Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Categorical QSAR models for skin sensitization based on local lymph node assay measures and both ground and excited state 4D-fingerprint descriptors

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In previous studies we have developed categorical QSAR models for predicting skin-sensitization potency based on 4D-fingerprint (4D-FP) descriptors and in vivo murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) measures. Only 4D-FP derived from the ground state (GMAX) structures of the molecules were used to build the QSAR models. In this study we have generated 4D-FP descriptors from the first excited state (EMAX) structures of the molecules. The GMAX, EMAX and the combined ground and excited state 4D-FP descriptors (GEMAX) were employed in building categorical QSAR models. Logistic regression (LR) and partial least square coupled logistic regression (PLS-CLR), found to be effective model building for the LLNA skin-sensitization measures in our previous studies, were used again in this study. This also permitted comparison of the prior ground state models to those involving first excited state 4D-FP descriptors. Three types of categorical QSAR models were constructed for each of the GMAX, EMAX and GEMAX datasets: a binary model (2-state), an ordinal model (3-state) and a binary-binary model (two-2-state). No significant differences exist among the LR 2-state model constructed for each of the three datasets. However, the PLS-CLR 3-state and 2-state models based on the EMAX and GEMAX datasets have higher predictivity than those constructed using only the GMAX dataset. These EMAX and GMAX categorical models are also more significant and predictive than corresponding models built in our previous QSAR studies of LLNA skin-sensitization measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engelhard VH (1994) Sci Am 271:54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Song PS, Chin CA, Yamazaki I, Baba H (1975) Int J Quantum Chem 1

  3. Moore TA, Mantulin WW, Song PS (1973) Photochem Photobiol 18:185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mantulin WW, Song PS (1973) J Am Chem Soc 95:5122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ou C-N, Tsai C-H, Song P-S (1977) In: Castellani A (ed) Research in photobiology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 257–265

  6. Wondrak GT, Jacobson MK, Jacobson EL (2005) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 312:482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li XY, Eriksson LA (2005) Photochem Photobiol 81:1153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan DH, Iyer M, Liu JZ, Li Y, Hopfinger AJ (2004) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:2083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hopfinger AJ, Wang S, Tokarski JS, Jin BQ, Albuquerque M, Madhav PJ, Duraiswami C (1997) J Am Chem Soc 119:10509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Senese CL, Duca J, Pan D, Hopfinger AJ, Tseng YJ (2004) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:1526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni A, Hopfinger AJ, Osborne R, Bruner LH, Thompson ED (2001) Toxicol Sci 59:335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kodithala K, Hopfinger AJ, Thompson ED, Robinson MK (2002) Toxicol Sci 66:336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Tseng YJ, Pan DH, Liu JZ, Kern PS, Gerberick GF, Hopfinger AJ (2007) Chem Res Toxicol 20:114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kimber I, Basketter DA (1992) Food Chem Toxicol 30:165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Y, Pan D, Liu J, Kern PS, Gerberick GF, Hopfinger AJ, Tseng YJ (2007) Toxicol Sci 99:532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Kern PS, Schlatter H, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Patlewicz GY, Basketter DA (2005) Dermatitis 16:157

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fedorowicz A, Zheng LY, Singh H, Demchuk E (2004) Int J Mol Sci 5:56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Contact Sensitisation: Classification According to Potency., European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) (2003) Brussels, Belgium

  19. HyperChem Program Release 7.05 for Windows (2005) In: Hypercube, Inc.

  20. Dewar MJS, Thiel W (1977) J Am Chem Soc 99:2338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart JJP (1989) J Comput Chem 10:209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearlstein RA (1998) CHEMLAB-II users guide. CHEMLAB Inc., Lake Forest, IL

  23. Duca JS, Hopfinger AJ (2001) J Chem Inf Comp Sci 41:1367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu JZ, Yang L, Li Y, Pan DH, Hopfinger AJ (2005) J Comput Aid Mol Des 19:567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu JZ, Pan DH, Tseng YF, Hopfinger AJ (2003) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:2170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Glen WG, Dunn WJ, Scott DR (1989) Tetrahedron Comput Methodol 2:349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Daganzo CF (1999) Logistics systems analysis. Springer

  28. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Institute, S., SAS/STAT User’s Guide, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1999

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Grant 1 R21 GM075775-01. Information on Novel Preclinical Tools for Predictive ADME-Toxicology can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-04-023.html. Links to nine initiatives are found at http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/initiatives.asp. This work was also supported in part by The Procter & Gamble Company. Resources of the Laboratory of Molecular Modeling and Design at UIC and The Chem21 Group, Inc. were used in performing these studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yufeng J. Tseng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Kern, P.S., Gerberick, G.F. et al. Categorical QSAR models for skin sensitization based on local lymph node assay measures and both ground and excited state 4D-fingerprint descriptors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 22, 345–366 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9190-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9190-y

Keywords

Navigation