Modernizing a General Education Requirement in Computing to Emphasize Critical Thinking
Pages 488 - 494
Abstract
In this paper, we describe the process of replacing a general education requirement in computing at a private liberal arts/professional American university. The original requirement evaluated students' ability to utilize spreadsheet and presentation software, meaning traditional CS1 courses did not satisfy the requirement. The new requirement emphasizes critical thinking and requires students to create digital artifacts in order to solve problems or analyze models in their major discipline. We describe our motivations for updating the general education requirement, and the feedback that we received during the revision process. We also describe the learning outcomes used during the assessment process. We briefly describe the results from the previous cycle of assessment in 2014 using the original requirement as well as the results from the current cycle in 2020 using the new requirement. Rather than being limited to spreadsheet and presentation software, assessed student artifacts in 2020 also included Excel, Python, MATLAB, and Mathematica source code, as well as written analyses. We conclude with recommendations from the assessment team for improving the general education requirement and associated assessment procedure.
References
[1]
Christine Alvarado, Zachary Dodds, and Ran Libeskind-Hadas. 2012. Increasing women's participation in computing at Harvey Mudd College. ACM Inroads 3, 4 (December 2012), 55--64.
[2]
AP Computer Science Principles: Course and Exam Description. Retrieved August 25, 2020 from https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/pdf/ap-computer-science-principles-course-and-exam-description.pdf.
[3]
Valerie Carr, Morris Jones, and Belle Wei. 2020. Interdisciplinary Computing: Applied Computing for Behavioral and Social Sciences. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 400--406.
[4]
John P. Dougherty, Tom Dececchi, Tony Clear, Brad Richards, Stephen Cooper, and Tadeusz Wilusz. 2002. Information technology fluency in practice. In Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE-WGR '02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153--171.
[5]
Mark Guzdial and Andrea Forte. 2005. Design process for a non-majors computing course. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 361--365.
[6]
Susanne Hambrusch, Christoph Hoffmann, John T. Korb, Mark Haugan, and Antony L. Hosking. 2009. A multidisciplinary approach towards computational thinking for science majors. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 183--187.
[7]
Dennis Kafura, Austin Cory Bart, and Bushra Chowdhury. 2015. Design and Preliminary Results From a Computational Thinking Course. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63--68.
[8]
Dennis Kafura and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Initial experience with a computational thinking course for computer science students. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 251--256.
[9]
Natalia Khuri, Wendy Lee, K. Virginia Lehmkuhl-Dakhwe, Miri VanHoven, and Sami Khuri. 2020. Interdisciplinary Minor in Bioinformatics: First Results and Outlook. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 407--412.
[10]
Christopher Kuster, John Symms, Christopher May, and Chenglie Hu. 2011. Developing computational thinking skills across the undergraduate curriculum. In 44th Annual Midwest Instruction and Computing Symposium (MICS '11). Duluth, MN, USA.
[11]
NECHE. Standards for Accreditation. (July 2016). Retrieved August 25, 2020 from https://www.neche.org/resources/standards-for-accreditation/.
[12]
Ljubomir Perkovic, Amber Settle, Sungsoon Hwang, and Joshua Jones. 2010. A framework for computational thinking across the curriculum. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 123--127.
[13]
Hong Qin. 2009. Teaching computational thinking through bioinformatics to biology students. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 188--191.
[14]
Nick Senske. 2017. Evaluation and Impact of a Required Computational Thinking Course for Architecture Students. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 525--530.
[15]
Robert H. Sloan, Valerie Barr, Heather Bort, Mark Guzdial, Ran Libeskind-Hadas, and Richard Warner. 2020. CS + X Meets CS 1: Strongly Themed Intro Courses. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 960--961.
[16]
Andrea Tartaro, Christopher Healy, and Kevin Treu. 2016. Computer science in general education: beyond quantitative reasoning. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 32, 2 (December 2016), 177--184.
[17]
Darrell B. Warner and Katie Koeppel. 2009. General education requirements: a comparative analysis. Journal of General Education 58, 4 (2009), 241--258.
Index Terms
- Modernizing a General Education Requirement in Computing to Emphasize Critical Thinking
Recommendations
Investigating the Role of Computing in General Education Requirements
SIGCSE '21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationGeneral education requirements delineate the core requirements that all students of a particular university must complete in order to graduate. These requirements are often indicative of how an institution views its core mission, leading to vastly ...
Critical thinking with Alice: a curriculum design model for middle school teachers
ALICE '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Alice SymposiumThis paper describes a curriculum design model for the use of the 3D animation program, Alice, with middle school students. Based on the learning theory of SCCS (social and cognitive-connectedness schemata), the model's design interweaves the construct ...
Capturing Students' Critical Thinking Skills in English for Academic Writing Course: A Case in Information System Students
ICEEL '18: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-LearningWriting has been regarded as the most difficult language skills since students in Indonesia were not familiar with this skill in the early and middle education level. On the other hand, in higher education level the students should produce a thesis to ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2021
1454 pages
ISBN:9781450380621
DOI:10.1145/3408877
- General Chairs:
- Mark Sherriff,
- Laurence D. Merkle,
- Program Chairs:
- Pamela Cutter,
- Alvaro Monge,
- Judithe Sheard
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 05 March 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
SIGCSE '21
Sponsor:
SIGCSE '21: The 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
March 13 - 20, 2021
Virtual Event, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%
Upcoming Conference
SIGCSE Virtual 2024
- Sponsor:
- sigcse
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 157Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)25
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in