Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1859184.1859197acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesladisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conductor: orchestrating the clouds

Published: 28 July 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Cloud computing enables customers to access virtually unlimited resources on demand and without any fixed upfront cost. However, the commoditization of computing resources imposes new challenges in how to manage them: customers of cloud services are no longer restricted to the resources they own, but instead choose from a variety of different services offered by different providers, and the impact of these choices on price and overall performance is not always clear. Furthermore, having to take into account new cloud products and services, the cost of recovering from faults, or price fluctuations due to spot markets makes the picture even more unclear.
This position paper highlights a series of challenges that must be overcome in order to allow customers to better lever-age cloud resources. We also make the case for a system called Conductor that automatically manages resources in cloud computing to meet user-specifiable optimization goals, such as minimizing monetary cost or completion time. Finally, we discuss some of the challenges we will face in building such a system.

References

[1]
}}Chohan, N., Castillo, C., Spreitzer, M., Steinder, M., Tantawi, A., and Krintz, C. See Spot Run: Using spot instances for MapReduce workflows. In 2nd USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (June 2010).
[2]
}}Dusseau, A. C., Arpaci, R. H., and Culler, D. E. Effective distributed scheduling of parallel workloads. In SIGMETRICS '96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems (1996), pp. 25--36.
[3]
}}Gottfrid, D. Self-service, Prorated Super Computing Fun! http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/self-service-prorated-super-computing-fun/.
[4]
}}Isard, M., Prabhakaran, V., Currey, J., Wieder, U., Talwar, K., and Goldberg, A. Quincy: fair scheduling for distributed computing clusters. In SOSP '09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 22nd symposium on Operating systems principles (2009), pp. 261--276.
[5]
}}Keeton, K., Kelly, T., Merchant, A., Santos, C., Wiener, J., Zhu, X., and Beyer, D. Don't settle for less than the best: Use optimization to make decisions. In HOTOS'07: Proceedings of the 11th USENIX workshop on Hot topics in operating systems (May 2007), pp. 1--6.
[6]
}}Ko, S. Y., Hoque, I., Cho, B., and Gupta, I. On availability of intermediate data in cloud computations. In Proceedings of HotOS'09: 12th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems.
[7]
}}Krawczyk, S., and Bubendorfer, K. Grid resource allocation: allocation mechanisms and utilisation patterns. In AusGrid '08: Proceedings of the sixth Australasian workshop on Grid computing and e-research (Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2008), Australian Computer Society, Inc., pp. 73--81.
[8]
}}Muthitacharoen, A., Morris, R., Gil, T. M., and Chen, B. Ivy: a read/write peer-to-peer file system. SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 36, SI (2002), 31--44.
[9]
}}Olston, C., Reed, B., Srivastava, U., Kumar, R., and Tomkins, A. Pig latin: a not-so-foreign language for data processing. In SIGMOD '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (2008), pp. 1099--1110.
[10]
}}Qureshi, A., Weber, R., Balakrishnan, H., Guttag, J., and Maggs, B. Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems. In SIGCOMM '09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 conference on Data communication (2009), pp. 123--134.
[11]
}}Raman, R., Livny, M., and Solomon, M. Matchmaking: Distributed resource management for high throughput computing. In HPDC '98: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (Washington, DC, USA, 1998), IEEE Computer Society, p. 140.
[12]
}}Wang, G., Butt, A. R., Pandey, P., and Gupta, K. A simulation approach to evaluating design decisions in mapreduce setups. In MASCOTS '09: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems.
[13]
}}Wieder, A., Bhatotia, P., Post, A., and Rodrigues, R. Brief Announcement: Modelling MapReduce for Optimal Execution in the Cloud. In PODC '10: Proceedings of the 29th ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing.
[14]
}}Yin, Q., Schüpbach, A., Cappos, J., Baumann, A., and Roscoe, T. Rhizoma: a runtime for self-deploying, self-managing overlays. In Middleware '09: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware (2009), pp. 1--20.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
LADIS '10: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Large Scale Distributed Systems and Middleware
July 2010
65 pages
ISBN:9781450304061
DOI:10.1145/1859184
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 July 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. MapReduce
  2. cloud computing
  3. optimization
  4. resource management
  5. spot markets

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PODC '10
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Incremental Sliding Window AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_156(1007-1015)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2019
  • (2019)Approximate Computing for Stream AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_153(90-97)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2019
  • (2019)Privacy-Preserving Data AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_152(1292-1300)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2019
  • (2019)Incremental Approximate ComputingEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_151(1000-1007)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2019
  • (2018)Incremental Sliding Window AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_156-1(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2018
  • (2018)Approximate Computing for Stream AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_153-1(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2018
  • (2018)Privacy-Preserving Data AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_152-1(1-8)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
  • (2018)Incremental Approximate ComputingEncyclopedia of Big Data Technologies10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_151-1(1-8)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
  • (2017)StreamApproxProceedings of the 18th ACM/IFIP/USENIX Middleware Conference10.1145/3135974.3135989(185-197)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2017
  • (2017)SieveProceedings of the 18th ACM/IFIP/USENIX Middleware Conference10.1145/3135974.3135977(14-27)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media