Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3349263.3351333acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

The effect of incentives in driving simulator studies

Published: 21 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In driving experiments, incentives are used to establish a motivation for task performances. Usually, monetary rewards are used to achieve this. We focus on the question whether other rewards than money (an anoymous donation and social comparison) can achieve equal task performance results compared to monetary rewards. In a simulator experiment (n = 20) we could show that participants perform equal task performance among all conditions (monetary rewards, anonymous donation, comparative highscore) except the baseline (a score with no further meaning). This leads to the assumption that besides monetary rewards, other incentives may lead to the same performance in simulator studies.

References

[1]
Douglas Bernstein. 2018. Essentials of psychology. Cengage Learning.
[2]
Judy Cameron and WD Pierce. 1997. Rewards, interest and performance: an evaluation of experimental findings. ACA JOURNAL 6 (1997), 6--15.
[3]
Allan H Church. 1993. Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis. Public opinion quarterly 57, 1 (1993), 62--79.
[4]
Cihan Cobanoglu and Nesrin Cobanoglu. 2003. The effect of incentives in web surveys: application and ethical considerations. International Journal of Market Research 45, 4 (2003), 1--13.
[5]
Sarah Darby and others. 2006. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and direct Displays 486, 2006 (2006), 26.
[6]
Raymond De Young. 1985. Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. (1985).
[7]
Donald L Fisher, Matthew Rizzo, Jeffrey Caird, and John D Lee. 2011. Handbook of driving simulation for engineering, medicine, and psychology. CRC Press.
[8]
Jon Froehlich, Tawanna Dillahunt, Predrag Klasnja, Jennifer Mankoff, Sunny Consolvo, Beverly Harrison, and James A Landay. 2009. UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1043--1052.
[9]
Stefan Mattes. 2003. The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. Quality of Work and Products in Enterprises of the Future 57 (2003).
[10]
Jeffrey A Roberts, Il-Horn Hann, and Sandra A Slaughter. 2006. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management science 52, 7 (2006), 984--999.
[11]
Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology 25, 1 (2000), 54--67.
[12]
Anthony C Stein, R Wade Allen, and Stephen H Schwartz. 1978. Use of reward-penalty structures in human experimentation. (1978).
[13]
Jie Su, Peiji Shao, and Jiaminq Fang. 2008. Effect of incentives on web-based surveys. Tsinghua Science and Technology 13, 3 (2008), 344--347.
[14]
Peter Vorderer, Tilo Hartmann, and Christoph Klimmt. 2003. Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Entertainment computing. Carnegie Mellon University, 1--9.
[15]
John P Wanous, Thomas L Keon, and Janina C Latack. 1983. Expectancy theory and occupational/organizational choices: A review and test. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 32, 1 (1983), 66--86.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Playing guardian angelProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3365610.3365614(1-12)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings
September 2019
524 pages
ISBN:9781450369206
DOI:10.1145/3349263
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 September 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. driving simulator
  2. incentives
  3. task performance

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress

Funding Sources

  • Carl-Zeiss-Scholarship

Conference

AutomotiveUI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

Upcoming Conference

AutomotiveUI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Playing guardian angelProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3365610.3365614(1-12)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media