Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3357236.3395551acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Push-Pull Energy Futures: Using Design to Discuss Agency in Distributed Energy Systems

Published: 03 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Distributed energy resources are expected to radically change the way energy is produced and distributed through decentralised generation and storage. Current distributed energy models tend to hide the complexity of these systems in order to improve ease of use, while restricting people's participation to predefined roles of passive users who can benefit from more reliable infrastructures, more competitive prices, and more access to sustainable energy. In this paper, we question these roles and present the Karma Kettle, an open-ended device that aims to explore perceptions of different levels of agency in distributed energy resources. A study of the Karma Kettle with 20 residents of a block of flats in the UK reveals strategies and values of these residents, the effectiveness of the Karma Kettle to inspire discussion on levels of agency, and how these systems could be designed to promote more participatory approaches in distributed energy systems.

References

[1]
Dimitrios Amaxilatis, Ioannis Chatzigiannakis, Georgios Mylonas, Lidia Pocero, Dimitrios Zarras, and Andreas Koskeris. 2015. Green mindset: using IoT to promote energy efficiency and sustainability in Greek public schools. In Proceedings of the 19th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics. 297--302.
[2]
Ernesto Arroyo, Leonardo Bonanni, and Ted Selker. 2005. Waterbot: Exploring Feedback and Persuasive Techniques at the Sink. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 631--639.
[3]
Peter Bradley, Alexia Coke, and Matthew Leach. 2016. Financial incentive approaches for reducing peak electricity demand, experience from pilot trials with a UK energy provider. Energy Policy 98 (2016), 108--120.
[4]
Kathryn Buchanan, Riccardo Russo, and Ben Anderson. 2014. Feeding back about eco-feedback: How do consumers use and respond to energy monitors? Energy Policy 73 (2014), 138--146.
[5]
Jill Chopyak and Peter Levesque. 2002. Public participation in science and technology decision making: trends for the future. Technology in Society 24, 1--2 (2002), 155--166.
[6]
EU Commission and others. 2017. Study on Residential Prosumers in the European Energy Union. (2017).
[7]
Enrico Costanza, Joel E. Fischer, James A. Colley, Tom Rodden, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2014. Doing the Laundry with Agents: A Field Trial of a Future Smart Energy System in the Home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 813--822.
[8]
Benjamin R. Cowan, Chris P. Bowers, Russell Beale, and Charlie Pinder. 2013. The Stroppy Kettle: An Intervention to Break Energy Consumption Habits. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1485--1490.
[9]
George Crabtree. 2015. Perspective: The energy-storage revolution. Nature 526, 7575 (2015), S92--S92.
[10]
Edward L Deci, Richard Koestner, and Richard M Ryan. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin 125, 6 (1999), 627.
[11]
Thomas Erickson, Ming Li, Younghun Kim, Ajay Deshpande, Sambit Sahu, Tian Chao, Piyawadee Sukaviriya, and Milind Naphade. 2013. The dubuque electricity portal: evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1203--1212.
[12]
National Grid Eso. 2019. "Future Energy Scenario" Tech. Rep. (2019). http://fes.nationalgrid.com/media/1409/fes-2019.pdf
[13]
Freja Friis and Toke Haunstrup Christensen. 2016. The challenge of time shifting energy demand practices: Insights from Denmark. Energy Research & Social Science 19 (2016), 124--133.
[14]
Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, and James Landay. 2010. The Design of Eco-feedback Technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1999--2008.
[15]
Anton Gustafsson and Magnus Gyllenswärd. 2005. The Power-aware Cord: Energy Awareness Through Ambient Information Display. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1423--1426.
[16]
Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, and others. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 17--24.
[17]
J. Lassila, J. Haakana, V. Tikka, and J. Partanen. 2012. Methodology to Analyze the Economic Effects of Electric Cars as Energy Storages. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3, 1 (March 2012), 506--516.
[18]
Chunhua Liu, KT Chau, Chenxi Diao, J Zhong, Xiaodong Zhang, Shuang Gao, and Diyun Wu. 2010. A new DC micro-grid system using renewable energy and electric vehicles for smart energy delivery. In 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference. IEEE, 1--6.
[19]
Arne Meeuw, Sandro Schopfer, Benjamin Ryder, and Felix Wortmann. 2018. LokalPower: Enabling Local Energy Markets with User-Driven Engagement. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article LBW613, 6 pages.
[20]
Jim Motavalli. 2007, Retrieved: Dec 2019. Power to the People: Run Your House on a Prius. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/02/automobiles/02POWER.html
[21]
James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2012a. Beyond Energy Monitors: Interaction, Energy, and Emerging Energy Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 665--674.
[22]
James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2012b. The Local Energy Indicator: Designing for Wind and Solar Energy Systems in the Home. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 631--634.
[23]
Gareth Powells, Harriet Bulkeley, Sandra Bell, and Ellis Judson. 2014. Peak electricity demand and the flexibility of everyday life. Geoforum 55 (2014), 43--52.
[24]
Larissa Pschetz, Kruakae Pothong, and Chris Speed. 2019. Autonomous Distributed Energy Systems: Problematising the Invisible through Design, Drama and Deliberation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[25]
Larissa Pschetz, Ella Tallyn, Rory Gianni, and Chris Speed. 2017. Bitbarista: Exploring Perceptions of Data Transactions in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2964--2975.
[26]
Jane Ritchie, Jane Lewis, Carol McNaughton Nicholls, Rachel Ormston, and others. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. sage.
[27]
Will Simm, Maria Angela Ferrario, Adrian Friday, Peter Newman, Stephen Forshaw, Mike Hazas, and Alan Dix. 2015. Tiree Energy Pulse: Exploring Renewable Energy Forecasts on the Edge of the Grid. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1965--1974.
[28]
Paul Upham, Christian Oltra, and Àlex Boso. 2015. Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science 8 (2015), 100--112.
[29]
Rolf Wüstenhagen, Maarten Wolsink, and Mary Jean Bürer. 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy policy 35, 5 (2007), 2683--2691.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Year in Energy: Imagining Energy Community Participation with a Collaborative Design FictionProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685355(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Exploring Critical Scenarios of Algorithmic Energy Distribution with the Karma Kettle GameCompanion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563703.3596655(266-269)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2021)Climate Change Communication in HCI: a Visual Analysis of the Past DecadeProceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3450741.3466774(1-16)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Push-Pull Energy Futures: Using Design to Discuss Agency in Distributed Energy Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 2020
    2264 pages
    ISBN:9781450369749
    DOI:10.1145/3357236
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. autonomous systems
    2. decentralised systems
    3. der
    4. distributed energy
    5. interaction design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Research Councils UK

    Conference

    DIS '20
    Sponsor:
    DIS '20: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2020
    July 6 - 10, 2020
    Eindhoven, Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Year in Energy: Imagining Energy Community Participation with a Collaborative Design FictionProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685355(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2023)Exploring Critical Scenarios of Algorithmic Energy Distribution with the Karma Kettle GameCompanion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563703.3596655(266-269)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2021)Climate Change Communication in HCI: a Visual Analysis of the Past DecadeProceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3450741.3466774(1-16)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021
    • (2021)Enacting the Last Mile: Experiences of Smart Contracts in Courier DeliveriesProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445525(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media