Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries

Patricia Danzon, Andrew Epstein and Sean Nicholson
Additional contact information
Andrew Epstein: Yale University, USA, Postal: Yale University, USA

Managerial and Decision Economics, 2007, vol. 28, issue 4-5, 307-328

Abstract: We examine the determinants and effects of M&A activity in the pharmaceutical|biotechnology industry using SDC data on 383 firms from 1988 to 2001. For large firms, mergers are a response to expected excess capacity due to patent expirations and gaps in a firm's product pipeline. For small firms, mergers are primarily an exit strategy in response to financial trouble (low Tobin's q, few marketed products, low cash-sales ratios). In estimating effects of mergers, we use a propensity score to control for selection based on observed characteristics. Controlling for merger propensity, large firms that merged experienced a similar change in enterprise value, sales, employees, and R&D, and had slower growth in operating profit, compared with similar firms that did not merge. Thus mergers may be a response to trouble, but they are not a solution. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (63)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/mde.1343 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Mergers and Acquisitions in the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industries (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:28:y:2007:i:4-5:p:307-328

DOI: 10.1002/mde.1343

Access Statistics for this article

Managerial and Decision Economics is currently edited by Antony Dnes

More articles in Managerial and Decision Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().