The effect of supplemental instruction on academic performance: An encouragement design experiment
Alfredo Paloyo,
Sally Rogan and
Peter Siminski
Economics of Education Review, 2016, vol. 55, issue C, 57-69
Abstract:
Supplemental Instruction (SI) or PASS (Peer Assisted Study Sessions) has been widely offered to students at tertiary institutions in many countries with the aim of improving academic performance. The SI/PASS evaluation literature is extensive, but it has not adequately addressed potential selection bias. We evaluate an SI/PASS program at an Australian university through a randomized-encouragement-design experiment. A randomly selected subgroup of students from first-year courses (N=6954) was offered large incentives (worth AUD 55,000) to attend PASS which increased attendance by an estimated 0.47 hours each. This first-stage (inducement) effect did not vary with the size of the incentive and was larger (0.89) for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Instrumental-variable estimates suggest that 1 hour of PASS improved grades by 0.065 standard deviations, which is consistent with the non-experimental literature. However, this estimate is not statistically significant, reflecting limited statistical power. The estimated effect is largest for students in their first semester at university.
Keywords: Australia; Randomized-encouragement design; Student outcomes; Peer-assisted study session; Supplemental instruction; Selection bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 I21 I23 I24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775716302187
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: The Effect of Supplemental Instruction on Academic Performance: An Encouragement Design Experiment (2016)
Working Paper: The effect of supplemental instruction on academic performance: An encouragement design experiment (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:55:y:2016:i:c:p:57-69
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.08.005
Access Statistics for this article
Economics of Education Review is currently edited by E. Cohn
More articles in Economics of Education Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().