Greenfield versus Merger & Acquisition FDI: Same Wine, Different Bottles?

Ronald Davies, Rodolphe Desbordes () and Anna Ray
Additional contact information
Rodolphe Desbordes: University of Strathclyde [Glasgow]
Anna Ray: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL

Abstract: Relying on a large foreign direct investment (FDI) transaction level dataset, unique both in terms of disaggregation and time and country coverage, this paper examines patterns in greenfield (GF) versus merger & acquisition (MA) investment. Although both are found to seek out large markets with low international barriers, important differences emerge. MA is more affected by geographic and cultural barriers and exhibits opportunistic behaviours as it is more sensitive to short-run changes, such as a currency crisis. On the other hand, GF is relatively driven by long-run factors, such as origincountry technological and institutional development or comparative advantage. These empirical facts are consistent with the conceptual distinction made between these two modes, i.e. MA involves transfer of ownership for integration or arbitrage reasons while GF relies on firms own capacities, which are linked to the origin countries attributes. They also suggest that GF and MA are likely to respond differently to policies intended to attract FDI.

Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment; Mergers and Acquisitions; Greenfield Investment; Multinational Firms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-03-04
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01122659v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01122659v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Greenfield versus Merger & Acquisition FDI: Same Wine, Different Bottles? (2015)
Working Paper: Greenfield versus Merger & Acquisition FDI: Same Wine, Different Bottles? (2015)
Working Paper: Greenfield versus Merger \& Acquisition FDI: Same Wine, Different Bottles? (2015)
Working Paper: Greenfield versus Merger & Acquisition FDI: Same Wine, Different Bottles? (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-01122659

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().