How fully do people exploit their bargaining position? The effects of bargaining institution and the 50–50 norm
Nejat Anbarci and
Nick Feltovich
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2018, vol. 145, issue C, 320-334
Abstract:
A recurring puzzle in bargaining experiments is that individuals under-exploit their bargaining position, compared to theoretical predictions. We conduct an experiment using two institutions: Nash demand game (NDG) and unstructured bargaining game (UBG). Unlike most previous experiments, disagreement payoffs are earned rather than assigned, and about one-fourth of the time, one bargainer's disagreement payoff is more than half the cake size (“dominant bargaining power”), so that equal splits are not individually rational.
Keywords: Nash demand game; Unstructured bargaining; Real effort; Dominant bargaining power; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C78 C90 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268117303244
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:145:y:2018:i:c:p:320-334
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.020
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().