Perception vs. Experience: Explaining Differences in Corruption Measures Using Microdata

Jerg Gutmann, Fabio Padovano and Stefan Voigt

No 30, ILE Working Paper Series from University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics

Abstract: Understanding corruption is at the heart of treating the dysfunctionality of many countries' public sectors. Yet, most corruption research suffers from one common problem: There is no "objective" measure of public-sector corruption for a cross-section of countries. Most studies on the determinants or the effects of corruption rely on indicators of corruption perception. In recent years, a second type of indicator reflecting stated experiences with bribery has become available. If corruption perception is primarily informed by experience with corruption, these two types of indicators should be very highly correlated. In fact, they are not. This paper deals with the divergence between these two types of corruption indicators. We examine the variation in individual corruption perception that cannot be explained by individual corruption experience alone. We find that both respondent characteristics and country characteristics affect corruption perception beyond what can be explained by individuals' first-hand experience of corruption. Some of these biases may force us to reevaluate results of corruption research that is based on perception data, as well as the anti-corruption policies designed after these results.

Keywords: Corruption Experience; Corruption Measurement; Corruption Perception; Governance Indicators; Institutional Quality; Subjective Indicators (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C8 D73 K42 O17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209591/1/ile-wp-2019-30.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Perception vs. experience: Explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata (2020)
Working Paper: Perception vs. experience: Explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata (2020)
Working Paper: Perception vs. Experience: Explaining Differences in Corruption Measures Using Microdata (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ilewps:30

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ILE Working Paper Series from University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().