Ethnic Diversity and Preferences for Redistribution: Reply
Matz Dahlberg (),
Karin Edmark and
Heléne Lundqvist
No 2013:4, Working Paper Series from Uppsala University, Department of Economics
Abstract:
In a comment to Dahlberg, Edmark and Lundqvist (2012), Nekby and Pettersson-Lidbom (2012) argue (i) that the refugee placement program should be measured with contracted rather than actually placed refugees, and claim that the correlation between the two measures is insignifficant and close to zero; (ii) that instead of using the rotating individual panel, we should have used the full cross-sections in combination with municipality fixed effects; and (iii) that immigrants should be defined based on country of birth rather than citizenship. In this response, we discuss why we (i) do not agree that contracted refugees is the preferred measure, and we show that the correlation be- tween the two measures is highly significant and large; (ii) do not agree that the full cross-sections can be used; and (iii) do agree that defining immigrants according to country of birth is preferred. In a re-analysis, the conclusion from Dahlberg, Edmark and Lundqvist (2012) that ethnic diversity has a statistically and economically significant negative effect on preferences for redistribution is only marginally affected.
Keywords: Income redistribution; ethnic heterogeneity; immigration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 D64 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23 pages
Date: 2013-02-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem and nep-ltv
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:607706/FULLTEXT01.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Ethnic Diversity and Preferences for Redistribution: Reply (2013)
Working Paper: Ethnic Diversity and Preferences for Redistribution: Reply (2013)
Working Paper: Ethnic Diversity and Preferences for Redistribution: Reply (2013)
Working Paper: Ethnic Diversity and Preferences for Redistribution: Reply (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:uunewp:2013_004
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series from Uppsala University, Department of Economics Department of Economics, Uppsala University, P. O. Box 513, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ulrika Öjdeby ().