Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2771839.2771917acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A value sensitive design approach to parental software for young children

Published: 21 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Parental control software enables parents to support risk-management of their children's digital media use. However, tools to support online opportunities are left unexplored. This paper presents an explorative inquiry into stakeholder values related to parental software for young children, using a Value Sensitive Design approach. By studying values, we aim to illuminate design of parental software solutions that are responsive to the issues families find most important. We engaged in value exploration of corporate and parental values, and conducted a workshop with the corporate stakeholders to align stakeholder values. The results highlight the importance of values such as 'control for safety' and 'involvement' in the development of parental software for young children. The contribution of this paper lies in the understanding of stakeholder needs and values concerning software tools that balance online risks and opportunities for young children.

References

[1]
Ames, M. G., Go, J., Kaye, J., and Spasojevic, M. Understanding technology choices and values through social class. Proc. CSCW 2011, 55--64.
[2]
Buckingham, D. Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
[3]
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. J., and Borning, A. Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang and D. F. Galletta, eds., Human-computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 2006, 348--372.
[4]
Glassey, R., Elliott, D., Polajnar, T., and Azzopardi, L. Interaction-based information filtering for children. Proc. IIiX 2010, 329--334.
[5]
Hashish, Y., Bunt, A., and Young, J. E. Involving Children in Content Control: A Collaborative and Education-Oriented Content Filtering Approach. Proc. CHI 2014, 1797--1806.
[6]
Iversen, O. S., Halskov, K., and Leong, T. W. Rekindling Values in Participatory Design. Proc. PDC 2010, 91--100.
[7]
Jeon, W., Lee, Y., and Won, D. Analysis of content filtering software. Proc. HI 2011, 548--557.
[8]
Kardes, F., Cronley, M., and Cline, T. Consumer Behavior. South-Western College Pub, 2010.
[9]
Knorr, C. New Parental Controls Nix the Fear, Up the Features. common sense media, 2014. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/blog/new-parental-controls-nix-the-fear-up-the-features.
[10]
Livingstone, S. Children & the Internet. Polity, Cambridge, 2009.
[11]
Mathiesen, K. The Internet, children, and privacy: the case against parental monitoring. Ethics and Information Technology 15, 4 (2013), 263--274.
[12]
Mendoza, K. Surveying Parental Mediation: Connections, Challenges and Questions for Media Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education 1, (2009), 28--41.
[13]
Nikken, P. and Jansz, J. Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, (2013).
[14]
Ofcom. Ofcom Report on Internet safety measures. Strategies of parental protection for children online. 2014.
[15]
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., Fraser, A. M., Dyer, W. J., and Yorgason, J. B. Parents and adolescents growing up in the digital age: Latent growth curve analysis of proactive media monitoring. Journal of Adolescence 35, (2012), 1153--1165.
[16]
Pruitt, J. and Adlin, T. The persona lifecycle: keeping people in mind throughout product design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2006.
[17]
Rokeach, M. The Nature of Human Values. Free Pr, 1973.
[18]
Schofield Clark, L. Parental Mediation Theory for the Digital Age. Communication Theory 21, (2011), 323--343.
[19]
Voida, A. and Mynatt, E. D. Conveying User Values Between Families and Designers. Proc. CHI 2005, 2013--2016.
[20]
Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., Deferrerre, E., and Van Looy, J. A Qualitative Inquiry into the Contextual Factors Determining Parental Mediation Practices of Young Children's Digital Media Use at Home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, (under review).
[21]
Zaman, B. and Vanden Abeele, V. Laddering with young children in User eXperience evaluations: theoretical groundings and a practical case. Proc. IDC 2010, 156--165.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring A Design Space for Digital Interventions Facilitating Early Adolescents’ Tech Disengagement: A Parent-Child PerspectiveProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685382(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)"It's hard for him to make choices sometimes and he needs guidance": Re-orienting Parental Control for ChildrenProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373598:CSCW1(1-51)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Developers’ Perspective of Diverse End User RequirementsEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_7(105-120)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A value sensitive design approach to parental software for young children

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IDC '15: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
    June 2015
    488 pages
    ISBN:9781450335904
    DOI:10.1145/2771839
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 June 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. child-computer interaction
    2. children
    3. digital media
    4. families
    5. parental software
    6. parenting
    7. value sensitive design
    8. values

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    IDC '15
    Sponsor:
    IDC '15: Interaction Design and Children
    June 21 - 24, 2015
    Massachusetts, Boston

    Acceptance Rates

    IDC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 103 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)74
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring A Design Space for Digital Interventions Facilitating Early Adolescents’ Tech Disengagement: A Parent-Child PerspectiveProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685382(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)"It's hard for him to make choices sometimes and he needs guidance": Re-orienting Parental Control for ChildrenProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373598:CSCW1(1-51)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Developers’ Perspective of Diverse End User RequirementsEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_7(105-120)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
    • (2023)How Can We Design Privacy-Friendly Apps for Children? Using a Research through Design Process to Understand Developers' Needs and ChallengesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100667:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Usability, Security, and Privacy Recommendations for Mobile Parental ControlProceedings of the 2023 European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference10.1145/3590777.3590800(138-143)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Do parental control tools fulfil family expectations for child protection? A rapid evidence review of the contexts and outcomes of useJournal of Children and Media10.1080/17482798.2023.226551218:1(29-49)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Runtime permissions for privacy in proactive intelligent assistantsProceedings of the Eighteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3563609.3563643(633-651)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2022
    • (2022)"It's come around way too quickly!" Can technology help parents provide support during menarche?Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3534568(1743-1757)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
    • (2022)‘ShishuShurokkha’: A Transformative Justice Approach for Combating Child Sexual Abuse in BangladeshProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517543(1-23)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Conducting Risky Research with TeensProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34329304:CSCW3(1-46)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media