Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3306500.3313980acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Motivation and factors effecting the participation behavior in the urban crowdsourcing logistics: evidence from China

Published: 10 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Purpose- The booming development of the new business model of local e-commerce has challenged the distribution capability of traditional urban logistics company in China. Crowdsourcing logistics, as a new terminal logistics distribution mode, provide a new perspective to solve the local logistics bottleneck in E-commerce effectively. In order to apply and develop crowdsourcing logistics better and design an effective crowdsourcing logistics platform, a better understanding of the participation behavior to the crowdsourcing logistics is needed. The purpose of this paper is to use the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAU) as a framework to develop a model to identify the effective factors of the participation behavior to the crowdsourcing logistics.
Design/methodology/approach- To test the model, a survey of 296 respondents in China is undertaken. And to analyze the participation behavior to the crowdsourcing logistics from the survey data, the structural equation modeling(SEM) is used. Findings- The results indicated that performance expectancy and social influence positively affect the intention of participation; perceived risk negatively influence the intention of participation; the higher the intention of participation, the more participative behavior of crowdsourcing logistics; and facilitating conditions also an important factor that leads to more participative behavior.
Research Limitations/implications-This research is limited by the young adults sample and the website questionnaire platform that might confine the generalizability of the study. Also, additional variables need to be examined in order to better explain crowdsourcing logistic behavior. The result of the research provides insights for company related take-out O2O and logistic to build successful crowdsourcing model, engage young employees who are familiar with network in urban crowdsourcing logistic, and increase involvement in sharing economy.
Practical implications- The results of this research can help the management of the urban crowdsourcing logistics companies to understand the participative intention and behavior to their products and services of people, so that they can improve their business model and design an effective and attractive crowdsourcing logistics platform.
Originality/value- This study developed the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to better explain the participation behavior in the crowdsourcing logistics. And the paper develops an understanding of how crowdsourcing logistics platform should be improved and design to appeal more people to take part in the new logistics model.

References

[1]
Howe, Jeff. The Rise of Crowdsourcing{J}. Wired Magazine, 2006, 14(6):176-183.06 Jenkins H Convergence Culture Where Old & New Media Collide, 2006, 14(14):1--5.
[2]
Habibi Mohammad Reza, DavidsonAlexander, Laroche Michel. What managers should know about the sharing economy{J}. Business Horizons, 2017, 60(1):113--121.
[3]
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption{J}. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015.
[4]
Belk, R., You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(8):1595--1600.
[5]
Wosskow, D. Unlocking the sharing economy: An independent review. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. United Kingdom. 2014.
[6]
Moore, J. 2013. Shared purpose: A thousand business ecosystems, a connected community, and the future (1st ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
[7]
Williamson, P. J., & De Meyer, A. 2012. Ecosystem advantage: How to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Review, 55(1), 24--46.
[8]
Chanal V, Caron-Fasan M L. How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing : the Crowdspirit ® case{J}. Post-Print, 2008.
[9]
Saxton G., Oh O., Kishore R., Rules of Crowdsourcing: Models, Issues, and Systems of Control{J}. Information Systems Management, 2013, 30(1):2--20.
[10]
{Brabham D. C. Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving: An Introduction and Cases{J}. Convergence, 2008, 14(1):75--90.
[11]
Schenk E., Guittard C., Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices{J}. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2011, 7(1):93--107.
[12]
Ocicka Barbara, Wieteska Grażyna. Sharing economy in logistics and supply chain management{J}. LogForum. 2017, 13(2):183--193.
[13]
Grybaite Virginija, Stankeviciene Jelena. Motives for participation in the sharing economy-evidence from Lithuania{J}. Economics & Management. 2016, 8(4):7--17
[14]
Albors J., Ramos J. C., Hervas J. L., Newlearning network paradigms: Communities of objectives, crowdsourcing, wikis and open source{J}. International Journal of Information Management, 2008, 28(3): 194--202.
[15]
Brabham D. C. Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects{J}. Planning Theory, 2009, 8(3):242--262.
[16]
Gao H., Barbier G., Goolsby R., Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief{J}. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2011, 26(3):10--14.
[17]
Vukovic M. Crowdsourcing for Enterprises{C}. Services-I, 2009 World Conference on. 2009: 686--692.
[18]
Zhao Y., Zhu Q., Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction{J}. Information Systems Frontiers, 2014, 16(3):417--434.
[19]
Hossain M. Crowdsourcing in business and management disciplines: an integrative literature review{J}. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 2015, 5(1):1--19.
[20]
Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R., User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical model{J}. Management Science, 1998, 35(8):982--1002.
[21]
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior {J}. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2):179--211.
[22]
Fishbein M., Ajzen I., Belief attitude intention and behavior an introduction to theory and research {M}. Addison Wesley Reading, 1975.
[23]
Venkatesh V., Morris M., Davis G. B., User acceptance of information technology toward a unified view{J}. MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(3):425--478.
[24]
Williams M. D. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT):a literature review{J}. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2015, 28(3):443--488.
[25]
Wang Y. S., Hung Y. H., Chou S. C. T., Determinants of User Acceptance of E-Government Service: A Validation of the UTAUT{J}. 2006.
[26]
Kijsanayotin B., Pannarunothai S., Speedie S M., Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model{J}. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2009, 78(6):404--416.
[27]
Yu C S. Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the utaut model{J}. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2012, 13(2):104--121.
[28]
Gruzd A, Staves K, Wilk A. Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model{J}. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(6):2340--2350.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Analysis of Motivational Theories in Crowdsourcing Using Long Tail Theory: A Systematic Literature ReviewInternational Journal of Crowd Science10.26599/IJCS.2023.91000108:1(10-27)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Factors Influencing Crowdworkers’ Continued Participation Behavior in Crowdsourcing Logistics: A Textual Analysis of Comments from Online PlatformsSustainability10.3390/su15191415715:19(14157)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
  • (2021)Exploring the determinants of university students’ contribution intention on crowdsourcing platforms: a value maximization perspectiveInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2021.189061931:5(2612-2634)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
IC4E '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning
January 2019
469 pages
ISBN:9781450366021
DOI:10.1145/3306500
© 2019 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 January 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. SEM
  2. UTAUT
  3. crowdsourcing logistics
  4. participant behavior

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IC4E 2019

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Analysis of Motivational Theories in Crowdsourcing Using Long Tail Theory: A Systematic Literature ReviewInternational Journal of Crowd Science10.26599/IJCS.2023.91000108:1(10-27)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Factors Influencing Crowdworkers’ Continued Participation Behavior in Crowdsourcing Logistics: A Textual Analysis of Comments from Online PlatformsSustainability10.3390/su15191415715:19(14157)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
  • (2021)Exploring the determinants of university students’ contribution intention on crowdsourcing platforms: a value maximization perspectiveInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2021.189061931:5(2612-2634)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2021
  • (2020)Crowdsourcing for Sustainable Urban Logistics: Exploring the Factors Influencing Crowd Workers’ Participative BehaviorSustainability10.3390/su1208309112:8(3091)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2020

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media