An empirical method for assessing the research relevance gapSuvankar Ghosh, Marvin D. Troutt, John Thornton and O. Felix Offodile European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, vol. 201, issue 3, 942-948 Abstract: There has been much debate on the relevance to firms of the academic research produced by business schools. However, what has not received as much attention is how the relevance of the research to businesses should be measured in a systematic and empirical way. We develop a systematic method to test for the relevance of academic research to businesses. Our method models as a vector autoregressive process the interests of the academic and practitioner communities in some new topic, as expressed by the number of articles published in the academic and the practitioner literature on that topic per calendar quarter, and then studies Granger causality between the academic and practitioner interest processes. This method can be used by academics to empirically demonstrate the impact of their intellectual contributions on practitioners and thence on the business world. We employ our approach to two relatively new and important topics, Real Options and Economic Value Added. Keywords: OR; in; societal; problem; analysis; Academic; research; relevance; Time; series; Granger; causality; Cointegration (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:3:p:942-948 Access Statistics for this article European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.