Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2502081.2502179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Evaluation of salient point methods

Published: 21 October 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Processing visual content in images and videos is a challenging task associated with the development of modern computer vision. Because salient point approaches can represent distinctive and affine invariant points in images, many approaches have been proposed over the past decade. Each method has particular advantages and limitations and may be appropriate in different contexts. In this paper we evaluate the performance of a wide set of salient point detectors and descriptors. We begin by comparing diverse salient point algorithms (SIFT, SURF, BRIEF, ORB, FREAK, BRISK, STAR, GFTT and FAST) with regard to repeatability, recall and precision and then move to accuracy and stability in real-time video tracking.

References

[1]
Lowe, D G. 2004. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2), 91--110.
[2]
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., and Van Gool, L. 2008. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 110(3), 346--359.
[3]
Calonder, M., Lepetit, V., Strecha, C., and Fua, P. 2010. BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features. European Conference on Computer vision, 778--792.
[4]
Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., and Bradski, G. 2011. ORB: An Efficient Alternative to SIFT or SURF. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2564--2571.
[5]
Leutenegger, S., Chli, M., and Siegwart, R. 2011. BRISK: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2548--2555.
[6]
Alahi, A., Ortiz, R., and Vandergheynst, P. 2012. FREAK: Fast Retina Keypoint. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[7]
Schmid, C., Mohr, R., and Bauckhage, C. 2000. Evaluation of interest point detectors. International Journal Computer Vision, 37(2), 151--172.
[8]
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. 2005. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(10), 1615--1630.
[9]
Miksik, O., Mikolajczyk, K. 2012. Evaluation of Local Detectors and Descriptors for Fast Feature Matching. International Conference on Pattern Recogntion, 2681--2684.
[10]
Gauglitz, S., Höllerer, T., and Turk, M. 2011. Evaluation of interest point detectors and feature descriptors for visual tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision, 335--360.
[11]
Rosten, E., and Drummond, T. 2006. Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. European Conference on Computer Vision, 430--443.
[12]
Agrawal, M., Konolige, K., Blas, M. 2008. Censure: Center Surround Extremas for Realtime Feature Detection and Matching. European Conference on Computer Vision, 102--115.
[13]
Shi, J., and Tomasi, C. 1994. Good features to track. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 593--600.
[14]
Thomee, B., and Lew, M.S. 2012. Interactive search in image retrieval: a survey. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 1(2), 71--86.
[15]
Jiang, Y., Bhattacharya, S., Chang, S-F., and Shah, M. 2013. High-level event recognition in unconstrained videos. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 2(2), 73--101.
[16]
Kim, T-K., Wong, S-F., and Cipolla, R. 2007. Tensor Canonical Correlation Analysis for Action Classification, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)A comprehensive evaluation of local detectors and descriptorsSignal Processing: Image Communication10.1016/j.image.2017.06.01059(150-167)Online publication date: Nov-2017
  • (2015)A High-Performance FPGA-Based Image Feature Detector and Matcher Based on the FAST and BRIEF AlgorithmsInternational Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems10.5772/6143412:10(141)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2015

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MM '13: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia
October 2013
1166 pages
ISBN:9781450324045
DOI:10.1145/2502081
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 October 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. evaluation
  2. salient point methods
  3. video tracking

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

MM '13
Sponsor:
MM '13: ACM Multimedia Conference
October 21 - 25, 2013
Barcelona, Spain

Acceptance Rates

MM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 47 of 235 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)A comprehensive evaluation of local detectors and descriptorsSignal Processing: Image Communication10.1016/j.image.2017.06.01059(150-167)Online publication date: Nov-2017
  • (2015)A High-Performance FPGA-Based Image Feature Detector and Matcher Based on the FAST and BRIEF AlgorithmsInternational Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems10.5772/6143412:10(141)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media