research-article

StegoTorus: a camouflage proxy for the Tor anonymity system

Authors:

Zachary Weinberg,

Vinod Yegneswaran,

Linda Briesemeister,

Dan BonehAuthors Info & Claims

CCS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer and communications security

Pages 109 - 120

https://doi.org/10.1145/2382196.2382211

Published: 16 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Internet censorship by governments is an increasingly common practice worldwide. Internet users and censors are locked in an arms race: as users find ways to evade censorship schemes, the censors develop countermeasures for the evasion tactics. One of the most popular and effective circumvention tools, Tor, must regularly adjust its network traffic signature to remain usable.

We present StegoTorus, a tool that comprehensively disguises Tor from protocol analysis. To foil analysis of packet contents, Tor's traffic is steganographed to resemble an innocuous cover protocol, such as HTTP. To foil analysis at the transport level, the Tor circuit is distributed over many shorter-lived connections with per-packet characteristics that mimic cover-protocol traffic. Our evaluation demonstrates that StegoTorus improves the resilience of Tor to fingerprinting attacks and delivers usable performance.

References

[1]

Adobe Systems Incorporated. SWF File Format Specification (version 10), 2008. https://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf.html.

[2]

Albrecht, M. R., Paterson, K. G., and Watson, G. J. Plaintext Recovery Attacks against SSH. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2009), pp. 16--26.

Digital Library

[3]

Alexa. Top Sites by Category. Data set, 2011. http://www.alexa.com/topsites/category.

[4]

Bar-Yanai, R., Langberg, M., Peleg, D., and Roditty, L. Realtime Classification for Encrypted Traffic. In Experimental Algorithms (2010), vol. 6049 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 373--385.

Digital Library

[5]

Bard, G. V. The Vulnerability of SSL to Chosen Plaintext Attack. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2004/111, 2004. http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/111.

[6]

Bard, G. V. A Challenging but Feasible Blockwise-Adaptive Chosen-Plaintext Attack on SSL. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2006/136, 2006. http://eprint.iacr.org/2006/136.

[7]

Bellare, M., and Namprempre, C. Authenticated Encryption: Relations among Notions and Analysis of the Generic Composition Paradigm. J. Cryptology 21, 4 (2008), 469--491.

Digital Library

[8]

Bissias, G. D., Liberatore, M., Jensen, D., and Levine, B. N. Privacy vulnerabilities in encrypted HTTP streams. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2006), vol. 3856 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1--11.

Digital Library

[9]

Black, J., and Urtubia, H. Side-Channel Attacks on Symmetric Encryption Schemes: The Case for Authenticated Encryption. In Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Security Symposium (2002), pp. 327--338. http://www.usenix.org/event/sec02/full_papers/black/black_html/.

Digital Library

[10]

Böhme, R. Advanced Statistical Steganalysis. Springer, 2010. http://www.springer.com/book/978-3-642-14312-0.

Digital Library

[11]

Burnett, S., Feamster, N., and Vempala, S. Chipping Away at Censorship Firewalls with User-Generated Content. In Proceedings of the 19th USENIX Security Symposium (2010), pp. 453--468. http://www.usenix.org/events/sec10/tech/full_papers/Burnett.pdf.

Digital Library

[12]

Caballero, J., Yin, H., Liang, Z., and Song, D. Polyglot: Automatic extraction of protocol format using dynamic binary analysis. In 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (2007), pp. 317--329.

Digital Library

[13]

Celine, H. Quoted in Leviathan, Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson, Dell Publishing, 1975.

[14]

claffy, k., Andersen, D., and Hick, P. The CAIDA Anonymized Internet Traces Equinix, Chicago, 17 Feb 2011. Data set, 2011. http://www.caida.org/data/passive/passive_2011_dataset.xml.

[15]

Cui, W., Kannan, J., and Wang, H. J. Discoverer: Automatic protocol reverse engineering from network traces. In Proceedings of the 16th USENIX Security Symposium (2007), pp. 199--212. http://www.usenix.org/events/sec07/tech/cui.html.

Digital Library

[16]

Deibert, R. J., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., and Zittrain, J. Global Internet Filtering Map and Regional Summaries, 2011. http://map.opennet.net/.

[17]

Dierks, T., and Allen, C. The TLS Protocol, Version 1.0. RFC 2246, 1999. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2246.

Digital Library

[18]

Diffie, W., Oorschot, P. C., and Wiener, M. J. Authentication and authenticated key exchanges. Designs, Codes and Cryptography 2 (1992), 107--125. http://sites.google.com/site/michaeljameswiener/STS.pdf.

Digital Library

[19]

Dingledine, R. Behavior for bridge users, bridge relays, and bridge authorities. Tor Proposal #125, 2007. https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/125-bridges.txt.

[20]

Dingledine, R. Iran blocks Tor; Tor releases same-day fix. Tor Project official blog, 2011. https://blog.torproject.org/blog/iranblocks-tor-tor-releases-same-day-fix.

[21]

Dingledine, R. Obfsproxy: the next step in the censorship arms race. Tor Project official blog, 2012. https://blog.torproject.org/blog/obfsproxy-next-step-censorship-arms-race.

[22]

Dingledine, R., and Mathewson, N. Tor Protocol Specification. The Tor Project, 2003--2011. https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/84ec5aca5f5735f445840f6f574842b71365bbde:/torspec.txt.

[23]

Dingledine, R., and Mathewson, N. Design of a blocking-resistant anonymity system. Tech. rep., The Tor Project, 2006. https://svn.torproject.org/svn/projects/designpaper/blocking.pdf.

[24]

Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N., and Syverson, P. Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router. In Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Security Symposium (2004), pp. 303--320. http://www.usenix.org/events/sec04/tech/dingledine.html.

Digital Library

[25]

Dworkin, M. Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC. NIST Special Publication 800-38D, 2007. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-38D/SP-800-38D.pdf.

Digital Library

[26]

Dynamic Internet Technology Inc. DynaWeb. Proxy service, 2002. http://www.dit-inc.us/dynaweb

[27]

Feamster, N., Balazinska, M., Harfst, G., Balakrishnan, H., and Karger, D. Infranet: Circumventing Web Censorship and Surveillance. In Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Security Symposium (2002), pp. 247--262. http://www.usenix.org/events/sec02/feamster.html.

Digital Library

[28]

Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and Berners-Lee, T. Hypertext Transfer Protocol--HTTP/1.1. RFC 2616, 1999. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616.

Digital Library

[29]

Fifield, D., Hardison, N., Ellithorpe, J., Stark, E., Dingledine, R., Porras, P., and Boneh, D. Evading Censorship with Browser-Based Proxies. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2012), vol. 7384 of Lecture Notes on Computer Science, pp. 239--258. https://crypto.stanford.edu/flashproxy/flashproxy.pdf.

Digital Library

[30]

Fisk, G., Fisk, M., Papadopoulos, C., and Neil, J. Eliminating Steganography in Internet Traffic with Active Wardens. In Information Hiding (2003), vol. 2578 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 18--35. http://www.woozle.org/~mfisk/papers/ih02.pdf.

Digital Library

[31]

Gilmore, J. Quoted in "First Nation in Cyberspace" by Philip Elmer-Dewitt. TIME Magazine, December 1993.

[32]

Guan, Y., Fu, X., Xuan, D., Shenoy, P. U., Bettati, R., and Zhao, W. NetCamo: Camouflaging Network Traffic for QoS-Guaranteed Mission Critical Applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 31, 4 (2001), 253--265.

Digital Library

[33]

Haselton, B., et al. Peacefire: Open Access for the Net Generation. Web site, 1995--2012. http://www.peacefire.org/info/about-peacefire.shtml.

[34]

Hemminger, S. Network Emulation with NetEm. In linux.conf.au (2005). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.67.1687&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

[35]

Herrmann, D., Wendolsky, R., and Federrath, H. Website Fingerprinting: Attacking Popular Privacy Enhancing Technologies with the Multinomial Naïve-Bayes Classifier. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM workshop on Cloud computing security (2009), pp. 31--42.

Digital Library

[36]

Hintz, A. Fingerprinting websites using traffic analysis. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2003), vol. 2482 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 229--233.

Digital Library

[37]

Hopper, N. J., Langford, J., and von Ahn, L. Provably Secure Steganography. In Advances in Cryptology -- CRYPTO (2002), vol. 2442 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 119--123.

Digital Library

[38]

Houmansadr, A., Nguyen, G. T., Caesar, M., and Borisov, N. Cirripede: Circumvention Infrastructure using Router Redirection with Plausible Deniability. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security (2011), pp. 187--200.

Digital Library

[39]

Josefsson, S. The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings. RFC 4648, 2006. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4648.

[40]

Karlin, J., Ellard, D., Jackson, A., Jones, C. E., Lauer, G., Makins, D. P., and Strayer, W. T. Decoy Routing: Toward Unblockable Internet Communication. In USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (2011). https://db.usenix.org/events/foci11/tech/final_files/Karlin.pdf.

[41]

Köpsell, S., and Hillig, U. How to Achieve Blocking Resistance for Existing Systems Enabling Anonymous Web Surfing. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society (2004), pp. 47--58. https://gnunet.org/sites/default/files/koepsell-wpes2004_0.pdf.

Digital Library

[42]

Krawczyk, H. Cryptographic Extraction and Key Derivation: The HKDF Scheme. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2010/264, 2010. http://eprint.iacr.org/2010/264.

Digital Library

[43]

Leech, M., Ganis, M., Lee, Y.-D., Kuris, R., Koblas, D., and Jones, L. SOCKS Protocol Version 5. RFC 1928, 1996. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1928.

Digital Library

[44]

Lin, Z., Jiang, X., Xu, D., and Zhang, X. Automatic Protocol Format Reverse Engineering through Context-Aware Monitored Execution. In 15th Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security (2008). http://www.isoc.org/isoc/conferences/ndss/08/papers/14_automatic_protocol_format.pdf.

[45]

Lincoln, P., Mason, I., Porras, P., Yegneswaran, V., Weinberg, Z., Massar, J., Simpson, W. A., Vixie, P., and Boneh, D. Bootstrapping Communications into an Anti-Censorship System. In 2nd USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (2012). https://www.usenix.org/conference/foci12/bootstrapping-communications-anti-censorship-system.

[46]

Maier, G., Feldmann, A., Paxson, V., and Allman, M. On Dominant Characteristics of Residential Broadband Internet Traffic. In Proceedings of the Ninth Internet Measurement Conference (2009), pp. 90--102. http://www.icir.org/vern/papers/imc102-maier.pdf.

Digital Library

[47]

Mathewson, N. Pluggable Transports for Circumvention. Tor Proposal #180, 2010-2011. https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/180-pluggable-transport.txt.

[48]

Mathewson, N. Tor and Circumvention: Lessons Learned. Invited talk at the 4th USENIX Workshop on Large-Scale Exploits and Emergent Threats (LEET), 2011. http://www.usenix.org/event/leet11/tech/slides/mathewson.pdf.

[49]

McGill, R., Tukey, J. W., and Larsen, W. A. Variations of Box Plots. The American Statistician 32, 1 (1978), 12--16. http://www.jstor.org/pss/2683468.

[50]

McLachlan, J., and Hopper, N. On the risks of serving whenever you surf: vulnerabilities in Tor's blocking resistance design. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society (2009), pp. 31--40.

Digital Library

[51]

Moghaddam, H. M., Li, B., Derakhshani, M., and Goldberg, I. SkypeMorph: Protocol Obfuscation for Tor Bridges. Tech. rep., University of Waterloo, 2012. http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2012/cacr2012-08.pdf.

[52]

Moller, B. A Public-Key Encryption Scheme with Pseudo-random Ciphertexts. In Computer Security -- ESORICS (2004), vol. 3193 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 335--351. http://www.bmoeller.de/pdf/pke-pseudo-esorics2004.pdf.

[53]

Murdoch, S. J., and Danezis, G. Low-Cost Traffic Analysis of Tor. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2005), pp. 183--195.

Digital Library

[54]

NIST. Digital Signature Standard. FIPS 186-2, 2000. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/archive/fips186-2/fips186-2.pdf.

[55]

Nottingham, M. Making HTTP Pipelining Usable on the Open Web. Internet-Draft, 2011. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draftnottingham-http-pipeline.

[56]

Ohling, F., Schoen, S., adam or aco, et al. How to Bypass Internet Censorship. FLOSS Manuals, 2011. http://en.flossmanuals.net/bypassing-censorship/.

[57]

Panchenko, A., Niessen, L., Zinnen, A., and Engel, T. Website Fingerprinting in Onion Routing Based Anonymization Networks. In Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society (2011), pp. 103--114.

Digital Library

[58]

Perry, M. Experimental Defense for Website Traffic Fingerprinting. Tor Project official blog, 2011. https://blog.torproject.org/blog/experimentaldefense-website-traffic-fingerprinting.

[59]

Pfitzmann, A., and Hansen, M. A terminology for talking about privacy by data minimization: Anonymity, Unlinkability, Undetectability, Unobservability, Pseudonymity, and Identity Management, 2010. v0.34. http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/literatur/Anon_Terminology_v0.34.pdf.

[60]

Price, M., Enayat, M., et al. Persian cyberspace report: internet blackouts across Iran. Iran Media Program news bulletin, 2012. http://iranmediaresearch.com/en/blog/101/12/02/09/840.

[61]

R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011. http://www.R-project.org/.

[62]

Rogaway, P. Nonce-Based Symmetric Encryption. In Fast Software Encryption (2004), vol. 3017 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 348--359. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.76.2964&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

[63]

Ross, A. Quoted in "Hillary Clinton adviser compares Internet to Che Guevara" by Josh Halliday. The Guardian, June 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/22/hillaryclinton-adviser-alec-ross.

[64]

Sun, Q., Simon, D. R., Wang, Y.-M., Russell, W., Padmanabhan, V. N., and Qiu, L. Statistical identification of encrypted Web browsing traffic. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2002), pp. 19--30.

Digital Library

[65]

UltraReach Internet Corp. Ultrasurf. Proxy service, 2001. http://www.ultrasurf.us/.

[66]

von Ahn, L., and Hopper, N. J. Public-Key Steganography. In Advances in Cryptology -- EUROCRYPT (2004), vol. 3027 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 323--341.

[67]

Wang, X., Luo, J., Yang, M., and Ling, Z. A potential HTTP-based application-level attack against Tor. Future Generation Computer Systems 27 (2011), 67--77.

Digital Library

[68]

White, A. M., Matthews, A. R., Snow, K. Z., and Monrose, F. Phonotactic Reconstruction of Encrypted VoIP Conversations: Hookt on Fon-iks. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2011), pp. 3--18. https://www.cs.unc.edu/~amw/resources/hooktonfoniks.pdf.

Digital Library

[69]

Wickham, H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer New York, 2009. http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/book.

Digital Library

[70]

Wilde, T. Knock Knock Knockin' on Bridges' Doors. Tor Project official blog, 2012. https://blog.torproject.org/blog/knock-knock-knockin-bridges-doors.

[71]

Wiley, B. Dust: A Blocking-Resistant Internet Transport Protocol, 2010. http://blanu.net/Dust.pdf.

[72]

Wustrow, E., Wolchok, S., Goldberg, I., and Halderman, J. A. Telex: Anticensorship in the Network Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 20th USENIX Security Symposium (2011), pp. 459--473. http://www.usenix.org/events/sec11/tech/full_papers/Wustrow.pdf.

Digital Library

[73]

Yeo, V. Green Dam enforcement watered down. ZDNet Asia (October 2009). http://www.zdnetasia.com/green-dam-enforcementwatered-down-62058509.htm.

Cited By

Zillien SSchmidbauer TKubek MKeller JWendzel SQuek TGao DZhou JCardenas A(2024)Look What’s There! Utilizing the Internet’s Existing Data for Censorship Circumvention with OPPRESSIONProceedings of the 19th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3634737.3637676(80-95)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3634737.3637676
Umayya ZMalik DGosain DKumar Sharma PMontpetit MLeivadeas AUhlig SJaved M(2023)PTPerf: On the Performance Evaluation of Tor Pluggable TransportsProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624817(501-525)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3618257.3624817
Fischlin MMeng WJensen CCremers CKirda E(2023)Stealth Key Exchange and Confined Access to the Record Protocol Data in TLS 1.3Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3576915.3623099(2901-2914)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576915.3623099
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

StegoTorus: a camouflage proxy for the Tor anonymity system
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Computing / technology policy
    1. Commerce policy
      1. Transborder data flow

Recommendations

SkypeMorph: protocol obfuscation for Tor bridges
CCS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer and communications security

The Tor network is designed to provide users with low-latency anonymous communications. Tor clients build circuits with publicly listed relays to anonymously reach their destinations. However, since the relays are publicly listed, they can be easily ...
User awareness and tolerance of privacy abuse on mobile Internet

User awareness regarding privacy abuse.Mobile market development.Influential factors on user awareness regarding internet content blocking.Relationship between country level development and the user tolerance regarding privacy abuse. The paper presents ...
A More Private & Secure E-Mail System using Image Steganography (EPS) and Data Mining
AICTC '16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Information Communication Technology & Computing

Data mining is a practice of automatically exploring and analysis of large quantities of data in order to discover valid, potentially useful and understandable patterns in data [1]. The data provided may contain private and user sensitive data leads to ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CCS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer and communications security

October 2012

1088 pages

ISBN:9781450316514

DOI:10.1145/2382196

General Chair:
Ting Yu
North Carolina State University, USA
,
Program Chairs:
George Danezis
Microsoft Research Cambridge, UK
,
Virgil Gligor
Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Copyright © 2012 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 October 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CCS'12

Sponsor:

SIGSAC

CCS'12: the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security

October 16 - 18, 2012

North Carolina, Raleigh, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,261 of 6,999 submissions, 18%

Upcoming Conference

CCS '24

Sponsor:
sigsac

ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

October 14 - 18, 2024

Salt Lake City , UT , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

79
Total Citations
View Citations
986
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)53
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zillien SSchmidbauer TKubek MKeller JWendzel SQuek TGao DZhou JCardenas A(2024)Look What’s There! Utilizing the Internet’s Existing Data for Censorship Circumvention with OPPRESSIONProceedings of the 19th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3634737.3637676(80-95)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3634737.3637676
Umayya ZMalik DGosain DKumar Sharma PMontpetit MLeivadeas AUhlig SJaved M(2023)PTPerf: On the Performance Evaluation of Tor Pluggable TransportsProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624817(501-525)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3618257.3624817
Fischlin MMeng WJensen CCremers CKirda E(2023)Stealth Key Exchange and Confined Access to the Record Protocol Data in TLS 1.3Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3576915.3623099(2901-2914)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576915.3623099
Sun ZShmatikov V(2023)Telepath: A Minecraft-based Covert Communication System2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179335(2223-2237)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179335
Jiang XWang YDing YLi ZWang HLiang H(2023)Semi-shadow file system: An anonymous files storage solutionPeer-to-Peer Networking and Applications10.1007/s12083-023-01573-y17:1(18-32)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-023-01573-y
Li SHong XFeng Y(2023)MuChat against active attacks, passive attacks, and traffic analysis methods: a free convert chat application for instant communication on mobileCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-023-04070-227:3(2653-2671)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-023-04070-2
Joshi PDinesha H(2023)Study Report of Tor Antiforensic TechniquesProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cognitive and Intelligent Computing10.1007/978-981-99-2742-5_9(81-91)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2742-5_9
Liu LYu HYu SYu X(2022)Network Traffic Obfuscation against Traffic ClassificationSecurity and Communication Networks10.1155/2022/31043922022(1-14)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3104392
Ding DJeong KXing SConti MFigueiredo RLiu F(2022)SEnD: A Social Network Friendship Enhanced Decentralized System to Circumvent CensorshipsIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2019.294259815:1(346-360)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2019.2942598
Sheikh MPeng Y(2022)Procedures, Criteria, and Machine Learning Techniques for Network Traffic Classification: A SurveyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.318113510(61135-61158)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3181135
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents