Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1879141.1879165acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Eyeball ASes: from geography to connectivity

Published: 01 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to determine the geographical footprint of individual Autonomous Systems that directly provide service to end-users, i.e., eyeball ASes. The key idea is to leverage the geo-location of end-users associated with an eyeball AS to identify its geographical footprint. We leverage the kernel density estimation method to estimate the density of users across individual eyeball ASes. This method enables us to cope with the potential error associated with the location of individual end-users while controlling the level of aggregation among data points to capture a geo-footprint at the desired resolution. We use the resulting geo-footprint of individual eyeball ASes to identify their likely Point-of-Presence (PoP) locations. To demonstrate our proposed technique, we use the inferred geo-locations of 48 million users from three popular P2P applications and assess the geo- and PoP-level footprints of 1233 eyeball ASes. The validation of the identified PoP locations by our technique against online information and prior results by a commonly-used technique based on traceroute shows a very high accuracy. Leveraging the acquired PoP locations, we examine the implications of geo-footprint of eyeball ASes on their connectivity to the rest of the Internet. In particular, we present a case study that reveals a much more complex picture of AS-level connectivity as compared to what the more traditional but geography-agnostic BGP- or traceroute-based approaches depict.

References

[1]
B. Augustin, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. IXPs: Mapped? In ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference, Nov. 2009.
[2]
Z. Botev, J. Grotowski, and D. Kroese. Kernel Density Estimation via Diffusion. Annals of Statistics, 2010.
[3]
The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA). AS relationships. http://www.caida.org/data/active/as-relationships.
[4]
H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W. Willinger. Internet connectivity at the as-level: An optimization-driven modeling approach. In ACM SIGCOMM MoMeTools Workshop, Aug. 2003.
[5]
K. Chen, D. Choffnes, R. Potharaju, Y. Chen, F. Bustamante, D. Pei, and Y. Zhao. Where the Sidewalk Ends: Extending the Internet AS Graph Using Traceroutes From P2P Users. In ACM CoNEXT, Dec. 2009.
[6]
A. Dhamdhere and C. Dovrolis. An agent-based model for the evolution of the internet ecosystem. In COMmunication Systems And NETworks, July 2009.
[7]
B. Eriksson, P. Barford, J. Sommers and R. Nowak. A Learning-based Approach to IP Geolocation. In Passive and Active Measurement conference, Apr. 2010.
[8]
P. Faratin, D. Clark, P. Gilmore, and A. Berger. Complexity of internet interconnections: Technology, incentives and implications for policy. In Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Sept. 2007.
[9]
Hexasoft. IP2Location. http://www.ip2location.com/aboutus.aspx.
[10]
Y. Hyun. Archipelago Infrastructure. http://www.caida.org/projects/ark.
[11]
R. Ma, D. Chiu, J. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein. Interconnecting eyeballs to content: a shapley value perspective on isp peering and settlement. In ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Economics of networked systems, Aug. 2008.
[12]
R. Ma, D. Chiu, J. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein. On cooperative settlement between content, transit and eyeball internet service providers. In ACM CoNEXT, Dec. 2008.
[13]
P. Mahadevan, C. Hubble, B. Huffaker, D. Krioukov, and A. Vahdat. Orbis: Rescaling Degree Correlations to Generate Annotated Internet Topologies. In ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2007.
[14]
P. Mahadevan, D. Krioukov, K. Fall, and A. Vahdat. Systematic Topology Analysis and Generation Using Degree Correlations,. In ACM SIGCOMM, Sept. 2006.
[15]
P. Mahadevan, D. Krioukov, M. Fomenkov, B. Huffaker, and X. Dimitropoulos. The Internet AS-level topology: Three data sources and one definitive metric. Computer Communication Review, 36(1):17--26, 2006.
[16]
Maxmind. GeoIP. http://www.maxmind.com/app/ip-locate.
[17]
W. B. Norton. The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem. http://tinyurl.com/39rwjwc, 2003.
[18]
U. of Oregon. RouteViews Project. http://www.routeviews.org/.
[19]
R. Oliveira, D. Pei, W. Willinger, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. The (in)completeness of the observed internet as-level structure. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 18(1):109 --122, Feb. 2010.
[20]
Y. Shavitt. The DIMES Project. http://www.netdimes.org.
[21]
Y. Shavitt and N. Zilberman. A Structural Approach for PoP Geo-Location. In IEEE Workshop on Network Science For Communication Networks, Mar. 2010.
[22]
S. Siwpersad, B. Gueye, and S. Uhlig. Assessing the geographic resolution of exhaustive tabulation for geolocating Internet hosts. In Passive and Active Measurement conference, Apr. 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Analysis of Inter-regional Relationship among Regional Tier-1 ASes in the Internet2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00210(1417-1422)Online publication date: Jul-2021
  • (2019)How Cloud Traffic Goes HidingProceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3355369.3355602(202-216)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Rasch analysis of HTTPS reachability2018 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops10.23919/IFIPNetworking.2018.8696525(1-9)Online publication date: May-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IMC '10: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
November 2010
496 pages
ISBN:9781450304832
DOI:10.1145/1879141
  • Program Chair:
  • Mark Allman
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • USENIX Assoc: USENIX Assoc

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. as geography
  2. autonomous system (AS)
  3. eyeball AS
  4. point-of-presence (POP)

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IMC '10
IMC '10: Internet Measurement Conference
November 1 - 30, 2010
Melbourne, Australia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 277 of 1,083 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Analysis of Inter-regional Relationship among Regional Tier-1 ASes in the Internet2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)10.1109/COMPSAC51774.2021.00210(1417-1422)Online publication date: Jul-2021
  • (2019)How Cloud Traffic Goes HidingProceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3355369.3355602(202-216)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Rasch analysis of HTTPS reachability2018 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops10.23919/IFIPNetworking.2018.8696525(1-9)Online publication date: May-2018
  • (2018)On the African Peering Connectivity Revealable via BGP Route Collectorse-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries10.1007/978-3-319-98827-6_35(368-376)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2018
  • (2017)Methods and Techniques for Measurements in the InternetPerformance Evaluation for Network Services, Systems and Protocols10.1007/978-3-319-54521-9_2(45-73)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2017
  • (2015)GeoTopo: A PoP-level Topology Generator for Evaluation of Future Internet Architectures2015 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)10.1109/ICNP.2015.29(90-99)Online publication date: Nov-2015
  • (2015)A Survey of Techniques for Internet Topology DiscoveryIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2014.237652017:2(1044-1065)Online publication date: Oct-2016
  • (2014)Remote PeeringProceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies10.1145/2674005.2675013(185-198)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2014
  • (2014)Layer 1-informed Internet Topology MeasurementProceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/2663716.2663737(381-394)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2014
  • (2014)Models and tools for the high-level simulation of a name-based interdomain routing architecture2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)10.1109/INFCOMW.2014.6849168(55-60)Online publication date: Apr-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media