Procedural Formalism and Social Networks in the Housing Market

Abstract: Why do some OECD countries have high levels of procedural formalism (PF) in the housing market? We provide an explanation based upon complementarities between the strength of social networks and the stringency of procedural formalism. The interest of social networks is that conflict resolution is independent of the law. When local people belong to social networks whereas foreigners do not, PF may facilitate housing search for locals at the expense of foreigners. To illustrate this mechanism we build a search-theoretic model of the housing market. The model emphasizes that the support for PF increases with the size of social networks, the default probability on the rent, the proportion of foreigners, and market tightness.

Keywords: housing market regulation; search and matching (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-soc and nep-ure
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01178230
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01178230/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Procedural Formalism and Social Networks in the Housing Market (2019)
Working Paper: Procedural Formalism and Social Networks in the Housing Market (2019)
Working Paper: Procedural Formalism and Social Networks in the Housing Market (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01178230

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().