Climate Change in a Public Goods Game: Investment Decision in Mitigation versus Adaptation
Reviva Hasson,
Löfgren, Åsa and
Martine Visser
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Åsa Löfgren
RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future
Abstract:
We use behavioral and experimental economics to study a particular aspect of the economics of climate change: the potential tradeoff between countries’ investments in mitigation versus adaptation. While mitigation of greenhouse gases can be viewed as a public good, adaptation to climate change is a private good, benefiting only the country or the individual that invests in adaptation. We use a one-shot public-goods game that deviates from the standard public-goods game by introducing a stochastic term to account for probabilistic destruction in a climate-change setting. Probability density function is mapped to within-group levels of mitigation. We compare low-vulnerability and high-vulnerability treatments by varying the magnitude of disaster across treatments. Our results show that there is no significant difference in the level of mitigation across these treatments. Further, our results emphasize the important role of trust in enhancing cooperation.
Keywords: public good; climate change; mitigation; adaptation; experiment; risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 H41 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-10-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/EfD-DP-09-23.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/EfD-DP-09-23.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/EfD-DP-09-23.pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Climate change in a public goods game: Investment decision in mitigation versus adaptation (2010)
Working Paper: Climate Change in a Public Goods Game: Investment Decision in Mitigation versus Adaptation (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-09-23-efd
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().