Streaming in China for Sharing Knowledge and Promoting Intangible Cultural Heritage. Interactions 27, 1 (Dec. 2019), 58--63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373145

Digital Library

[82]

Zhicong Lu, Michelle Annett, Mingming Fan, and Daniel Wigdor. 2019. 'I Feel It is My Responsibility to Stream': Streaming and Engaging with Intangible Cultural Heritage through Livestreaming. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300459

Digital Library

[83]

Zhicong Lu, Michelle Annett, and Daniel Wigdor. 2019. Vicariously Experiencing It All Without Going Outside: A Study of Outdoor Livestreaming in China. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 25 (Nov. 2019), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359127

Digital Library

[84]

Zhicong Lu and Xing Lu. 2019. Fifteen Seconds of Fame: A Qualitative Study of Douyin, A Short Video Sharing Mobile Application in China. In Social Computing and Social Media. Design, Human Behavior and Analytics. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Scienc (1nd. ed.), Meiselwitz G. (Ed.). Vol. vol 11578. Springer, Cham, 285--298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21902-4_17

Digital Library

[85]

Caitlin Lustig and Bonnie Nardi. 2015. Algorithmic authority: The case of Bitcoin. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 743--752.

Digital Library

[86]

Caitlin Lustig, Katie Pine, Bonnie Nardi, Lilly Irani, Min Kyung Lee, Dawn Nafus, and Christian Sandvig. 2016. Algorithmic Authority: The Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Algorithms That Interpret, Decide, and Manage. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1057--1062. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2886426

Digital Library

[87]

Wei-Ying Ma. 2020. Democratizing Content Creation and Dissemination through AI Technology. In WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 (WWW '20). ACM Press, New York, NY, 3143. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423. 3382669

Digital Library

[88]

Sorcha Avalon Mackenzie and David Nichols. 2020. Finding ?Places to Be Bad? in Social Media: The Case of TikTok. In Urban Australia and Post-Punk (1nd. ed.), David Nichols and Sophie Perillo (Eds.). Palgrave Macmillian, New York, NY, 285--298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9702-9_22

[89]

Gloria Mark and Bryan Semaan. 2008. Resilience in Collaboration: Technology as a Resource for New Patterns of Action. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Diego, CA, USA) (CSCW '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137--146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460585

Digital Library

[90]

Alice E Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13, 1 (2011), 114--133.

[91]

Adrienne Massanari. 2017. # Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit's algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society 19, 3 (2017), 329--346.

[92]

Michael Massimi, Jill P. Dimond, and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2012. Finding a New Normal: The Role of Technology in Life Disruptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 719--728. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2145204.2145314

Digital Library

[93]

Sarah McRobets, Ye Yuan, Kathleen Watson, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2019. Behind the Scenes: Design, Collaboration, and Video Creation with Youth. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '19). ACM Press, New York, NY, 173--184. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323134

Digital Library

[94]

Leigh Moscowitz. 2013. The battle over marriage: Gay rights activism through the media. University of Illinois Press.

[95]

Lucas D Introna, Helen Nissenbaum and Lucas D Introna. 2000. Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society 16, 3 (2000), 169--185.

[96]

Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.

[97]

Ziad Obermeyer and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm That Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287593

Digital Library

[98]

Bahiyah Omar and Wang Dequan. 2020. Watch, Share or Create: The Influence of Personality Traits and User Motivation on TikTok Mobile Video Usage. International Association of Online Engineering (2020). https://www. learntechlib.org/p/216454/

[99]

Jahna Otterbacher, Jo Bates, and Paul Clough. 2017. Competent Men and Warm Women: Gender Stereotypes and Backlash in Image Search Results. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6620--6631. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025727

Digital Library

[100]

CJ Pascoe. 2010. Dude, you're a fag. The Structure of Schooling: Readings in the Sociology of Education (2010), 391.

[101]

Amelia Pavlik. 2020. Use TikTok to engage with future students. Enrollment Management Report 24, 2 (2020), 6--7. https://doi.org/10.1002/emt.30654

[102]

Elia Powers. 2017. My news feed is filtered? Awareness of news personalization among college students. Digital Journalism 5, 10 (2017), 1315--1335.

[103]

Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173--182. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2702123.2702174

Digital Library

[104]

Jahmeilah Roberson and Bonnie Nardi. 2010. Survival Needs and Social Inclusion: Technology Use among the Homeless. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Savannah, Georgia, USA) (CSCW '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 445--448. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718993

Digital Library

[105]

Adi Robertson. 2019. TikTok prevented disabled users? videos from showing up in feeds. The Verge (2019).

[106]

Belinda Robnett and Cynthia Feliciano. 2011. Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Social Forces 89, 3 (2011), 807--828.

[107]

Vito Russo. 1987. The celluloid closet: Homosexuality in the movies. Harper Collins.

[108]

Corina Sas and Steve Whittaker. 2013. Design for Forgetting: Disposing of Digital Possessions after a Breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1823--1832. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466241

Digital Library

[109]

Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M. Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe Spaces and Safe Places: Unpacking Technology-Mediated Experiences of Safety and Harm with Transgender People. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 155 (Nov. 2018), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274424

Digital Library

[110]

Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jacob M. Paul, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2019. How Computers See Gender: An Evaluation of Gender Classification in Commercial Facial Analysis Services. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 144 (Nov. 2019), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359246

Digital Library

[111]

Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Kandrea Wade, Caitlin Lustig, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2020. How We've Taught Algorithms to See Identity: Constructing Race and Gender in Image Databases for Facial Anal. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 58 (May 2020), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392866

Digital Library

[112]

Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2013. The secret life of online moms: Anonymity and disinhibition on youbemom. com. In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.

[113]

Bryan Semaan. 2019. 'Routine Infrastructuring' as Building Everyday Resilience with Technology? When Disruption Becomes Ordinary. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--24.

[114]

Bryan Semaan, Heather Faucett, Scott Robertson, Misa Maruyama, and Sara Douglas. 2015. Navigating Imagined Audiences: Motivations for Participating in the Online Public Sphere. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1158--1169. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675187

Digital Library

[115]

Bryan Semaan and Gloria Mark. 2011. Technology-mediated social arrangements to resolve breakdowns in infrastructure during ongoing disruption. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 18, 4 (2011).

Digital Library

[116]

Bryan Semaan and Gloria Mark. 2011. Technology-Mediated Social Arrangements to Resolve Breakdowns in Infrastructure during Ongoing Disruption. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 4, Article 21 (Dec. 2011), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2063231.2063235

Digital Library

[117]

Juan Carlos Medina Serrano, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, and Simon Hegelich. 2020. Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05478 (2020).

[118]

David Sibley. 1995. Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. Psychology Press.

[119]

Manya Sleeper, Rebecca Balebako, Sauvik Das, Amber Lynn McConahy, Jason Wiese, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2013. The Post That Wasn?t: Exploring Self-Censorship on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 793--802. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441865

Digital Library

[120]

Madeline E. Smith, Duyen T. Nguyen, Charles Lai, Gilly Leshed, and Eric P.S. Baumer. 2012. Going to College and Staying Connected: Communication between College Freshmen and Their Parents. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 789--798. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145322

Digital Library

[121]

David A Snow, Doug McAdam, et al. 2000. Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement nexus. Self, Identity, and Social Movements 13 (2000), 41--67.

[122]

Steven M Southwick, George A Bonanno, Ann S Masten, Catherine Panter-Brick, and Rachel Yehuda. 2014. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. European journal of psychotraumatology 5, 1 (2014), 25338.

[123]

Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information systems research 7, 1 (1996), 111--134.

[124]

Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.

[125]

Henri Tajfel. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Information (International Social Science Council) 13, 2 (1974), 65--93.

[126]

Benjamin Toff and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2018. ?I just Google it?: Folk theories of distributed discovery. Journal of Communication 68, 3 (2018), 636--657.

[127]

Dan Trudeau and Chris McMorran. 2011. The geographies of marginalization. A companion to social geography (2011), 437--453.

[128]

John Van Maanen. 2010. Identity work and control in occupational communities. Cambridge University Press.

[129]

Ashley Marie Walker and Michael Ann DeVito. 2020. ''More Gay? Fits in Better?: Intracommunity Power Dynamics and Harms in Online LGBTQ+ Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376497

Digital Library

[130]

Shuaishuai Wang. 2020. Calculating dating goals: data gaming and algorithmic sociality on Blued, a Chinese gay dating app. Information, Communication & Society 23, 2 (2020), 181--197.

[131]

Yunwen Wang. 2020. Humor and camera view on mobile short-form video apps influence user experience and technology-adoption intent, an example of TikTok (DouYin). Computers in Human Behavior 110, 106373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106373

[132]

Y. Wang, T. Gu, and S. Wang. 2019. Causes and Characteristics of Short Video Platform Internet Community Taking the TikTok Short Video Application as an Example. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Taiwan (ICCE-TW). 1--2.

[133]

Tom Wengraf. 2001. Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Sage.

[134]

Vera Whisman. 2012. Queer by choice: Lesbians, gay men, and the politics of identity. Routledge.

[135]

Langdon Winner. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus (1980), 121--136.

[136]

Aimee Wodda and Vanessa R Panfil. 2014. Don't talk to me about deception: The necessary erosion of the trans panic defense. Alb. L. Rev. 78 (2014), 927.

[137]

Allison Woodruff. 2019. 10 things you should know about algorithmic fairness. Interactions 26, 4 (2019), 47--51.

Digital Library

[138]

Robert K Yin. 2017. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

[139]

Qiyang Zhou. 2019. Understanding User Behaviors of Creative Practice on Short Video Sharing Platforms -- A Case Study of TikTok and Bilibili. Master's thesis. Cincinnati, OH, USA. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num= ucin155421202112545

[140]

Yue Zhuge. 2018. Video consumption, social networking, and influence. Commun. ACM 61, 11 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1145/3239554

Digital Library

Cited By

Ma LJiang Q(2024)Swiping more, thinking less: Using TikTok hinders analytic thinkingCyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace10.5817/CP2024-3-118:3Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2024-3-1
Duguay S(2024)Identity Modulation on TikTok: The Case of a Lesbian CowboyCanadian Journal of Communication10.3138/cjc-2023-003049:3(370-390)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjc-2023-0030
Ionescu CCiuperca ECotel ALicu M(2024)Personal values clusters and their associations to social media behaviors and psychological well-beingBMC Psychology10.1186/s40359-024-02046-412:1Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02046-4
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

The interplay of internalized homophobia, compulsive use of dating apps, and mental distress among sexual minority individuals: Two moderated mediation models
Abstract
The association between internalized homophobia and mental health problems is well-documented among sexual minority individuals. At the same time, growing evidence suggests that dating apps influence sexual minority individuals’ well-being in ...
Highlights
- We examined the interplay of internalized homophobia, mental distress, and use of dating apps in sexual minorities.
- Internalized homophobia and compulsive use of dating apps are positively correlated with mental distress.
- ...
Examining the Unique Online Risk Experiences and Mental Health Outcomes of LGBTQ+ versus Heterosexual Youth
CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

We collected and analyzed Instagram direct messages (DMs) from 173 youth aged 13–21 (including 86 LGBTQ+ youth). We examined youth’s risk-flagged social media trace data with their self-reported mental health outcomes to examine how the differing online ...
LGBTQ Persons’ Use of Online Spaces to Navigate Conception, Pregnancy, and Pregnancy Loss: An Intersectional Approach
Navigating conception, pregnancy, and loss is challenging for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people, who experience stigma due to LGBTQ identity, other identities (e.g., loss), and intersections thereof. We conducted interviews ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

CSCW

December 2020

1825 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3446568

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 January 2021

Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

81
Total Citations
View Citations
5,349
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,073
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)122

Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ma LJiang Q(2024)Swiping more, thinking less: Using TikTok hinders analytic thinkingCyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace10.5817/CP2024-3-118:3Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2024-3-1
Duguay S(2024)Identity Modulation on TikTok: The Case of a Lesbian CowboyCanadian Journal of Communication10.3138/cjc-2023-003049:3(370-390)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjc-2023-0030
Ionescu CCiuperca ECotel ALicu M(2024)Personal values clusters and their associations to social media behaviors and psychological well-beingBMC Psychology10.1186/s40359-024-02046-412:1Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02046-4
Lookingbill VLe K(2024)“There’s Always a Way to Get Around the Guidelines”: Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Content Moderation on TikTokSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124125437110:2Online publication date: 17-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241254371
Obreja D(2024)When Stories Turn Institutional: How TikTok Users Legitimate the Algorithmic SensemakingSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305123122411410:1Online publication date: 30-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224114
Obreja D(2024)Bridging awareness and resistance: Using algorithmic knowledge against controversial contentBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724129604611:4Online publication date: 10-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241296046
Zhao L(2024)Algorithmic camouflage: Exploring the shadowbans imposed by algorithms to moderate the content of Chinese gay menBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724129603711:4Online publication date: 3-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241296037
Tompkins JGuajardo (née Brown) A(2024)Gatekeeping the Gatekeepers: An Exploratory Study of Transformative Games Fandom & TikTok AlgorithmsGames and Culture10.1177/15554120241244416Online publication date: 9-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120241244416
Zhou Z(2024)Performing lowbrowness: How Chinese queer people negotiate visibility on short-video platformsNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448241266984Online publication date: 27-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241266984
Chartrand ADuguay S(2024)Sexual and geocultural algorithmic imaginaries: Examining approaches of participatory resignation among LGBTQ+ Instagrammers in Berlin and MontrealInternational Journal of Cultural Studies10.1177/13678779241267292Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779241267292
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents