Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1999747.1999787acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of team-based learning on a CS1 course

Published: 27 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Many active learning techniques have been used and described over the years, including team-based learning (TBL). While this technique is well established, it is only recently that analyses that compare it to other teaching techniques have been reported. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of team-based learning on two major concerns for computer science instructors: the drop/attrition rates, and students' success in CS1. The results show some major improvements both in terms of the drop rate and students' success, as measured by final exam grades. For example, the number of students obtaining 50% or more on the final exam has increased from 54% to 75.5%. Moreover, the drop rate has decreased from more than 30% to 6.4%.

References

[1]
Beaubouef, T., Mason J. 2005. Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations. SIGCSE Bull., 37 (2), 103--106, ACM Press (2005). DOI = http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1083431.1083474
[2]
Beck, J., Buckner, B., and Nikolova, O. 2007. Using interdisciplinary bioinformatics undergraduate research to recruit and retain computer science students. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 07 - 11, 2007). SIGCSE '07. ACM, New York, NY, 358--361. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1227310.1227436
[3]
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York. David McKay Co Inc. (http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html)
[4]
Chung, E. K., Rhee, J. A., Baik Y. H., A O. S. 2009. The effect of team-based learning in medical ethics education. Med. Teach. 31, 11 (Nov 2009), 1013--7.
[5]
Clark, C. C., Nguyen, H. T., Bray, C., Levine R. E. 2008. Team-Based Learning in an Undergraduate Nursing Course. J. Nursing Education. 47/3 (March 2008).
[6]
Eagle, M. and Barnes, T. 2008. Wu's castle: teaching arrays and loops in a game. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Madrid, Spain, June 30 - July 02, 2008). ITiCSE '08. ACM, New York, NY, 245--249. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1384271.1384337
[7]
Edmondson, C. 2008. Teaching tales: some student perceptions of computing education. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 4 (Nov. 2008), 103--106. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1473195.1473232
[8]
Gonzalez, G. 2006. A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 03 - 05, 2006). SIGCSE '06. ACM, New York, NY, 133--137. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1121341.1121386
[9]
Hamer, J., Cutts, Q., Jackova, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., McCartney, R., Purchase, H., Riedesel, C., Saeli, M., Sanders, K., and Sheard, J. 2008. Contributing student pedagogy. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 4 (Nov. 2008), 194--212. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1473195.1473242
[10]
Hillyard, C., Angotti, R., Panitz, M., Sung, K., Nordlinger, J., and Goldstein, D. 2010. Game-themed programming assignments for faculty: a case study. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, March 10 - 13, 2010). SIGCSE '10. ACM, New York, NY, 270--274. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1734263.1734358
[11]
Howles, T. 2007. Preliminary results of a longitudinal study of computer science student trends, behaviors and preferences. J. Comput. Small Coll. 22, 6 (Jun. 2007), 18--27.
[12]
Kinnunen, P. and Malmi, L. 2006. Why students drop out CS1 course? In Proceedings of the Second international Workshop on Computing Education Research (Canterbury, United Kingdom, September 09 - 10, 2006). ICER '06. ACM, New York, NY, 97--108. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1151588.1151604
[13]
Koles, P., Nelson, S., Stolfi, A., Parmelee, D., Destephen, D. 2005. Active learning in a Year 2 pathology curriculum. Med. Educ. 39,10 (Oct 2005) 1045--55.
[14]
Lasserre, P. 2009. Adaptation of team-based learning on a first term programming class. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Paris, France, July 06 - 09, 2009). ITiCSE '09. ACM, New York, NY, 186--190. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1562877.1562937
[15]
Luxton-Reilly, A. and Denny, P. 2009. A simple framework for interactive games in CS1. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Chattanooga, TN, USA, March 04 - 07, 2009). SIGCSE '09. ACM, New York, NY, 216--220. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1508865.1508947
[16]
McKinney, D. and Denton, L. F. 2006. Developing collaborative skills early in the CS curriculum in a laboratory environment. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Houston, Texas, USA, March 03 - 05, 2006). SIGCSE '06. ACM, New York, NY, 138--142. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1121341.1121387
[17]
Michaelsen, L. K., Knight A. B., and Fink D. L. 2004. Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Stylus Publishing. Sterling VA.
[18]
Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E., Black, R. H. (1989) A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,5 (Oct. 1989) 834--839.
[19]
Ostafichuck P., Hodgson A. 2007. Standing on Our Heads: How Teaching Engineering Design Looks Different from a Team-based Learning Perspective. TBL Conference. Vancouver (June 2007) (http://tbl.apsc.ubc.ca/conferences/2007/#h).
[20]
Schulte, C. and Knobelsdorf, M. 2007. Attitudes towards computer science-computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to computer science. In Proceedings of the Third international Workshop on Computing Education Research (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, September 15 - 16, 2007). ICER '07. ACM, New York, NY, 27--38. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1288580.1288585
[21]
Thompson, B. M., Schneider, P. H., Levine, R. E., McMahon, K. K., Perkowski, l. C., Richards, B. F. 2007. Team-based learning at ten medical schools: two years later. Med. Educ. 41,3 (March 2007) 250--257.
[22]
Trytten D. A. 2005. A design for team peer code review. SIGCSE Bull. 37, 1 (February 2005), 455--459. DOI=10.1145/1047124.1047492 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1047124.1047492
[23]
Whittington K. J. 2007 Understanding the TBL divide; examining similarities and differences between writing and programming. TBL conference. Vancouver (June 2007) (http://tbl.apsc.ubc.ca/conferences/2007/#1)

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Supporting Collaboration in Introductory Programming Classes Taught in Hybrid Mode: A Participatory Design StudyProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596042(1248-1262)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Online Team-based Learning for Productivity Management Module2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00077(436-440)Online publication date: Dec-2022
  • (2021)The effect of gender on student self-assessment in introductory computer science classesJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3447080.344709236:3(102-110)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '11: Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
June 2011
418 pages
ISBN:9781450306973
DOI:10.1145/1999747
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. active learning
  2. cs1
  3. drop rate
  4. success rate
  5. team-based learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Supporting Collaboration in Introductory Programming Classes Taught in Hybrid Mode: A Participatory Design StudyProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596042(1248-1262)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Online Team-based Learning for Productivity Management Module2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00077(436-440)Online publication date: Dec-2022
  • (2021)The effect of gender on student self-assessment in introductory computer science classesJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3447080.344709236:3(102-110)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Enhancing postgraduate students’ technical skills: perceptions of modified team-based learning in a six-week multi-subject Bootcamp-style CS courseComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2021.195917433:2(186-210)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Evaluating the Benefits of Team-Based Learning in a Systems Programming Class2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274183(1-7)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2020
  • (2019)Interactive Peer-Led Code Reviews In CS2 CurriculaProceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3287324.3287442(659-665)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
  • (2018)Introductory programming: a systematic literature reviewProceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3293881.3295779(55-106)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
  • (2018)Active Learning in a Discrete Mathematics ClassProceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3159450.3159604(828-833)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2018
  • (2017)Changing a Generation’s Way of Thinking: Teaching Computational Thinking Through ProgrammingReview of Educational Research10.3102/003465431771009687:4(834-860)Online publication date: 23-May-2017
  • (2017)Learning DimensionsProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3059009.3059046(299-304)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media