Advocatus, et non latro? Testing the supplier-induced demand hypothesis for Italian courts of justice

Paolo Buonanno and Matteo Galizzi

Working Papers from University of Brescia, Department of Economics

Abstract: We explore the relationship between litigation rates and the number of lawyers, in a typical supplier-induced demand (SID) frame. Drawing on an original panel dataset for the 169 Italian courts of justice between 2000 and 2007, we first document that the number of lawyers is positively correlated with different measures of litigation rate. Then, using an instrumental variables strategy we find that a 10 percent increase of lawyers over population is associated with an increase between 1.6 to 6 percent in civil litigation rates. Thus our empirical analysis supports the SID hypothesis for the Italian lawyers: following an increase in their relative number, lawyers may exploit their informational advantage to induce clients to access to courts even when litigation is unnecessary or ineffective.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.unibs.it/on-line/dse/Home/Inevidenza/Pa ... /documento12251.html
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
Working Paper: Advocatus, et non Latro? Testing the Supplier-Induced Demand Hypothesis for the Italian Courts of Justice (2012)
Working Paper: Advocatus, et non latro? Testing the Supplier-Induced-Demand Hypothesis for Italian Courts of Justice (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ubs:wpaper:0914

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Brescia, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Matteo Galizzi ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).