Contracting for technology improvement: The effect of asymmetric bargaining power and investment uncertainty
Ali Shantia,
Sam Aflaki and
Andrea Masini
European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, vol. 293, issue 2, 481-494
Abstract:
Investment in technology improvement (TI) measures that reduce the consumption rate of input commodities (like fuel, energy, water, etc.) yields significant economic and sustainability benefits. Yet, evidence shows that the so-called holdup problem leads to inefficient levels of investment in TI. The suppliers refrain from investing in TI because they fear that a buyer with greater bargaining power will use TI-related cost reductions to push prices down—in the purchase bargaining process—and thereby further reduce the supplier’s profit margin. Conventional wisdom suggests that higher bargaining power on the buyer’s side aggravates this problem. In a two-tier supplier–buyer setting, we study the role of relative bargaining power along with technology uncertainty—i.e., the risk associated with investment return—on TI investment levels by the supplier. We challenge conventional wisdom to show that there is an inverse U-shaped relationship between buyer bargaining power and TI investment by the supplier and characterize how technology uncertainty moderates this relationship. We study and rank various contracting arrangements commonly used in industry, including the price commitment and shared investment contracts to remedy the investment inefficiencies resulting from the bargaining process.
Keywords: Supply chain management; Technology improvement; Supply chain coordination; Bargaining power; Technology uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720310742
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:293:y:2021:i:2:p:481-494
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.031
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati
More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().