Cited By
View all- Flinter SKeane M(2005)On the automatic generation of case libraries by chunking chess gamesCase-Based Reasoning Research and Development10.1007/3-540-60598-3_38(421-430)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2005
Model-based integration of planning and learning
Abstract
The goal of our research is to construct an integrated model of planning and learning that can account for the acquisition of new planning knowledge. Our approach involves the use of model-based reasoning. In this approach, the system monitors its performance by comparing it with expectations derived from a model of the system's planning architecture. The arguments relating the system's expectations to its underlying model of the planning process are encoded in the form of explicit justification structures. When the system's actual performance diverges from its expectations, it traces back through these justification structures, looking to fault the setting of some controllable parameter of the planner. When such a controllable parameter is isolated, a repair is then effected, in the form of an adjustment to one of these parameters.
References
[1]
Agre, P., and Chapman, D. 1987. Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity. Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 268--272.
[2]
Birnbaum, L., Collins, G. Freed, M., and Krulwich, B. 1990. Model-based diagnosis of planning failures. Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA, pp. 318--323.
[3]
Collins, G., Birnbaum, L., and Krulwich, B. 1989. An adaptive model of decision-making in planning. Proceedings of the Eleventh IJCAI, Detroit, MI, pp. 511--516.
[4]
Silins, G., Birnbaum, L., Krulwich, B., and Freed, M. 1991. Plan debugging in an intentional system. To appear in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia.
[5]
Davis, R. 1984. Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 24, pp. 347--410.
[6]
DeJong, G., and Mooney, R. 1986. Explanation-based learning: An alternative view. Machine Learning, vol. 1, pp. 145--176.
[7]
deKleer, J., Doyle, J., Steele, G., and Sussman, G. 1977. AMORD: Explicit control of reasoning. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Programming Languages, Rochester, NY, pp. 116--125.
[8]
deKleer, J., and Willams, B.C. 1987. Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence 32, pp. 97--130.
[9]
Doyle, J. 1979. A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, pp. 231--272.
[10]
Doyle, R., Atkinson, D., and Doshi, R. 1986. Generating perception requests and expectations to verify the execution of plans. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 81--88.
[11]
Fikes, R., Hart, P., and Nilsson, N. 1972. Learning and executing generalized robot plans. Artificial Intelligence 3, pp. 251--288.
[12]
Firby, R.J. 1989. Adaptive execution in complex dynamic worlds. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University Research Report YALEU/CSD/RR-672.
[13]
Krulwich, B. 1991a. Learning from deliberated reactivity. To appear in Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Machine Learning, Evanston, IL.
[14]
Krulwich, B. 1991b. Determining what to learn in a multicomponent planning system. To appear in The Proceedings of the 1991 Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL.
[15]
Krulwich, B., Collins, G., and Birnbaum, L. 1990. Cross-Domain Transfer of Planning Strategies: Alternative Approaches. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cambridge, MA, pp. 954--961.
[16]
Kuokka, D. 1990. The deliberative integration of planning, execution, and learning. Technical report CMU-CS-90--135, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Pittsburgh, PA.
[17]
Mitchell, T., Keller, R., and Kedar-Cabelli, S. 1986. Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning, vol. 1, pp. 47--80.
[18]
Sacerdoti, E. 1974. Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces. Artificial Intelligence 5, pp. 115--132.
[19]
Sacerdoti, E. 1977. A Structure for Plans and Behavior. American Elsevier, New York.
[20]
Schank, R. 1982. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
[21]
Simmons, R. 1988. A theory of debugging plans and interpretations. Proceedings of the 1988 AAAI Conference, St. Paul, MN, pp. 94--99.
[22]
Sussman, G. 1975. A Computer Model of Skill Acquisition. American Elsevier, New York.
[23]
Wilkins, D. 1984. Domain independent planning: Representation and plan generation. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 3, pp, 269--302.
Index Terms
- Model-based integration of planning and learning
Recommendations
Towards an integration of Golog and planning
IJCAI'07: Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligenceThe action language Golog has been applied successfully to the control of robots, among other things. Perhaps its greatest advantage is that a user can write programs which constrain the search for an executable plan in a flexible manner. However, when ...
Assumption-based planning: generating plans and explanations under incomplete knowledge
AAAI'13: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceMany practical planning problems necessitate the generation of a plan under incomplete information about the state of the world. In this paper we propose the notion of Assumption-Based Planning. Unlike conformant planning, which attempts to find a plan ...
Landmark-based heuristic online contingent planning
In contingent planning problems, agents have partial information about their state and use sensing actions to learn the value of some variables. When sensing and actuation are separated, plans for such problems can often be viewed as a tree of sensing ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 1991 Authors.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 1991
Published in SIGAI Volume 2, Issue 4
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 125Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)17
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Flinter SKeane M(2005)On the automatic generation of case libraries by chunking chess gamesCase-Based Reasoning Research and Development10.1007/3-540-60598-3_38(421-430)Online publication date: 5-Aug-2005
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in