Why aid is unpredictable: An empirical analysis of the gap between actual and planned aid flows
Gustavo Canavire-Bacarreza,
Eric Neumayer and
Peter Nunnenkamp
No 1933, Kiel Working Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel)
Abstract:
Aid flows continue to be volatile and unpredictable, even though it is widely accepted that this erodes the effectiveness of foreign aid. We argue that fragmented donor-recipient relationships, notably the large number of minor aid relations that tend to be associated with donors' desire to have 'fly their flag' around the world, increase aid unpredictability. Our empirical analysis of the determinants of aid unpredictability suggests that aid becomes less predictable with more fragmented donor-recipient relationships. Specifically, the effect of fragmentation on overshooting previous spending plans is statistically highly significant and substantively important. In contrast, fragmented donor-recipient relationships have no effect on the shortfall of actual aid compared to donors' spending plans.
Keywords: aid predictability; donor fragmentation; forward spending plans (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/98410/1/789083655.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Why Aid is Unpredictable: An Empirical Analysis of the Gap Between Actual and Planned Aid Flows (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1933
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Kiel Working Papers from Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().