Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure
David Autor,
David Dorn,
Gordon Hanson and
Kaveh Majlesi
No 13861, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
Abstract:
Has rising import competition contributed to the polarization of U.S. politics? Analyzing multiple measures of political expression and results of congressional and presidential elections spanning the period 2000 through 2016, we find strong though not definitive evidence of an ideological realignment in trade-exposed local labor markets that commences prior to the divisive 2016 U.S. presidential election. Exploiting the exogenous component of rising import competition by China, we find that trade exposed electoral districts simultaneously exhibit growing ideological polarization in some domains—meaning expanding support for both strong-left and strong-right views—and pure rightward shifts in others. Specifically, trade-impacted commuting zones or districts saw an increasing market share for the FOX News channel (a rightward shift), stronger ideological polarization in campaign contributions (a polarized shift), and a relative rise in the likelihood of electing a Republican to Congress (a rightward shift). Trade-exposed counties with an initial majority white population became more likely to elect a GOP conservative, while trade-exposed counties with an initial majority-minority population become more likely to elect a liberal Democrat, where in both sets of counties, these gains came at the expense of moderate Democrats (a polarized shift). In presidential elections, counties with greater trade exposure shifted towards the Republican candidate (a rightward shift). These results broadly support an emerging political economy literature that connects adverse economic shocks to sharp ideological realignments that cleave along racial and ethnic lines and induce discrete shifts in political preferences and economic policy.
Keywords: trade; elections; political polarization; labor market shocks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 F14 F16 F68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 72 pages
Date: 2020-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-int and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (270)
Published - published in: American Economic Review, 2020, 110(10), 3139-3189
Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp13861.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure (2020)
Working Paper: Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure (2016)
Working Paper: Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure (2016)
Working Paper: Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13861
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().